Loading…
Validity of the Oral Behaviours Checklist: correlations between OBC scores and intensity of facial pain
Summary The first purpose of this study was to translate the Oral Behaviours Checklist (OBC) into Dutch and to examine its psychometric properties. The second purpose was to examine the correlations between scores on the OBC and facial pain, while controlling for the possible confounding effects of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of oral rehabilitation 2014-02, Vol.41 (2), p.115-121 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3674-343a491214d7953541241eb21945580d7b2f99c935b0694787b429a4e44b7f633 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3674-343a491214d7953541241eb21945580d7b2f99c935b0694787b429a4e44b7f633 |
container_end_page | 121 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 115 |
container_title | Journal of oral rehabilitation |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | van der Meulen, M. J. Lobbezoo, F. Aartman, I. H. A. Naeije, M. |
description | Summary
The first purpose of this study was to translate the Oral Behaviours Checklist (OBC) into Dutch and to examine its psychometric properties. The second purpose was to examine the correlations between scores on the OBC and facial pain, while controlling for the possible confounding effects of psychosocial factors, such as stress, depression, somatisation and anxiety. The OBC was translated, following the international RDC/TMD consortium guidelines. Its psychometric properties were examined by assessing the test–retest reliability and concurrent validity [correlations between the OBC and the previously developed Oral Parafunctions Questionnaire (OPQ)]. Participants were 155 patients with TMD (77% female; mean age and s.d. = 43·6 and 14·4 years). The translation of the OBC into Dutch proceeded satisfactorily. The psychometric properties of the Dutch OBC were good; test–retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0·86, P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/joor.12114 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1525767942</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1525767942</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3674-343a491214d7953541241eb21945580d7b2f99c935b0694787b429a4e44b7f633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQQC0Eokvhwg9APqJKKf4YxzE3uqILtBCpKpSb5SQT1m02XuwsZf89bnfbI7744DdPnkfIa86OeT7vrkOIx1xwDk_IjMtSFaIC8ZTMmGSq4JX4eUBepHTNGKuk0s_JgQChQVVsRn79cIPv_LSloafTEmkd3UBPcOn--LCJic6X2N4MPk3vaRtixMFNPoyJNjjdIo60PpnTlF8wUTd21I8Tjmnv613rs23t_PiSPOvdkPDV_j4k308_Xs4_Fef14vP8w3nRylJDIUE6MHkX6LRRUgEXwLER3IDK_-10I3pjWiNVw0oDutINCOMAARrdl1Iekrc77zqG3xtMk1351OIwuBHDJlmuhNKlNiAyerRD2xhSitjbdfQrF7eWM3sX1t6FtfdhM_xm7900K-we0YeSGeA74NYPuP2Pyn6p64sHabGbyXnx7-OMize21FIre_VtYeHr1ULC2alV8h_6_ZDY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1525767942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity of the Oral Behaviours Checklist: correlations between OBC scores and intensity of facial pain</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>van der Meulen, M. J. ; Lobbezoo, F. ; Aartman, I. H. A. ; Naeije, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>van der Meulen, M. J. ; Lobbezoo, F. ; Aartman, I. H. A. ; Naeije, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
The first purpose of this study was to translate the Oral Behaviours Checklist (OBC) into Dutch and to examine its psychometric properties. The second purpose was to examine the correlations between scores on the OBC and facial pain, while controlling for the possible confounding effects of psychosocial factors, such as stress, depression, somatisation and anxiety. The OBC was translated, following the international RDC/TMD consortium guidelines. Its psychometric properties were examined by assessing the test–retest reliability and concurrent validity [correlations between the OBC and the previously developed Oral Parafunctions Questionnaire (OPQ)]. Participants were 155 patients with TMD (77% female; mean age and s.d. = 43·6 and 14·4 years). The translation of the OBC into Dutch proceeded satisfactorily. The psychometric properties of the Dutch OBC were good; test–retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0·86, P < 0·001). Concurrent validity was good: the correlation between the OBC and OPQ was high (r = 0·757, P < 0·001), while the correlations between individual items ranged from 0·389 to 0·892 (P < 0·001). Similar to previous Dutch studies using the OPQ, no significant correlation was found between oral parafunctions and facial pain (r = 0·069, P = 0·892). No significant correlations could be found between oral parafunctional behaviours and facial pain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-182X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2842</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/joor.12114</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24274580</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Checklist - standards ; Dentistry ; facial pain ; Facial Pain - psychology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Oral Behaviours Checklist ; oral parafunctions ; Psychometrics - methods ; Psychometrics - standards ; psychosocial factors ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; temporomandibular disorders</subject><ispartof>Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2014-02, Vol.41 (2), p.115-121</ispartof><rights>2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3674-343a491214d7953541241eb21945580d7b2f99c935b0694787b429a4e44b7f633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3674-343a491214d7953541241eb21945580d7b2f99c935b0694787b429a4e44b7f633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24274580$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van der Meulen, M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobbezoo, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aartman, I. H. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naeije, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Validity of the Oral Behaviours Checklist: correlations between OBC scores and intensity of facial pain</title><title>Journal of oral rehabilitation</title><addtitle>J Oral Rehabil</addtitle><description>Summary
