Loading…
Mesohepatectomy versus extended hemihepatectomy for centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma
Background Extended hemihepatectomy is usually recommended to treat large centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the morbidity and mortality are high because of the postoperative liver failure. Mesohepatectomy is seldom used because of its technical complexity. This study aimed t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Hepatobiliary & pancreatic diseases international 2014-06, Vol.13 (3), p.264-270 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background Extended hemihepatectomy is usually recommended to treat large centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the morbidity and mortality are high because of the postoperative liver failure. Mesohepatectomy is seldom used because of its technical complexity. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term and long-term curative effect of mesohepatectomy. Methods From January 2002 to September 2008, a total of 198 consecutive patients with centrally located HCC underwent hepatectomy in our department. According to the surgical procedures, they were divided into mesohepatectomy (group M, n =118), extended right hemihepatectomy (group RE, n =47) and extended left hemihepatectomy (group LE, n =33) groups. The surgical techniques, clinical pathological characteristics and outcomes were compared between group M, group RE and group LE. Results The operative time of group M was significantly longer than that of the other two groups ( P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1499-3872 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S1499-3872(14)60253-8 |