Loading…

Unraveling phonological conspiracies: A case study

Abstract This paper focuses on three seemingly unrelated error patterns in the sound system of a child with a phonological delay, Child 218 (male, age 4 years 6 months) and ascribes those error patterns to a larger conspiracy to eliminate fricatives from the phonetic inventory. Employing Optimality...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical linguistics & phonetics 2014-07, Vol.28 (7-8), p.463-476
Main Authors: Dinnsen, Daniel A., Gierut, Judith A., Morrisette, Michele L., Rose, Darcy E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-d337387a8fb575ec7f462490541bf1e0388ced9fd3014973427aa19a463b5b7b3
container_end_page 476
container_issue 7-8
container_start_page 463
container_title Clinical linguistics & phonetics
container_volume 28
creator Dinnsen, Daniel A.
Gierut, Judith A.
Morrisette, Michele L.
Rose, Darcy E.
description Abstract This paper focuses on three seemingly unrelated error patterns in the sound system of a child with a phonological delay, Child 218 (male, age 4 years 6 months) and ascribes those error patterns to a larger conspiracy to eliminate fricatives from the phonetic inventory. Employing Optimality Theory for its advantages in characterizing conspiracies, our analysis offers a unified account of the observed repairs. The contextual restrictions on those repairs are, moreover, attributed to early developmental prominence effects, which are independently manifested in another error pattern involving rhotic consonants. Comparisons are made with a published case study involving a different implementation of the same conspiracy, the intent being to disambiguate the force behind certain error patterns. The clinical implications of the account are also considered.
doi_str_mv 10.3109/02699206.2014.926996
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1543996553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2008864622</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-d337387a8fb575ec7f462490541bf1e0388ced9fd3014973427aa19a463b5b7b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2O0zAUhS0EYkrhDRDKBolNiv8ds5jRaMSfNBIbZm3dOE6bkWsXOxnUt8dR24HZ0JVj-TtX5-ZD6C3BK0aw_oip1JpiuaKY8JWeb_IZWhAueS2wks_RYkbqmblAr3K-xxiXoH6JLqgo30zRBaJ3IcGD80NYV7tNDNHH9WDBVzaGvBsS2MHlT9V1ZSG7Ko9Tt3-NXvTgs3tzPJfo7svnnzff6tsfX7_fXN_WVkg-1h1jijUKmr4VSjirei4p11hw0vbEYdY01nW671jprxXjVAEQDVyyVrSqZUt0eZi7m9qt66wLYwJvdmnYQtqbCIN5-hKGjVnHB8OlZrLst0QfjgNS_DW5PJrtkK3zHoKLUzYU46aRpRU9ixKpKVWaE3keFZwVFUKwgvIDalPMObn-sTzBZpZoThLNLNEcJJbYu38XfwydrBXg_RGAXFz1CYId8l-uUY1Wcv4BVwduCH1MW_gdk-_MCHsf0ynEzlS5fDJh48CPGwvJmfs4pVD8_3-XP63yynk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1543996553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unraveling phonological conspiracies: A case study</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Dinnsen, Daniel A. ; Gierut, Judith A. ; Morrisette, Michele L. ; Rose, Darcy E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dinnsen, Daniel A. ; Gierut, Judith A. ; Morrisette, Michele L. ; Rose, Darcy E.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract This paper focuses on three seemingly unrelated error patterns in the sound system of a child with a phonological delay, Child 218 (male, age 4 years 6 months) and ascribes those error patterns to a larger conspiracy to eliminate fricatives from the phonetic inventory. Employing Optimality Theory for its advantages in characterizing conspiracies, our analysis offers a unified account of the observed repairs. The contextual restrictions on those repairs are, moreover, attributed to early developmental prominence effects, which are independently manifested in another error pattern involving rhotic consonants. Comparisons are made with a published case study involving a different implementation of the same conspiracy, the intent being to disambiguate the force behind certain error patterns. The clinical implications of the account are also considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-9206</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5076</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/02699206.2014.926996</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25000372</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLLPEZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Colchester: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Articulation Disorders - diagnosis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child clinical studies ; Child, Preschool ; Humans ; Language and communication disorders ; Language Development Disorders - diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Optimality theory ; Phonetics ; phonological conspiracies ; phonological delay ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Speech Production Measurement</subject><ispartof>Clinical linguistics &amp; phonetics, 2014-07, Vol.28 (7-8), p.463-476</ispartof><rights>2014 Informa UK Ltd. All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-d337387a8fb575ec7f462490541bf1e0388ced9fd3014973427aa19a463b5b7b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,31270</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28789760$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25000372$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dinnsen, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gierut, Judith A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrisette, Michele L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Darcy E.</creatorcontrib><title>Unraveling phonological conspiracies: A case study</title><title>Clinical linguistics &amp; phonetics</title><addtitle>Clin Linguist Phon</addtitle><description>Abstract This paper focuses on three seemingly unrelated error patterns in the sound system of a child with a phonological delay, Child 218 (male, age 4 years 6 months) and ascribes those error patterns to a larger conspiracy to eliminate fricatives from the phonetic inventory. Employing Optimality Theory for its advantages in characterizing conspiracies, our analysis offers a unified account of the observed repairs. The contextual restrictions on those repairs are, moreover, attributed to early developmental prominence effects, which are independently manifested in another error pattern involving rhotic consonants. Comparisons are made with a published case study involving a different implementation of the same conspiracy, the intent being to disambiguate the force behind certain error patterns. The clinical implications of the account are also considered.