Loading…
Computed tomography-based classification of axis vertebra: choice of screw placement
Purpose The purpose of the study was to: (1) introduce a new CT-based parameter: free facet area and provide its normative data; (2) standardize the method of measuring isthmus width and height of the axis vertebra; (3) propose a new grading system to predict the difficulty in inserting transarticul...
Saved in:
Published in: | European spine journal 2014-05, Vol.23 (5), p.1084-1091 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3ec36bcbb9a84193a8592cf68273380ef92dd6c75f9c1c5fe1f63818a36f62053 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3ec36bcbb9a84193a8592cf68273380ef92dd6c75f9c1c5fe1f63818a36f62053 |
container_end_page | 1091 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1084 |
container_title | European spine journal |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Pruthi, Nupur Dawn, Rose Ravindranath, Yogitha Maiti, Tanmoy Kumar Ravindranath, Roopa Philip, Mariamma |
description | Purpose
The purpose of the study was to: (1) introduce a new CT-based parameter: free facet area and provide its normative data; (2) standardize the method of measuring isthmus width and height of the axis vertebra; (3) propose a new grading system to predict the difficulty in inserting transarticular and C2 pedicle screws.
Methods
Spiral CT scans of 47 adult dry axis vertebrae were studied. The methods of measuring isthmus width, isthmus height and free facet area are described.
Results
The mean isthmus width was 5.04 mm on the right side and 5.42 mm on the left side. The mean isthmus height was 5.21 mm on the right side and 5.45 mm on the left side. Mean free facet area was 61.23 % on the right side and 70.18 % on the left side. A novel grading system is proposed on the basis of these three parameters. As per this grading system, 40.4 % of the sides were found to be difficult for transarticular and 24.5 % sides for C2 pedicle screw insertion (total score 2, 3, 4). A Management protocol is suggested on the basis of the grading system.
Conclusion
Inserting a transarticular screw was more frequently difficult as compared to pedicle screw. A new CT-based parameter (free facet area) and an efficient grading have been proposed to help surgeons choose the appropriate screw options, appreciate the complex anatomy of this region and compare data across various studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00586-014-3240-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524408351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1520340639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3ec36bcbb9a84193a8592cf68273380ef92dd6c75f9c1c5fe1f63818a36f62053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9rFTEQx4Mo9rX6B3iRBS9eVmfy6yXe5KFVKHip55DNm7Rbdjdrsmtt_3rzeFVEEDwNzHzmOwkfxl4gvEGA7dsCoIxuAWUruIT2_hHboBS8BSv4Y7YBW5t6i_aEnZZyA4DKgn7KTrhUWvCt2LDLXRrndaF9s6QxXWU_X9-1nS-1EQZfSh_74Jc-TU2Kjf_Rl-Y75YW67N814Tr1gQ6DEjLdNvPgA400Lc_Yk-iHQs8f6hn7-vHD5e5Te_Hl_PPu_UUbJKilFRSE7kLXWW8kWuGNsjxEberLhAGKlu_3OmxVtAGDioRRC4PGCx01ByXO2Otj7pzTt5XK4sa-BBoGP1Fai0PFpQQjFP4PCkKCFrair_5Cb9Kap_qRSqE1HBBNpfBIhZxKyRTdnPvR5zuH4A523NGOq3bcwY67rzsvH5LXbqT9741fOirAj0Cpo-mK8h-n_5n6E3rymb4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1519820118</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computed tomography-based classification of axis vertebra: choice of screw placement</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pruthi, Nupur ; Dawn, Rose ; Ravindranath, Yogitha ; Maiti, Tanmoy Kumar ; Ravindranath, Roopa ; Philip, Mariamma</creator><creatorcontrib>Pruthi, Nupur ; Dawn, Rose ; Ravindranath, Yogitha ; Maiti, Tanmoy Kumar ; Ravindranath, Roopa ; Philip, Mariamma</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The purpose of the study was to: (1) introduce a new CT-based parameter: free facet area and provide its normative data; (2) standardize the method of measuring isthmus width and height of the axis vertebra; (3) propose a new grading system to predict the difficulty in inserting transarticular and C2 pedicle screws.
