Piezoelectric Technology for Pediatric Autologous Cranioplasty

• Published in: The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal 2014-05, Vol.51 (3), p.361-364
• Main Authors: Phillips, Benjamin Z., Taylor, Helena O., Klinge, Petra M., Sullivan, Stephen R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Birth defects; Bone Transplantation - instrumentation; Brain surgery; Child; Child, Preschool; Dentistry; Female; Humans; Male; Medical technology; Pediatrics; Piezosurgery - instrumentation; Retrospective Studies; Skull - abnormalities; Skull - injuries; Skull - surgery; Studies; Surgical Instruments; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 1055-6656; 1545-1569
• DOI: 10.1597/13-083

Objective Pediatric patients with skull defects larger than available sources for splitting bicortical bone have limited options for autogenous cortical bone cranioplasty. Piezoelectric instruments allow donor bone to be chosen based on the best possible contour rather than the presence of bicortical bone. We present the use of piezoelectric technology to split thin unicortical calvarium for autogenous cranioplasty in a series of pediatric patients. Design Retrospective review of a series of pediatric patients requiring reconstruction for skull defects. Patients/Intervention Our series included a 2-year-old with a parietal skull tumor and resultant 3 × 3-cm defect after craniectomy, a 2-year-old with a 3 × 3-cm defect after excision of an occipital skull tumor, a 10-year-old with a 4 × 5-cm skull defect after excision of an occipital skull tumor, and a 13-year-old who suffered a gunshot to the forehead with a 12 × 7-cm frontal skull defect. We used a piezoelectric saw to precisely and safely split unicortical and bicortical cranium that ranged from 1 to 3 mm in thickness. The inner layer was used to reconstruct the donor site; whereas, the outer layer was used for the craniectomy defect. Conclusion The piezoelectric saw allows unicortical bone to be split and used for cortical bone cranioplasty. This technology allows choice of donor site based on the best contour rather than the presence of bicortical bone. This technique expands the possibilities of autogenous cranioplasty and enables primary repair of cranial defects that would otherwise require secondary cranioplasty with remote donor sites, foreign materials, or unstable particulate cranioplasty.