Loading…

Comparison between ABR with click and narrow band chirp stimuli in children

Abstract Objective Click and chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABR) are applied for the estimation of hearing thresholds in children. The present study analyzes ABR thresholds across a large sample of children's ears obtained with both methods. The aim was to demonstrate the correlatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology 2014-08, Vol.78 (8), p.1352-1355
Main Authors: Zirn, Stefan, Louza, Julia, Reiman, Viktor, Wittlinger, Natalie, Hempel, John-Martin, Schuster, Maria
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-db29400fb4138b2bf9fb6f9eeef88dd0f90890d207fe40bff27989e7e278eb793
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-db29400fb4138b2bf9fb6f9eeef88dd0f90890d207fe40bff27989e7e278eb793
container_end_page 1355
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1352
container_title International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology
container_volume 78
creator Zirn, Stefan
Louza, Julia
Reiman, Viktor
Wittlinger, Natalie
Hempel, John-Martin
Schuster, Maria
description Abstract Objective Click and chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABR) are applied for the estimation of hearing thresholds in children. The present study analyzes ABR thresholds across a large sample of children's ears obtained with both methods. The aim was to demonstrate the correlation between both methods using narrow band chirp and click stimuli. Methods Click and chirp evoked ABRs were measured in 253 children aged from 0 to 18 years to determine their individual auditory threshold. The delay-compensated stimuli were narrow band CE chirps with either 2000 Hz or 4000 Hz center frequencies. Measurements were performed consecutively during natural sleep, and under sedation or general anesthesia. Threshold estimation was performed for each measurement by two experienced audiologists. Results Pearson-correlation analysis revealed highly significant correlations ( r = 0.94) between click and chirp derived thresholds for both 2 kHz and 4 kHz chirps. No considerable differences were observed either between different age ranges or gender. Comparing the thresholds estimated using ABR with click stimuli and chirp stimuli, only 0.8–2% for the 2000 Hz NB-chirp and 0.4–1.2% of the 4000 Hz NB-chirp measurements differed more than 15 dB for different degrees of hearing loss or normal hearing. Conclusion The results suggest that either NB-chirp or click ABR is sufficient for threshold estimation. This holds for the chirp frequencies of 2000 Hz and 4000 Hz. The use of either click- or chirp-evoked ABR allows a reduction of recording time in young infants. Nevertheless, to cross-check the results of one of the methods, we recommend measurements with the other method as well.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.05.028
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1545188223</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0165587614002961</els_id><sourcerecordid>1545188223</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-db29400fb4138b2bf9fb6f9eeef88dd0f90890d207fe40bff27989e7e278eb793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQQC0EokvhHyDkI5cE22sn9gWprPhSKyEVOFuxPVadJk6wk6767-toCwcuPc1o9GZG8waht5TUlNDmQ1-Hfp7SUDNCeU1ETZh8hnZUtqySvOHP0a5gohKybc7Qq5x7QmhLhHiJzhiXknHR7NDlYRrnLoU8RWxgOQJEfPHpGh_DcoPtEOwt7qLDsUtpOmKz5fYmpBnnJYzrEHCIW2FwCeJr9MJ3Q4Y3j_Ec_f7y-dfhW3X14-v3w8VVZblsl8oZpjgh3nC6l4YZr7xpvAIAL6VzxCsiFXGMtB44Md6zVkkFLbBWgmnV_hy9P82d0_RnhbzoMWQLw9BFmNasqeCClgPZvqD8hNo05ZzA6zmFsUv3mhK9adS9PmnUm0ZNhC4aS9u7xw2rGcH9a_rrrQAfTwCUO-8CJJ1tgGjBhQR20W4KT234f0CRHYPthlu4h9xPa4rFoaY6M030z-2V2ydpMcdUQ_cPR2uakg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1545188223</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between ABR with click and narrow band chirp stimuli in children</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zirn, Stefan ; Louza, Julia ; Reiman, Viktor ; Wittlinger, Natalie ; Hempel, John-Martin ; Schuster, Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Zirn, Stefan ; Louza, Julia ; Reiman, Viktor ; Wittlinger, Natalie ; Hempel, John-Martin ; Schuster, Maria</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective Click and chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABR) are applied for the estimation of hearing thresholds in children. The present study analyzes ABR thresholds across a large sample of children's ears obtained with both methods. The aim was to demonstrate the correlation between both methods using narrow band chirp and click stimuli. Methods Click and chirp evoked ABRs were measured in 253 children aged from 0 to 18 years to determine their individual auditory threshold. The delay-compensated stimuli were narrow band CE chirps with either 2000 Hz or 4000 Hz center frequencies. Measurements were performed consecutively during natural sleep, and under sedation or general anesthesia. Threshold estimation was performed for each measurement by two experienced audiologists. Results Pearson-correlation analysis revealed highly significant