Loading…
Percutaneous cardiac assist devices compared with surgical hemodynamic support alternatives: cost-effectiveness in the emergent setting
This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of percutaneous cardiac assist device (pVAD) therapy in the emergent setting compared with traditional surgical hemodynamic support alternatives. Previous research has demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of pVAD hemodynamic support for patients undergoing...
Saved in:
Published in: | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2014-05, Vol.83 (6), p.E183-E192 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of percutaneous cardiac assist device (pVAD) therapy in the emergent setting compared with traditional surgical hemodynamic support alternatives.
Previous research has demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of pVAD hemodynamic support for patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. For patients in cardiogenic shock (CS), use of pVAD therapy has been shown to reduce length of stay (LOS).
National utilization and outcome data from the 2010-2011 MedPAR and state-sponsored all-payer databases were collected for patients with an acute myocardial infarction complicated by CS who were treated with either a pVAD (n = 883) or with traditional surgical hemodynamic support alternatives (ECMO and extracorporeal VAD) (n = 305).
Discharge survival was greater with pVADs than with surgical alternatives (56% vs. 42%, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1522-1946 1522-726X |
DOI: | 10.1002/ccd.25247 |