</description><subject>Articulation Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child clinical studies</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language and communication disorders</subject><subject>Language Development Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Optimality theory</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>phonological conspiracies</subject><subject>phonological delay</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Speech Production Measurement</subject><issn>0269-9206</issn><issn>1464-5076</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2O0zAUhS0EYkrhDRDKBolNiv8ds5jRaMSfNBIbZm3dOE6bkWsXOxnUt8dR24HZ0JVj-TtX5-ZD6C3BK0aw_oip1JpiuaKY8JWeb_IZWhAueS2wks_RYkbqmblAr3K-xxiXoH6JLqgo30zRBaJ3IcGD80NYV7tNDNHH9WDBVzaGvBsS2MHlT9V1ZSG7Ko9Tt3-NXvTgs3tzPJfo7svnnzff6tsfX7_fXN_WVkg-1h1jijUKmr4VSjirei4p11hw0vbEYdY01nW671jprxXjVAEQDVyyVrSqZUt0eZi7m9qt66wLYwJvdmnYQtqbCIN5-hKGjVnHB8OlZrLst0QfjgNS_DW5PJrtkK3zHoKLUzYU46aRpRU9ixKpKVWaE3keFZwVFUKwgvIDalPMObn-sTzBZpZoThLNLNEcJJbYu38XfwydrBXg_RGAXFz1CYId8l-uUY1Wcv4BVwduCH1MW_gdk-_MCHsf0ynEzlS5fDJh48CPGwvJmfs4pVD8_3-XP63yynk</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Dinnsen, Daniel A.</creator><creator>Gierut, Judith A.</creator><creator>Morrisette, Michele L.</creator><creator>Rose, Darcy E.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Informa</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Unraveling phonological conspiracies: A case study</title><author>Dinnsen, Daniel A. ; Gierut, Judith A. ; Morrisette, Michele L. ; Rose, Darcy E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-d337387a8fb575ec7f462490541bf1e0388ced9fd3014973427aa19a463b5b7b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Articulation Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child clinical studies</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language and communication disorders</topic><topic>Language Development Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Optimality theory</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>phonological conspiracies</topic><topic>phonological delay</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Speech Production Measurement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dinnsen, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gierut, Judith A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrisette, Michele L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Darcy E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical linguistics &amp; phonetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dinnsen, Daniel A.</au><au>Gierut, Judith A.</au><au>Morrisette, Michele L.</au><au>Rose, Darcy E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unraveling phonological conspiracies: A case study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical linguistics &amp; phonetics</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Linguist Phon</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>7-8</issue><spage>463</spage><epage>476</epage><pages>463-476</pages><issn>0269-9206</issn><eissn>1464-5076</eissn><coden>CLLPEZ</coden><abstract>Abstract This paper focuses on three seemingly unrelated error patterns in the sound system of a child with a phonological delay, Child 218 (male, age 4 years 6 months) and ascribes those error patterns to a larger conspiracy to eliminate fricatives from the phonetic inventory. Employing Optimality Theory for its advantages in characterizing conspiracies, our analysis offers a unified account of the observed repairs. The contextual restrictions on those repairs are, moreover, attributed to early developmental prominence effects, which are independently manifested in another error pattern involving rhotic consonants. Comparisons are made with a published case study involving a different implementation of the same conspiracy, the intent being to disambiguate the force behind certain error patterns. The clinical implications of the account are also considered.</abstract><cop>Colchester</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>25000372</pmid><doi>10.3109/02699206.2014.926996</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-9206
ispartof Clinical linguistics & phonetics, 2014-07, Vol.28 (7-8), p.463-476
issn 0269-9206
1464-5076
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1543996553
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list); Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects Articulation Disorders - diagnosis
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Child clinical studies
Child, Preschool
Humans
Language and communication disorders
Language Development Disorders - diagnosis
Medical sciences
Optimality theory
Phonetics
phonological conspiracies
phonological delay
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Speech Production Measurement
title Unraveling phonological conspiracies: A case study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A42%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unraveling%20phonological%20conspiracies:%20A%20case%20study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20linguistics%20&%20phonetics&rft.au=Dinnsen,%20Daniel%20A.&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=7-8&rft.spage=463&rft.epage=476&rft.pages=463-476&rft.issn=0269-9206&rft.eissn=1464-5076&rft.coden=CLLPEZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/02699206.2014.926996&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2008864622%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-d337387a8fb575ec7f462490541bf1e0388ced9fd3014973427aa19a463b5b7b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1543996553&rft_id=info:pmid/25000372&rfr_iscdi=true