Validation of the Coupled Thermosphere Ionosphere Plasmasphere Electrodynamics model: CTIPE-Mass Spectrometer Incoherent Scatter temperature comparison

New requirements for specification and forecast of the space environment and the availability of unprecedented amounts of real‐time data are now driving the development of data assimilation schemes for the thermosphere and ionosphere. Such schemes require accurate knowledge of any biases affecting t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Space weather 2008-09, Vol.6 (9), p.np-n/a
Main Authors: Codrescu, M. V., Fuller-Rowell, T. J., Munteanu, Vlad, Minter, C. F., Millward, G. H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
energy deposition
thermosphere
thermospheric dynamics
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:New requirements for specification and forecast of the space environment and the availability of unprecedented amounts of real‐time data are now driving the development of data assimilation schemes for the thermosphere and ionosphere. Such schemes require accurate knowledge of any biases affecting the models. Finding the biases is not trivial and requires significant effort. Here we present a first step in the validation of a coupled thermosphere ionosphere general circulation model in preparation for its inclusion in a data assimilation scheme. We present a comparison between the Mass Spectrometer Incoherent Scatter (MSIS) radar empirical model neutral temperatures and the Coupled Thermosphere Ionosphere Plasmasphere Electrodynamics (CTIPE) neutral temperature predictions for three solar cycle conditions (F10.7 = 70, 125, and 200), three geomagnetic activity conditions (Kp = 1, 3, and 7), and three seasons (equinox, summer, and winter). The CTIPE model was run for each case with constant inputs until a diurnally reproducible (“steady state”) global temperature pattern was obtained. MSIS predictions were generated for “perpetually constant” equivalent conditions. The temperature comparisons are performed on a 300 km altitude shell. We present global temperature averages, area‐weighted root mean square differences, and zonally averaged temperature comparisons. CTIPE temperatures at 300 km altitude are lower than MSIS if Joule heating calculations do not include small‐scale E field variability. This is the first global assessment of a general circulation model for the thermosphere over such a wide range of geomagnetic and solar conditions.
ISSN:1542-7390
1542-7390
DOI:10.1029/2007SW000364