Loading…

Forecasting Mixed-Frequency Time Series with ECM-MIDAS Models

ABSTRACT This paper proposes a mixed‐frequency error correction model for possibly cointegrated non‐stationary time series sampled at different frequencies. We highlight the impact, in terms of model specification, of the choice of the particular high‐frequency explanatory variable to be included in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of forecasting 2014-04, Vol.33 (3), p.198-213
Main Authors: Götz, Thomas B., Hecq, Alain, Urbain, Jean-Pierre
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4626-c91bfa5b29da38200d342133f00508b210eb1c460b4c5206baa48d36db8d44b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4626-c91bfa5b29da38200d342133f00508b210eb1c460b4c5206baa48d36db8d44b3
container_end_page 213
container_issue 3
container_start_page 198
container_title Journal of forecasting
container_volume 33
creator Götz, Thomas B.
Hecq, Alain
Urbain, Jean-Pierre
description ABSTRACT This paper proposes a mixed‐frequency error correction model for possibly cointegrated non‐stationary time series sampled at different frequencies. We highlight the impact, in terms of model specification, of the choice of the particular high‐frequency explanatory variable to be included in the cointegrating relationship, which we call a dynamic mixed‐frequency cointegrating relationship. The forecasting performance of aggregated models and several mixed‐frequency regressions are compared in a set of Monte Carlo experiments. In particular, we look at both the unrestricted mixed‐frequency model and at a more parsimonious MIDAS regression. Whereas the existing literature has only investigated the potential improvements of the MIDAS framework for stationary time series, our study emphasizes the need to include the relevant cointegrating vectors in the non‐stationary case. Furthermore, it is illustrated that the choice of dynamic mixed‐frequency cointegrating relationship does not matter as long as the short‐run dynamics are adapted accordingly. Finally, the unrestricted model is shown to suffer from parameter proliferation for samples of relatively small size, whereas MIDAS forecasts are robust to over‐parameterization. We illustrate our results for the US inflation rate. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/for.2286
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1521336154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3261925481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4626-c91bfa5b29da38200d342133f00508b210eb1c460b4c5206baa48d36db8d44b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EFPwjAcBfDGaCKiiR9hiRcvw3_brdsOHggwRJkYIcFb026dFseG7Qjw7R3BaDTx9C6_vLw8hC4xdDAAuckr0yEkZEeohSGKXEzxyzFqAQkCl7GInqIzaxcAEISYtNBtXBmVClvr8tVJ9FZlbmzUx1qV6c6Z6aVypspoZZ2Nrt-cQS9xk1G_O3WSKlOFPUcnuSisuvjKNprFg1nvzh1PhqNed-ymHiPMTSMsc-FLEmWChgQgox7BlOYAPoSSYFASNxSkl_oEmBTCCzPKMhlmnidpG10falemaqbZmi-1TVVRiFJVa8uxv29j2PcaevWHLqq1KZtxjcKYgUcBfgpTU1lrVM5XRi-F2XEMfH8jb27k-xsb6h7oRhdq96_j8eT5t9e2VttvL8w7ZwENfD5_HHLKnvrxwxzze_oJVBp_WA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1511604300</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forecasting Mixed-Frequency Time Series with ECM-MIDAS Models</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Götz, Thomas B. ; Hecq, Alain ; Urbain, Jean-Pierre</creator><creatorcontrib>Götz, Thomas B. ; Hecq, Alain ; Urbain, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT This paper proposes a mixed‐frequency error correction model for possibly cointegrated non‐stationary time series sampled at different frequencies. We highlight the impact, in terms of model specification, of the choice of the particular high‐frequency explanatory variable to be included in the cointegrating relationship, which we call a dynamic mixed‐frequency cointegrating relationship. The forecasting performance of aggregated models and several mixed‐frequency regressions are compared in a set of Monte Carlo experiments. In particular, we look at both the unrestricted mixed‐frequency model and at a more parsimonious MIDAS regression. Whereas the existing literature has only investigated the potential improvements of the MIDAS framework for stationary time series, our study emphasizes the need to include the relevant cointegrating vectors in the non‐stationary case. Furthermore, it is illustrated that the choice of dynamic mixed‐frequency cointegrating relationship does not matter as long as the short‐run dynamics are adapted accordingly. Finally, the unrestricted model is shown to suffer from parameter proliferation for samples of relatively small size, whereas MIDAS forecasts are robust to over‐parameterization. We illustrate our results for the US inflation rate. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-6693</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-131X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/for.2286</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOFODV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Cointegration analysis ; ECM ; Economic analysis ; Economic forecasting ; Economic forecasts ; Economic models ; Error correction models ; forecasting ; Inflation ; MIDAS ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Regression analysis ; Studies ; Time series ; U.S.A</subject><ispartof>Journal of forecasting, 2014-04, Vol.33 (3), p.198-213</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Apr 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4626-c91bfa5b29da38200d342133f00508b210eb1c460b4c5206baa48d36db8d44b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4626-c91bfa5b29da38200d342133f00508b210eb1c460b4c5206baa48d36db8d44b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,33202,33203</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Götz, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hecq, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbain, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><title>Forecasting Mixed-Frequency Time Series with ECM-MIDAS Models</title><title>Journal of forecasting</title><addtitle>J. Forecast</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT This paper proposes a mixed‐frequency error correction model for possibly cointegrated non‐stationary time series sampled at different frequencies. We highlight