Evaluation of two dental registration-splint techniques for surgical navigation in cranio-maxillofacial surgery

• Published in: Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery 2014-07, Vol.42 (5), p.448-453
• Main Authors: Venosta, Dominik, Sun, Yi, Matthews, Felix, Kruse, Astrid L, Lanzer, Martin, Gander, Thomas, Grätz, Klaus W, Lübbers, Heinz-Theo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anatomic Landmarks - diagnostic imaging; Biocompatible Materials - chemistry; Bone Screws; Cephalometry - methods; Computer-assisted; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods; Cranial; Dentistry; Extender; Facial Bones - diagnostic imaging; Facial Bones - surgery; Fiducial Markers; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods; Jaw Relation Record - instrumentation; Maxillofacial; Models, Anatomic; Navigation; Occlusal; Occlusal Splints; Orbit - diagnostic imaging; Orbital; Rapid; Registration; Skull - diagnostic imaging; Skull - surgery; Splint; Surgery; Surgery, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation; Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods; Surgical planning; Titanium - chemistry
• ISSN: 1010-5182; 1878-4119
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.05.040

Abstract Background Surgical navigation requires precise registration of the pre-operative image dataset to the patient in the operation theatre. Different marker-based and marker-free registration techniques are available, each of them with advantages and disadvantages regarding precision and clinical handling. In this model study, the precision of two dental splint techniques for marker-based registration is analyzed. Materials and methods A synthetic full-size human skull was registered with its cone beam computed tomography dataset using (a) a dentally-mounted “rapid” occlusal splint with five titanium screws directly attached to the splint, (b) an “extender”, a dentally-mounted occlusal splint with similar fiducials fixed to an extension of the splint. The target registration error was measured for 170 landmarks distributed over the viscero- and neurocranium in 10 repeats per splint type using the Vector Vision2 (BrainLAB AG, Heimstetten, Germany) navigation system. Statistical and graphical evaluations were performed per anatomical region. Results In the periorbital region, the rapid splint, with an average deviation of 1.50 mm (SD = 0.439) showed greater accuracy than the extender with 1.76 mm (SD = 0.525). The viscerocranial results for both splints were similar (extender 1.84 mm, SD = 0.559, rapid occlusal splint 1.86 mm, SD = 0.686). In the cranial vault region, registration with the extender (2.33 mm, SD = 0.685) proved to be more precise than with the rapid splint (2.86 mm, SD = 0.929). Conclusions Due to the more compact dimension of the rapid occlusal splint, errors close to the splint were smaller compared to the extender technique. The advantage of greater distances between the registration fiducials on the extender is particularly important in areas such as the orbital roof, the cranial vault, and the lateral skull base.