Loading…
Right-hemisphere superiority for discriminating memorized from nonmemorized faces: Affective imagery, sex, and perceived emotionality effects
Sixty-four subjects, divided into four groups according to sex and type of memorization instruction, were given a manual RT task requiring discrimination of two memorized from two nonmemorized faces. Two types of memorization were employed, one emphasizing highly negative affective imagery about the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Brain and language 1981, Vol.12 (2), p.246-260 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-30d2a04da0803309dfa4de2ed6eb874b1ba7a82b3917ef21fb734e1a543ac2d13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-30d2a04da0803309dfa4de2ed6eb874b1ba7a82b3917ef21fb734e1a543ac2d13 |
container_end_page | 260 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 246 |
container_title | Brain and language |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | McKeever, Walter F. Dixon, Michael S. |
description | Sixty-four subjects, divided into four groups according to sex and type of memorization instruction, were given a manual RT task requiring discrimination of two memorized from two nonmemorized faces. Two types of memorization were employed, one emphasizing highly negative affective imagery about the faces being memorized (extreme sadness), the other relatively neutral imagery (feeling composed). Females in the affective imagery group were predicted to show left-visual-field superiority (LVFS), while females employing neutral imagery were not. Males were predicted to show LVFS regardless of imagery type because of their presumed strong right-hemispheric dominance for visual-spatial functions. Predictions were accurate for females; neither group of males showed significant LVFS. Post-experimental semantic differential ratings of the emotionality of the memorized faces showed that LVFS existed for faces rated as emotional, but not for faces rated as nonemotional. This effect was common to the sexes. Results indicate that right-hemispheric memory storage of faces can be induced in females through affective imagery and in both sexes via idiosyncratically perceived emotionality in the face stimuli. This effect of affectivity cannot be attributed to visual-spatial dominannce of the right hemisphere. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0093-934X(81)90017-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15338284</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0093934X81900171</els_id><sourcerecordid>1295068485</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-30d2a04da0803309dfa4de2ed6eb874b1ba7a82b3917ef21fb734e1a543ac2d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kdFqFDEUhoNUcFt9Ay8CQrGwozlJZifTi0JZ2ioUBFHwLmSSk92UncmazBbXd-g7m-kWKV54FTjn-_-c8x9C3gL7AAwWHxlrRdUK-eO9grOWMWgqeEFmwFpWcajrIzL7i7wixznfFQakghl5-BpW67FaYx_ydo0Jad5tMYWYwrinPibqQrYp9GEwYxhWtMe-9H6joz7Fng5xeFYxFvM5vfQe7RjukYberDDt5zTjrzk1g6PF22JpOVpUY4iD2Uwf4aMkvyYvvdlkfPP0npDv11fflp-q2y83n5eXt5XljRorwRw3TDrDFBOCtc4b6ZCjW2CnGtlBZxqjeCdaaNBz8F0jJIKppTCWOxAn5PTgu03x5w7zqMv6FjcbM2DcZQ21EIorWcB3_4B3cZfK0IXhbc0WSqq6UPJA2RRzTuj1tiRm0l4D09OF9BS_nuLXCvTjhfQ0xcVBhmXV-4BJZxtwsOhCKmloF8P_Df4Aj9ubqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1295068485</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Right-hemisphere superiority for discriminating memorized from nonmemorized faces: Affective imagery, sex, and perceived emotionality effects</title><source>ScienceDirect: Social Science Backfile</source><creator>McKeever, Walter F. ; Dixon, Michael S.</creator><creatorcontrib>McKeever, Walter F. ; Dixon, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><description>Sixty-four subjects, divided into four groups according to sex and type of memorization instruction, were given a manual RT task requiring discrimination of two memorized from two nonmemorized faces. Two types of memorization were employed, one emphasizing highly negative affective imagery about the faces being memorized (extreme sadness), the other relatively neutral imagery (feeling composed). Females in the affective imagery group were predicted to show left-visual-field superiority (LVFS), while females employing neutral imagery were not. Males were predicted to show LVFS regardless of imagery type because of their presumed strong right-hemispheric dominance for visual-spatial functions. Predictions were accurate for females; neither group of males showed significant LVFS. Post-experimental semantic differential ratings of the emotionality of the memorized faces showed that LVFS existed for faces rated as emotional, but not for faces rated as nonemotional. This effect was common to the sexes. Results indicate that right-hemispheric memory storage of faces can be induced in females through affective imagery and in both sexes via idiosyncratically perceived emotionality in the face stimuli. This effect of affectivity cannot be attributed to visual-spatial dominannce of the right hemisphere.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-934X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2155</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0093-934X(81)90017-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Brain and language, 1981, Vol.12 (2), p.246-260</ispartof><rights>1981</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-30d2a04da0803309dfa4de2ed6eb874b1ba7a82b3917ef21fb734e1a543ac2d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-30d2a04da0803309dfa4de2ed6eb874b1ba7a82b3917ef21fb734e1a543ac2d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0093934X81900171$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3643,4010,27904,27905,27906,46012</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McKeever, Walter F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><title>Right-hemisphere superiority for discriminating memorized from nonmemorized faces: Affective imagery, sex, and perceived emotionality effects</title><title>Brain and