Loading…

Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X-ray microtomography: A review

Easier access to X‐ray microtomography (μCT) facilities has provided much new insight from high‐resolution imaging for various problems in porous media research. Pore space analysis with respect to functional properties usually requires segmentation of the intensity data into different classes. Imag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water resources research 2014-04, Vol.50 (4), p.3615-3639
Main Authors: Schlüter, Steffen, Sheppard, Adrian, Brown, Kendra, Wildenschild, Dorthe
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4719-15490215cf8eaa3adc9f6fbb005698b97e606f48528968ccf3e1fdc59eb704f53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4719-15490215cf8eaa3adc9f6fbb005698b97e606f48528968ccf3e1fdc59eb704f53
container_end_page 3639
container_issue 4
container_start_page 3615
container_title Water resources research
container_volume 50
creator Schlüter, Steffen
Sheppard, Adrian
Brown, Kendra
Wildenschild, Dorthe
description Easier access to X‐ray microtomography (μCT) facilities has provided much new insight from high‐resolution imaging for various problems in porous media research. Pore space analysis with respect to functional properties usually requires segmentation of the intensity data into different classes. Image segmentation is a nontrivial problem that may have a profound impact on all subsequent image analyses. This review deals with two issues that are neglected in most of the recent studies on image segmentation: (i) focus on multiclass segmentation and (ii) detailed descriptions as to why a specific method may fail together with strategies for preventing the failure by applying suitable image enhancement prior to segmentation. In this way, the presented algorithms become very robust and are less prone to operator bias. Three different test images are examined: a synthetic image with ground‐truth information, a synchrotron image of precision beads with three different fluids residing in the pore space, and a μCT image of a soil sample containing macropores, rocks, organic matter, and the soil matrix. Image blur is identified as the major cause for poor segmentation results. Other impairments of the raw data like noise, ring artifacts, and intensity variation can be removed with current image enhancement methods. Bayesian Markov random field segmentation, watershed segmentation, and converging active contours are well suited for multiclass segmentation, yet with different success to correct for partial volume effects and conserve small image features simultaneously. Key Points First survey of image processing methods for multiphase fluid images A novel protocol is suitable for various types of porous media Many routines come with a freely available open‐source library
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2014WR015256
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1529944618</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3545619211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4719-15490215cf8eaa3adc9f6fbb005698b97e606f48528968ccf3e1fdc59eb704f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEuVx4wdY4sKBgB2_Ym6oPFqEQKpA5WY56boYkqbYaaH_HqMihDhw2sN-szszCB1QckIJyU9zQvl4RKjIhdxAPao5z5RWbBP1COEso0yrbbQT4wtJpJCqh0bDxk4Bz0NbQYx-NsWtw82i7vz82UbA_msdcVt21s9ggpfe4qcs2BVufBXarm3aabDz59UZPscBlh7e99CWs3WE_e-5ix6vLh_6g-z2_nrYP7_NLFdUZ1RwTXIqKleAtcxOKu2kK0tChNRFqRVIIh0vRF5oWVSVY0DdpBIaSkW4E2wXHa3vJvNvC4idaXysoK7tDNpFNKkGnRqQtEjo4R_0pV2EWXJnqOQ5kekDT9TxmkrBYgzgzDyk_GFlKDFfBZvfBSecrfF3X8PqX9aMR_1RTgqpkypbq3zs4ONHZcOrkYopYcZ31-biZnxT5Gpg7tgnlvGK0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1642069684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X-ray microtomography: A review</title><source>Wiley Online Library AGU 2017</source><creator>Schlüter, Steffen ; Sheppard, Adrian ; Brown, Kendra ; Wildenschild, Dorthe</creator><creatorcontrib>Schlüter, Steffen ; Sheppard, Adrian ; Brown, Kendra ; Wildenschild, Dorthe</creatorcontrib><description>Easier access to X‐ray microtomography (μCT) facilities has provided much new insight from high‐resolution imaging for various problems in porous media research. Pore space analysis with respect to functional properties usually requires segmentation of the intensity data into different classes. Image segmentation is a nontrivial problem that may have a profound impact on all subsequent image analyses. This review deals with two issues that are neglected in most of the recent studies on image segmentation: (i) focus on multiclass segmentation and (ii) detailed descriptions as to why a specific method may fail together with strategies for preventing the failure by applying suitable image enhancement prior to segmentation. In this way, the presented algorithms become very robust and are less prone to operator bias. Three different test images are examined: a synthetic image with ground‐truth information, a synchrotron image of precision beads with three different fluids residing in the pore space, and a μCT image of a soil sample containing macropores, rocks, organic matter, and the soil matrix. Image blur is identified as the major cause for poor segmentation results. Other impairments of the raw data like noise, ring artifacts, and intensity variation can be removed with current image enhancement methods. Bayesian Markov random field segmentation, watershed segmentation, and converging active contours are well suited for multiclass segmentation, yet with different success to correct for partial volume effects and conserve small image features simultaneously. Key Points First survey of image processing methods for multiphase fluid images A novel protocol is suitable for various types of porous media Many routines come with a freely available open‐source library</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2014WR015256</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>image processing ; multiphase flow ; Organic matter ; Porous media ; segmentation ; soil structure ; structure analysis ; X-ray tomography</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2014-04, Vol.50 (4), p.3615-3639</ispartof><rights>2014. