Loading…

Optimizing the formulation of polypropylene and rubberwood flour composites for moisture resistance by mixture design

D-optimal mixture experimental design was used to determine the optimal mixture of composites from rubberwood (Hevea brasiliensis) flour and recycled polypropylene and to systematically analyze the effects of composition, namely recycled polypropylene, rubberwood flour, maleic anhydride-grafted poly...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of reinforced plastics and composites 2014-05, Vol.33 (9), p.810-823
Main Authors: Homkhiew, Chatree, Ratanawilai, Thanate, Thongruang, Wiriya
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-5510f5aaea3decaf52478816a06a00e46a132bc04c5479a721fe08ebfdf2b0cf3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-5510f5aaea3decaf52478816a06a00e46a132bc04c5479a721fe08ebfdf2b0cf3
container_end_page 823
container_issue 9
container_start_page 810
container_title Journal of reinforced plastics and composites
container_volume 33
creator Homkhiew, Chatree
Ratanawilai, Thanate
Thongruang, Wiriya
description D-optimal mixture experimental design was used to determine the optimal mixture of composites from rubberwood (Hevea brasiliensis) flour and recycled polypropylene and to systematically analyze the effects of composition, namely recycled polypropylene, rubberwood flour, maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene, and ultraviolet stabilizer fractions. Panel samples were extruded, and their properties were characterized. The overall compositions significantly affected water absorption, thickness swelling, flexural strength and modulus, and maximum strain. Water absorption and thickness swelling increased with the fraction of rubberwood flour. At long immersion times, flexural strength and modulus decreased, but maximum strain increased with high fraction of rubberwood flour. The fraction of maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene only slightly affected water absorption and flexural properties, while the ultraviolet stabilizer fraction had a clear negative effect increasing water absorption and decreasing flexural properties. The models fitted were used for optimization of a desirability score, substituting for the multiple objectives modeled. The optimal formulation found was 68.9 wt% recycled polypropylene, 25.0 wt% rubberwood flour, 5.0 wt% maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene, 0.1 wt% ultraviolet stabilizer, and 1.0 wt% lubricant. This formulation of the composites can be used for most suitable applications based on the moisture resistance.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0731684413518362
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1541404698</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0731684413518362</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1541404698</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-5510f5aaea3decaf52478816a06a00e46a132bc04c5479a721fe08ebfdf2b0cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtLxDAQDqLg-rh7zNFLNdMkbfcoiy9Y2IueS5pO1ixtUpMWrb_erOtJEAZm-B4D30fIFbAbgLK8ZSWHohICuISKF_kRWYDkLCuXhTgmiz2d7flTchbjjrEchBALMm2G0fb2y7otHd-QGh_6qVOj9Y56QwffzUPww9yhQ6pcS8PUNBg-vG-p6fwUqPb94KMdMe7NtPc2jlNAGjCmSzmNtJlpbz9_0DahW3dBTozqIl7-7nPy-nD_snrK1pvH59XdOtNcFmMmJTAjlULFW9TKyFyUVQWFYmkYikIBzxvNhJaiXKoyB4Oswsa0Jm-YNvycXB_-pgzvE8ax7m3U2HXKoZ9iDVKAYKJYVknKDlIdfIwBTT0E26sw18DqfcP134aTJTtYotpivUtluBTmf_039kJ-vA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1541404698</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimizing the formulation of polypropylene and rubberwood flour composites for moisture resistance by mixture design</title><source>SAGE</source><creator>Homkhiew, Chatree ; Ratanawilai, Thanate ; Thongruang, Wiriya</creator><creatorcontrib>Homkhiew, Chatree ; Ratanawilai, Thanate ; Thongruang, Wiriya</creatorcontrib><description>D-optimal mixture experimental design was used to determine the optimal mixture of composites from rubberwood (Hevea brasiliensis) flour and recycled polypropylene and to systematically analyze the effects of composition, namely recycled polypropylene, rubberwood flour, maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene, and ultraviolet stabilizer fractions. Panel samples were extruded, and their properties were characterized. The overall compositions significantly affected water absorption, thickness swelling, flexural strength and modulus, and maximum strain. Water absorption and thickness swelling increased with the fraction of rubberwood flour. At long immersion times, flexural strength and modulus decreased, but maximum strain increased with high fraction of rubberwood flour. The fraction of maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene only slightly affected water absorption and flexural properties, while the ultraviolet stabilizer fraction had a clear negative effect increasing water absorption and decreasing flexural properties. The models fitted were used for optimization of a desirability score, substituting for the multiple objectives modeled. The optimal formulation found was 68.9 wt% recycled polypropylene, 25.0 wt% rubberwood flour, 5.0 wt% maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene, 0.1 wt% ultraviolet stabilizer, and 1.0 wt% lubricant. This formulation of the composites can be used for most suitable applications based on the moisture resistance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0731-6844</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-7964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0731684413518362</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Flour ; Mathematical models ; Optimization ; Polymer matrix composites ; Polypropylenes ; Rubberwood ; UV stabilizers ; Water absorption</subject><ispartof>Journal of reinforced plastics and composites, 2014-05, Vol.33 (9), p.810-823</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-5510f5aaea3decaf52478816a06a00e46a132bc04c5479a721fe08ebfdf2b0cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-5510f5aaea3decaf52478816a06a00e46a132bc04c5479a721fe08ebfdf2b0cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Homkhiew, Chatree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratanawilai, Thanate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thongruang, Wiriya</creatorcontrib><title>Optimizing the formulation of polypropylene and rubberwood flour composites for moisture resistance by mixture design</title><title>Journal of reinforced plastics and composites</title><description>D-optimal mixture experimental design was used to determine the optimal mixture of composites from rubberwood (Hevea brasiliensis) flour and