Loading…
Forecasting Mixed-Frequency Time Series with ECM-MIDAS Models
ABSTRACT This paper proposes a mixed‐frequency error correction model for possibly cointegrated non‐stationary time series sampled at different frequencies. We highlight the impact, in terms of model specification, of the choice of the particular high‐frequency explanatory variable to be included in...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of forecasting 2014-04, Vol.33 (3), p.198-213 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4626-c91bfa5b29da38200d342133f00508b210eb1c460b4c5206baa48d36db8d44b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4626-c91bfa5b29da38200d342133f00508b210eb1c460b4c5206baa48d36db8d44b3 |
container_end_page | 213 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 198 |
container_title | Journal of forecasting |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Götz, Thomas B. Hecq, Alain Urbain, Jean-Pierre |
description | ABSTRACT
This paper proposes a mixed‐frequency error correction model for possibly cointegrated non‐stationary time series sampled at different frequencies. We highlight the impact, in terms of model specification, of the choice of the particular high‐frequency explanatory variable to be included in the cointegrating relationship, which we call a dynamic mixed‐frequency cointegrating relationship. The forecasting performance of aggregated models and several mixed‐frequency regressions are compared in a set of Monte Carlo experiments. In particular, we look at both the unrestricted mixed‐frequency model and at a more parsimonious MIDAS regression. Whereas the existing literature has only investigated the potential improvements of the MIDAS framework for stationary time series, our study emphasizes the need to include the relevant cointegrating vectors in the non‐stationary case. Furthermore, it is illustrated that the choice of dynamic mixed‐frequency cointegrating relationship does not matter as long as the short‐run dynamics are adapted accordingly. Finally, the unrestricted model is shown to suffer from parameter proliferation for samples of relatively small size, whereas MIDAS forecasts are robust to over‐parameterization. We illustrate our results for the US inflation rate. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/for.2286 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1521336154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3261925481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4626-c91bfa5b29da38200d342133f00508b210eb1c460b4c5206baa48d36db8d44b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EFPwjAcBfDGaCKiiR9hiRcvw3_brdsOHggwRJkYIcFb026dFseG7Qjw7R3BaDTx9C6_vLw8hC4xdDAAuckr0yEkZEeohSGKXEzxyzFqAQkCl7GInqIzaxcAEISYtNBtXBmVClvr8tVJ9FZlbmzUx1qV6c6Z6aVypspoZZ2Nrt-cQS9xk1G_O3WSKlOFPUcnuSisuvjKNprFg1nvzh1PhqNed-ymHiPMTSMsc-FLEmWChgQgox7BlOYAPoSSYFASNxSkl_oEmBTCCzPKMhlmnidpG10falemaqbZmi-1TVVRiFJVa8uxv29j2PcaevWHLqq1KZtxjcKYgUcBfgpTU1lrVM5XRi-F2XEMfH8jb27k-xsb6h7oRhdq96_j8eT5t9e2VttvL8w7ZwENfD5_HHLKnvrxwxzze_oJVBp_WA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1511604300</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forecasting Mixed-Frequency Time Series with ECM-MIDAS Models</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Götz, Thomas B. ; Hecq, Alain ; Urbain, Jean-Pierre</creator><creatorcontrib>Götz, Thomas B. ; Hecq, Alain ; Urbain, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
This paper proposes a mixed‐frequency error correction model for possibly cointegrated non‐stationary time series sampled at different frequencies. We highlight the impact, in terms of model specification, of the choice of the particular high‐frequency explanatory variable to be included in the cointegrating relationship, which we call a dynamic mixed‐frequency cointegrating relationship. The forecasting performance of aggregated models and several mixed‐frequency regressions are compared in a set of Monte Carlo experiments. In particular, we look at both the unrestricted mixed‐frequency model and at a more parsimonious MIDAS regression. Whereas the existing literature has only investigated the potential improvements of the MIDAS framework for stationary time series, our study emphasizes the need to include the relevant cointegrating vectors in the non‐stationary case. Furthermore, it is illustrated that the choice of dynamic mixed‐frequency cointegrating relationship does not matter as long as the short‐run dynamics are adapted accordingly. Finally, the unrestricted model is shown to suffer from parameter proliferation for samples of relatively small size, whereas MIDAS forecasts are robust to over‐parameterization. We illustrate our results for the US inflation rate. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-6693</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-131X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/for.2286</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOFODV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Cointegration analysis ; ECM ; Economic analysis ; Economic forecasting ; Economic forecasts ; Economic models ; Error correction models ; forecasting ; Inflation ; MIDAS ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Regression analysis ; Studies ; Time series ; U.S.A</subject><ispartof>Journal of forecasting, 2014-04, Vol.33 (3), p.198-213</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Apr 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4626-c91bfa5b29da38200d342133f00508b210eb1c460b4c5206baa48d36db8d44b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4626-c91bfa5b29da38200d342133f00508b210eb1c460b4c5206baa48d36db8d44b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,33202,33203</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Götz, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hecq, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbain, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><title>Forecasting Mixed-Frequency Time Series with ECM-MIDAS Models</title><title>Journal of forecasting</title><addtitle>J. Forecast</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
