Loading…
Unraveling phonological conspiracies: A case study
Abstract This paper focuses on three seemingly unrelated error patterns in the sound system of a child with a phonological delay, Child 218 (male, age 4 years 6 months) and ascribes those error patterns to a larger conspiracy to eliminate fricatives from the phonetic inventory. Employing Optimality...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical linguistics & phonetics 2014-07, Vol.28 (7-8), p.463-476 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-d337387a8fb575ec7f462490541bf1e0388ced9fd3014973427aa19a463b5b7b3 |
container_end_page | 476 |
container_issue | 7-8 |
container_start_page | 463 |
container_title | Clinical linguistics & phonetics |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Dinnsen, Daniel A. Gierut, Judith A. Morrisette, Michele L. Rose, Darcy E. |
description | Abstract
This paper focuses on three seemingly unrelated error patterns in the sound system of a child with a phonological delay, Child 218 (male, age 4 years 6 months) and ascribes those error patterns to a larger conspiracy to eliminate fricatives from the phonetic inventory. Employing Optimality Theory for its advantages in characterizing conspiracies, our analysis offers a unified account of the observed repairs. The contextual restrictions on those repairs are, moreover, attributed to early developmental prominence effects, which are independently manifested in another error pattern involving rhotic consonants. Comparisons are made with a published case study involving a different implementation of the same conspiracy, the intent being to disambiguate the force behind certain error patterns. The clinical implications of the account are also considered. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3109/02699206.2014.926996 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1543996553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2008864622</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-d337387a8fb575ec7f462490541bf1e0388ced9fd3014973427aa19a463b5b7b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2O0zAUhS0EYkrhDRDKBolNiv8ds5jRaMSfNBIbZm3dOE6bkWsXOxnUt8dR24HZ0JVj-TtX5-ZD6C3BK0aw_oip1JpiuaKY8JWeb_IZWhAueS2wks_RYkbqmblAr3K-xxiXoH6JLqgo30zRBaJ3IcGD80NYV7tNDNHH9WDBVzaGvBsS2MHlT9V1ZSG7Ko9Tt3-NXvTgs3tzPJfo7svnnzff6tsfX7_fXN_WVkg-1h1jijUKmr4VSjirei4p11hw0vbEYdY01nW671jprxXjVAEQDVyyVrSqZUt0eZi7m9qt66wLYwJvdmnYQtqbCIN5-hKGjVnHB8OlZrLst0QfjgNS_DW5PJrtkK3zHoKLUzYU46aRpRU9ixKpKVWaE3keFZwVFUKwgvIDalPMObn-sTzBZpZoThLNLNEcJJbYu38XfwydrBXg_RGAXFz1CYId8l-uUY1Wcv4BVwduCH1MW_gdk-_MCHsf0ynEzlS5fDJh48CPGwvJmfs4pVD8_3-XP63yynk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1543996553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unraveling phonological conspiracies: A case study</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Dinnsen, Daniel A. ; Gierut, Judith A. ; Morrisette, Michele L. ; Rose, Darcy E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dinnsen, Daniel A. ; Gierut, Judith A. ; Morrisette, Michele L. ; Rose, Darcy E.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
This paper focuses on three seemingly unrelated error patterns in the sound system of a child with a phonological delay, Child 218 (male, age 4 years 6 months) and ascribes those error patterns to a larger conspiracy to eliminate fricatives from the phonetic inventory. Employing Optimality Theory for its advantages in characterizing conspiracies, our analysis offers a unified account of the observed repairs. The contextual restrictions on those repairs are, moreover, attributed to early developmental prominence effects, which are independently manifested in another error pattern involving rhotic consonants. Comparisons are made with a published case study involving a different implementation of the same conspiracy, the intent being to disambiguate the force behind certain error patterns. The clinical implications of the account are also considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-9206</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5076</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/02699206.2014.926996</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25000372</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLLPEZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Colchester: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Articulation Disorders - diagnosis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child clinical studies ; Child, Preschool ; Humans ; Language and communication disorders ; Language Development Disorders - diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Optimality theory ; Phonetics ; phonological conspiracies ; phonological delay ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Speech Production Measurement</subject><ispartof>Clinical linguistics & phonetics, 2014-07, Vol.28 (7-8), p.463-476</ispartof><rights>2014 Informa UK Ltd. All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-d337387a8fb575ec7f462490541bf1e0388ced9fd3014973427aa19a463b5b7b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,31270</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28789760$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25000372$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dinnsen, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gierut, Judith A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrisette, Michele L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Darcy E.</creatorcontrib><title>Unraveling phonological conspiracies: A case study</title><title>Clinical linguistics & phonetics</title><addtitle>Clin Linguist Phon</addtitle><description>Abstract
