Loading…

Lead- and drug-like compounds: the rule-of-five revolution

Citations in CAS SciFinder to the rule-of-five (RO5) publication will exceed 1000 by year-end 2004. Trends in the RO5 literature explosion that can be discerned are the further definitions of drug-like. This topic is explored in terms of drug-like physicochemical features, drug-like structural featu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Drug discovery today. Technologies 2004-12, Vol.1 (4), p.337-341
Main Author: Lipinski, Christopher A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-478555d87ca6868440166c91a043f206a4cec109d44889963e5e7cd54cb8dc083
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-478555d87ca6868440166c91a043f206a4cec109d44889963e5e7cd54cb8dc083
container_end_page 341
container_issue 4
container_start_page 337
container_title Drug discovery today. Technologies
container_volume 1
creator Lipinski, Christopher A.
description Citations in CAS SciFinder to the rule-of-five (RO5) publication will exceed 1000 by year-end 2004. Trends in the RO5 literature explosion that can be discerned are the further definitions of drug-like. This topic is explored in terms of drug-like physicochemical features, drug-like structural features, a comparison of drug-like and non-drug-like in drug discovery and a discussion of how drug-like features relate to clinical success. Physicochemical features of CNS drugs and features related to CNS blood–brain transporter affinity are briefly reviewed. Recent literature on features of non-oral drugs is reviewed and how features of lead-like compounds differ from those of drug-like compounds is discussed. Most recently, partly driven by NIH roadmap initiatives, considerations have arisen as to what tool-like means in the search for chemical tools to probe biology space. All these topics frame the scope of this short review/perspective. Han van de Waterbeemd, Christopher Kohl – Pfizer Global Research & Development, Sandwich Laboratories, PDM (Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism), Sandwich, Kent, UK CT13 9NJ In the past, many clinical candidates failed during development. The reasons for failure are now much better understood. The author of this contribution, Chris Lipinski, was among the first to point out that drugs typically have physicochemical and structural properties within certain ranges. This review discusses the original rule-of-five concept and its variants, to be used in the design of orally active compounds. He also compares the concepts of drug-like, lead-like, and CNS-like compounds and drugs. It is important to consider differences better oral and non-oral drugs. Finally, the new idea of tool-like compounds is presented.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ddtec.2004.11.007
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1542297209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1740674904000551</els_id><sourcerecordid>1542297209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-478555d87ca6868440166c91a043f206a4cec109d44889963e5e7cd54cb8dc083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEYmPwCZBQj1xSnDZNk0kc0MQ_aRIXOEdd4kJG14ykncS3p2MDceJkW3rPz_4Rcs4gZcDE1TK1tkOTZgA8ZSwFKA_ImJUcqCi5OvzTj8hJjEuAnKtcHpNRxpVkgmVjMp1jZWlStTaxoX-ljXvHxPjV2vetjdOke8Mk9A1SX9PabYYBN77pO-fbU3JUV03Es32dkJe72-fZA50_3T_ObubU5Ao6yktZFIWVpamEFJLz4XZhFKuA53UGouIGDQNlOZdSKZFjgaWxBTcLaQ3IfEIud3vXwX_0GDu9ctFg01Qt-j5qVvAsU2UGapDmO6kJPsaAtV4Ht6rCp2agt9D0Un9D01tomjE9QBtcF_uAfrFC--v5oTQIrncCHN7cOAw6GoetQesCmk5b7_4N-AKiW3wz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1542297209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lead- and drug-like compounds: the rule-of-five revolution</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Lipinski, Christopher A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lipinski, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><description>Citations in CAS SciFinder to the rule-of-five (RO5) publication will exceed 1000 by year-end 2004. Trends in the RO5 literature explosion that can be discerned are the further definitions of drug-like. This topic is explored in terms of drug-like physicochemical features, drug-like structural features, a comparison of drug-like and non-drug-like in drug discovery and a discussion of how drug-like features relate to clinical success. Physicochemical features of CNS drugs and features related to CNS blood–brain transporter affinity are briefly reviewed. Recent literature on features of non-oral drugs is reviewed and how features of lead-like compounds differ from those of drug-like compounds is discussed. Most recently, partly driven by NIH roadmap initiatives, considerations have arisen as to what tool-like means in the search for chemical tools to probe biology space. All these topics frame the scope of this short review/perspective. Han van de Waterbeemd, Christopher Kohl – Pfizer Global Research &amp; Development, Sandwich Laboratories, PDM (Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism), Sandwich, Kent, UK CT13 9NJ In the past, many clinical candidates failed during development. The reasons for failure are now much better understood. The author of this contribution, Chris Lipinski, was among the first to point out that drugs typically have physicochemical and structural properties within certain ranges. This review discusses the original rule-of-five concept and its variants, to be used in the design of orally active compounds. He also compares the concepts of drug-like, lead-like, and CNS-like compounds and drugs. It is important to consider differences better oral and non-oral drugs. Finally, the new idea of tool-like compounds is presented.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1740-6749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-6749</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ddtec.2004.11.