Loading…
Current Status of Molecular Biomarkers in Endometrial Cancer
In spite of the high and increasing incidence of endometrial cancer, our current models for prediction of prognosis and even more treatment response are suboptimal, and molecular biomarkers to assist clinical decision making are needed. In this review an overview is given of the currently known as w...
Saved in:
Published in: | Current oncology reports 2014-09, Vol.16 (9), p.403-403, Article 403 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-1e1f81c6d88d52abd16d3eb6abaed398b147b931cec9b61f9c77d1b6f38683ec3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-1e1f81c6d88d52abd16d3eb6abaed398b147b931cec9b61f9c77d1b6f38683ec3 |
container_end_page | 403 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 403 |
container_title | Current oncology reports |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Werner, H. M. J. Salvesen, H. B. |
description | In spite of the high and increasing incidence of endometrial cancer, our current models for prediction of prognosis and even more treatment response are suboptimal, and molecular biomarkers to assist clinical decision making are needed. In this review an overview is given of the currently known as well as promising prognostic and predictive biomarkers in endometrial carcinoma. Key clinical challenges, where use of molecular biomarkers can meet clinical needs, are highlighted. The current status for the presently most promising prognostic and predictive biomarkers in endometrial carcinoma is reviewed. DNA ploidy, p53 status, hormone receptor level, HER2, stathmin, L1 cell adhesion molecule expression and other biomarkers are discussed in relation to the scientific robustness of various essential steps in biomarker development and (current) clinical applicability for individualizing treatment strategies. Tumour heterogeneity and its consequences for biomarker assessment and the importance of developing standardised tests for implementation are discussed. To improve the development and clinical uptake of biomarkers, several strategies are proposed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11912-014-0403-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1549178655</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1549178655</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-1e1f81c6d88d52abd16d3eb6abaed398b147b931cec9b61f9c77d1b6f38683ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMorq7-AC9S8OKlmmnaNAEvWtYPWPGgnkOaTKVrt12T9uC_N6WriOApQ-aZN5mHkBOgF0BpfukBJCQxhTSmKWUx2yEHkLE05gmXu2OdhMtc0hk59H5FaUKpoPtklmSUp5nID8hVMTiHbR8997offNRV0WPXoBka7aKbultr947OR3UbLVrbrbF3tW6iQrcG3RHZq3Tj8Xh7zsnr7eKluI-XT3cPxfUyNikTfQwIlQDDrRA2S3RpgVuGJdelRsukKCHNS8nAoJElh0qaPLdQ8ooJLhgaNifnU-7GdR8D-l6ta2-waXSL3eAVZKmEXPAsC-jZH3TVDa4Nv1MQ-nkiUxgpmCjjOu8dVmrj6rDqpwKqRrVqUquCWjWqVSzMnG6Th3KN9mfi22UAkgnwodW-ofv19L-pX6msgso</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1655729415</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Current Status of Molecular Biomarkers in Endometrial Cancer</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Werner, H. M. J. ; Salvesen, H. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Werner, H. M. J. ; Salvesen, H. B.</creatorcontrib><description>In spite of the high and increasing incidence of endometrial cancer, our current models for prediction of prognosis and even more treatment response are suboptimal, and molecular biomarkers to assist clinical decision making are needed. In this review an overview is given of the currently known as well as promising prognostic and predictive biomarkers in endometrial carcinoma. Key clinical challenges, where use of molecular biomarkers can meet clinical needs, are highlighted. The current status for the presently most promising prognostic and predictive biomarkers in endometrial carcinoma is reviewed. DNA ploidy, p53 status, hormone receptor level, HER2, stathmin, L1 cell adhesion molecule expression and other biomarkers are discussed in relation to the scientific robustness of various essential steps in biomarker development and (current) clinical applicability for individualizing treatment strategies. Tumour heterogeneity and its consequences for biomarker assessment and the importance of developing standardised tests for implementation are discussed. To improve the development and clinical uptake of biomarkers, several strategies are proposed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-3790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-6269</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11912-014-0403-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25064587</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis ; Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics ; DNA, Neoplasm - genetics ; Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Endometrial Neoplasms - genetics ; Female ; Genes, p53 ; Gynecologic Cancers (NS Reed ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Oncology ; Ploidies ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; Section Editor ; Topical Collection on Gynecologic Cancers</subject><ispartof>Current oncology reports, 2014-09, Vol.16 (9), p.403-403, Article 403</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-1e1f81c6d88d52abd16d3eb6abaed398b147b931cec9b61f9c77d1b6f38683ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-1e1f81c6d88d52abd16d3eb6abaed398b147b931cec9b61f9c77d1b6f38683ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25064587$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Werner, H. M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvesen, H. