Loading…
Strategy-proof preference aggregation: Possibilities and characterizations
An aggregation rule maps each profile of individual strict preference orderings over a set of alternatives into a social ordering over that set. We call such a rule strategy-proof if misreporting one's preference never produces a different social ordering that is between the original ordering a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Games and economic behavior 2014-05, Vol.85, p.109-126 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | An aggregation rule maps each profile of individual strict preference orderings over a set of alternatives into a social ordering over that set. We call such a rule strategy-proof if misreporting one's preference never produces a different social ordering that is between the original ordering and one's own preference. After describing two examples of manipulable rules, we study in some detail three classes of strategy-proof rules: (i) rules based on a monotonic alteration of the majority relation generated by the preference profile; (ii) rules improving upon a fixed status-quo; and (iii) rules generalizing the Condorcet–Kemeny aggregation method.
•We propose a definition of strategyproofness applicable to preference aggregation rules.•We discuss examples of manipulable rules.•We study three classes of strategy-proof aggregation rules. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0899-8256 1090-2473 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.geb.2014.01.015 |