Loading…

Computed tomography-based classification of axis vertebra: choice of screw placement

Purpose The purpose of the study was to: (1) introduce a new CT-based parameter: free facet area and provide its normative data; (2) standardize the method of measuring isthmus width and height of the axis vertebra; (3) propose a new grading system to predict the difficulty in inserting transarticul...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European spine journal 2014-05, Vol.23 (5), p.1084-1091
Main Authors: Pruthi, Nupur, Dawn, Rose, Ravindranath, Yogitha, Maiti, Tanmoy Kumar, Ravindranath, Roopa, Philip, Mariamma
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3ec36bcbb9a84193a8592cf68273380ef92dd6c75f9c1c5fe1f63818a36f62053
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3ec36bcbb9a84193a8592cf68273380ef92dd6c75f9c1c5fe1f63818a36f62053
container_end_page 1091
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1084
container_title European spine journal
container_volume 23
creator Pruthi, Nupur
Dawn, Rose
Ravindranath, Yogitha
Maiti, Tanmoy Kumar
Ravindranath, Roopa
Philip, Mariamma
description Purpose The purpose of the study was to: (1) introduce a new CT-based parameter: free facet area and provide its normative data; (2) standardize the method of measuring isthmus width and height of the axis vertebra; (3) propose a new grading system to predict the difficulty in inserting transarticular and C2 pedicle screws. Methods Spiral CT scans of 47 adult dry axis vertebrae were studied. The methods of measuring isthmus width, isthmus height and free facet area are described. Results The mean isthmus width was 5.04 mm on the right side and 5.42 mm on the left side. The mean isthmus height was 5.21 mm on the right side and 5.45 mm on the left side. Mean free facet area was 61.23 % on the right side and 70.18 % on the left side. A novel grading system is proposed on the basis of these three parameters. As per this grading system, 40.4 % of the sides were found to be difficult for transarticular and 24.5 % sides for C2 pedicle screw insertion (total score 2, 3, 4). A Management protocol is suggested on the basis of the grading system. Conclusion Inserting a transarticular screw was more frequently difficult as compared to pedicle screw. A new CT-based parameter (free facet area) and an efficient grading have been proposed to help surgeons choose the appropriate screw options, appreciate the complex anatomy of this region and compare data across various studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00586-014-3240-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524408351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1520340639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3ec36bcbb9a84193a8592cf68273380ef92dd6c75f9c1c5fe1f63818a36f62053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9rFTEQx4Mo9rX6B3iRBS9eVmfy6yXe5KFVKHip55DNm7Rbdjdrsmtt_3rzeFVEEDwNzHzmOwkfxl4gvEGA7dsCoIxuAWUruIT2_hHboBS8BSv4Y7YBW5t6i_aEnZZyA4DKgn7KTrhUWvCt2LDLXRrndaF9s6QxXWU_X9-1nS-1EQZfSh_74Jc-TU2Kjf_Rl-Y75YW67N814Tr1gQ6DEjLdNvPgA400Lc_Yk-iHQs8f6hn7-vHD5e5Te_Hl_PPu_UUbJKilFRSE7kLXWW8kWuGNsjxEberLhAGKlu_3OmxVtAGDioRRC4PGCx01ByXO2Otj7pzTt5XK4sa-BBoGP1Fai0PFpQQjFP4PCkKCFrair_5Cb9Kap_qRSqE1HBBNpfBIhZxKyRTdnPvR5zuH4A523NGOq3bcwY67rzsvH5LXbqT9741fOirAj0Cpo-mK8h-n_5n6E3rymb4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1519820118</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computed tomography-based classification of axis vertebra: choice of screw placement</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pruthi, Nupur ; Dawn, Rose ; Ravindranath, Yogitha ; Maiti, Tanmoy Kumar ; Ravindranath, Roopa ; Philip, Mariamma</creator><creatorcontrib>Pruthi, Nupur ; Dawn, Rose ; Ravindranath, Yogitha ; Maiti, Tanmoy Kumar ; Ravindranath, Roopa ; Philip, Mariamma</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The purpose of the study was to: (1) introduce a new CT-based parameter: free facet area and provide its normative data; (2) standardize the method of measuring isthmus width and height of the axis vertebra; (3) propose a new grading system to predict the difficulty in inserting transarticular and C2 pedicle screws. Methods Spiral CT scans of 47 adult dry axis vertebrae were studied. The methods of measuring isthmus width, isthmus height and free facet area are described. Results The mean isthmus width was 5.04 mm on the right side and 5.42 mm on the left side. The mean isthmus height was 5.21 mm on the right side and 5.45 mm on the left side. Mean free facet area was 61.23 % on the right side and 70.18 % on the left side. A novel grading system is proposed on the basis of