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Current Status of Molecular Biomarkers in Endometrial Cancer</title><title>Current oncology reports</title><addtitle>Curr Oncol Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Curr Oncol Rep</addtitle><description>In spite of the high and increasing incidence of endometrial cancer, our current models for prediction of prognosis and even more treatment response are suboptimal, and molecular biomarkers to assist clinical decision making are needed. In this review an overview is given of the currently known as well as promising prognostic and predictive biomarkers in endometrial carcinoma. Key clinical challenges, where use of molecular biomarkers can meet clinical needs, are highlighted. The current status for the presently most promising prognostic and predictive biomarkers in endometrial carcinoma is reviewed. DNA ploidy, p53 status, hormone receptor level, HER2, stathmin, L1 cell adhesion molecule expression and other biomarkers are discussed in relation to the scientific robustness of various essential steps in biomarker development and (current) clinical applicability for individualizing treatment strategies. Tumour heterogeneity and its consequences for biomarker assessment and the importance of developing standardised tests for implementation are discussed. To improve the development and clinical uptake of biomarkers, several strategies are proposed.</description><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</subject><subject>DNA, Neoplasm - genetics</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genes, p53</subject><subject>Gynecologic Cancers (NS Reed</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Ploidies</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Section Editor</subject><subject>Topical Collection on Gynecologic Cancers</subject><issn>1523-3790</issn><issn>1534-6269</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMorq7-AC9S8OKlmmnaNAEvWtYPWPGgnkOaTKVrt12T9uC_N6WriOApQ-aZN5mHkBOgF0BpfukBJCQxhTSmKWUx2yEHkLE05gmXu2OdhMtc0hk59H5FaUKpoPtklmSUp5nID8hVMTiHbR8997offNRV0WPXoBka7aKbultr947OR3UbLVrbrbF3tW6iQrcG3RHZq3Tj8Xh7zsnr7eKluI-XT3cPxfUyNikTfQwIlQDDrRA2S3RpgVuGJdelRsukKCHNS8nAoJElh0qaPLdQ8ooJLhgaNifnU-7GdR8D-l6ta2-waXSL3eAVZKmEXPAsC-jZH3TVDa4Nv1MQ-nkiUxgpmCjjOu8dVmrj6rDqpwKqRrVqUquCWjWqVSzMnG6Th3KN9mfi22UAkgnwodW-ofv19L-pX6msgso</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Werner, H. M. J.</creator><creator>Salvesen, H. B.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Current Status of Molecular Biomarkers in Endometrial Cancer</title><author>Werner, H. M. J. ; Salvesen, H. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-1e1f81c6d88d52abd16d3eb6abaed398b147b931cec9b61f9c77d1b6f38683ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</topic><topic>DNA, Neoplasm - genetics</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genes, p53</topic><topic>Gynecologic Cancers (NS Reed</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Ploidies</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Section Editor</topic><topic>Topical Collection on Gynecologic Cancers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Werner, H. M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvesen, H. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current oncology reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Werner, H. M. J.</au><au>Salvesen, H. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Current Status of Molecular Biomarkers in Endometrial Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Current oncology reports</jtitle><stitle>Curr Oncol Rep</stitle><addtitle>Curr Oncol Rep</addtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>403</spage><epage>403</epage><pages>403-403</pages><artnum>403</artnum><issn>1523-3790</issn><eissn>1534-6269</eissn><abstract>In spite of the high and increasing incidence of endometrial cancer, our current models for prediction of prognosis and even more treatment response are suboptimal, and molecular biomarkers to assist clinical decision making are needed. In this review an overview is given of the currently known as well as promising prognostic and predictive biomarkers in endometrial carcinoma. Key clinical challenges, where use of molecular biomarkers can meet clinical needs, are highlighted. The current status for the presently most promising prognostic and predictive biomarkers in endometrial carcinoma is reviewed. DNA ploidy, p53 status, hormone receptor level, HER2, stathmin, L1 cell adhesion molecule expression and other biomarkers are discussed in relation to the scientific robustness of various essential steps in biomarker development and (current) clinical applicability for individualizing treatment strategies. Tumour heterogeneity and its consequences for biomarker assessment and the importance of developing standardised tests for implementation are discussed. To improve the development and clinical uptake of biomarkers, several strategies are proposed.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>25064587</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11912-014-0403-3</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1523-3790 |
ispartof | Current oncology reports, 2014-09, Vol.16 (9), p.403-403, Article 403 |
issn | 1523-3790 1534-6269 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1549178655 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics DNA, Neoplasm - genetics Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnosis Endometrial Neoplasms - genetics Female Genes, p53 Gynecologic Cancers (NS Reed Humans Medicine Medicine & Public Health Oncology Ploidies Predictive Value of Tests Prognosis Section Editor Topical Collection on Gynecologic Cancers |
title | Current Status of Molecular Biomarkers in Endometrial Cancer |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A27%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Current%20Status%20of%20Molecular%20Biomarkers%20in%20Endometrial%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Current%20oncology%20reports&rft.au=Werner,%20H.%20M.%20J.&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=403&rft.epage=403&rft.pages=403-403&rft.artnum=403&rft.issn=1523-3790&rft.eissn=1534-6269&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11912-014-0403-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1549178655%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-1e1f81c6d88d52abd16d3eb6abaed398b147b931cec9b61f9c77d1b6f38683ec3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1655729415&rft_id=info:pmid/25064587&rfr_iscdi=true |