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4719-15490215cf8eaa3adc9f6fbb005698b97e606f48528968ccf3e1fdc59eb704f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4719-15490215cf8eaa3adc9f6fbb005698b97e606f48528968ccf3e1fdc59eb704f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2014WR015256$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2014WR015256$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11513,27923,27924,46467,46891</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schlüter, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheppard, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Kendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wildenschild, Dorthe</creatorcontrib><title>Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X-ray microtomography: A review</title><title>Water resources research</title><addtitle>Water Resour. Res</addtitle><description>Easier access to X‐ray microtomography (μCT) facilities has provided much new insight from high‐resolution imaging for various problems in porous media research. Pore space analysis with respect to functional properties usually requires segmentation of the intensity data into different classes. Image segmentation is a nontrivial problem that may have a profound impact on all subsequent image analyses. This review deals with two issues that are neglected in most of the recent studies on image segmentation: (i) focus on multiclass segmentation and (ii) detailed descriptions as to why a specific method may fail together with strategies for preventing the failure by applying suitable image enhancement prior to segmentation. In this way, the presented algorithms become very robust and are less prone to operator bias. Three different test images are examined: a synthetic image with ground‐truth information, a synchrotron image of precision beads with three different fluids residing in the pore space, and a μCT image of a soil sample containing macropores, rocks, organic matter, and the soil matrix. Image blur is identified as the major cause for poor segmentation results. Other impairments of the raw data like noise, ring artifacts, and intensity variation can be removed with current image enhancement methods. Bayesian Markov random field segmentation, watershed segmentation, and converging active contours are well suited for multiclass segmentation, yet with different success to correct for partial volume effects and conserve small image features simultaneously. Key Points First survey of image processing methods for multiphase fluid images A novel protocol is suitable for various types of porous media Many routines come with a freely available open‐source library</description><subject>image processing</subject><subject>multiphase flow</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Porous media</subject><subject>segmentation</subject><subject>soil structure</subject><subject>structure analysis</subject><subject>X-ray tomography</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEuVx4wdY4sKBgB2_Ym6oPFqEQKpA5WY56boYkqbYaaH_HqMihDhw2sN-szszCB1QckIJyU9zQvl4RKjIhdxAPao5z5RWbBP1COEso0yrbbQT4wtJpJCqh0bDxk4Bz0NbQYx-NsWtw82i7vz82UbA_msdcVt21s9ggpfe4qcs2BVufBXarm3aabDz59UZPscBlh7e99CWs3WE_e-5ix6vLh_6g-z2_nrYP7_NLFdUZ1RwTXIqKleAtcxOKu2kK0tChNRFqRVIIh0vRF5oWVSVY0DdpBIaSkW4E2wXHa3vJvNvC4idaXysoK7tDNpFNKkGnRqQtEjo4R_0pV2EWXJnqOQ5kekDT9TxmkrBYgzgzDyk_GFlKDFfBZvfBSecrfF3X8PqX9aMR_1RTgqpkypbq3zs4ONHZcOrkYopYcZ31-biZnxT5Gpg7tgnlvGK0w</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>Schlüter, Steffen</creator><creator>Sheppard, Adrian</creator><creator>Brown, Kendra</creator><creator>Wildenschild, Dorthe</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X-ray microtomography: A review</title><author>Schlüter, Steffen ; Sheppard, Adrian ; Brown, Kendra ; Wildenschild, Dorthe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4719-15490215cf8eaa3adc9f6fbb005698b97e606f48528968ccf3e1fdc59eb704f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>image processing</topic><topic>multiphase flow</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Porous media</topic><topic>segmentation</topic><topic>soil structure</topic><topic>structure analysis</topic><topic>X-ray tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schlüter, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheppard, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Kendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wildenschild, Dorthe</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schlüter, Steffen</au><au>Sheppard, Adrian</au><au>Brown, Kendra</au><au>Wildenschild, Dorthe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X-ray microtomography: A review</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><addtitle>Water Resour. Res</addtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>3615</spage><epage>3639</epage><pages>3615-3639</pages><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>Easier access to X‐ray microtomography (μCT) facilities has provided much new insight from high‐resolution imaging for various problems in porous media research. Pore space analysis with respect to functional properties usually requires segmentation of the intensity data into different classes. Image segmentation is a nontrivial problem that may have a profound impact on all subsequent image analyses. This review deals with two issues that are neglected in most of the recent studies on image segmentation: (i) focus on multiclass segmentation and (ii) detailed descriptions as to why a specific method may fail together with strategies for preventing the failure by applying suitable image enhancement prior to segmentation. In this way, the presented algorithms become very robust and are less prone to operator bias. Three different test images are examined: a synthetic image with ground‐truth information, a synchrotron image of precision beads with three different fluids residing in the pore space, and a μCT image of a soil sample containing macropores, rocks, organic matter, and the soil matrix. Image blur is identified as the major cause for poor segmentation results. Other impairments of the raw data like noise, ring artifacts, and intensity variation can be removed with current image enhancement methods. Bayesian Markov random field segmentation, watershed segmentation, and converging active contours are well suited for multiclass segmentation, yet with different success to correct for partial volume effects and conserve small image features simultaneously. Key Points First survey of image processing methods for multiphase fluid images A novel protocol is suitable for various types of porous media Many routines come with a freely available open‐source library</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2014WR015256</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1397
ispartof Water resources research, 2014-04, Vol.50 (4), p.3615-3639
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1529944618
source Wiley Online Library AGU 2017
subjects image processing
multiphase flow
Organic matter
Porous media
segmentation
soil structure
structure analysis
X-ray tomography
title Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X-ray microtomography: A review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T21%3A14%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Image%20processing%20of%20multiphase%20images%20obtained%20via%20X-ray%20microtomography:%20A%20review&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Schl%C3%BCter,%20Steffen&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=3615&rft.epage=3639&rft.pages=3615-3639&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2014WR015256&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3545619211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4719-15490215cf8eaa3adc9f6fbb005698b97e606f48528968ccf3e1fdc59eb704f53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1642069684&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true