This paper focuses on three seemingly unrelated error patterns in the sound system of a child with a phonological delay, Child 218 (male, age 4 years 6 months) and ascribes those error patterns to a larger conspiracy to eliminate fricatives from the phonetic inventory. Employing Optimality Theory for its advantages in characterizing conspiracies, our analysis offers a unified account of the observed repairs. The contextual restrictions on those repairs are, moreover, attributed to early developmental prominence effects, which are independently manifested in another error pattern involving rhotic consonants. Comparisons are made with a published case study involving a different implementation of the same conspiracy, the intent being to disambiguate the force behind certain error patterns. The clinical implications of the account are also considered.</description><subject>Articulation Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child clinical studies</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language and communication disorders</subject><subject>Language Development Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Optimality theory</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>phonological conspiracies</subject><subject>phonological delay</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Speech Production Measurement</subject><issn>0269-9206</issn><issn>1464-5076</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2O0zAUhS0EYkrhDRDKBolNiv8ds5jRaMSfNBIbZm3dOE6bkWsXOxnUt8dR24HZ0JVj-TtX5-ZD6C3BK0aw_oip1JpiuaKY8JWeb_IZWhAueS2wks_RYkbqmblAr3K-xxiXoH6JLqgo30zRBaJ3IcGD80NYV7tNDNHH9WDBVzaGvBsS2MHlT9V1ZSG7Ko9Tt3-NXvTgs3tzPJfo7svnnzff6tsfX7_fXN_WVkg-1h1jijUKmr4VSjirei4p11hw0vbEYdY01nW671jprxXjVAEQDVyyVrSqZUt0eZi7m9qt66wLYwJvdmnYQtqbCIN5-hKGjVnHB8OlZrLst0QfjgNS_DW5PJrtkK3zHoKLUzYU46aRpRU9ixKpKVWaE3keFZwVFUKwgvIDalPMObn-sTzBZpZoThLNLNEcJJbYu38XfwydrBXg_RGAXFz1CYId8l-uUY1Wcv4BVwduCH1MW_gdk-_MCHsf0ynEzlS5fDJh48CPGwvJmfs4pVD8_3-XP63yynk</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Dinnsen, Daniel A.</creator><creator>Gierut, Judith A.</creator><creator>Morrisette, Michele L.</creator><creator>Rose, Darcy E.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Informa</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Unraveling phonological conspiracies: A case study</title><author>Dinnsen, Daniel A. ; Gierut, Judith A. ; Morrisette, Michele L. ; Rose, Darcy E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-d337387a8fb575ec7f462490541bf1e0388ced9fd3014973427aa19a463b5b7b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Articulation Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child clinical studies</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language and communication disorders</topic><topic>Language Development Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Optimality theory</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>phonological conspiracies</topic><topic>phonological delay</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Speech Production Measurement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dinnsen, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gierut, Judith A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrisette, Michele L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Darcy E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical linguistics & phonetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dinnsen, Daniel A.</au><au>Gierut, Judith A.</au><au>Morrisette, Michele L.</au><au>Rose, Darcy E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unraveling phonological conspiracies: A case study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical linguistics & phonetics</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Linguist Phon</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>7-8</issue><spage>463</spage><epage>476</epage><pages>463-476</pages><issn>0269-9206</issn><eissn>1464-5076</eissn><coden>CLLPEZ</coden><abstract>Abstract
This paper focuses on three seemingly unrelated error patterns in the sound system of a child with a phonological delay, Child 218 (male, age 4 years 6 months) and ascribes those error patterns to a larger conspiracy to eliminate fricatives from the phonetic inventory. Employing Optimality Theory for its advantages in characterizing conspiracies, our analysis offers a unified account of the observed repairs. The contextual restrictions on those repairs are, moreover, attributed to early developmental prominence effects, which are independently manifested in another error pattern involving rhotic consonants. Comparisons are made with a published case study involving a different implementation of the same conspiracy, the intent being to disambiguate the force behind certain error patterns. The clinical implications of the account are also considered.</abstract><cop>Colchester</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>25000372</pmid><doi>10.3109/02699206.2014.926996</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-9206 |
ispartof | Clinical linguistics & phonetics, 2014-07, Vol.28 (7-8), p.463-476 |
issn | 0269-9206 1464-5076 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1543996553 |
source | Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list); Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) |
subjects | Articulation Disorders - diagnosis Biological and medical sciences Child Child clinical studies Child, Preschool Humans Language and communication disorders Language Development Disorders - diagnosis Medical sciences Optimality theory Phonetics phonological conspiracies phonological delay Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Speech Production Measurement |
title | Unraveling phonological conspiracies: A case study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A42%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unraveling%20phonological%20conspiracies:%20A%20case%20study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20linguistics%20&%20phonetics&rft.au=Dinnsen,%20Daniel%20A.&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=7-8&rft.spage=463&rft.epage=476&rft.pages=463-476&rft.issn=0269-9206&rft.eissn=1464-5076&rft.coden=CLLPEZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/02699206.2014.926996&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2008864622%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-d337387a8fb575ec7f462490541bf1e0388ced9fd3014973427aa19a463b5b7b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1543996553&rft_id=info:pmid/25000372&rfr_iscdi=true |