Prevalence and predictors of cancer specific distress in men with a family history of prostate cancer

• Published in: Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) England), 2013-11, Vol.22 (11), p.2496-2504
• Main Authors: McDowell, M. E., Occhipinti, S., Gardiner, R. A., Chambers, S. K.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Anxiety; Anxiety - epidemiology; Anxiety - psychology; Australia - epidemiology; Depression - epidemiology; Depression - psychology; distress; Emotional disorders; Family histories; family history; Family medical history; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Humans; Male; Medical diagnosis; Men; Mens health; Middle Aged; oncology; Perception; Prevalence; Prospective Studies; Prostate cancer; Prostatic cancer; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis; Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology; Prostatic Neoplasms - genetics; Prostatic Neoplasms - psychology; Psychological distress; Quality of Life; Regression Analysis; Relatives; Socioeconomic Factors; Stress, Psychological - epidemiology; Stress, Psychological - psychology; Undiagnosed
• ISSN: 1057-9249; 1099-1611
• DOI: 10.1002/pon.3312

Objective To examine prevalence and predictors of cancer‐specific distress in undiagnosed men with and without a family history of prostate cancer, and to examine the contribution of perceptions of an affected relative's cancer experience on the distress of unaffected male relatives. Methods Men with a first degree relative with prostate cancer (n = 207) and men without a family history (n = 239) from Australia completed a Computer Assisted Telephone Interview. Participants completed the Prostate Cancer Anxiety Subscale of the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer, measures of perceived risk, and socio‐demographic information. Men with a family history provided details about their family history (number of relatives diagnosed with and dead from prostate cancer, relationship to affected relative, months since diagnosis) and reported their perceptions of their affected relative's prostate cancer experience including perceptions of threat related to the relative's diagnosis and perceived treatment phase and prognosis. Results Cancer‐specific distress was low for all men and there was no significant difference in the distress experienced by men with and without a family history. Regression analyses showed that for all men, cancer‐specific distress increased with urinary symptoms and decreased in those with higher education and in older participants. For men with a family history, having a relative who died from prostate cancer and perceiving greater threat from a relative's diagnosis was associated with greater cancer‐specific distress. Conclusions Interventions would benefit from examining appraisals of familial risk and examining prospective assessments of distress in the unaffected male relatives of men with prostate cancer over the course of the cancer trajectory. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.