Loading…

Systematic Analysis of Bisphosphonate Intervention on Periprosthetic BMD as a Function of Stem Design

Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of bisphosphonates periprosthetic BMD in THA patients as a function of stem design. Specifically, the goals were to determine if bisphosphonates as a group could significantly inhibit periprosthetic bone loss, time needed to see an effe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2014-06, Vol.29 (6), p.1292-1297
Main Authors: Knusten, Ashleen R., MS, Ebramzadeh, Edward, PhD, Longjohn, Donald B., MD, Sangiorgio, Sophia N., PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-f1968262437cc12999d660bd2e779b8c54ae90f439182087282f80b1d9b02d7a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-f1968262437cc12999d660bd2e779b8c54ae90f439182087282f80b1d9b02d7a3
container_end_page 1297
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1292
container_title The Journal of arthroplasty
container_volume 29
creator Knusten, Ashleen R., MS
Ebramzadeh, Edward, PhD
Longjohn, Donald B., MD
Sangiorgio, Sophia N., PhD
description Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of bisphosphonates periprosthetic BMD in THA patients as a function of stem design. Specifically, the goals were to determine if bisphosphonates as a group could significantly inhibit periprosthetic bone loss, time needed to see an effect, if one drug was more effective than the others, and if there was a difference due to stem design or cement. Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Overall, groups treated with bisphosphonate therapy preserved significantly more BMD than the control groups as early as six months postoperatively, and orally delivered bisphosphonates were most effective. Furthermore, the biggest differences were in patients with non-cemented stems, and of those, the largest differences were seen in patients with fully coated CoCr stems.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.015
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1541383421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0883540314000370</els_id><sourcerecordid>1541383421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-f1968262437cc12999d660bd2e779b8c54ae90f439182087282f80b1d9b02d7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU2LFDEUDKK44-of8CA5eunx5aM7aRBhP1xdWFEYPYd0-rWTsSc9m6QX5t-bZlYPHoQKuVQVr6oIec1gzYA173ZrG_N2zYHJNbCC-glZsVrwSktonpIVaC2qWoI4Iy9S2gEwVtfyOTnjUoFQmq0Ibo4p495m7-hFsOMx-USngV76dNhOyws2I70NGeMDhuynQAu-YfSHOKW8xUV5-eWa2kQtvZmDO3EGuim-9BqT_xlekmeDHRO-evzPyY-bj9-vPld3Xz_dXl3cVU4qlauBtY3mDZdCOcd427Z900DXc1Sq7bSrpcUWBilapjloxTUfNHSsbzvgvbLinLw9-Zbb7mdM2ex9cjiONuA0J8NqyYQWkrNC5SeqKzFSxMEcot_beDQMzFKv2ZmlXrPUa4AV1EX05tF_7vbY_5X86bMQ3p8IWFI-eIwmOY_BYe8jumz6yf_f_8M_cjf64J0df-ER026aY9mo5DCJGzCbZeBlXyYBygEgfgORqZ_G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1541383421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic Analysis of Bisphosphonate Intervention on Periprosthetic BMD as a Function of Stem Design</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Knusten, Ashleen R., MS ; Ebramzadeh, Edward, PhD ; Longjohn, Donald B., MD ; Sangiorgio, Sophia N., PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Knusten, Ashleen R., MS ; Ebramzadeh, Edward, PhD ; Longjohn, Donald B., MD ; Sangiorgio, Sophia N., PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of bisphosphonates periprosthetic BMD in THA patients as a function of stem design. Specifically, the goals were to determine if bisphosphonates as a group could significantly inhibit periprosthetic bone loss, time needed to see an effect, if one drug was more effective than the others, and if there was a difference due to stem design or cement. Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Overall, groups treated with bisphosphonate therapy preserved significantly more BMD than the control groups as early as six months postoperatively, and orally delivered bisphosphonates were most effective. Furthermore, the biggest differences were in patients with non-cemented stems, and of those, the largest differences were seen in patients with fully coated CoCr stems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24703781</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects ; bisphosphonates ; Bone Cements ; Bone Density - drug effects ; Bone Density Conservation Agents - pharmacology ; bone mineral density ; Bone Resorption - etiology ; Bone Resorption - prevention &amp; control ; Diphosphonates - pharmacology ; Female ; Femur - drug effects ; Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; periprosthetic ; Prosthesis Design ; total hip arthroplasty</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2014-06, Vol.29 (6), p.1292-1297</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-f1968262437cc12999d660bd2e779b8c54ae90f439182087282f80b1d9b02d7a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-f1968262437cc12999d660bd2e779b8c54ae90f439182087282f80b1d9b02d7a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24703781$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Knusten, Ashleen R., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebramzadeh, Edward, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longjohn, Donald B., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sangiorgio, Sophia N., PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic Analysis of Bisphosphonate Intervention on Periprosthetic BMD as a Function of Stem Design</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of bisphosphonates periprosthetic BMD in THA patients as a function of stem design. Specifically, the goals were to determine if bisphosphonates as a group could significantly inhibit periprosthetic bone loss, time needed to see an effect, if one drug was more effective than the others, and if there was a difference due to stem design or cement. Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Overall, groups treated with bisphosphonate therapy preserved significantly more BMD than the control groups as early as six months postoperatively, and orally delivered bisphosphonates were most effective. Furthermore, the biggest differences were in patients with non-cemented stems, and of those, the largest differences were seen in patients with fully coated CoCr stems.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</subject><subject>bisphosphonates</subject><subject>Bone Cements</subject><subject>Bone Density - drug effects</subject><subject>Bone Density Conservation Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>bone mineral density</subject><subject>Bone Resorption - etiology</subject><subject>Bone Resorption - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Diphosphonates - pharmacology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - drug effects</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>periprosthetic</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>total hip arthroplasty</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UU2LFDEUDKK44-of8CA5eunx5aM7aRBhP1xdWFEYPYd0-rWTsSc9m6QX5t-bZlYPHoQKuVQVr6oIec1gzYA173ZrG_N2zYHJNbCC-glZsVrwSktonpIVaC2qWoI4Iy9S2gEwVtfyOTnjUoFQmq0Ibo4p495m7-hFsOMx-USngV76dNhOyws2I70NGeMDhuynQAu-YfSHOKW8xUV5-eWa2kQtvZmDO3EGuim-9BqT_xlekmeDHRO-evzPyY-bj9-vPld3Xz_dXl3cVU4qlauBtY3mDZdCOcd427Z900DXc1Sq7bSrpcUWBilapjloxTUfNHSsbzvgvbLinLw9-Zbb7mdM2ex9cjiONuA0J8NqyYQWkrNC5SeqKzFSxMEcot_beDQMzFKv2ZmlXrPUa4AV1EX05tF_7vbY_5X86bMQ3p8IWFI-eIwmOY_BYe8jumz6yf_f_8M_cjf64J0df-ER026aY9mo5DCJGzCbZeBlXyYBygEgfgORqZ_G</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Knusten, Ashleen R., MS</creator><creator>Ebramzadeh, Edward, PhD</creator><creator>Longjohn, Donald B., MD</creator><creator>Sangiorgio, Sophia N., PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Systematic Analysis of Bisphosphonate Intervention on Periprosthetic BMD as a Function of Stem Design</title><author>Knusten, Ashleen R., MS ; Ebramzadeh, Edward, PhD ; Longjohn, Donald B., MD ; Sangiorgio, Sophia N., PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-f1968262437cc12999d660bd2e779b8c54ae90f439182087282f80b1d9b02d7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</topic><topic>bisphosphonates</topic><topic>Bone Cements</topic><topic>Bone Density - drug effects</topic><topic>Bone Density Conservation Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>bone mineral density</topic><topic>Bone Resorption - etiology</topic><topic>Bone Resorption - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Diphosphonates - pharmacology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - drug effects</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>periprosthetic</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>total hip arthroplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Knusten, Ashleen R., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebramzadeh, Edward, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longjohn, Donald B., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sangiorgio, Sophia N., PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Knusten, Ashleen R., MS</au><au>Ebramzadeh, Edward, PhD</au><au>Longjohn, Donald B., MD</au><au>Sangiorgio, Sophia N., PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic Analysis of Bisphosphonate Intervention on Periprosthetic BMD as a Function of Stem Design</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1292</spage><epage>1297</epage><pages>1292-1297</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of bisphosphonates periprosthetic BMD in THA patients as a function of stem design. Specifically, the goals were to determine if bisphosphonates as a group could significantly inhibit periprosthetic bone loss, time needed to see an effect, if one drug was more effective than the others, and if there was a difference due to stem design or cement. Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Overall, groups treated with bisphosphonate therapy preserved significantly more BMD than the control groups as early as six months postoperatively, and orally delivered bisphosphonates were most effective. Furthermore, the biggest differences were in patients with non-cemented stems, and of those, the largest differences were seen in patients with fully coated CoCr stems.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24703781</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.015</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0883-5403
ispartof The Journal of arthroplasty, 2014-06, Vol.29 (6), p.1292-1297
issn 0883-5403
1532-8406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1541383421
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Aged
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects
bisphosphonates
Bone Cements
Bone Density - drug effects
Bone Density Conservation Agents - pharmacology
bone mineral density
Bone Resorption - etiology
Bone Resorption - prevention & control
Diphosphonates - pharmacology
Female
Femur - drug effects
Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Orthopedics
periprosthetic
Prosthesis Design
total hip arthroplasty
title Systematic Analysis of Bisphosphonate Intervention on Periprosthetic BMD as a Function of Stem Design
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T02%3A08%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20Analysis%20of%20Bisphosphonate%20Intervention%20on%20Periprosthetic%20BMD%20as%20a%20Function%20of%20Stem%20Design&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Knusten,%20Ashleen%20R.,%20MS&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1292&rft.epage=1297&rft.pages=1292-1297&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1541383421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-f1968262437cc12999d660bd2e779b8c54ae90f439182087282f80b1d9b02d7a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1541383421&rft_id=info:pmid/24703781&rfr_iscdi=true