The first purpose of this study was to translate the Oral Behaviours Checklist (OBC) into Dutch and to examine its psychometric properties. The second purpose was to examine the correlations between scores on the OBC and facial pain, while controlling for the possible confounding effects of psychosocial factors, such as stress, depression, somatisation and anxiety. The OBC was translated, following the international RDC/TMD consortium guidelines. Its psychometric properties were examined by assessing the test–retest reliability and concurrent validity [correlations between the OBC and the previously developed Oral Parafunctions Questionnaire (OPQ)]. Participants were 155 patients with TMD (77% female; mean age and s.d. = 43·6 and 14·4 years). The translation of the OBC into Dutch proceeded satisfactorily. The psychometric properties of the Dutch OBC were good; test–retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0·86, P < 0·001). Concurrent validity was good: the correlation between the OBC and OPQ was high (r = 0·757, P < 0·001), while the correlations between individual items ranged from 0·389 to 0·892 (P < 0·001). Similar to previous Dutch studies using the OPQ, no significant correlation was found between oral parafunctions and facial pain (r = 0·069, P = 0·892). No significant correlations could be found between oral parafunctional behaviours and facial pain.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Checklist - standards</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>facial pain</subject><subject>Facial Pain - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oral Behaviours Checklist</subject><subject>oral parafunctions</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Psychometrics - standards</subject><subject>psychosocial factors</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>temporomandibular disorders</subject><issn>0305-182X</issn><issn>1365-2842</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQQC0Eokvhwg9APqJKKf4YxzE3uqILtBCpKpSb5SQT1m02XuwsZf89bnfbI7744DdPnkfIa86OeT7vrkOIx1xwDk_IjMtSFaIC8ZTMmGSq4JX4eUBepHTNGKuk0s_JgQChQVVsRn79cIPv_LSloafTEmkd3UBPcOn--LCJic6X2N4MPk3vaRtixMFNPoyJNjjdIo60PpnTlF8wUTd21I8Tjmnv613rs23t_PiSPOvdkPDV_j4k308_Xs4_Fef14vP8w3nRylJDIUE6MHkX6LRRUgEXwLER3IDK_-10I3pjWiNVw0oDutINCOMAARrdl1Iekrc77zqG3xtMk1351OIwuBHDJlmuhNKlNiAyerRD2xhSitjbdfQrF7eWM3sX1t6FtfdhM_xm7900K-we0YeSGeA74NYPuP2Pyn6p64sHabGbyXnx7-OMize21FIre_VtYeHr1ULC2alV8h_6_ZDY</recordid><startdate>201402</startdate><enddate>201402</enddate><creator>van der Meulen, M. J.</creator><creator>Lobbezoo, F.</creator><creator>Aartman, I. H. A.</creator><creator>Naeije, M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201402</creationdate><title>Validity of the Oral Behaviours Checklist: correlations between OBC scores and intensity of facial pain</title><author>van der Meulen, M. J. ; Lobbezoo, F. ; Aartman, I. H. A. ; Naeije, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3674-343a491214d7953541241eb21945580d7b2f99c935b0694787b429a4e44b7f633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Checklist - standards</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>facial pain</topic><topic>Facial Pain - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oral Behaviours Checklist</topic><topic>oral parafunctions</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Psychometrics - standards</topic><topic>psychosocial factors</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>temporomandibular disorders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van der Meulen, M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobbezoo, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aartman, I. H. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naeije, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of oral rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van der Meulen, M. J.</au><au>Lobbezoo, F.</au><au>Aartman, I. H. A.</au><au>Naeije, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity of the Oral Behaviours Checklist: correlations between OBC scores and intensity of facial pain</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oral rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>J Oral Rehabil</addtitle><date>2014-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>121</epage><pages>115-121</pages><issn>0305-182X</issn><eissn>1365-2842</eissn><abstract>Summary
The first purpose of this study was to translate the Oral Behaviours Checklist (OBC) into Dutch and to examine its psychometric properties. The second purpose was to examine the correlations between scores on the OBC and facial pain, while controlling for the possible confounding effects of psychosocial factors, such as stress, depression, somatisation and anxiety. The OBC was translated, following the international RDC/TMD consortium guidelines. Its psychometric properties were examined by assessing the test–retest reliability and concurrent validity [correlations between the OBC and the previously developed Oral Parafunctions Questionnaire (OPQ)]. Participants were 155 patients with TMD (77% female; mean age and s.d. = 43·6 and 14·4 years). The translation of the OBC into Dutch proceeded satisfactorily. The psychometric properties of the Dutch OBC were good; test–retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0·86, P < 0·001). Concurrent validity was good: the correlation between the OBC and OPQ was high (r = 0·757, P < 0·001), while the correlations between individual items ranged from 0·389 to 0·892 (P < 0·001). Similar to previous Dutch studies using the OPQ, no significant correlation was found between oral parafunctions and facial pain (r = 0·069, P = 0·892). No significant correlations could be found between oral parafunctional behaviours and facial pain.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24274580</pmid><doi>10.1111/joor.12114</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-182X |
ispartof | Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2014-02, Vol.41 (2), p.115-121 |
issn | 0305-182X 1365-2842 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1525767942 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Adult Checklist - standards Dentistry facial pain Facial Pain - psychology Female Humans Male Middle Aged Oral Behaviours Checklist oral parafunctions Psychometrics - methods Psychometrics - standards psychosocial factors Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires temporomandibular disorders |
title | Validity of the Oral Behaviours Checklist: correlations between OBC scores and intensity of facial pain |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T23%3A09%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20of%20the%20Oral%20Behaviours%20Checklist:%20correlations%20between%20OBC%20scores%20and%20intensity%20of%20facial%20pain&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oral%20rehabilitation&rft.au=van%20der%20Meulen,%20M.%20J.&rft.date=2014-02&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=121&rft.pages=115-121&rft.issn=0305-182X&rft.eissn=1365-2842&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/joor.12114&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1525767942%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3674-343a491214d7953541241eb21945580d7b2f99c935b0694787b429a4e44b7f633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1525767942&rft_id=info:pmid/24274580&rfr_iscdi=true |