Loading…

Facilitation of pain sensitization in knee osteoarthritis and persistent post-operative pain: A cross-sectional study

Background Around 20% of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) have chronic post‐operative pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and often undergo revision surgery with unfavourable pain outcome. This study compared sensitization in pain patients with knee OA and after revision TKA (re‐TKA). Methods...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of pain 2014-08, Vol.18 (7), p.1024-1031
Main Authors: Skou, S.T., Graven-Nielsen, T., Rasmussen, S., Simonsen, O.H., Laursen, M.B., Arendt-Nielsen, L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Around 20% of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) have chronic post‐operative pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and often undergo revision surgery with unfavourable pain outcome. This study compared sensitization in pain patients with knee OA and after revision TKA (re‐TKA). Methods Median pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) assessed from the most affected knee (localized sensitization) were used to subgroup 53 patients with OA pain and 20 patients with pain after re‐TKA: group 1: OA and high‐knee PPT; group 2: OA and low‐knee PPT; group 3: re‐TKA and high‐knee PPT; group 4: re‐TKA and low‐knee PPT. Clinical pain intensity was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Bilateral PPTs were measured from the lower leg and forearm (spreading sensitization). Furthermore, the pain intensities evoked by 10 repeated pressure pain stimuli (temporal summation) at the knee and lower leg were assessed on an electronic VAS. Results The mean clinical pain intensity was not significantly different between groups. The PPTs from both lower leg and forearm were significantly lower in group 4 compared to groups 1, 2, and 3 and in groups 2 and 3 compared to group 1 (p 
ISSN:1090-3801
1532-2149
DOI:10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00447.x