Effects of Food Availability and Predation on Prairie Vole Demography: A Field Experiment

• Published in: Ecology (Durham) 1989-04, Vol.70 (2), p.411-421
• Main Authors: Desy, Elizabeth A., Batzli, George O.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal and plant ecology; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Animals; Biological and medical sciences; Demecology; Ecology; Food availability; Food security; Food supply; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Population density; Population dynamics; Population ecology; Predation; Predators; Rodents; Vertebrata; Voles
• ISSN: 0012-9658; 1939-9170
• DOI: 10.2307/1937546

Nutrition, spacing behavior, and predation have been proposed as major factors limiting the population density of microtine rodents (lemmings and voles). However, there is no general agreement as to the relative importance of these factors, nor have their interactions been carefully examined. This paper reports on a factorial experiment designed to test the general hypothesis that predation and the availability of high—quality food act simultaneously and additively to limit densities of microtine rodent populations. Our results showed that supplemental high—quality food significantly increased body growth rates, proportion of adults in the population, adult male body size, reproductive activity, recruitment, and density of prairie vole populations. Food availability had no effect on survival nor on sex ratio in any of the 3 yr of this study. Protection from predation significantly increased adult survival (somewhat sporadically), recruitment, and density, but it did not directly affect growth, population structure, or reproduction. Improved survival of young animals could not be detected, but increased recruitment suggested that it may have occurred, perhaps before the young reached trappable size. Food supplementation and protection from predation generally had additive and equal effects on density. The only significant food—predator interactions were for body growth rates and adult body size. The presence of predators appeared to inhibit the growth response to supplemental food, possibly because of more restricted movement and, therefore, less access to food.