the impact, in terms of model specification, of the choice of the particular high‐frequency explanatory variable to be included in the cointegrating relationship, which we call a dynamic mixed‐frequency cointegrating relationship. The forecasting performance of aggregated models and several mixed‐frequency regressions are compared in a set of Monte Carlo experiments. In particular, we look at both the unrestricted mixed‐frequency model and at a more parsimonious MIDAS regression. Whereas the existing literature has only investigated the potential improvements of the MIDAS framework for stationary time series, our study emphasizes the need to include the relevant cointegrating vectors in the non‐stationary case. Furthermore, it is illustrated that the choice of dynamic mixed‐frequency cointegrating relationship does not matter as long as the short‐run dynamics are adapted accordingly. Finally, the unrestricted model is shown to suffer from parameter proliferation for samples of relatively small size, whereas MIDAS forecasts are robust to over‐parameterization. We illustrate our results for the US inflation rate. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Cointegration analysis</subject><subject>ECM</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic forecasting</subject><subject>Economic forecasts</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Error correction models</subject><subject>forecasting</subject><subject>Inflation</subject><subject>MIDAS</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><issn>0277-6693</issn><issn>1099-131X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EFPwjAcBfDGaCKiiR9hiRcvw3_brdsOHggwRJkYIcFb026dFseG7Qjw7R3BaDTx9C6_vLw8hC4xdDAAuckr0yEkZEeohSGKXEzxyzFqAQkCl7GInqIzaxcAEISYtNBtXBmVClvr8tVJ9FZlbmzUx1qV6c6Z6aVypspoZZ2Nrt-cQS9xk1G_O3WSKlOFPUcnuSisuvjKNprFg1nvzh1PhqNed-ymHiPMTSMsc-FLEmWChgQgox7BlOYAPoSSYFASNxSkl_oEmBTCCzPKMhlmnidpG10falemaqbZmi-1TVVRiFJVa8uxv29j2PcaevWHLqq1KZtxjcKYgUcBfgpTU1lrVM5XRi-F2XEMfH8jb27k-xsb6h7oRhdq96_j8eT5t9e2VttvL8w7ZwENfD5_HHLKnvrxwxzze_oJVBp_WA</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>Götz, Thomas B.</creator><creator>Hecq, Alain</creator><creator>Urbain, Jean-Pierre</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>Forecasting Mixed-Frequency Time Series with ECM-MIDAS Models</title><author>Götz, Thomas B. ; Hecq, Alain ; Urbain, Jean-Pierre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4626-c91bfa5b29da38200d342133f00508b210eb1c460b4c5206baa48d36db8d44b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Cointegration analysis</topic><topic>ECM</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic forecasting</topic><topic>Economic forecasts</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Error correction models</topic><topic>forecasting</topic><topic>Inflation</topic><topic>MIDAS</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Götz, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hecq, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbain, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of forecasting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Götz, Thomas B.</au><au>Hecq, Alain</au><au>Urbain, Jean-Pierre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forecasting Mixed-Frequency Time Series with ECM-MIDAS Models</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forecasting</jtitle><addtitle>J. Forecast</addtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>198</spage><epage>213</epage><pages>198-213</pages><issn>0277-6693</issn><eissn>1099-131X</eissn><coden>JOFODV</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT This paper proposes a mixed‐frequency error correction model for possibly cointegrated non‐stationary time series sampled at different frequencies. We highlight the impact, in terms of model specification, of the choice of the particular high‐frequency explanatory variable to be included in the cointegrating relationship, which we call a dynamic mixed‐frequency cointegrating relationship. The forecasting performance of aggregated models and several mixed‐frequency regressions are compared in a set of Monte Carlo experiments. In particular, we look at both the unrestricted mixed‐frequency model and at a more parsimonious MIDAS regression. Whereas the existing literature has only investigated the potential improvements of the MIDAS framework for stationary time series, our study emphasizes the need to include the relevant cointegrating vectors in the non‐stationary case. Furthermore, it is illustrated that the choice of dynamic mixed‐frequency cointegrating relationship does not matter as long as the short‐run dynamics are adapted accordingly. Finally, the unrestricted model is shown to suffer from parameter proliferation for samples of relatively small size, whereas MIDAS forecasts are robust to over‐parameterization. We illustrate our results for the US inflation rate. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/for.2286</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-6693
ispartof Journal of forecasting, 2014-04, Vol.33 (3), p.198-213
issn 0277-6693
1099-131X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1521336154
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Cointegration analysis
ECM
Economic analysis
Economic forecasting
Economic forecasts
Economic models
Error correction models
forecasting
Inflation
MIDAS
Monte Carlo simulation
Regression analysis
Studies
Time series
U.S.A
title Forecasting Mixed-Frequency Time Series with ECM-MIDAS Models
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T13%3A56%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forecasting%20Mixed-Frequency%20Time%20Series%20with%20ECM-MIDAS%20Models&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forecasting&rft.au=G%C3%B6tz,%20Thomas%20B.&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=213&rft.pages=198-213&rft.issn=0277-6693&rft.eissn=1099-131X&rft.coden=JOFODV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/for.2286&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3261925481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4626-c91bfa5b29da38200d342133f00508b210eb1c460b4c5206baa48d36db8d44b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1511604300&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true