Loading…

Defense against parasites by hitchhikers in leaf-cutting ants: a quantitative assessment

A curious behavior in leaf-cutting ants in the genus Atta is the "hitchhiking" of small minim workers on leaf fragments carried by larger workers. Two functions of these hitchhikers have been proposed: (1) defense of leaf carriers against parasitic flies in the family Phoridae (ant protect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 1990, Vol.26 (1), p.17-29
Main Authors: Feener, D.H. Jr, Moss, K.A.G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-a9cbfca116713845c2be3203fa1eca5e0e3b51384ab7e35eac6b9664366edc63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-a9cbfca116713845c2be3203fa1eca5e0e3b51384ab7e35eac6b9664366edc63
container_end_page 29
container_issue 1
container_start_page 17
container_title Behavioral ecology and sociobiology
container_volume 26
creator Feener, D.H. Jr
Moss, K.A.G
description A curious behavior in leaf-cutting ants in the genus Atta is the "hitchhiking" of small minim workers on leaf fragments carried by larger workers. Two functions of these hitchhikers have been proposed: (1) defense of leaf carriers against parasitic flies in the family Phoridae (ant protection hypothesis; Eibl-Eibesfeldt and Eibl-Eibesfeldt 1967) and (2) reduction of transport costs of small minims that collect plant fluids (energy conservation hypothesis; Stradling 1978). We studied hitchhiking behavior in colonies of Atta colombica on Barro Colorado Island, Panama, and found strong evidence in favor of the ant protection hypothesis. Females of Apocephalus attophilus (Diptera: Phoridae) attack leaf carriers of A. colombica and deposit eggs in the head capsules of these ants. Our observations indicate that parasites require leaf fragments to stand on during oviposition, and, as a result, only leaf carriers are susceptible to parasitic attack. The presence of hitchhikers reduces significantly both the time parasites spend on leaf fragments and the probability that they will land in the first place. Results of experimental introductions of parasites and a year of biweekly censuses at ten colonies indicate that leaf-cutting ants adjust the level of hitchhiking to accommodate both daily and seasonal changes in the abundance of parasites. We found little evidence in support of the energy conservation hypothesis. If it is assumed that all minim workers hitchhike back to the nest, our calculations indicate that total transport costs along a foraging trail are reduced by 10% or less. However, our observations indicate that only 50% of returning minim workers hitchhike, and therefore energy savings are actually considerably less than 10%. Leaf-cutting ants in the genera Atta and Acromyrmex are attacked by over 20 species of parasitic phorids. In the discussion we review what is known about these associations and suggest that these parasites have influenced the ecology and evolution of polyethism in leaf-cutting ants.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF00174021
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15445092</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4600370</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4600370</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-a9cbfca116713845c2be3203fa1eca5e0e3b51384ab7e35eac6b9664366edc63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LxDAQhoMouH5cPAvmogehOknapOvNbwXBgwreyjROd6PddjeTFfz3Vlb0NAPvMw_MK8SeghMF4E4vbgCUy0GrNTFSudEZOKvXxQhMDlmR52ZTbDG_A4BVZTkSr1fUUMckcYKh4yTnGJFDIpb1l5yG5KfT8EGRZehkS9hkfplS6CYSu8RnEuViOWwhYQqfg4WZmGfUpR2x0WDLtPs7t8XzzfXz5V328Hh7f3n-kHljipTh2NeNR6WsU6bMC69rMhpMg4o8FgRk6uInwdqRKQi9rcfW5sZaevPWbIujlXYe-8WSOFWzwJ7aFjvql1yp4ecCxnoAj1egjz1zpKaaxzDD-FUpqH66q_67G-DDXyuyx7aJ2PnA_xdjXZbWuYHbX3HvnPr4l-cWwDgY4oNV3GBf4SQOipcnDcqAtqVyVplvnR-Bbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15445092</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Defense against parasites by hitchhikers in leaf-cutting ants: a quantitative assessment</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Online Journal Archives (Through 1996)</source><creator>Feener, D.H. Jr ; Moss, K.A.G</creator><creatorcontrib>Feener, D.H. Jr ; Moss, K.A.G</creatorcontrib><description>A curious behavior in leaf-cutting ants in the genus Atta is the "hitchhiking" of small minim workers on leaf fragments carried by larger workers. Two functions of these hitchhikers have been proposed: (1) defense of leaf carriers against parasitic flies in the family Phoridae (ant protection hypothesis; Eibl-Eibesfeldt and Eibl-Eibesfeldt 1967) and (2) reduction of transport costs of small minims that collect plant fluids (energy conservation hypothesis; Stradling 1978). We studied hitchhiking behavior in colonies of Atta colombica on Barro Colorado Island, Panama, and found strong evidence in favor of the ant protection hypothesis. Females of Apocephalus attophilus (Diptera: Phoridae) attack leaf carriers of A. colombica and deposit eggs in the head capsules of these ants. Our observations indicate that parasites require leaf fragments to stand on during oviposition, and, as a result, only leaf carriers are susceptible to parasitic attack. The presence of hitchhikers reduces significantly both the time parasites spend on leaf fragments and the probability that they will land in the first place. Results of experimental introductions of parasites and a year of biweekly censuses at ten colonies indicate that leaf-cutting ants adjust the level of hitchhiking to accommodate both daily and seasonal changes in the abundance of parasites. We