Loading…

Percutaneous cardiac assist devices compared with surgical hemodynamic support alternatives: cost-effectiveness in the emergent setting

This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of percutaneous cardiac assist device (pVAD) therapy in the emergent setting compared with traditional surgical hemodynamic support alternatives. Previous research has demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of pVAD hemodynamic support for patients undergoing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2014-05, Vol.83 (6), p.E183-E192
Main Authors: Maini, Brijeshwar, Gregory, David, Scotti, Dennis J, Buyantseva, Larisa
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of percutaneous cardiac assist device (pVAD) therapy in the emergent setting compared with traditional surgical hemodynamic support alternatives. Previous research has demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of pVAD hemodynamic support for patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. For patients in cardiogenic shock (CS), use of pVAD therapy has been shown to reduce length of stay (LOS). National utilization and outcome data from the 2010-2011 MedPAR and state-sponsored all-payer databases were collected for patients with an acute myocardial infarction complicated by CS who were treated with either a pVAD (n = 883) or with traditional surgical hemodynamic support alternatives (ECMO and extracorporeal VAD) (n = 305). Discharge survival was greater with pVADs than with surgical alternatives (56% vs. 42%, P 
ISSN:1522-1946
1522-726X
DOI:10.1002/ccd.25247