these three parameters. As per this grading system, 40.4 % of the sides were found to be difficult for transarticular and 24.5 % sides for C2 pedicle screw insertion (total score 2, 3, 4). A Management protocol is suggested on the basis of the grading system. Conclusion Inserting a transarticular screw was more frequently difficult as compared to pedicle screw. A new CT-based parameter (free facet area) and an efficient grading have been proposed to help surgeons choose the appropriate screw options, appreciate the complex anatomy of this region and compare data across various studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-6719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3240-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24563273</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Axis, Cervical Vertebra - anatomy &amp; histology ; Axis, Cervical Vertebra - diagnostic imaging ; Female ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnostic imaging ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neurosurgery ; Original Article ; Pedicle Screws ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Tomography, Spiral Computed</subject><ispartof>European spine journal, 2014-05, Vol.23 (5), p.1084-1091</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3ec36bcbb9a84193a8592cf68273380ef92dd6c75f9c1c5fe1f63818a36f62053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3ec36bcbb9a84193a8592cf68273380ef92dd6c75f9c1c5fe1f63818a36f62053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24563273$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pruthi, Nupur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawn, Rose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravindranath, Yogitha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiti, Tanmoy Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravindranath, Roopa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philip, Mariamma</creatorcontrib><title>Computed tomography-based classification of axis vertebra: choice of screw placement</title><title>European spine journal</title><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><description>Purpose The purpose of the study was to: (1) introduce a new CT-based parameter: free facet area and provide its normative data; (2) standardize the method of measuring isthmus width and height of the axis vertebra; (3) propose a new grading system to predict the difficulty in inserting transarticular and C2 pedicle screws. Methods Spiral CT scans of 47 adult dry axis vertebrae were studied. The methods of measuring isthmus width, isthmus height and free facet area are described. Results The mean isthmus width was 5.04 mm on the right side and 5.42 mm on the left side. The mean isthmus height was 5.21 mm on the right side and 5.45 mm on the left side. Mean free facet area was 61.23 % on the right side and 70.18 % on the left side. A novel grading system is proposed on the basis of these three parameters. As per this grading system, 40.4 % of the sides were found to be difficult for transarticular and 24.5 % sides for C2 pedicle screw insertion (total score 2, 3, 4). A Management protocol is suggested on the basis of the grading system. Conclusion Inserting a transarticular screw was more frequently difficult as compared to pedicle screw. A new CT-based parameter (free facet area) and an efficient grading have been proposed to help surgeons choose the appropriate screw options, appreciate the complex anatomy of this region and compare data across various studies.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Axis, Cervical Vertebra - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Axis, Cervical Vertebra - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pedicle Screws</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Tomography, Spiral Computed</subject><issn>0940-6719</issn><issn>1432-0932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc9rFTEQx4Mo9rX6B3iRBS9eVmfy6yXe5KFVKHip55DNm7Rbdjdrsmtt_3rzeFVEEDwNzHzmOwkfxl4gvEGA7dsCoIxuAWUruIT2_hHboBS8BSv4Y7YBW5t6i_aEnZZyA4DKgn7KTrhUWvCt2LDLXRrndaF9s6QxXWU_X9-1nS-1EQZfSh_74Jc-TU2Kjf_Rl-Y75YW67N814Tr1gQ6DEjLdNvPgA400Lc_Yk-iHQs8f6hn7-vHD5e5Te_Hl_PPu_UUbJKilFRSE7kLXWW8kWuGNsjxEberLhAGKlu_3OmxVtAGDioRRC4PGCx01ByXO2Otj7pzTt5XK4sa-BBoGP1Fai0PFpQQjFP4PCkKCFrair_5Cb9Kap_qRSqE1HBBNpfBIhZxKyRTdnPvR5zuH4A523NGOq3bcwY67rzsvH5LXbqT9741fOirAj0Cpo-mK8h-n_5n6E3rymb4</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Pruthi, Nupur</creator><creator>Dawn, Rose</creator><creator>Ravindranath, Yogitha</creator><creator>Maiti, Tanmoy Kumar</creator><creator>Ravindranath, Roopa</creator><creator>Philip, Mariamma</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Computed