Methods
Spiral CT scans of 47 adult dry axis vertebrae were studied. The methods of measuring isthmus width, isthmus height and free facet area are described.
Results
The mean isthmus width was 5.04 mm on the right side and 5.42 mm on the left side. The mean isthmus height was 5.21 mm on the right side and 5.45 mm on the left side. Mean free facet area was 61.23 % on the right side and 70.18 % on the left side. A novel grading system is proposed on the basis of these three parameters. As per this grading system, 40.4 % of the sides were found to be difficult for transarticular and 24.5 % sides for C2 pedicle screw insertion (total score 2, 3, 4). A Management protocol is suggested on the basis of the grading system.
Conclusion
Inserting a transarticular screw was more frequently difficult as compared to pedicle screw. A new CT-based parameter (free facet area) and an efficient grading have been proposed to help surgeons choose the appropriate screw options, appreciate the complex anatomy of this region and compare data across various studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-6719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3240-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24563273</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Axis, Cervical Vertebra - anatomy & histology ; Axis, Cervical Vertebra - diagnostic imaging ; Female ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnostic imaging ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neurosurgery ; Original Article ; Pedicle Screws ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Tomography, Spiral Computed</subject><ispartof>European spine journal, 2014-05, Vol.23 (5), p.1084-1091</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3ec36bcbb9a84193a8592cf68273380ef92dd6c75f9c1c5fe1f63818a36f62053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3ec36bcbb9a84193a8592cf68273380ef92dd6c75f9c1c5fe1f63818a36f62053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24563273$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pruthi, Nupur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawn, Rose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravindranath, Yogitha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiti, Tanmoy Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravindranath, Roopa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philip, Mariamma</creatorcontrib><title>Computed tomography-based classification of axis vertebra: choice of screw placement</title><title>European spine journal</title><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><description>Purpose
The purpose of the study was to: (1) introduce a new CT-based parameter: free facet area and provide its normative data; (2) standardize the method of measuring isthmus width and height of the axis vertebra; (3) propose a new grading system to predict the difficulty in inserting transarticular and C2 pedicle screws.
Methods
Spiral CT scans of 47 adult dry axis vertebrae were studied. The methods of measuring isthmus width, isthmus height and free facet area are described.
Results
The mean isthmus width was 5.04 mm on the right side and 5.42 mm on the left side. The mean isthmus height was 5.21 mm on the right side and 5.45 mm on the left side. Mean free facet area was 61.23 % on the right side and 70.18 % on the left side. A novel grading system is proposed on the basis of these three parameters. As per this grading system, 40.4 % of the sides were found to be difficult for transarticular and 24.5 % sides for C2 pedicle screw insertion (total score 2, 3, 4). A Management protocol is suggested on the basis of the grading system.
