Loading…

Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gingival dimensions

Aim The aim of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to compare the clinical performance of the tunnel technique with subepithelial connective tissue graft (TUN) versus a coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative (CAF) in the treatment of gingival recession defects. The use of innovat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical periodontology 2014-06, Vol.41 (6), p.593-603
Main Authors: Rebele, Stephan F., Zuhr, Otto, Schneider, David, Jung, Ronny E., Hürzeler, Markus B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim The aim of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to compare the clinical performance of the tunnel technique with subepithelial connective tissue graft (TUN) versus a coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative (CAF) in the treatment of gingival recession defects. The use of innovative 3D digital measuring methods allowed to study healing dynamics at connective tissue (CT)‐grafted sites and to evaluate the influence of the thickness of the root covering soft tissues on the outcome of surgical root coverage. Material & Methods Twenty‐four patients contributed a total of 47 Miller class I or II recessions for scientific evaluation. Precise study models collected at baseline and follow‐up examinations were optically scanned and virtually superimposed for digital evaluation of clinical outcome measures including mean marginal soft tissue thickness (THK). Healing dynamics were measured in a defined region of interest at CT‐grafted sites where volume differences between time points were calculated. Results At 12 months, recession reduction as well as mean root coverage were significantly better at CT‐grafted sites treated in the TUN group (1.94 mm and 98.4% respectively) compared to the non‐augmented sites of the CAF group (1.17 mm and 71.8% respectively) and statistical analysis revealed a positive correlation of THK (1.63 mm TUN versus 0.91 mm CAF, p 
ISSN:0303-6979
1600-051X
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.12254