Loading…

Market power in cap-and-trade auctions: A Monte Carlo approach

Recent greenhouse gas auctions have resulted in base level prices while remaining significantly concentrated. How do dominant firms receive such a large share of emissions allowances without bidding up the market price? This paper provides a Monte Carlo simulation analysis based on a contemporary re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy policy 2013-11, Vol.62, p.788-797
Main Author: Dormady, Noah C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Recent greenhouse gas auctions have resulted in base level prices while remaining significantly concentrated. How do dominant firms receive such a large share of emissions allowances without bidding up the market price? This paper provides a Monte Carlo simulation analysis based on a contemporary regional greenhouse gas market in the United States. It introduces a C# simulation software environment, Oligopsony 1.0 that simulates uniform-price emissions auctions in repeated iterations. The results of these simulations indicate that there can be significant non-linearities between profit and market power as exercised through strategic demand reduction. This analysis finds the optimum point of strategic demand reduction that enables firms to exploit these non-linearities. The use of auctions to distribute tradeable pollution rights to firms in heavily concentrated markets can have significant unintended consequences, as it can exacerbate the problems of market power that exist within those markets. •The theory of market power behavior in emissions auctions is furthered.•Monte Carlo simulation environment Oligopsony 1.0 is introduced.•Simulations provide analysis of optimum bids to exercise market power.•Significant non-linearities exist between profit and the exercise of market power.
ISSN:0301-4215
1873-6777
DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.022