correlations ( r = 0.94) between click and chirp derived thresholds for both 2 kHz and 4 kHz chirps. No considerable differences were observed either between different age ranges or gender. Comparing the thresholds estimated using ABR with click stimuli and chirp stimuli, only 0.8–2% for the 2000 Hz NB-chirp and 0.4–1.2% of the 4000 Hz NB-chirp measurements differed more than 15 dB for different degrees of hearing loss or normal hearing. Conclusion The results suggest that either NB-chirp or click ABR is sufficient for threshold estimation. This holds for the chirp frequencies of 2000 Hz and 4000 Hz. The use of either click- or chirp-evoked ABR allows a reduction of recording time in young infants. Nevertheless, to cross-check the results of one of the methods, we recommend measurements with the other method as well.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-5876</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.05.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24882456</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>ABR ; Acoustic Stimulation - methods ; Adolescent ; Auditory Threshold - physiology ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Chirp ; Click ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology ; Female ; Hearing - physiology ; Hearing Loss - diagnosis ; Hearing Loss - physiopathology ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Loudness Perception - physiology ; Male ; Otolaryngology ; Pediatrics ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2014-08, Vol.78 (8), p.1352-1355</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-db29400fb4138b2bf9fb6f9eeef88dd0f90890d207fe40bff27989e7e278eb793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-db29400fb4138b2bf9fb6f9eeef88dd0f90890d207fe40bff27989e7e278eb793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24882456$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zirn, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louza, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiman, Viktor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittlinger, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hempel, John-Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, Maria</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between ABR with click and narrow band chirp stimuli in children</title><title>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</title><addtitle>Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective Click and chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABR) are applied for the estimation of hearing thresholds in children. The present study analyzes ABR thresholds across a large sample of children's ears obtained with both methods. The aim was to demonstrate the correlation between both methods using narrow band chirp and click stimuli. Methods Click and chirp evoked ABRs were measured in 253 children aged from 0 to 18 years to determine their individual auditory threshold. The delay-compensated stimuli were narrow band CE chirps with either 2000 Hz or 4000 Hz center frequencies. Measurements were performed consecutively during natural sleep, and under sedation or general anesthesia. Threshold estimation was performed for each measurement by two experienced audiologists. Results Pearson-correlation analysis revealed highly significant correlations ( r = 0.94) between click and chirp derived thresholds for both 2 kHz and 4 kHz chirps. No considerable differences were observed either between different age ranges or gender. Comparing the thresholds estimated using ABR with click stimuli and chirp stimuli, only 0.8–2% for the 2000 Hz NB-chirp and 0.4–1.2% of the 4000 Hz NB-chirp measurements differed more than 15 dB for different degrees of hearing loss or normal hearing. Conclusion The results suggest that either NB-chirp or click ABR is sufficient for threshold estimation. This holds for the chirp frequencies of 2000 Hz and 4000 Hz. The use of either click- or chirp-evoked ABR allows a reduction of recording time in young infants. Nevertheless, to cross-check the results of one of the methods, we recommend measurements with the other method as well.</description><subject>ABR</subject><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold - physiology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Chirp</subject><subject>Click</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing - physiology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Loudness Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0165-5876</issn><issn>1872-8464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQQC0EokvhHyDkI5cE22sn9gWprPhSKyEVOFuxPVadJk6wk6767-toCwcuPc1o9GZG8waht5TUlNDmQ1-Hfp7SUDNCeU1ETZh8hnZUtqySvOHP0a5gohKybc7Qq5x7QmhLhHiJzhiXknHR7NDlYRrnLoU8RWxgOQJEfPHpGh_DcoPtEOwt7qLDsUtpOmKz5fYmpBnnJYzrEHCIW2FwCeJr9MJ3Q4Y3j_Ec_f7y-dfhW3X14-v3w8VVZblsl8oZpjgh3nC6l4YZr7xpvAIAL6VzxCsiFXGMtB44Md6zVkkFLbBWgmnV_hy9P82d0_RnhbzoMWQLw9BFmNasqeCClgPZvqD8hNo05ZzA6zmFsUv3mhK9adS9PmnUm0ZNhC4aS9u7xw2rGcH9a_rrrQAfTwCUO-8CJJ1tgGjBhQR20W4KT234f0CRHYPthlu4h9xPa4rFoaY6M030z-2V2ydpMcdUQ_cPR2uakg</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>Zirn, Stefan</creator><creator>Louza, Julia</creator><creator>Reiman, Viktor</creator><creator>Wittlinger, Natalie</creator><creator>Hempel, John-Martin</creator><creator>Schuster, Maria</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>Comparison