Loading…
Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in detecting acute appendicitis in children: Comparison with conventional MRI and surgical findings
Purpose To determine the value of diffusion‐weighted MRI for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children. Materials and Methods Forty‐five consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis underwent abdominal MRI; 39 were operated on for acute appendicitis. First, the diffusio...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2014-06, Vol.39 (6), p.1518-1524 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose
To determine the value of diffusion‐weighted MRI for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children.
Materials and Methods
Forty‐five consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis underwent abdominal MRI; 39 were operated on for acute appendicitis. First, the diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) alone was reviewed, followed by conventional MRI alone, and then conventional MRI and DWI were reviewed by two observers within a consensus. The surgical findings were compared with the MRI. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for DWI, conventional MRI, and combined DWI and conventional MRI for the depiction of acute appendicitis.
Results
A combination of DWI and conventional MRI was the most sensitive and the most accurate, with corresponding sensitivity and accuracy of 0.92 and 0.92, respectively. Using DWI alone the sensitivity and accuracy was found to be 0.78 and 0.77, respectively. Using conventional MRI alone, sensitivity of 0.81 and accuracy of 0.82 was found for the consensus of the two observers.
Conclusion
The use of combination of DWI and conventional MRI is a valuable technique in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;39:1518–1524. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1053-1807 1522-2586 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jmri.24316 |