Targeting Binge Eating Through Components of Dialectical Behavior Therapy: Preliminary Outcomes for Individually Supported Diary Card Self-Monitoring Versus Group-Based DBT

• Published in: Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.) Ill.), 2013-12, Vol.50 (4), p.543-552
• Main Authors: Klein, Angela S., Skinner, Jeremy B., Hawley, Kristin M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Behavior Therapy - methods; Behaviour therapy; Binge Eating; Binge-Eating Disorder - psychology; Binge-Eating Disorder - therapy; Bulimia; Dialectical Behavior Therapy; Diaries; Female; Human; Humans; Patient Compliance - psychology; Patient Compliance - statistics & numerical data; Psychotherapy, Group - methods; Self Report; Self-Efficacy; Selfmonitoring; Symptoms; Thinness; Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0033-3204; 1939-1536
• DOI: 10.1037/a0033130

The current study examined two condensed adaptations of dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) for binge eating. Women with full- or sub-threshold variants of either binge eating disorder or bulimia nervosa were randomly assigned to individually supported self-monitoring using adapted DBT diary cards (DC) or group-based DBT, each 15 sessions over 16 weeks. DC sessions focused on problem-solving diary card completion issues, praising diary card completion, and supporting nonjudgmental awareness of eating-related habits and urges, but not formally teaching DBT skills. Group-based DBT included eating mindfulness, progressing through graded exposure; mindfulness, emotion regulation, and distress tolerance skills; and coaching calls between sessions. Both treatments evidenced large and significant improvements in binge eating, bulimic symptoms, and interoceptive awareness. For group-based DBT, ineffectiveness, drive for thinness, body dissatisfaction, and perfectionism also decreased significantly, with medium to large effect sizes. For DC, results were not significant but large in effect size for body dissatisfaction and medium in effect size for ineffectiveness and drive for thinness. Retention for both treatments was higher than recent trends for eating disorder treatment in fee-for-service practice and for similar clinic settings, but favored DC, with the greater attrition of group-based DBT primarily attributed to its more intensive and time-consuming nature, and dropout overall associated with less pretreatment impairment and greater interoceptive awareness. This preliminary investigation suggests that with both abbreviated DBT-based treatments, substantial improvement in core binge eating symptoms is possible, enhancing potential avenues for implementation beyond more time-intensive DBT.