Loading…

Right-hemisphere superiority for discriminating memorized from nonmemorized faces: Affective imagery, sex, and perceived emotionality effects

Sixty-four subjects, divided into four groups according to sex and type of memorization instruction, were given a manual RT task requiring discrimination of two memorized from two nonmemorized faces. Two types of memorization were employed, one emphasizing highly negative affective imagery about the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brain and language 1981, Vol.12 (2), p.246-260
Main Authors: McKeever, Walter F., Dixon, Michael S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-30d2a04da0803309dfa4de2ed6eb874b1ba7a82b3917ef21fb734e1a543ac2d13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-30d2a04da0803309dfa4de2ed6eb874b1ba7a82b3917ef21fb734e1a543ac2d13
container_end_page 260
container_issue 2
container_start_page 246
container_title Brain and language
container_volume 12
creator McKeever, Walter F.
Dixon, Michael S.
description Sixty-four subjects, divided into four groups according to sex and type of memorization instruction, were given a manual RT task requiring discrimination of two memorized from two nonmemorized faces. Two types of memorization were employed, one emphasizing highly negative affective imagery about the faces being memorized (extreme sadness), the other relatively neutral imagery (feeling composed). Females in the affective imagery group were predicted to show left-visual-field superiority (LVFS), while females employing neutral imagery were not. Males were predicted to show LVFS regardless of imagery type because of their presumed strong right-hemispheric dominance for visual-spatial functions. Predictions were accurate for females; neither group of males showed significant LVFS. Post-experimental semantic differential ratings of the emotionality of the memorized faces showed that LVFS existed for faces rated as emotional, but not for faces rated as nonemotional. This effect was common to the sexes. Results indicate that right-hemispheric memory storage of faces can be induced in females through affective imagery and in both sexes via idiosyncratically perceived emotionality in the face stimuli. This effect of affectivity cannot be attributed to visual-spatial dominannce of the right hemisphere.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0093-934X(81)90017-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15338284</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0093934X81900171</els_id><sourcerecordid>1295068485</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-30d2a04da0803309dfa4de2ed6eb874b1ba7a82b3917ef21fb734e1a543ac2d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kdFqFDEUhoNUcFt9Ay8CQrGwozlJZifTi0JZ2ioUBFHwLmSSk92UncmazBbXd-g7m-kWKV54FTjn-_-c8x9C3gL7AAwWHxlrRdUK-eO9grOWMWgqeEFmwFpWcajrIzL7i7wixznfFQakghl5-BpW67FaYx_ydo0Jad5tMYWYwrinPibqQrYp9GEwYxhWtMe-9H6joz7Fng5xeFYxFvM5vfQe7RjukYberDDt5zTjrzk1g6PF22JpOVpUY4iD2Uwf4aMkvyYvvdlkfPP0npDv11fflp-q2y83n5eXt5XljRorwRw3TDrDFBOCtc4b6ZCjW2CnGtlBZxqjeCdaaNBz8F0jJIKppTCWOxAn5PTgu03x5w7zqMv6FjcbM2DcZQ21EIorWcB3_4B3cZfK0IXhbc0WSqq6UPJA2RRzTuj1tiRm0l4D09OF9BS_nuLXCvTjhfQ0xcVBhmXV-4BJZxtwsOhCKmloF8P_Df4Aj9ubqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1295068485</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Right-hemisphere superiority for discriminating memorized from nonmemorized faces: Affective imagery, sex, and perceived emotionality effects</title><source>ScienceDirect: Social Science Backfile</source><creator>McKeever, Walter F. ; Dixon, Michael S.</creator><creatorcontrib>McKeever, Walter F. ; Dixon, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><description>Sixty-four subjects, divided into four groups according to sex and type of memorization instruction, were given a manual RT task requiring discrimination of two memorized from two nonmemorized faces. Two types of memorization were employed, one emphasizing highly negative affective imagery about the faces being memorized (extreme sadness), the other relatively neutral imagery (feeling composed). Females in the affective imagery group were predicted to show left-visual-field superiority (LVFS), while females employing neutral imagery were not. Males were predicted to show LVFS regardless of imagery type because of their presumed strong right-hemispheric dominance for visual-spatial functions. Predictions were accurate for females; neither group of males showed significant LVFS. Post-experimental semantic differential ratings of the emotionality of the memorized faces showed that LVFS existed for faces rated as emotional, but not for faces rated as nonemotional. This effect was common to the sexes. Results indicate that right-hemispheric memory storage of faces can be induced in females through affective imagery and in both sexes via idiosyncratically perceived emotionality in the face stimuli. This effect of affectivity cannot be attributed to visual-spatial dominannce of the right hemisphere.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-934X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2155</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0093-934X(81)90017-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Brain and language, 1981, Vol.12 (2), p.246-260</ispartof><rights>1981</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-30d2a04da0803309dfa4de2ed6eb874b1ba7a82b3917ef21fb734e1a543ac2d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-30d2a04da0803309dfa4de2ed6eb874b1ba7a82b3917ef21fb734e1a543ac2d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0093934X81900171$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3643,4010,27904,27905,27906,46012</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McKeever, Walter F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><title>Right-hemisphere superiority for discriminating memorized from nonmemorized faces: Affective imagery, sex, and perceived emotionality effects</title><title>Brain