recycled polypropylene and to systematically analyze the effects of composition, namely recycled polypropylene, rubberwood flour, maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene, and ultraviolet stabilizer fractions. Panel samples were extruded, and their properties were characterized. The overall compositions significantly affected water absorption, thickness swelling, flexural strength and modulus, and maximum strain. Water absorption and thickness swelling increased with the fraction of rubberwood flour. At long immersion times, flexural strength and modulus decreased, but maximum strain increased with high fraction of rubberwood flour. The fraction of maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene only slightly affected water absorption and flexural properties, while the ultraviolet stabilizer fraction had a clear negative effect increasing water absorption and decreasing flexural properties. The models fitted were used for optimization of a desirability score, substituting for the multiple objectives modeled. The optimal formulation found was 68.9 wt% recycled polypropylene, 25.0 wt% rubberwood flour, 5.0 wt% maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene, 0.1 wt% ultraviolet stabilizer, and 1.0 wt% lubricant. This formulation of the composites can be used for most suitable applications based on the moisture resistance.</description><subject>Flour</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Polymer matrix composites</subject><subject>Polypropylenes</subject><subject>Rubberwood</subject><subject>UV stabilizers</subject><subject>Water absorption</subject><issn>0731-6844</issn><issn>1530-7964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UEtLxDAQDqLg-rh7zNFLNdMkbfcoiy9Y2IueS5pO1ixtUpMWrb_erOtJEAZm-B4D30fIFbAbgLK8ZSWHohICuISKF_kRWYDkLCuXhTgmiz2d7flTchbjjrEchBALMm2G0fb2y7otHd-QGh_6qVOj9Y56QwffzUPww9yhQ6pcS8PUNBg-vG-p6fwUqPb94KMdMe7NtPc2jlNAGjCmSzmNtJlpbz9_0DahW3dBTozqIl7-7nPy-nD_snrK1pvH59XdOtNcFmMmJTAjlULFW9TKyFyUVQWFYmkYikIBzxvNhJaiXKoyB4Oswsa0Jm-YNvycXB_-pgzvE8ax7m3U2HXKoZ9iDVKAYKJYVknKDlIdfIwBTT0E26sw18DqfcP134aTJTtYotpivUtluBTmf_039kJ-vA</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Homkhiew, Chatree</creator><creator>Ratanawilai, Thanate</creator><creator>Thongruang, Wiriya</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Optimizing the formulation of polypropylene and rubberwood flour composites for moisture resistance by mixture design</title><author>Homkhiew, Chatree ; Ratanawilai, Thanate ; Thongruang, Wiriya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-5510f5aaea3decaf52478816a06a00e46a132bc04c5479a721fe08ebfdf2b0cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Flour</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Polymer matrix composites</topic><topic>Polypropylenes</topic><topic>Rubberwood</topic><topic>UV stabilizers</topic><topic>Water absorption</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Homkhiew, Chatree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratanawilai, Thanate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thongruang, Wiriya</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of reinforced plastics and composites</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Homkhiew, Chatree</au><au>Ratanawilai, Thanate</au><au>Thongruang, Wiriya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimizing the formulation of polypropylene and rubberwood flour composites for moisture resistance by mixture design</atitle><jtitle>Journal of reinforced plastics and composites</jtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>810</spage><epage>823</epage><pages>810-823</pages><issn>0731-6844</issn><eissn>1530-7964</eissn><abstract>D-optimal mixture experimental design was used to determine the optimal mixture of composites from rubberwood (Hevea brasiliensis) flour and recycled polypropylene and to systematically analyze the effects of composition, namely recycled polypropylene, rubberwood flour, maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene, and ultraviolet stabilizer fractions. Panel samples were extruded, and their properties were characterized. The overall compositions significantly affected water absorption, thickness swelling, flexural strength and modulus, and maximum strain. Water absorption and thickness swelling increased with the fraction of rubberwood flour. At long immersion times, flexural strength and modulus decreased, but maximum strain increased with high fraction of rubberwood flour. The fraction of maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene only slightly affected water absorption and flexural properties, while the ultraviolet stabilizer fraction had a clear negative effect increasing water absorption and decreasing flexural properties. The models fitted were used for optimization of a desirability score, substituting for the multiple objectives modeled. The optimal formulation found was 68.9 wt% recycled polypropylene, 25.0 wt% rubberwood flour, 5.0 wt% maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene, 0.1 wt% ultraviolet stabilizer, and 1.0 wt% lubricant. This formulation of the composites can be used for most suitable applications based on the moisture resistance.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0731684413518362</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0731-6844
ispartof Journal of reinforced plastics and composites, 2014-05, Vol.33 (9), p.810-823
issn 0731-6844
1530-7964
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1541404698
source SAGE
subjects Flour
Mathematical models
Optimization
Polymer matrix composites
Polypropylenes
Rubberwood
UV stabilizers
Water absorption
title Optimizing the formulation of polypropylene and rubberwood flour composites for moisture resistance by mixture design
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T15%3A17%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimizing%20the%20formulation%20of%20polypropylene%20and%20rubberwood%20flour%20composites%20for%20moisture%20resistance%20by%20mixture%20design&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20reinforced%20plastics%20and%20composites&rft.au=Homkhiew,%20Chatree&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=810&rft.epage=823&rft.pages=810-823&rft.issn=0731-6844&rft.eissn=1530-7964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0731684413518362&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1541404698%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-5510f5aaea3decaf52478816a06a00e46a132bc04c5479a721fe08ebfdf2b0cf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1541404698&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0731684413518362&rfr_iscdi=true