Loading…

Effects of Change Interventions: What Kind of Evidence Do We Really Have?

Despite the popularity of organizational change management, the question arises whether its prescriptions are based on solid and convergent evidence. To answer this question, a systematic review was conducted of organizational change management research published in scholarly journals during the pas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of applied behavioral science 2014-03, Vol.50 (1), p.5-27
Main Authors: Barends, Eric, Janssen, Barbara, ten Have, Wouter, ten Have, Steven
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-3a473fe6b449c42f4297447bd57a05863d608ce5e4cfc1a752efc8a222e6b73b3
container_end_page 27
container_issue 1
container_start_page 5
container_title The Journal of applied behavioral science
container_volume 50
creator Barends, Eric
Janssen, Barbara
ten Have, Wouter
ten Have, Steven
description Despite the popularity of organizational change management, the question arises whether its prescriptions are based on solid and convergent evidence. To answer this question, a systematic review was conducted of organizational change management research published in scholarly journals during the past 30 years. The databases ABI/INFORM, Business Source Premier, ERIC, and PsycINFO were searched for relevant studies. A total of 563 studies met the review’s criteria. Assessment shows a predominance of one-shot studies with a low internal validity. Replication studies are rare. Findings suggest that scholars and practitioners should be sceptical regarding the body of research results in the field of organizational change management published to date. Prescriptions are offered for researchers, editors, and educators to develop a more solid body of evidence on organizational change management.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0021886312473152
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520336707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0021886312473152</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1505348098</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-3a473fe6b449c42f4297447bd57a05863d608ce5e4cfc1a752efc8a222e6b73b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0cFKAzEQBuAgCtbq3ZsFL15WJ5Nkkz1KqVooeNHzkqaTuqXdrcmu4NubZT1IQfSUw3z_TIZh7JLDLeda3wEgNyYXHKUWXOERG3GlMMuNLo7ZqC9nff2UncW4AQApRD5iVzPvybVx0vjJ9M3Wa5rM65bCB9Vt1dTxnJ14u4108f2O2evD7GX6lC2eH-fT-0XmRIFtJmya6ilfSlk4iV5ioaXUy5XSFlQau8rBOFIknXfcaoXknbGImDJaLMWY3Qx996F57yi25a6KjrZbW1PTxTJtBOnDGvT_KGqZ_N8UlJAGCpPo9QHdNF2o0869kqgFKEgKBuVCE2MgX-5DtbPhs-RQ9ncoD--QItkQiXZNP5r-5r8A7dyC8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1504273050</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Change Interventions: What Kind of Evidence Do We Really Have?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Barends, Eric ; Janssen, Barbara ; ten Have, Wouter ; ten Have, Steven</creator><creatorcontrib>Barends, Eric ; Janssen, Barbara ; ten Have, Wouter ; ten Have, Steven</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the popularity of organizational change management, the question arises whether its prescriptions are based on solid and convergent evidence. To answer this question, a systematic review was conducted of organizational change management research published in scholarly journals during the past 30 years. The databases ABI/INFORM, Business Source Premier, ERIC, and PsycINFO were searched for relevant studies. A total of 563 studies met the review’s criteria. Assessment shows a predominance of one-shot studies with a low internal validity. Replication studies are rare. Findings suggest that scholars and practitioners should be sceptical regarding the body of research results in the field of organizational change management published to date. Prescriptions are offered for researchers, editors, and educators to develop a more solid body of evidence on organizational change management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8863</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6879</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0021886312473152</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JABHAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Assessment ; Intervention ; Interventions ; Management ; Management of change ; Management theory ; Organizational Change ; Organizational Research ; Popularity ; Prescriptions ; Scholarly publishing ; Studies ; Systematic review ; Teachers</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied behavioral science, 2014-03, Vol.50 (1), p.5-27</ispartof><rights>2013 NTL Institute</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Mar 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-3a473fe6b449c42f4297447bd57a05863d608ce5e4cfc1a752efc8a222e6b73b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,30977,33751,33752</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barends, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Have, Wouter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Have, Steven</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Change Interventions: What Kind of Evidence Do We Really Have?