Conclusion
Inserting a transarticular screw was more frequently difficult as compared to pedicle screw. A new CT-based parameter (free facet area) and an efficient grading have been proposed to help surgeons choose the appropriate screw options, appreciate the complex anatomy of this region and compare data across various studies.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Axis, Cervical Vertebra - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Axis, Cervical Vertebra - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pedicle Screws</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Tomography, Spiral Computed</subject><issn>0940-6719</issn><issn>1432-0932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc9rFTEQx4Mo9rX6B3iRBS9eVmfy6yXe5KFVKHip55DNm7Rbdjdrsmtt_3rzeFVEEDwNzHzmOwkfxl4gvEGA7dsCoIxuAWUruIT2_hHboBS8BSv4Y7YBW5t6i_aEnZZyA4DKgn7KTrhUWvCt2LDLXRrndaF9s6QxXWU_X9-1nS-1EQZfSh_74Jc-TU2Kjf_Rl-Y75YW67N814Tr1gQ6DEjLdNvPgA400Lc_Yk-iHQs8f6hn7-vHD5e5Te_Hl_PPu_UUbJKilFRSE7kLXWW8kWuGNsjxEberLhAGKlu_3OmxVtAGDioRRC4PGCx01ByXO2Otj7pzTt5XK4sa-BBoGP1Fai0PFpQQjFP4PCkKCFrair_5Cb9Kap_qRSqE1HBBNpfBIhZxKyRTdnPvR5zuH4A523NGOq3bcwY67rzsvH5LXbqT9741fOirAj0Cpo-mK8h-n_5n6E3rymb4</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Pruthi, Nupur</creator><creator>Dawn, Rose</creator><creator>Ravindranath, Yogitha</creator><creator>Maiti, Tanmoy Kumar</creator><creator>Ravindranath, Roopa</creator><creator>Philip, Mariamma</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Computed tomography-based classification of axis vertebra: choice of screw placement</title><author>Pruthi, Nupur ; Dawn, Rose ; Ravindranath, Yogitha ; Maiti, Tanmoy Kumar ; Ravindranath, Roopa ; Philip, Mariamma</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3ec36bcbb9a84193a8592cf68273380ef92dd6c75f9c1c5fe1f63818a36f62053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Axis, Cervical Vertebra - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Axis, Cervical Vertebra - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pedicle Screws</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Tomography, Spiral Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pruthi, Nupur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawn, Rose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravindranath, Yogitha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiti, Tanmoy Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravindranath, Roopa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philip, Mariamma</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pruthi, Nupur</au><au>Dawn, Rose</au><au>Ravindranath, Yogitha</au><au>Maiti, Tanmoy Kumar</au><au>Ravindranath, Roopa</au><au>Philip, Mariamma</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computed tomography-based classification of axis vertebra: choice of screw placement</atitle><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle><stitle>Eur Spine J</stitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1084</spage><epage>1091</epage><pages>1084-1091</pages><issn>0940-6719</issn><eissn>1432-0932</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The purpose of the study was to: (1) introduce a new CT-based parameter: free facet area and provide its normative data; (2) standardize the method of measuring isthmus width and height of the axis vertebra; (3) propose a new grading system to predict the difficulty in inserting transarticular and C2 pedicle screws.
Methods
Spiral CT scans of 47 adult dry axis vertebrae were studied. The methods of measuring isthmus width, isthmus height and free facet area are described.
Results
The mean isthmus width was 5.04 mm on the right side and 5.42 mm on the left side. The mean isthmus height was 5.21 mm on the right side and 5.45 mm on the left side. Mean free facet area was 61.23 % on the right side and 70.18 % on the left side. A novel grading system is proposed on the basis of these three parameters. As per this grading system, 40.4 % of the sides were found to be difficult for transarticular and 24.5 % sides for C2 pedicle screw insertion (total score 2, 3, 4). A Management protocol is suggested on the basis of the grading system.
Conclusion
Inserting a transarticular screw was more frequently difficult as compared to pedicle screw. A new CT-based parameter (free facet area) and an efficient grading have been proposed to help surgeons choose the appropriate screw options, appreciate the complex anatomy of this region and compare data across various studies.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>24563273</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00586-014-3240-z</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0940-6719 |
ispartof | European spine journal, 2014-05, Vol.23 (5), p.1084-1091 |
issn | 0940-6719 1432-0932 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524408351 |
source | Springer Nature; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Axis, Cervical Vertebra - anatomy & histology Axis, Cervical Vertebra - diagnostic imaging Female Humans Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnostic imaging Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neurosurgery Original Article Pedicle Screws Surgical Orthopedics Tomography, Spiral Computed |
title | Computed tomography-based classification of axis vertebra: choice of screw placement |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A10%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computed%20tomography-based%20classification%20of%20axis%20vertebra:%20choice%20of%20screw%20placement&rft.jtitle=European%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Pruthi,%20Nupur&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1084&rft.epage=1091&rft.pages=1084-1091&rft.issn=0940-6719&rft.eissn=1432-0932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00586-014-3240-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1520340639%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3ec36bcbb9a84193a8592cf68273380ef92dd6c75f9c1c5fe1f63818a36f62053%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1519820118&rft_id=info:pmid/24563273&rfr_iscdi=true |