and language</title><description>Sixty-four subjects, divided into four groups according to sex and type of memorization instruction, were given a manual RT task requiring discrimination of two memorized from two nonmemorized faces. Two types of memorization were employed, one emphasizing highly negative affective imagery about the faces being memorized (extreme sadness), the other relatively neutral imagery (feeling composed). Females in the affective imagery group were predicted to show left-visual-field superiority (LVFS), while females employing neutral imagery were not. Males were predicted to show LVFS regardless of imagery type because of their presumed strong right-hemispheric dominance for visual-spatial functions. Predictions were accurate for females; neither group of males showed significant LVFS. Post-experimental semantic differential ratings of the emotionality of the memorized faces showed that LVFS existed for faces rated as emotional, but not for faces rated as nonemotional. This effect was common to the sexes. Results indicate that right-hemispheric memory storage of faces can be induced in females through affective imagery and in both sexes via idiosyncratically perceived emotionality in the face stimuli. This effect of affectivity cannot be attributed to visual-spatial dominannce of the right hemisphere.</description><issn>0093-934X</issn><issn>1090-2155</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1981</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kdFqFDEUhoNUcFt9Ay8CQrGwozlJZifTi0JZ2ioUBFHwLmSSk92UncmazBbXd-g7m-kWKV54FTjn-_-c8x9C3gL7AAwWHxlrRdUK-eO9grOWMWgqeEFmwFpWcajrIzL7i7wixznfFQakghl5-BpW67FaYx_ydo0Jad5tMYWYwrinPibqQrYp9GEwYxhWtMe-9H6joz7Fng5xeFYxFvM5vfQe7RjukYberDDt5zTjrzk1g6PF22JpOVpUY4iD2Uwf4aMkvyYvvdlkfPP0npDv11fflp-q2y83n5eXt5XljRorwRw3TDrDFBOCtc4b6ZCjW2CnGtlBZxqjeCdaaNBz8F0jJIKppTCWOxAn5PTgu03x5w7zqMv6FjcbM2DcZQ21EIorWcB3_4B3cZfK0IXhbc0WSqq6UPJA2RRzTuj1tiRm0l4D09OF9BS_nuLXCvTjhfQ0xcVBhmXV-4BJZxtwsOhCKmloF8P_Df4Aj9ubqw</recordid><startdate>1981</startdate><enddate>1981</enddate><creator>McKeever, Walter F.</creator><creator>Dixon, Michael S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JILTI</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1981</creationdate><title>Right-hemisphere superiority for discriminating memorized from nonmemorized faces: Affective imagery, sex, and perceived emotionality effects</title><author>McKeever, Walter F. ; Dixon, Michael S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-30d2a04da0803309dfa4de2ed6eb874b1ba7a82b3917ef21fb734e1a543ac2d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1981</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McKeever, Walter F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 32</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Brain and language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McKeever, Walter F.</au><au>Dixon, Michael S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Right-hemisphere superiority for discriminating memorized from nonmemorized faces: Affective imagery, sex, and perceived emotionality effects</atitle><jtitle>Brain and language</jtitle><date>1981</date><risdate>1981</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>246</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>246-260</pages><issn>0093-934X</issn><eissn>1090-2155</eissn><abstract>Sixty-four subjects, divided into four groups according to sex and type of memorization instruction, were given a manual RT task requiring discrimination of two memorized from two nonmemorized faces. Two types of memorization were employed, one emphasizing highly negative affective imagery about the faces being memorized (extreme sadness), the other relatively neutral imagery (feeling composed). Females in the affective imagery group were predicted to show left-visual-field superiority (LVFS), while females employing neutral imagery were not. Males were predicted to show LVFS regardless of imagery type because of their presumed strong right-hemispheric dominance for visual-spatial functions. Predictions were accurate for females; neither group of males showed significant LVFS. Post-experimental semantic differential ratings of the emotionality of the memorized faces showed that LVFS existed for faces rated as emotional, but not for faces rated as nonemotional. This effect was common to the sexes. Results indicate that right-hemispheric memory storage of faces can be induced in females through affective imagery and in both sexes via idiosyncratically perceived emotionality in the face stimuli. This effect of affectivity cannot be attributed to visual-spatial dominannce of the right hemisphere.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/0093-934X(81)90017-1</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0093-934X
ispartof Brain and language, 1981, Vol.12 (2), p.246-260
issn 0093-934X
1090-2155
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15338284
source ScienceDirect: Social Science Backfile
title Right-hemisphere superiority for discriminating memorized from nonmemorized faces: Affective imagery, sex, and perceived emotionality effects
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A41%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Right-hemisphere%20superiority%20for%20discriminating%20memorized%20from%20nonmemorized%20faces:%20Affective%20imagery,%20sex,%20and%20perceived%20emotionality%20effects&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20language&rft.au=McKeever,%20Walter%20F.&rft.date=1981&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=246-260&rft.issn=0093-934X&rft.eissn=1090-2155&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0093-934X(81)90017-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1295068485%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-30d2a04da0803309dfa4de2ed6eb874b1ba7a82b3917ef21fb734e1a543ac2d13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1295068485&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true