Potential problems in collection and data processing of luminescence signals

• Published in: Journal of luminescence 2013-10, Vol.142, p.202-211
• Main Authors: Wang, Y., Townsend, P.D.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Band de-convolution; Compensation; Computers in experimental physics; Condensed matter: electronic structure, electrical, magnetic, and optical properties; Correction factors; Data analysis: algorithms and implementation; data management; Data processing; Errors; Exact sciences and technology; Failure; Instruments, apparatus, components and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy; Luminescence; Optical properties and condensed-matter spectroscopy and other interactions of matter with particles and radiation; Photoluminescence; Physics; Signal processing; Spectra; Wavelengths
• ISSN: 0022-2313; 1872-7883
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2013.03.052

Luminescence studies are central to a very wide range of disciplines, both as a primary experiment and in a minor role for additional discrimination between samples. Unfortunately when luminescence studies are not the central objective and expertise the data collection, instrumental corrections and data analysis are not always being totally, or correctly, employed. There are often historical reasons for this but with modern equipment one can readily make the requisite compensations. The problems are outlined with emphasis on spectral and polarisation response of spectrometers and detectors. Typical data processing errors are noted with demonstrations of their consequent effects on the signals. These include the fact that the peak in the wavelength presentation can significantly differ from the true energy centre of a Gaussian emission band. There can be failure to totally compensate for the spectral sensitivity of the detection system, as well as the incorrect use of band de-convolution on the wavelength representation, and energy plots where only the wavelength axis has been corrected; these mistakes all distort the true spectra. Not only are these analyses physically incorrect, but they are misleading, and introduce false features. This brief review indicates why such processing errors can generate spectral differences cited in the luminescence literature that are from measurement, rather than differences between source materials. •The problems of spectral response of spectrometers and detectors are noted.•Common mistakes during the luminescence analysis are outlined.•This paper indicates why such processing errors can generate spectral differences.