Primacy or World Order? The United States and China's Rise—A Review Essay

How should the United States respond to China's rise? What are China's long-term strategic goals? What are the implications of U.S.-China strategic interactions for world order? Three recent works—Aaron Friedberg's A Contest for Supremacy, Hugh White's The China Choice, and Yan X...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International security 2013-01, Vol.38 (3), p.153-175
Main Author: Khong, Yuen Foong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Asia
China
China (People's Republic)
Competition
DEMOCRACY
Economic policy
ECONOMY
Interaction
Interdependence
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
International security
Legitimacy
Political Power
Political science
Review articles
U.S.A
United States
United States of America
World order
World politics
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:How should the United States respond to China's rise? What are China's long-term strategic goals? What are the implications of U.S.-China strategic interactions for world order? Three recent works—Aaron Friedberg's A Contest for Supremacy, Hugh White's The China Choice, and Yan Xuetong's Ancient Chinese Political Thought, Modern Chinese Power—grapple with these questions in authoritative and revealing ways. This review essay examines the answers provided by these authors, with the aim of clarifying the different underlying assumptions that led them to their conclusions. Four themes are found to be especially pertinent. These are the assumptions the authors hold about the existing distribution of power, China's strategic objectives, the role of economic interdependence in Asia, and the relationship between democracy and political legitimacy. The way the authors parse these themes—which ones they bracket or admit into their analysis, and how they weigh and combine them—helps to reveal the underlying bases of their and, by implication, our policy preferences. The essay concludes by suggesting that contrary to the view of some, time has something to offer both sides. And if those opportunities are properly understood by the United States and China, the prospects for peaceful competition and coevolution improve.
ISSN:0162-2889
1531-4804
DOI:10.1162/ISEC_a_00147