Loading…
Effects of Change Interventions: What Kind of Evidence Do We Really Have?
Despite the popularity of organizational change management, the question arises whether its prescriptions are based on solid and convergent evidence. To answer this question, a systematic review was conducted of organizational change management research published in scholarly journals during the pas...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of applied behavioral science 2014-03, Vol.50 (1), p.5-27 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-3a473fe6b449c42f4297447bd57a05863d608ce5e4cfc1a752efc8a222e6b73b3 |
container_end_page | 27 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 5 |
container_title | The Journal of applied behavioral science |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Barends, Eric Janssen, Barbara ten Have, Wouter ten Have, Steven |
description | Despite the popularity of organizational change management, the question arises whether its prescriptions are based on solid and convergent evidence. To answer this question, a systematic review was conducted of organizational change management research published in scholarly journals during the past 30 years. The databases ABI/INFORM, Business Source Premier, ERIC, and PsycINFO were searched for relevant studies. A total of 563 studies met the review’s criteria. Assessment shows a predominance of one-shot studies with a low internal validity. Replication studies are rare. Findings suggest that scholars and practitioners should be sceptical regarding the body of research results in the field of organizational change management published to date. Prescriptions are offered for researchers, editors, and educators to develop a more solid body of evidence on organizational change management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0021886312473152 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520336707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0021886312473152</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1505348098</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-3a473fe6b449c42f4297447bd57a05863d608ce5e4cfc1a752efc8a222e6b73b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0cFKAzEQBuAgCtbq3ZsFL15WJ5Nkkz1KqVooeNHzkqaTuqXdrcmu4NubZT1IQfSUw3z_TIZh7JLDLeda3wEgNyYXHKUWXOERG3GlMMuNLo7ZqC9nff2UncW4AQApRD5iVzPvybVx0vjJ9M3Wa5rM65bCB9Vt1dTxnJ14u4108f2O2evD7GX6lC2eH-fT-0XmRIFtJmya6ilfSlk4iV5ioaXUy5XSFlQau8rBOFIknXfcaoXknbGImDJaLMWY3Qx996F57yi25a6KjrZbW1PTxTJtBOnDGvT_KGqZ_N8UlJAGCpPo9QHdNF2o0869kqgFKEgKBuVCE2MgX-5DtbPhs-RQ9ncoD--QItkQiXZNP5r-5r8A7dyC8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1504273050</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Change Interventions: What Kind of Evidence Do We Really Have?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Barends, Eric ; Janssen, Barbara ; ten Have, Wouter ; ten Have, Steven</creator><creatorcontrib>Barends, Eric ; Janssen, Barbara ; ten Have, Wouter ; ten Have, Steven</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the popularity of organizational change management, the question arises whether its prescriptions are based on solid and convergent evidence. To answer this question, a systematic review was conducted of organizational change management research published in scholarly journals during the past 30 years. The databases ABI/INFORM, Business Source Premier, ERIC, and PsycINFO were searched for relevant studies. A total of 563 studies met the review’s criteria. Assessment shows a predominance of one-shot studies with a low internal validity. Replication studies are rare. Findings suggest that scholars and practitioners should be sceptical regarding the body of research results in the field of organizational change management published to date. Prescriptions are offered for researchers, editors, and educators to develop a more solid body of evidence on organizational change management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8863</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6879</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0021886312473152</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JABHAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Assessment ; Intervention ; Interventions ; Management ; Management of change ; Management theory ; Organizational Change ; Organizational Research ; Popularity ; Prescriptions ; Scholarly publishing ; Studies ; Systematic review ; Teachers</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied behavioral science, 2014-03, Vol.50 (1), p.5-27</ispartof><rights>2013 NTL Institute</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Mar 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-3a473fe6b449c42f4297447bd57a05863d608ce5e4cfc1a752efc8a222e6b73b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,30977,33751,33752</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barends, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Have, Wouter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Have, Steven</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Change Interventions: What Kind of Evidence Do We Really Have?