Loading…
Systematic Analysis of Bisphosphonate Intervention on Periprosthetic BMD as a Function of Stem Design
Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of bisphosphonates periprosthetic BMD in THA patients as a function of stem design. Specifically, the goals were to determine if bisphosphonates as a group could significantly inhibit periprosthetic bone loss, time needed to see an effe...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of arthroplasty 2014-06, Vol.29 (6), p.1292-1297 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-f1968262437cc12999d660bd2e779b8c54ae90f439182087282f80b1d9b02d7a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-f1968262437cc12999d660bd2e779b8c54ae90f439182087282f80b1d9b02d7a3 |
container_end_page | 1297 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1292 |
container_title | The Journal of arthroplasty |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Knusten, Ashleen R., MS Ebramzadeh, Edward, PhD Longjohn, Donald B., MD Sangiorgio, Sophia N., PhD |
description | Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of bisphosphonates periprosthetic BMD in THA patients as a function of stem design. Specifically, the goals were to determine if bisphosphonates as a group could significantly inhibit periprosthetic bone loss, time needed to see an effect, if one drug was more effective than the others, and if there was a difference due to stem design or cement. Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Overall, groups treated with bisphosphonate therapy preserved significantly more BMD than the control groups as early as six months postoperatively, and orally delivered bisphosphonates were most effective. Furthermore, the biggest differences were in patients with non-cemented stems, and of those, the largest differences were seen in patients with fully coated CoCr stems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.015 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1541383421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0883540314000370</els_id><sourcerecordid>1541383421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-f1968262437cc12999d660bd2e779b8c54ae90f439182087282f80b1d9b02d7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU2LFDEUDKK44-of8CA5eunx5aM7aRBhP1xdWFEYPYd0-rWTsSc9m6QX5t-bZlYPHoQKuVQVr6oIec1gzYA173ZrG_N2zYHJNbCC-glZsVrwSktonpIVaC2qWoI4Iy9S2gEwVtfyOTnjUoFQmq0Ibo4p495m7-hFsOMx-USngV76dNhOyws2I70NGeMDhuynQAu-YfSHOKW8xUV5-eWa2kQtvZmDO3EGuim-9BqT_xlekmeDHRO-evzPyY-bj9-vPld3Xz_dXl3cVU4qlauBtY3mDZdCOcd427Z900DXc1Sq7bSrpcUWBilapjloxTUfNHSsbzvgvbLinLw9-Zbb7mdM2ex9cjiONuA0J8NqyYQWkrNC5SeqKzFSxMEcot_beDQMzFKv2ZmlXrPUa4AV1EX05tF_7vbY_5X86bMQ3p8IWFI-eIwmOY_BYe8jumz6yf_f_8M_cjf64J0df-ER026aY9mo5DCJGzCbZeBlXyYBygEgfgORqZ_G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1541383421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic Analysis of Bisphosphonate Intervention on Periprosthetic BMD as a Function of Stem Design</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Knusten, Ashleen R., MS ; Ebramzadeh, Edward, PhD ; Longjohn, Donald B., MD ; Sangiorgio, Sophia N., PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Knusten, Ashleen R., MS ; Ebramzadeh, Edward, PhD ; Longjohn, Donald B., MD ; Sangiorgio, Sophia N., PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of bisphosphonates periprosthetic BMD in THA patients as a function of stem design. Specifically, the goals were to determine if bisphosphonates as a group could significantly inhibit periprosthetic bone loss, time needed to see an effect, if one drug was more effective than the others, and if there was a difference due to stem design or cement. Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Overall, groups treated with bisphosphonate therapy preserved significantly more BMD than the control groups as early as six months postoperatively, and orally delivered bisphosphonates were most effective. Furthermore, the biggest differences were in patients with non-cemented stems, and of those, the largest differences were seen in patients with fully coated CoCr stems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24703781</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects ; bisphosphonates ; Bone Cements ; Bone Density - drug effects ; Bone Density Conservation Agents - pharmacology ; bone mineral density ; Bone Resorption - etiology ; Bone Resorption - prevention & control ; Diphosphonates - pharmacology ; Female ; Femur - drug effects ; Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; periprosthetic ; Prosthesis Design ; total hip arthroplasty</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2014-06, Vol.29 (6), p.1292-1297</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-f1968262437cc12999d660bd2e779b8c54ae90f439182087282f80b1d9b02d7a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-f1968262437cc12999d660bd2e779b8c54ae90f439182087282f80b1d9b02d7a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24703781$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Knusten, Ashleen R., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebramzadeh, Edward, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longjohn, Donald B., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sangiorgio, Sophia N., PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic Analysis of Bisphosphonate Intervention on Periprosthetic BMD as a Function of Stem Design</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of bisphosphonates periprosthetic BMD in THA patients as a function of stem design. Specifically, the goals were to determine if bisphosphonates as a group could significantly inhibit periprosthetic bone loss, time needed to see an effect, if one drug was more effective than the others, and if there was a difference due to stem design or cement. Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Overall, groups treated with bisphosphonate therapy preserved significantly more BMD than the control groups as early as six months postoperatively, and orally delivered bisphosphonates were most effective. Furthermore, the biggest differences were in patients with non-cemented stems, and of those, the largest differences were seen in patients with fully coated CoCr stems.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</subject><subject>bisphosphonates</subject><subject>Bone Cements</subject><subject>Bone Density - drug effects</subject><subject>Bone Density Conservation Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>bone mineral density</subject><subject>Bone Resorption - etiology</subject><subject>Bone Resorption - prevention & control</subject><subject>Diphosphonates - pharmacology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - drug effects</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>periprosthetic</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>total hip arthroplasty</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UU2LFDEUDKK44-of8CA5eunx5aM7aRBhP1xdWFEYPYd0-rWTsSc9m6QX5t-bZlYPHoQKuVQVr6oIec1gzYA173ZrG_N2zYHJNbCC-glZsVrwSktonpIVaC2qWoI4Iy9S2gEwVtfyOTnjUoFQmq0Ibo4p495m7-hFsOMx-USngV76dNhOyws2I70NGeMDhuynQAu-YfSHOKW8xUV5-eWa2kQtvZmDO3EGuim-9BqT_xlekmeDHRO-evzPyY-bj9-vPld3Xz_dXl3cVU4qlauBtY3mDZdCOcd427Z900DXc1Sq7bSrpcUWBilapjloxTUfNHSsbzvgvbLinLw9-Zbb7mdM2ex9cjiONuA0J8NqyYQWkrNC5SeqKzFSxMEcot_beDQMzFKv2ZmlXrPUa4AV1EX05tF_7vbY_5X86bMQ3p8IWFI-eIwmOY_BYe8jumz6yf_f_8M_cjf64J0df-ER026aY9mo5DCJGzCbZeBlXyYBygEgfgORqZ_G</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Knusten, Ashleen R., MS</creator><creator>Ebramzadeh, Edward, PhD</creator><creator>Longjohn, Donald B., MD</creator><creator>Sangiorgio, Sophia N., PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Systematic Analysis of Bisphosphonate Intervention on Periprosthetic BMD as a Function of Stem Design</title><author>Knusten, Ashleen R., MS ; Ebramzadeh, Edward, PhD ; Longjohn, Donald B., MD ; Sangiorgio, Sophia N., PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-f1968262437cc12999d660bd2e779b8c54ae90f439182087282f80b1d9b02d7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</topic><topic>bisphosphonates</topic><topic>Bone Cements</topic><topic>Bone Density - drug effects</topic><topic>Bone Density Conservation Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>bone mineral density</topic><topic>Bone Resorption - etiology</topic><topic>Bone Resorption - prevention & control</topic><topic>Diphosphonates - pharmacology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - drug effects</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>periprosthetic</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>total hip arthroplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Knusten, Ashleen R., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebramzadeh, Edward, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longjohn, Donald B., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sangiorgio, Sophia N., PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Knusten, Ashleen R., MS</au><au>Ebramzadeh, Edward, PhD</au><au>Longjohn, Donald B., MD</au><au>Sangiorgio, Sophia N., PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic Analysis of Bisphosphonate Intervention on Periprosthetic BMD as a Function of Stem Design</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1292</spage><epage>1297</epage><pages>1292-1297</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of bisphosphonates periprosthetic BMD in THA patients as a function of stem design. Specifically, the goals were to determine if bisphosphonates as a group could significantly inhibit periprosthetic bone loss, time needed to see an effect, if one drug was more effective than the others, and if there was a difference due to stem design or cement. Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Overall, groups treated with bisphosphonate therapy preserved significantly more BMD than the control groups as early as six months postoperatively, and orally delivered bisphosphonates were most effective. Furthermore, the biggest differences were in patients with non-cemented stems, and of those, the largest differences were seen in patients with fully coated CoCr stems.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24703781</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.015</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0883-5403 |
ispartof | The Journal of arthroplasty, 2014-06, Vol.29 (6), p.1292-1297 |
issn | 0883-5403 1532-8406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1541383421 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Aged Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects bisphosphonates Bone Cements Bone Density - drug effects Bone Density Conservation Agents - pharmacology bone mineral density Bone Resorption - etiology Bone Resorption - prevention & control Diphosphonates - pharmacology Female Femur - drug effects Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects Humans Male Middle Aged Orthopedics periprosthetic Prosthesis Design total hip arthroplasty |
title | Systematic Analysis of Bisphosphonate Intervention on Periprosthetic BMD as a Function of Stem Design |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T02%3A08%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20Analysis%20of%20Bisphosphonate%20Intervention%20on%20Periprosthetic%20BMD%20as%20a%20Function%20of%20Stem%20Design&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Knusten,%20Ashleen%20R.,%20MS&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1292&rft.epage=1297&rft.pages=1292-1297&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1541383421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-f1968262437cc12999d660bd2e779b8c54ae90f439182087282f80b1d9b02d7a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1541383421&rft_id=info:pmid/24703781&rfr_iscdi=true |