tomography-based classification of axis vertebra: choice of screw placement</title><author>Pruthi, Nupur ; Dawn, Rose ; Ravindranath, Yogitha ; Maiti, Tanmoy Kumar ; Ravindranath, Roopa ; Philip, Mariamma</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3ec36bcbb9a84193a8592cf68273380ef92dd6c75f9c1c5fe1f63818a36f62053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Axis, Cervical Vertebra - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Axis, Cervical Vertebra - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pedicle Screws</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Tomography, Spiral Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pruthi, Nupur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawn, Rose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravindranath, Yogitha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiti, Tanmoy Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravindranath, Roopa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philip, Mariamma</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pruthi, Nupur</au><au>Dawn, Rose</au><au>Ravindranath, Yogitha</au><au>Maiti, Tanmoy Kumar</au><au>Ravindranath, Roopa</au><au>Philip, Mariamma</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computed tomography-based classification of axis vertebra: choice of screw placement</atitle><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle><stitle>Eur Spine J</stitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1084</spage><epage>1091</epage><pages>1084-1091</pages><issn>0940-6719</issn><eissn>1432-0932</eissn><abstract>Purpose The purpose of the study was to: (1) introduce a new CT-based parameter: free facet area and provide its normative data; (2) standardize the method of measuring isthmus width and height of the axis vertebra; (3) propose a new grading system to predict the difficulty in inserting transarticular and C2 pedicle screws. Methods Spiral CT scans of 47 adult dry axis vertebrae were studied. The methods of measuring isthmus width, isthmus height and free facet area are described. Results The mean isthmus width was 5.04 mm on the right side and 5.42 mm on the left side. The mean isthmus height was 5.21 mm on the right side and 5.45 mm on the left side. Mean free facet area was 61.23 % on the right side and 70.18 % on the left side. A novel grading system is proposed on the basis of these three parameters. As per this grading system, 40.4 % of the sides were found to be difficult for transarticular and 24.5 % sides for C2 pedicle screw insertion (total score 2, 3, 4). A Management protocol is suggested on the basis of the grading system. Conclusion Inserting a transarticular screw was more frequently difficult as compared to pedicle screw. A new CT-based parameter (free facet area) and an efficient grading have been proposed to help surgeons choose the appropriate screw options, appreciate the complex anatomy of this region and compare data across various studies.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>24563273</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00586-014-3240-z</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0940-6719
ispartof European spine journal, 2014-05, Vol.23 (5), p.1084-1091
issn 0940-6719
1432-0932
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524408351
source Springer Nature; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Axis, Cervical Vertebra - anatomy & histology
Axis, Cervical Vertebra - diagnostic imaging
Female
Humans
Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnostic imaging
Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neurosurgery
Original Article
Pedicle Screws
Surgical Orthopedics
Tomography, Spiral Computed
title Computed tomography-based classification of axis vertebra: choice of screw placement
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A10%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computed%20tomography-based%20classification%20of%20axis%20vertebra:%20choice%20of%20screw%20placement&rft.jtitle=European%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Pruthi,%20Nupur&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1084&rft.epage=1091&rft.pages=1084-1091&rft.issn=0940-6719&rft.eissn=1432-0932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00586-014-3240-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1520340639%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3ec36bcbb9a84193a8592cf68273380ef92dd6c75f9c1c5fe1f63818a36f62053%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1519820118&rft_id=info:pmid/24563273&rfr_iscdi=true