found little evidence in support of the energy conservation hypothesis. If it is assumed that all minim workers hitchhike back to the nest, our calculations indicate that total transport costs along a foraging trail are reduced by 10% or less. However, our observations indicate that only 50% of returning minim workers hitchhike, and therefore energy savings are actually considerably less than 10%. Leaf-cutting ants in the genera Atta and Acromyrmex are attacked by over 20 species of parasitic phorids. In the discussion we review what is known about these associations and suggest that these parasites have influenced the ecology and evolution of polyethism in leaf-cutting ants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00174021</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BESOD6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; animal behavior ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Ants ; apocephalus attophilus ; Atta ; Atta colombica ; Autoecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological taxonomies ; defensive behavior ; Diptera ; Foraging ; Formicidae ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hitchhiking ; Hymenoptera ; Insect colonies ; Invertebrates ; Leaf cutting ants ; Leaves ; oviposition ; Parasite hosts ; Parasites ; Parasitism ; Phoridae ; Protozoa. Invertebrata</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 1990, Vol.26 (1), p.17-29</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1990 Springer-Verlag</rights><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-a9cbfca116713845c2be3203fa1eca5e0e3b51384ab7e35eac6b9664366edc63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-a9cbfca116713845c2be3203fa1eca5e0e3b51384ab7e35eac6b9664366edc63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4600370$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4600370$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19288677$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Feener, D.H. Jr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, K.A.G</creatorcontrib><title>Defense against parasites by hitchhikers in leaf-cutting ants: a quantitative assessment</title><title>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</title><description>A curious behavior in leaf-cutting ants in the genus Atta is the "hitchhiking" of small minim workers on leaf fragments carried by larger workers. Two functions of these hitchhikers have been proposed: (1) defense of leaf carriers against parasitic flies in the family Phoridae (ant protection hypothesis; Eibl-Eibesfeldt and Eibl-Eibesfeldt 1967) and (2) reduction of transport costs of small minims that collect plant fluids (energy conservation hypothesis; Stradling 1978). We studied hitchhiking behavior in colonies of Atta colombica on Barro Colorado Island, Panama, and found strong evidence in favor of the ant protection hypothesis. Females of Apocephalus attophilus (Diptera: Phoridae) attack leaf carriers of A. colombica and deposit eggs in the head capsules of these ants. Our observations indicate that parasites require leaf fragments to stand on during oviposition, and, as a result, only leaf carriers are susceptible to parasitic attack. The presence of hitchhikers reduces significantly both the time parasites spend on leaf fragments and the probability that they will land in the first place. Results of experimental introductions of parasites and a year of biweekly censuses at ten colonies indicate that leaf-cutting ants adjust the level of hitchhiking to accommodate both daily and seasonal changes in the abundance of parasites. We found little evidence in support of the energy conservation hypothesis. If it is assumed that all minim workers hitchhike back to the nest, our calculations indicate that total transport costs along a foraging trail are reduced by 10% or less. However, our observations indicate that only 50% of returning minim workers hitchhike, and therefore energy savings are actually considerably less than 10%. Leaf-cutting ants in the genera Atta and Acromyrmex are attacked by over 20 species of parasitic phorids. In the discussion we review what is known about these associations and suggest that these parasites have influenced the ecology and evolution of polyethism in leaf-cutting ants.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ants</subject><subject>apocephalus attophilus</subject><subject>Atta</subject><subject>Atta colombica</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological taxonomies</subject><subject>defensive behavior</subject><subject>Diptera</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Formicidae</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hitchhiking</subject><subject>Hymenoptera</subject><subject>Insect colonies</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Leaf cutting ants</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>oviposition</subject><subject>Parasite hosts</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Parasitism</subject><subject>Phoridae</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrata</subject><issn>0340-5443</issn><issn>1432-0762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1LxDAQhoMouH5cPAvmogehOknapOvNbwXBgwreyjROd6PddjeTFfz3Vlb0NAPvMw_MK8SeghMF4E4vbgCUy0GrNTFSudEZOKvXxQhMDlmR52ZTbDG_A4BVZTkSr1fUUMckcYKh4yTnGJFDIpb1l5yG5KfT8EGRZehkS9hkfplS6CYSu8RnEuViOWwhYQqfg4WZmGfUpR2x0WDLtPs7t8XzzfXz5V328Hh7f3n-kHljipTh2NeNR6WsU6bMC69rMhpMg4o8FgRk6uInwdqRKQi9rcfW5sZaevPWbIujlXYe-8WSOFWzwJ7aFjvql1yp4ecCxnoAj1egjz1zpKaaxzDD-FUpqH66q_67G-DDXyuyx7aJ2PnA_xdjXZbWuYHbX3HvnPr4l-cWwDgY4oNV3GBf4SQOipcnDcqAtqVyVplvnR-Bbg</recordid><startdate>1990</startdate><enddate>1990</enddate><creator>Feener, D.H. Jr</creator><creator>Moss, K.A.G</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1990</creationdate><title>Defense against parasites by hitchhikers in leaf-cutting ants: a quantitative assessment</title><author>Feener, D.H. Jr ; Moss, K.A.G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-a9cbfca116713845c2be3203fa1eca5e0e3b51384ab7e35eac6b9664366edc63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ants</topic><topic>apocephalus attophilus</topic><topic>Atta</topic><topic>Atta colombica</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological taxonomies</topic><topic>defensive behavior</topic><topic>Diptera</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Formicidae</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hitchhiking</topic><topic>Hymenoptera</topic><topic>Insect colonies</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Leaf cutting ants</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>oviposition</topic><topic>Parasite hosts</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Parasitism</topic><topic>Phoridae</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Feener, D.H. Jr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, K.A.G</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Feener, D.H. Jr</au><au>Moss, K.A.G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Defense against parasites by hitchhikers in leaf-cutting ants: a quantitative assessment</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle><date>1990</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>17-29</pages><issn>0340-5443</issn><eissn>1432-0762</eissn><coden>BESOD6</coden><abstract>A curious behavior in leaf-cutting ants in the genus Atta is the "hitchhiking" of small minim workers on leaf fragments carried by larger workers. Two functions of these hitchhikers have been proposed: (1) defense of leaf carriers against parasitic flies in the family Phoridae (ant protection hypothesis; Eibl-Eibesfeldt and Eibl-Eibesfeldt 1967) and (2) reduction of transport costs of small minims that collect plant fluids (energy conservation hypothesis; Stradling 1978). We studied hitchhiking behavior in colonies of Atta colombica on Barro Colorado Island, Panama, and found strong evidence in favor of the ant protection hypothesis. Females of Apocephalus attophilus (Diptera: Phoridae) attack leaf carriers of A. colombica and deposit eggs in the head capsules of these ants. Our observations indicate that parasites require leaf fragments to stand on during oviposition, and, as a result, only leaf carriers are susceptible to parasitic attack. The presence of hitchhikers reduces significantly both the time parasites spend on leaf fragments and the probability that they will land in the first place. Results of experimental introductions of parasites and a year of biweekly censuses at ten colonies indicate that leaf-cutting ants adjust the level of hitchhiking to accommodate both daily and seasonal changes in the abundance of parasites. We found little evidence in support of the energy conservation hypothesis. If it is assumed that all minim workers hitchhike back to the nest, our calculations indicate that total transport costs along a foraging trail are reduced by 10% or less. However, our observations indicate that only 50% of returning minim workers hitchhike, and therefore energy savings are actually considerably less than 10%. Leaf-cutting ants in the genera Atta and Acromyrmex are attacked by over 20 species of parasitic phorids. In the discussion we review what is known about these associations and suggest that these parasites have influenced the ecology and evolution of polyethism in leaf-cutting ants.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/BF00174021</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0340-5443
ispartof Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 1990, Vol.26 (1), p.17-29
issn 0340-5443
1432-0762
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15445092
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Online Journal Archives (Through 1996)
subjects Animal and plant ecology
animal behavior
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Ants
apocephalus attophilus
Atta
Atta colombica
Autoecology
Biological and medical sciences
Biological taxonomies
defensive behavior
Diptera
Foraging
Formicidae
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hitchhiking
Hymenoptera
Insect colonies
Invertebrates
Leaf cutting ants
Leaves
oviposition
Parasite hosts
Parasites
Parasitism
Phoridae
Protozoa. Invertebrata
title Defense against parasites by hitchhikers in leaf-cutting ants: a quantitative assessment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A39%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Defense%20against%20parasites%20by%20hitchhikers%20in%20leaf-cutting%20ants:%20a%20quantitative%20assessment&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology%20and%20sociobiology&rft.au=Feener,%20D.H.%20Jr&rft.date=1990&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=17-29&rft.issn=0340-5443&rft.eissn=1432-0762&rft.coden=BESOD6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00174021&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4600370%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-a9cbfca116713845c2be3203fa1eca5e0e3b51384ab7e35eac6b9664366edc63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15445092&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4600370&rfr_iscdi=true