between ABR with click and narrow band chirp stimuli in children</title><author>Zirn, Stefan ; Louza, Julia ; Reiman, Viktor ; Wittlinger, Natalie ; Hempel, John-Martin ; Schuster, Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-db29400fb4138b2bf9fb6f9eeef88dd0f90890d207fe40bff27989e7e278eb793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>ABR</topic><topic>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold - physiology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Chirp</topic><topic>Click</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing - physiology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Loudness Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zirn, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louza, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiman, Viktor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittlinger, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hempel, John-Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zirn, Stefan</au><au>Louza, Julia</au><au>Reiman, Viktor</au><au>Wittlinger, Natalie</au><au>Hempel, John-Martin</au><au>Schuster, Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between ABR with click and narrow band chirp stimuli in children</atitle><jtitle>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1352</spage><epage>1355</epage><pages>1352-1355</pages><issn>0165-5876</issn><eissn>1872-8464</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective Click and chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABR) are applied for the estimation of hearing thresholds in children. The present study analyzes ABR thresholds across a large sample of children's ears obtained with both methods. The aim was to demonstrate the correlation between both methods using narrow band chirp and click stimuli. Methods Click and chirp evoked ABRs were measured in 253 children aged from 0 to 18 years to determine their individual auditory threshold. The delay-compensated stimuli were narrow band CE chirps with either 2000 Hz or 4000 Hz center frequencies. Measurements were performed consecutively during natural sleep, and under sedation or general anesthesia. Threshold estimation was performed for each measurement by two experienced audiologists. Results Pearson-correlation analysis revealed highly significant correlations ( r = 0.94) between click and chirp derived thresholds for both 2 kHz and 4 kHz chirps. No considerable differences were observed either between different age ranges or gender. Comparing the thresholds estimated using ABR with click stimuli and chirp stimuli, only 0.8–2% for the 2000 Hz NB-chirp and 0.4–1.2% of the 4000 Hz NB-chirp measurements differed more than 15 dB for different degrees of hearing loss or normal hearing. Conclusion The results suggest that either NB-chirp or click ABR is sufficient for threshold estimation. This holds for the chirp frequencies of 2000 Hz and 4000 Hz. The use of either click- or chirp-evoked ABR allows a reduction of recording time in young infants. Nevertheless, to cross-check the results of one of the methods, we recommend measurements with the other method as well.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>24882456</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.05.028</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-5876
ispartof International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2014-08, Vol.78 (8), p.1352-1355
issn 0165-5876
1872-8464
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1545188223
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects ABR
Acoustic Stimulation - methods
Adolescent
Auditory Threshold - physiology
Child
Child, Preschool
Children
Chirp
Click
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology
Female
Hearing - physiology
Hearing Loss - diagnosis
Hearing Loss - physiopathology
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Loudness Perception - physiology
Male
Otolaryngology
Pediatrics
Retrospective Studies
title Comparison between ABR with click and narrow band chirp stimuli in children
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A53%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20ABR%20with%20click%20and%20narrow%20band%20chirp%20stimuli%20in%20children&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20pediatric%20otorhinolaryngology&rft.au=Zirn,%20Stefan&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1352&rft.epage=1355&rft.pages=1352-1355&rft.issn=0165-5876&rft.eissn=1872-8464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.05.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1545188223%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-db29400fb4138b2bf9fb6f9eeef88dd0f90890d207fe40bff27989e7e278eb793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1545188223&rft_id=info:pmid/24882456&rfr_iscdi=true