</title><title>The Journal of applied behavioral science</title><description>Despite the popularity of organizational change management, the question arises whether its prescriptions are based on solid and convergent evidence. To answer this question, a systematic review was conducted of organizational change management research published in scholarly journals during the past 30 years. The databases ABI/INFORM, Business Source Premier, ERIC, and PsycINFO were searched for relevant studies. A total of 563 studies met the review’s criteria. Assessment shows a predominance of one-shot studies with a low internal validity. Replication studies are rare. Findings suggest that scholars and practitioners should be sceptical regarding the body of research results in the field of organizational change management published to date. Prescriptions are offered for researchers, editors, and educators to develop a more solid body of evidence on organizational change management.</description><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Interventions</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Management of change</subject><subject>Management theory</subject><subject>Organizational Change</subject><subject>Organizational Research</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Prescriptions</subject><subject>Scholarly publishing</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><issn>0021-8863</issn><issn>1552-6879</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0cFKAzEQBuAgCtbq3ZsFL15WJ5Nkkz1KqVooeNHzkqaTuqXdrcmu4NubZT1IQfSUw3z_TIZh7JLDLeda3wEgNyYXHKUWXOERG3GlMMuNLo7ZqC9nff2UncW4AQApRD5iVzPvybVx0vjJ9M3Wa5rM65bCB9Vt1dTxnJ14u4108f2O2evD7GX6lC2eH-fT-0XmRIFtJmya6ilfSlk4iV5ioaXUy5XSFlQau8rBOFIknXfcaoXknbGImDJaLMWY3Qx996F57yi25a6KjrZbW1PTxTJtBOnDGvT_KGqZ_N8UlJAGCpPo9QHdNF2o0869kqgFKEgKBuVCE2MgX-5DtbPhs-RQ9ncoD--QItkQiXZNP5r-5r8A7dyC8A</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Barends, Eric</creator><creator>Janssen, Barbara</creator><creator>ten Have, Wouter</creator><creator>ten Have, Steven</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Effects of Change Interventions</title><author>Barends, Eric ; Janssen, Barbara ; ten Have, Wouter ; ten Have, Steven</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-3a473fe6b449c42f4297447bd57a05863d608ce5e4cfc1a752efc8a222e6b73b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Interventions</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Management of change</topic><topic>Management theory</topic><topic>Organizational Change</topic><topic>Organizational Research</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Prescriptions</topic><topic>Scholarly publishing</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barends, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Have, Wouter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Have, Steven</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied behavioral science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barends, Eric</au><au>Janssen, Barbara</au><au>ten Have, Wouter</au><au>ten Have, Steven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Change Interventions: What Kind of Evidence Do We Really Have?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied behavioral science</jtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>5-27</pages><issn>0021-8863</issn><eissn>1552-6879</eissn><coden>JABHAP</coden><abstract>Despite the popularity of organizational change management, the question arises whether its prescriptions are based on solid and convergent evidence. To answer this question, a systematic review was conducted of organizational change management research published in scholarly journals during the past 30 years. The databases ABI/INFORM, Business Source Premier, ERIC, and PsycINFO were searched for relevant studies. A total of 563 studies met the review’s criteria. Assessment shows a predominance of one-shot studies with a low internal validity. Replication studies are rare. Findings suggest that scholars and practitioners should be sceptical regarding the body of research results in the field of organizational change management published to date. Prescriptions are offered for researchers, editors, and educators to develop a more solid body of evidence on organizational change management.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0021886312473152</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8863
ispartof The Journal of applied behavioral science, 2014-03, Vol.50 (1), p.5-27
issn 0021-8863
1552-6879
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520336707
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list); Sociological Abstracts
subjects Assessment
Intervention
Interventions
Management
Management of change
Management theory
Organizational Change
Organizational Research
Popularity
Prescriptions
Scholarly publishing
Studies
Systematic review
Teachers
title Effects of Change Interventions: What Kind of Evidence Do We Really Have?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T10%3A19%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Change%20Interventions:%20What%20Kind%20of%20Evidence%20Do%20We%20Really%20Have?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20behavioral%20science&rft.au=Barends,%20Eric&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=5-27&rft.issn=0021-8863&rft.eissn=1552-6879&rft.coden=JABHAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0021886312473152&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1505348098%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-3a473fe6b449c42f4297447bd57a05863d608ce5e4cfc1a752efc8a222e6b73b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1504273050&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0021886312473152&rfr_iscdi=true