This paper proposes a mixed‐frequency error correction model for possibly cointegrated non‐stationary time series sampled at different frequencies. We highlight the impact, in terms of model specification, of the choice of the particular high‐frequency explanatory variable to be included in the cointegrating relationship, which we call a dynamic mixed‐frequency cointegrating relationship. The forecasting performance of aggregated models and several mixed‐frequency regressions are compared in a set of Monte Carlo experiments. In particular, we look at both the unrestricted mixed‐frequency model and at a more parsimonious MIDAS regression. Whereas the existing literature has only investigated the potential improvements of the MIDAS framework for stationary time series, our study emphasizes the need to include the relevant cointegrating vectors in the non‐stationary case. Furthermore, it is illustrated that the choice of dynamic mixed‐frequency cointegrating relationship does not matter as long as the short‐run dynamics are adapted accordingly. Finally, the unrestricted model is shown to suffer from parameter proliferation for samples of relatively small size, whereas MIDAS forecasts are robust to over‐parameterization. We illustrate our results for the US inflation rate. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Cointegration analysis</subject><subject>ECM</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic forecasting</subject><subject>Economic forecasts</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Error correction models</subject><subject>forecasting</subject><subject>Inflation</subject><subject>MIDAS</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><issn>0277-6693</issn><issn>1099-131X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EFPwjAcBfDGaCKiiR9hiRcvw3_brdsOHggwRJkYIcFb026dFseG7Qjw7R3BaDTx9C6_vLw8hC4xdDAAuckr0yEkZEeohSGKXEzxyzFqAQkCl7GInqIzaxcAEISYtNBtXBmVClvr8tVJ9FZlbmzUx1qV6c6Z6aVypspoZZ2Nrt-cQS9xk1G_O3WSKlOFPUcnuSisuvjKNprFg1nvzh1PhqNed-ymHiPMTSMsc-FLEmWChgQgox7BlOYAPoSSYFASNxSkl_oEmBTCCzPKMhlmnidpG10falemaqbZmi-1TVVRiFJVa8uxv29j2PcaevWHLqq1KZtxjcKYgUcBfgpTU1lrVM5XRi-F2XEMfH8jb27k-xsb6h7oRhdq96_j8eT5t9e2VttvL8w7ZwENfD5_HHLKnvrxwxzze_oJVBp_WA</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>Götz, Thomas B.</creator><creator>Hecq, Alain</creator><creator>Urbain, Jean-Pierre</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>Forecasting Mixed-Frequency Time Series with ECM-MIDAS Models</title><author>Götz, Thomas B. ; Hecq, Alain ; Urbain, Jean-Pierre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4626-c91bfa5b29da38200d342133f00508b210eb1c460b4c5206baa48d36db8d44b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Cointegration analysis</topic><topic>ECM</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic forecasting</topic><topic>Economic forecasts</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Error correction models</topic><topic>forecasting</topic><topic>Inflation</topic><topic>MIDAS</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Götz, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hecq, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbain, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of forecasting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Götz, Thomas B.</au><au>Hecq, Alain</au><au>Urbain, Jean-Pierre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forecasting Mixed-Frequency Time Series with ECM-MIDAS Models</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forecasting</jtitle><addtitle>J. Forecast</addtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>198</spage><epage>213</epage><pages>198-213</pages><issn>0277-6693</issn><eissn>1099-131X</eissn><coden>JOFODV</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT
This paper proposes a mixed‐frequency error correction model for possibly cointegrated non‐stationary time series sampled at different frequencies. We highlight the impact, in terms of model specification, of the choice of the particular high‐frequency explanatory variable to be included in the cointegrating relationship, which we call a dynamic mixed‐frequency cointegrating relationship. The forecasting performance of aggregated models and several mixed‐frequency regressions are compared in a set of Monte Carlo experiments. In particular, we look at both the unrestricted mixed‐frequency model and at a more parsimonious MIDAS regression. Whereas the existing literature has only investigated the potential improvements of the MIDAS framework for stationary time series, our study emphasizes the need to include the relevant cointegrating vectors in the non‐stationary case. Furthermore, it is illustrated that the choice of dynamic mixed‐frequency cointegrating relationship does not matter as long as the short‐run dynamics are adapted accordingly. Finally, the unrestricted model is shown to suffer from parameter proliferation for samples of relatively small size, whereas MIDAS forecasts are robust to over‐parameterization. We illustrate our results for the US inflation rate. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/for.2286</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-6693 |
ispartof | Journal of forecasting, 2014-04, Vol.33 (3), p.198-213 |
issn | 0277-6693 1099-131X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1521336154 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Cointegration analysis ECM Economic analysis Economic forecasting Economic forecasts Economic models Error correction models forecasting Inflation MIDAS Monte Carlo simulation Regression analysis Studies Time series U.S.A |
title | Forecasting Mixed-Frequency Time Series with ECM-MIDAS Models |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T13%3A56%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forecasting%20Mixed-Frequency%20Time%20Series%20with%20ECM-MIDAS%20Models&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forecasting&rft.au=G%C3%B6tz,%20Thomas%20B.&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=213&rft.pages=198-213&rft.issn=0277-6693&rft.eissn=1099-131X&rft.coden=JOFODV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/for.2286&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3261925481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4626-c91bfa5b29da38200d342133f00508b210eb1c460b4c5206baa48d36db8d44b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1511604300&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |