Loading…

Memory-Experience Gap in Early Adolescents’ Happiness Reports

Studies among adult populations show that estimates of how happy one has felt in the past tend to be more positive than average happiness as assessed using time sampling techniques. This ‘memory-experience gap’ is attributed to cognitive biases, among which fading affect bias. In this paper we repor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Child indicators research 2014-03, Vol.7 (1), p.21-40
Main Authors: Tadić, Maja, Braam, Huub, Van Vliet, Katja, Veenhoven, Ruut
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f53185924ea936e971b03ce9a9c9b0fa8537e06922a96dbaf050f98d54ed81293
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f53185924ea936e971b03ce9a9c9b0fa8537e06922a96dbaf050f98d54ed81293
container_end_page 40
container_issue 1
container_start_page 21
container_title Child indicators research
container_volume 7
creator Tadić, Maja
Braam, Huub
Van Vliet, Katja
Veenhoven, Ruut
description Studies among adult populations show that estimates of how happy one has felt in the past tend to be more positive than average happiness as assessed using time sampling techniques. This ‘memory-experience gap’ is attributed to cognitive biases, among which fading affect bias. In this paper we report a study among 352 pupils of a secondary school in the Netherlands. These youngsters reported subsequently: 1) how happy they had felt yesterday, 2) how happy they had felt during the last month, 3) what they had done the previous day and 4) how they had felt during each of these activities. Unlike earlier studies, the average rating of happiness in the last month appeared to be lower than average happiness of the previous day. In accordance with earlier research, the global rating of happiness during the previous day was higher than the average of reported affect during separate activities during that day. A further multilevel analysis suggest that in estimating how they have felt on the whole yesterday, youngsters overestimated short pleasant episodes and underestimated unpleasant episodes, especially when such episodes lasted long.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12187-013-9194-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1550985558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1939625448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f53185924ea936e971b03ce9a9c9b0fa8537e06922a96dbaf050f98d54ed81293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9Kw0AQhxdRsFYfwFvAi5fV_ZPd7JykSG2FiiAK3pZtMpGUNIm7Kdibr-Hr-SRuiYgInmYYvt-P4SPklLMLzlh2GbjgJqOMSwocUqr3yCgeUmrAmP2fPXs-JEchrBjTnAkxIld3uG79lk7fOvQVNjkmM9clVZNMna-3yaRoaww5Nn34fP9I5q7rqgZDSB6wa30fjslB6eqAJ99zTJ5upo_Xc7q4n91eTxY0lyB6WirJjQKRogOpETK-ZDJHcJDDkpXOKJkh0yCEA10sXckUK8EUKsXCcAFyTM6H3s63rxsMvV1X8a26dg22m2C5UgyMUspE9OwPumo3vonfWQ4StFBpuqP4QOW-DcFjaTtfrZ3fWs7sTqkdlNqo1O6UWh0zYsiEyDYv6H81_xv6ArQjeJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1939625448</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Memory-Experience Gap in Early Adolescents’ Happiness Reports</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Tadić, Maja ; Braam, Huub ; Van Vliet, Katja ; Veenhoven, Ruut</creator><creatorcontrib>Tadić, Maja ; Braam, Huub ; Van Vliet, Katja ; Veenhoven, Ruut</creatorcontrib><description>Studies among adult populations show that estimates of how happy one has felt in the past tend to be more positive than average happiness as assessed using time sampling techniques. This ‘memory-experience gap’ is attributed to cognitive biases, among which fading affect bias. In this paper we report a study among 352 pupils of a secondary school in the Netherlands. These youngsters reported subsequently: 1) how happy they had felt yesterday, 2) how happy they had felt during the last month, 3) what they had done the previous day and 4) how they had felt during each of these activities. Unlike earlier studies, the average rating of happiness in the last month appeared to be lower than average happiness of the previous day. In accordance with earlier research, the global rating of happiness during the previous day was higher than the average of reported affect during separate activities during that day. A further multilevel analysis suggest that in estimating how they have felt on the whole yesterday, youngsters overestimated short pleasant episodes and underestimated unpleasant episodes, especially when such episodes lasted long.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1874-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-8988</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12187-013-9194-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Adolescents ; Averages ; Child and School Psychology ; Cognitive bias ; Early Adolescents ; Early Childhood Education ; Happiness ; Memory ; Multilevel analysis ; Pupils ; Quality of Life Research ; Sampling ; Secondary Schools ; Social Sciences ; Social Work ; Students ; Unpleasant</subject><ispartof>Child indicators research, 2014-03, Vol.7 (1), p.21-40</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><rights>Child Indicators Research is a copyright of Springer, 2014.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f53185924ea936e971b03ce9a9c9b0fa8537e06922a96dbaf050f98d54ed81293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f53185924ea936e971b03ce9a9c9b0fa8537e06922a96dbaf050f98d54ed81293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1939625448?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12825,21357,21373,27901,27902,30976,30977,33588,33589,33854,33855,43709,43856</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tadić, Maja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braam, Huub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Vliet, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veenhoven, Ruut</creatorcontrib><title>Memory-Experience Gap in Early Adolescents’ Happiness Reports</title><title>Child indicators research</title><addtitle>Child Ind Res</addtitle><description>Studies among adult populations show that estimates of how happy one has felt in the past tend to be more positive than average happiness as assessed using time sampling techniques. This ‘memory-experience gap’ is attributed to cognitive biases, among which fading affect bias. In this paper we report a study among 352 pupils of a secondary school in the Netherlands. These youngsters reported subsequently: 1) how happy they had felt yesterday, 2) how happy they had felt during the last month, 3) what they had done the previous day and 4) how they had felt during each of these activities. Unlike earlier studies, the average rating of happiness in the last month appeared to be lower than average happiness of the previous day. In accordance with earlier research, the global rating of happiness during the previous day was higher than the average of reported affect during separate activities during that day. A further multilevel analysis suggest that in estimating how they have felt on the whole yesterday, youngsters overestimated short pleasant episodes and underestimated unpleasant episodes, especially when such episodes lasted long.</description><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Averages</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive bias</subject><subject>Early Adolescents</subject><subject>Early Childhood Education</subject><subject>Happiness</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Multilevel analysis</subject><subject>Pupils</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Secondary Schools</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social Work</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Unpleasant</subject><issn>1874-897X</issn><issn>1874-8988</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9Kw0AQhxdRsFYfwFvAi5fV_ZPd7JykSG2FiiAK3pZtMpGUNIm7Kdibr-Hr-SRuiYgInmYYvt-P4SPklLMLzlh2GbjgJqOMSwocUqr3yCgeUmrAmP2fPXs-JEchrBjTnAkxIld3uG79lk7fOvQVNjkmM9clVZNMna-3yaRoaww5Nn34fP9I5q7rqgZDSB6wa30fjslB6eqAJ99zTJ5upo_Xc7q4n91eTxY0lyB6WirJjQKRogOpETK-ZDJHcJDDkpXOKJkh0yCEA10sXckUK8EUKsXCcAFyTM6H3s63rxsMvV1X8a26dg22m2C5UgyMUspE9OwPumo3vonfWQ4StFBpuqP4QOW-DcFjaTtfrZ3fWs7sTqkdlNqo1O6UWh0zYsiEyDYv6H81_xv6ArQjeJA</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Tadić, Maja</creator><creator>Braam, Huub</creator><creator>Van Vliet, Katja</creator><creator>Veenhoven, Ruut</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Memory-Experience Gap in Early Adolescents’ Happiness Reports</title><author>Tadić, Maja ; Braam, Huub ; Van Vliet, Katja ; Veenhoven, Ruut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f53185924ea936e971b03ce9a9c9b0fa8537e06922a96dbaf050f98d54ed81293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Averages</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive bias</topic><topic>Early Adolescents</topic><topic>Early Childhood Education</topic><topic>Happiness</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Multilevel analysis</topic><topic>Pupils</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Secondary Schools</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social Work</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Unpleasant</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tadić, Maja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braam, Huub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Vliet, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veenhoven, Ruut</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Child indicators research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tadić, Maja</au><au>Braam, Huub</au><au>Van Vliet, Katja</au><au>Veenhoven, Ruut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Memory-Experience Gap in Early Adolescents’ Happiness Reports</atitle><jtitle>Child indicators research</jtitle><stitle>Child Ind Res</stitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>21-40</pages><issn>1874-897X</issn><eissn>1874-8988</eissn><abstract>Studies among adult populations show that estimates of how happy one has felt in the past tend to be more positive than average happiness as assessed using time sampling techniques. This ‘memory-experience gap’ is attributed to cognitive biases, among which fading affect bias. In this paper we report a study among 352 pupils of a secondary school in the Netherlands. These youngsters reported subsequently: 1) how happy they had felt yesterday, 2) how happy they had felt during the last month, 3) what they had done the previous day and 4) how they had felt during each of these activities. Unlike earlier studies, the average rating of happiness in the last month appeared to be lower than average happiness of the previous day. In accordance with earlier research, the global rating of happiness during the previous day was higher than the average of reported affect during separate activities during that day. A further multilevel analysis suggest that in estimating how they have felt on the whole yesterday, youngsters overestimated short pleasant episodes and underestimated unpleasant episodes, especially when such episodes lasted long.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s12187-013-9194-6</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1874-897X
ispartof Child indicators research, 2014-03, Vol.7 (1), p.21-40
issn 1874-897X
1874-8988
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1550985558
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Social Science Premium Collection; Springer Nature; Education Collection
subjects Adolescents
Averages
Child and School Psychology
Cognitive bias
Early Adolescents
Early Childhood Education
Happiness
Memory
Multilevel analysis
Pupils
Quality of Life Research
Sampling
Secondary Schools
Social Sciences
Social Work
Students
Unpleasant
title Memory-Experience Gap in Early Adolescents’ Happiness Reports
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T09%3A47%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Memory-Experience%20Gap%20in%20Early%20Adolescents%E2%80%99%20Happiness%20Reports&rft.jtitle=Child%20indicators%20research&rft.au=Tadi%C4%87,%20Maja&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=21-40&rft.issn=1874-897X&rft.eissn=1874-8988&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12187-013-9194-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1939625448%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f53185924ea936e971b03ce9a9c9b0fa8537e06922a96dbaf050f98d54ed81293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1939625448&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true