The empirically supported status of acceptance and commitment therapy: An update

Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is a transdiagnostic cognitive behavioural therapy that predominantly teaches clients acceptance and mindfulness skills, as well as values clarification and enactment skills. Australian treatment guideline providers have been cautious in recognising ACT as emp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical psychologist (Australian Psychological Society) 2012-11, Vol.16 (3), p.97-109
Main Authors: Smout, Matthew F., Hayes, Louise, Atkins, Paul W. B., Klausen, Jessica, Duguid, James E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acceptance
ACT
Adherence
Anxiety
Anxiety Disorders
Australia
Behavior Modification
Cognitive Restructuring
Comparative Analysis
empirically supported
Enactment
Evidence
Foreign Countries
Guidelines
Medical Research
Metacognition
Obsessive-Compulsive neuroses
Outcomes of Treatment
Pain
review
Social phobia
Therapy
Values Clarification
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is a transdiagnostic cognitive behavioural therapy that predominantly teaches clients acceptance and mindfulness skills, as well as values clarification and enactment skills. Australian treatment guideline providers have been cautious in recognising ACT as empirically supported. This article reviews evidence from randomised controlled trials published since Öst's review, and examines the extent to which the methodology of ACT research has improved since. Since 2008, ACT research has improved its use of adherence and competence monitoring. Good‐quality studies could be considered to offer National Health and Medical Research Council Level II evidence for chronic pain, obsessive–compulsive disorder, and a subset of other anxiety disorders (panic disorder, social phobia, and generalised anxiety disorder). The majority of studies demonstrated that ACT significantly improved primary outcomes but used comparison conditions that did not rule out therapy‐unspecific factors, including use of concurrent treatments, as explanations for the improvements. Recommendations for future ACT research are presented.
ISSN:1328-4207
1742-9552
DOI:10.1111/j.1742-9552.2012.00051.x