Clinical Normative Data for Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire and Eating Disorder Inventory for DSM-5 Feeding and Eating Disorder Classifications: A Retrospective Study of Patients Formerly Diagnosed Via DSM-IV

Normative data for measures of eating disorder (ED) psychopathology provide a fundamental description of a presentation and a means to establish clinically significant change following an intervention. Clinical norms for the ED population are lacking and out of date following the publication of Diag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European eating disorders review 2014-07, Vol.22 (4), p.299-305
Main Authors: Brewin, Nicola, Baggott, Jonathan, Dugard, Pat, Arcelus, Jon
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Analysis of Variance
Classification
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
DSM-5
Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire
eating disorder inventory
Eating disorders
Feeding and Eating Disorders - diagnosis
Humans
Medical diagnosis
norms
Psychiatry
Psychopathology
Quantitative psychology
Reference Values
Retrospective Studies
Statistical analysis
Surveys and Questionnaires
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Normative data for measures of eating disorder (ED) psychopathology provide a fundamental description of a presentation and a means to establish clinically significant change following an intervention. Clinical norms for the ED population are lacking and out of date following the publication of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders (DSM) 5. This study aimed to show that scores from the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE‐q) and the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) differ across ED diagnosis groups and provide norm data for DSM‐5 ED diagnoses. Patients (n = 932) presenting to an out‐patient service over 5 years were retrospectively re‐diagnosed based on DSM‐5 criteria. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference on most subscale scores of the EDE‐q and the EDI across diagnosis. Means, standard deviations and percentile ranks are presented by diagnosis. The norms detailed contribute to improving the accuracy with which scores are interpreted when using DSM‐5 and aid with the assessment of clinically significant change following treatment. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.
ISSN:1072-4133
1099-0968
DOI:10.1002/erv.2301