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24981612</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Drug discovery today. Technologies, 2004-12, Vol.1 (4), p.337-341</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd . All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-478555d87ca6868440166c91a043f206a4cec109d44889963e5e7cd54cb8dc083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-478555d87ca6868440166c91a043f206a4cec109d44889963e5e7cd54cb8dc083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24981612$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lipinski, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><title>Lead- and drug-like compounds: the rule-of-five revolution</title><title>Drug discovery today. Technologies</title><addtitle>Drug Discov Today Technol</addtitle><description>Citations in CAS SciFinder to the rule-of-five (RO5) publication will exceed 1000 by year-end 2004. Trends in the RO5 literature explosion that can be discerned are the further definitions of drug-like. This topic is explored in terms of drug-like physicochemical features, drug-like structural features, a comparison of drug-like and non-drug-like in drug discovery and a discussion of how drug-like features relate to clinical success. Physicochemical features of CNS drugs and features related to CNS blood–brain transporter affinity are briefly reviewed. Recent literature on features of non-oral drugs is reviewed and how features of lead-like compounds differ from those of drug-like compounds is discussed. Most recently, partly driven by NIH roadmap initiatives, considerations have arisen as to what tool-like means in the search for chemical tools to probe biology space. All these topics frame the scope of this short review/perspective. Han van de Waterbeemd, Christopher Kohl – Pfizer Global Research &amp; Development, Sandwich Laboratories, PDM (Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism), Sandwich, Kent, UK CT13 9NJ In the past, many clinical candidates failed during development. The reasons for failure are now much better understood. The author of this contribution, Chris Lipinski, was among the first to point out that drugs typically have physicochemical and structural properties within certain ranges. This review discusses the original rule-of-five concept and its variants, to be used in the design of orally active compounds. He also compares the concepts of drug-like, lead-like, and CNS-like compounds and drugs. It is important to consider differences better oral and non-oral drugs. Finally, the new idea of tool-like compounds is presented.</description><issn>1740-6749</issn><issn>1740-6749</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEYmPwCZBQj1xSnDZNk0kc0MQ_aRIXOEdd4kJG14ykncS3p2MDceJkW3rPz_4Rcs4gZcDE1TK1tkOTZgA8ZSwFKA_ImJUcqCi5OvzTj8hJjEuAnKtcHpNRxpVkgmVjMp1jZWlStTaxoX-ljXvHxPjV2vetjdOke8Mk9A1SX9PabYYBN77pO-fbU3JUV03Es32dkJe72-fZA50_3T_ObubU5Ao6yktZFIWVpamEFJLz4XZhFKuA53UGouIGDQNlOZdSKZFjgaWxBTcLaQ3IfEIud3vXwX_0GDu9ctFg01Qt-j5qVvAsU2UGapDmO6kJPsaAtV4Ht6rCp2agt9D0Un9D01tomjE9QBtcF_uAfrFC--v5oTQIrncCHN7cOAw6GoetQesCmk5b7_4N-AKiW3wz</recordid><startdate>200412</startdate><enddate>200412</enddate><creator>Lipinski, Christopher A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200412</creationdate><title>Lead- and drug-like compounds: the rule-of-five revolution</title><author>Lipinski, Christopher A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-478555d87ca6868440166c91a043f206a4cec109d44889963e5e7cd54cb8dc083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lipinski, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Drug discovery today. Technologies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lipinski, Christopher A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lead- and drug-like compounds: the rule-of-five revolution</atitle><jtitle>Drug discovery today. Technologies</jtitle><addtitle>Drug Discov Today Technol</addtitle><date>2004-12</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>337</spage><epage>341</epage><pages>337-341</pages><issn>1740-6749</issn><eissn>1740-6749</eissn><abstract>Citations in CAS SciFinder to the rule-of-five (RO5) publication will exceed 1000 by year-end 2004. Trends in the RO5 literature explosion that can be discerned are the further definitions of drug-like. This topic is explored in terms of drug-like physicochemical features, drug-like structural features, a comparison of drug-like and non-drug-like in drug discovery and a discussion of how drug-like features relate to clinical success. Physicochemical features of CNS drugs and features related to CNS blood–brain transporter affinity are briefly reviewed. Recent literature on features of non-oral drugs is reviewed and how features of lead-like compounds differ from those of drug-like compounds is discussed. Most recently, partly driven by NIH roadmap initiatives, considerations have arisen as to what tool-like means in the search for chemical tools to probe biology space. All these topics frame the scope of this short review/perspective. Han van de Waterbeemd, Christopher Kohl – Pfizer Global Research &amp; Development, Sandwich Laboratories, PDM (Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism), Sandwich, Kent, UK CT13 9NJ In the past, many clinical candidates failed during development. The reasons for failure are now much better understood. The author of this contribution, Chris Lipinski, was among the first to point out that drugs typically have physicochemical and structural properties within certain ranges. This review discusses the original rule-of-five concept and its variants, to be used in the design of orally active compounds. He also compares the concepts of drug-like, lead-like, and CNS-like compounds and drugs. It is important to consider differences better oral and non-oral drugs. Finally, the new idea of tool-like compounds is presented.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24981612</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ddtec.2004.11.007</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1740-6749
ispartof Drug discovery today. Technologies, 2004-12, Vol.1 (4), p.337-341
issn 1740-6749
1740-6749
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1542297209
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
title Lead- and drug-like compounds: the rule-of-five revolution
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A40%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lead-%20and%20drug-like%20compounds:%20the%20rule-of-five%20revolution&rft.jtitle=Drug%20discovery%20today.%20Technologies&rft.au=Lipinski,%20Christopher%20A.&rft.date=2004-12&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=337&rft.epage=341&rft.pages=337-341&rft.issn=1740-6749&rft.eissn=1740-6749&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ddtec.2004.11.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1542297209%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-478555d87ca6868440166c91a043f206a4cec109d44889963e5e7cd54cb8dc083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1542297209&rft_id=info:pmid/24981612&rfr_iscdi=true