</title><title>The Journal of applied behavioral science</title><description>Despite the popularity of organizational change management, the question arises whether its prescriptions are based on solid and convergent evidence. To answer this question, a systematic review was conducted of organizational change management research published in scholarly journals during the past 30 years. The databases ABI/INFORM, Business Source Premier, ERIC, and PsycINFO were searched for relevant studies. A total of 563 studies met the review’s criteria. Assessment shows a predominance of one-shot studies with a low internal validity. Replication studies are rare. Findings suggest that scholars and practitioners should be sceptical regarding the body of research results in the field of organizational change management published to date. Prescriptions are offered for researchers, editors, and educators to develop a more solid body of evidence on organizational change management.</description><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Interventions</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Management of change</subject><subject>Management theory</subject><subject>Organizational Change</subject><subject>Organizational Research</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Prescriptions</subject><subject>Scholarly publishing</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><issn>0021-8863</issn><issn>1552-6879</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0cFKAzEQBuAgCtbq3ZsFL15WJ5Nkkz1KqVooeNHzkqaTuqXdrcmu4NubZT1IQfSUw3z_TIZh7JLDLeda3wEgNyYXHKUWXOERG3GlMMuNLo7ZqC9nff2UncW4AQApRD5iVzPvybVx0vjJ9M3Wa5rM65bCB9Vt1dTxnJ14u4108f2O2evD7GX6lC2eH-fT-0XmRIFtJmya6ilfSlk4iV5ioaXUy5XSFlQau8rBOFIknXfcaoXknbGImDJaLMWY3Qx996F57yi25a6KjrZbW1PTxTJtBOnDGvT_KGqZ_N8UlJAGCpPo9QHdNF2o0869kqgFKEgKBuVCE2MgX-5DtbPhs-RQ9ncoD--QItkQiXZNP5r-5r8A7dyC8A</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Barends, Eric</creator><creator>Janssen, Barbara</creator><creator>ten Have, Wouter</creator><creator>ten Have, Steven</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Effects of Change Interventions</title><author>Barends, Eric ; Janssen, Barbara ; ten Have, Wouter ; ten Have, Steven</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-3a473fe6b449c42f4297447bd57a05863d608ce5e4cfc1a752efc8a222e6b73b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Interventions</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Management of change</topic><topic>Management theory</topic><topic>Organizational Change</topic><topic>Organizational Research</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Prescriptions</topic><topic>Scholarly publishing</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barends, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Have, Wouter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Have, Steven</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied behavioral science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barends, Eric</au><au>Janssen, Barbara</au><au>ten Have, Wouter</au><au>ten Have, Steven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Change Interventions: What Kind of Evidence Do We Really Have?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied behavioral science</jtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>5-27</pages><issn>0021-8863</issn><eissn>1552-6879</eissn><coden>JABHAP</coden><abstract>Despite the popularity of organizational change management, the question arises whether its prescriptions are based on solid and convergent evidence. To answer this question, a systematic review was conducted of organizational change management research published in scholarly journals during the past 30 years. The databases ABI/INFORM, Business Source Premier, ERIC, and PsycINFO were searched for relevant studies. A total of 563 studies met the review’s criteria. Assessment shows a predominance of one-shot studies with a low internal validity. Replication studies are rare. Findings suggest that scholars and practitioners should be sceptical regarding the body of research results in the field of organizational change management published to date. Prescriptions are offered for researchers, editors, and educators to develop a more solid body of evidence on organizational change management.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0021886312473152</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8863 |
ispartof | The Journal of applied behavioral science, 2014-03, Vol.50 (1), p.5-27 |
issn | 0021-8863 1552-6879 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520336707 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list); Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Assessment Intervention Interventions Management Management of change Management theory Organizational Change Organizational Research Popularity Prescriptions Scholarly publishing Studies Systematic review Teachers |
title | Effects of Change Interventions: What Kind of Evidence Do We Really Have? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T10%3A19%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Change%20Interventions:%20What%20Kind%20of%20Evidence%20Do%20We%20Really%20Have?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20behavioral%20science&rft.au=Barends,%20Eric&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=5-27&rft.issn=0021-8863&rft.eissn=1552-6879&rft.coden=JABHAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0021886312473152&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1505348098%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-3a473fe6b449c42f4297447bd57a05863d608ce5e4cfc1a752efc8a222e6b73b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1504273050&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0021886312473152&rfr_iscdi=true |