Safety and efficacy of Danqipiantan capsule for treatment of stroke： a systematic review

• Published in: Journal of traditional Chinese medicine 2013-12, Vol.33 (6), p.707-714
• Main Authors: Li, Jiashen, Zheng, Haizhen, Zhao, Xiaofeng, Wang, Shu, Shi, Xuemin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Capsules; Drugs, Chinese Herbal - administration & dosage; Drugs, Chinese Herbal - adverse effects; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke - drug therapy; 中风; 国家知识基础设施; 安全性; 治疗; 疗效; 胶囊; 评价; 随机对照试验
• ISSN: 0255-2922
• DOI: 10.1016/S0254-6272(14)60001-7

OBJECTIVE： To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Danqipiantan capsule （DPC） for the treatment of stroke. METHODS： PubMed, China Science And Technolo- gy Journal Database, Wanfang Database, Chinese periodicals in the China National Knowledge Infra- structure, and the General Hospital of Tianjin Medi- cal University＇s Library were searched until July 2012. Randomized controlled trials （RCTs） and ob- servational studies that reported the use of DPC for treatment of stroke were selected. RESULTS： Eleven articles that included 12 RCTs, and 2 articles that included 3 observational studies were identified. A total of 2590 patients participat- ed in the studies. We found that there was a signifi-cant statistical difference between DPC treatment groups and the control groups in terms of the effec- tive rate [risk ratio （RR）, 1.14; 95% confidence inter- vals （CI）, 1.04, 1.25; P=0.01], FugI-Meyer Assessment Scale [weighted mean difference （WMD）, 9.77; 95% CI （4.84, 14.70）; P=0.00], Barthel Index [WMD=6.40; 95% CI （3.15, 9.65）], and mean flow velocity [WMD= 5.79; 95% CI （1.64, 9.94）]. There were no significant differences for The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [WMD=0.60; 95% CI （ - 1.09, 2.29）], vi- sual field defects [left visual field： WMD= - 203.10; 95% CI （ - 424.41, 18.21）; right visual field： WMD= - 172.60; 95% CI （ - 409.29, 64.09）] or the functional independence measure [WMD= - 7.90; 95% CI （ - 16.64, 0.84）]. Seven articles that included eight RCTs reported the safety of DPC treatment. Two ar- ticles that included three observational studies also reported beneficial effects for DPC. Because the Chinese studies were of poor methodological quali- ty, and most of the sample sizes were small, our analysis was likely affected by bias. CONCLUSION： DPC has a beneficial effect and is relatively safe when used for the treatment of stroke.