language</title><description>Sixty-four subjects, divided into four groups according to sex and type of memorization instruction, were given a manual RT task requiring discrimination of two memorized from two nonmemorized faces. Two types of memorization were employed, one emphasizing highly negative affective imagery about the faces being memorized (extreme sadness), the other relatively neutral imagery (feeling composed). Females in the affective imagery group were predicted to show left-visual-field superiority (LVFS), while females employing neutral imagery were not. Males were predicted to show LVFS regardless of imagery type because of their presumed strong right-hemispheric dominance for visual-spatial functions. Predictions were accurate for females; neither group of males showed significant LVFS. Post-experimental semantic differential ratings of the emotionality of the memorized faces showed that LVFS existed for faces rated as emotional, but not for faces rated as nonemotional. This effect was common to the sexes. Results indicate that right-hemispheric memory storage of faces can be induced in females through affective imagery and in both sexes via idiosyncratically perceived emotionality in the face stimuli. This effect of affectivity cannot be attributed to visual-spatial dominannce of the right hemisphere.</description><issn>0093-934X</issn><issn>1090-2155</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1981</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kdFqFDEUhoNUcFt9Ay8CQrGwozlJZifTi0JZ2ioUBFHwLmSSk92UncmazBbXd-g7m-kWKV54FTjn-_-c8x9C3gL7AAwWHxlrRdUK-eO9grOWMWgqeEFmwFpWcajrIzL7i7wixznfFQakghl5-BpW67FaYx_ydo0Jad5tMYWYwrinPibqQrYp9GEwYxhWtMe-9H6joz7Fng5xeFYxFvM5vfQe7RjukYberDDt5zTjrzk1g6PF22JpOVpUY4iD2Uwf4aMkvyYvvdlkfPP0npDv11fflp-q2y83n5eXt5XljRorwRw3TDrDFBOCtc4b6ZCjW2CnGtlBZxqjeCdaaNBz8F0jJIKppTCWOxAn5PTgu03x5w7zqMv6FjcbM2DcZQ21EIorWcB3_4B3cZfK0IXhbc0WSqq6UPJA2RRzTuj1tiRm0l4D09OF9BS_nuLXCvTjhfQ0xcVBhmXV-4BJZxtwsOhCKmloF8P_Df4Aj9ubqw</recordid><startdate>1981</startdate><enddate>1981</enddate><creator>McKeever, Walter F.</creator><creator>Dixon, Michael S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JILTI</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1981</creationdate><title>Right-hemisphere superiority for discriminating memorized from nonmemorized faces: Affective imagery, sex, and perceived emotionality effects</title><author>McKeever, Walter F. ; Dixon, Michael S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-30d2a04da0803309dfa4de2ed6eb874b1ba7a82b3917ef21fb734e1a543ac2d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1981</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McKeever, Walter F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 32</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Brain and language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McKeever, Walter F.</au><au>Dixon, Michael S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Right-hemisphere superiority for discriminating memorized from nonmemorized faces: Affective imagery, sex, and perceived emotionality effects</atitle><jtitle>Brain and language</jtitle><date>1981</date><risdate>1981</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>246</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>246-260</pages><issn>0093-934X</issn><eissn>1090-2155</eissn><abstract>Sixty-four subjects, divided into four groups according to sex and type of memorization instruction, were given a manual RT task requiring discrimination of two memorized from two nonmemorized faces. Two types of memorization were employed, one emphasizing highly negative affective imagery about the faces being memorized (extreme sadness), the other relatively neutral imagery (feeling composed). Females in the affective imagery group were predicted to show left-visual-field superiority (LVFS), while females employing neutral imagery were not. Males were predicted to show LVFS regardless of imagery type because of their presumed strong right-hemispheric dominance for visual-spatial functions. Predictions were accurate for females; neither group of males showed significant LVFS. Post-experimental semantic differential ratings of the emotionality of the memorized faces showed that LVFS existed for faces rated as emotional, but not for faces rated as nonemotional. This effect was common to the sexes. Results indicate that right-hemispheric memory storage of faces can be induced in females through affective imagery and in both sexes via idiosyncratically perceived emotionality in the face stimuli. This effect of affectivity cannot be attributed to visual-spatial dominannce of the right hemisphere.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/0093-934X(81)90017-1</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0093-934X |
ispartof | Brain and language, 1981, Vol.12 (2), p.246-260 |
issn | 0093-934X 1090-2155 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15338284 |
source | ScienceDirect: Social Science Backfile |
title | Right-hemisphere superiority for discriminating memorized from nonmemorized faces: Affective imagery, sex, and perceived emotionality effects |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A41%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Right-hemisphere%20superiority%20for%20discriminating%20memorized%20from%20nonmemorized%20faces:%20Affective%20imagery,%20sex,%20and%20perceived%20emotionality%20effects&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20language&rft.au=McKeever,%20Walter%20F.&rft.date=1981&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=246-260&rft.issn=0093-934X&rft.eissn=1090-2155&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0093-934X(81)90017-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1295068485%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-30d2a04da0803309dfa4de2ed6eb874b1ba7a82b3917ef21fb734e1a543ac2d13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1295068485&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |