Loading…
Memory-Experience Gap in Early Adolescents’ Happiness Reports
Studies among adult populations show that estimates of how happy one has felt in the past tend to be more positive than average happiness as assessed using time sampling techniques. This ‘memory-experience gap’ is attributed to cognitive biases, among which fading affect bias. In this paper we repor...
Saved in:
Published in: | Child indicators research 2014-03, Vol.7 (1), p.21-40 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f53185924ea936e971b03ce9a9c9b0fa8537e06922a96dbaf050f98d54ed81293 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f53185924ea936e971b03ce9a9c9b0fa8537e06922a96dbaf050f98d54ed81293 |
container_end_page | 40 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 21 |
container_title | Child indicators research |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Tadić, Maja Braam, Huub Van Vliet, Katja Veenhoven, Ruut |
description | Studies among adult populations show that estimates of how happy one has felt in the past tend to be more positive than average happiness as assessed using time sampling techniques. This ‘memory-experience gap’ is attributed to cognitive biases, among which fading affect bias. In this paper we report a study among 352 pupils of a secondary school in the Netherlands. These youngsters reported subsequently: 1) how happy they had felt yesterday, 2) how happy they had felt during the last month, 3) what they had done the previous day and 4) how they had felt during each of these activities. Unlike earlier studies, the average rating of happiness in the last month appeared to be lower than average happiness of the previous day. In accordance with earlier research, the global rating of happiness during the previous day was higher than the average of reported affect during separate activities during that day. A further multilevel analysis suggest that in estimating how they have felt on the whole yesterday, youngsters overestimated short pleasant episodes and underestimated unpleasant episodes, especially when such episodes lasted long. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12187-013-9194-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1550985558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1939625448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f53185924ea936e971b03ce9a9c9b0fa8537e06922a96dbaf050f98d54ed81293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9Kw0AQhxdRsFYfwFvAi5fV_ZPd7JykSG2FiiAK3pZtMpGUNIm7Kdibr-Hr-SRuiYgInmYYvt-P4SPklLMLzlh2GbjgJqOMSwocUqr3yCgeUmrAmP2fPXs-JEchrBjTnAkxIld3uG79lk7fOvQVNjkmM9clVZNMna-3yaRoaww5Nn34fP9I5q7rqgZDSB6wa30fjslB6eqAJ99zTJ5upo_Xc7q4n91eTxY0lyB6WirJjQKRogOpETK-ZDJHcJDDkpXOKJkh0yCEA10sXckUK8EUKsXCcAFyTM6H3s63rxsMvV1X8a26dg22m2C5UgyMUspE9OwPumo3vonfWQ4StFBpuqP4QOW-DcFjaTtfrZ3fWs7sTqkdlNqo1O6UWh0zYsiEyDYv6H81_xv6ArQjeJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1939625448</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Memory-Experience Gap in Early Adolescents’ Happiness Reports</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Tadić, Maja ; Braam, Huub ; Van Vliet, Katja ; Veenhoven, Ruut</creator><creatorcontrib>Tadić, Maja ; Braam, Huub ; Van Vliet, Katja ; Veenhoven, Ruut</creatorcontrib><description>Studies among adult populations show that estimates of how happy one has felt in the past tend to be more positive than average happiness as assessed using time sampling techniques. This ‘memory-experience gap’ is attributed to cognitive biases, among which fading affect bias. In this paper we report a study among 352 pupils of a secondary school in the Netherlands. These youngsters reported subsequently: 1) how happy they had felt yesterday, 2) how happy they had felt during the last month, 3) what they had done the previous day and 4) how they had felt during each of these activities. Unlike earlier studies, the average rating of happiness in the last month appeared to be lower than average happiness of the previous day. In accordance with earlier research, the global rating of happiness during the previous day was higher than the average of reported affect during separate activities during that day. A further multilevel analysis suggest that in estimating how they have felt on the whole yesterday, youngsters overestimated short pleasant episodes and underestimated unpleasant episodes, especially when such episodes lasted long.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1874-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-8988</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12187-013-9194-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Adolescents ; Averages ; Child and School Psychology ; Cognitive bias ; Early Adolescents ; Early Childhood Education ; Happiness ; Memory ; Multilevel analysis ; Pupils ; Quality of Life Research ; Sampling ; Secondary Schools ; Social Sciences ; Social Work ; Students ; Unpleasant</subject><ispartof>Child indicators research, 2014-03, Vol.7 (1), p.21-40</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><rights>Child Indicators Research is a copyright of Springer, 2014.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f53185924ea936e971b03ce9a9c9b0fa8537e06922a96dbaf050f98d54ed81293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f53185924ea936e971b03ce9a9c9b0fa8537e06922a96dbaf050f98d54ed81293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1939625448?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12825,21357,21373,27901,27902,30976,30977,33588,33589,33854,33855,43709,43856</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tadić, Maja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braam, Huub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Vliet, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veenhoven, Ruut</creatorcontrib><title>Memory-Experience Gap in Early Adolescents’ Happiness Reports</title><title>Child indicators research</title><addtitle>Child Ind Res</addtitle><description>Studies among adult populations show that estimates of how happy one has felt in the past tend to be more positive than average happiness as assessed using time sampling techniques. This ‘memory-experience gap’ is attributed to cognitive biases, among which fading affect bias. In this paper we report a study among 352 pupils of a secondary school in the Netherlands. These youngsters reported subsequently: 1) how happy they had felt yesterday, 2) how happy they had felt during the last month, 3) what they had done the previous day and 4) how they had felt during each of these activities. Unlike earlier studies, the average rating of happiness in the last month appeared to be lower than average happiness of the previous day. In accordance with earlier research, the global rating of happiness during the previous day was higher than the average of reported affect during separate activities during that day. A further multilevel analysis suggest that in estimating how they have felt on the whole yesterday, youngsters overestimated short pleasant episodes and underestimated unpleasant episodes, especially when such episodes lasted long.</description><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Averages</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive bias</subject><subject>Early Adolescents</subject><subject>Early Childhood Education</subject><subject>Happiness</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Multilevel analysis</subject><subject>Pupils</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Secondary Schools</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social Work</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Unpleasant</subject><issn>1874-897X</issn><issn>1874-8988</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9Kw0AQhxdRsFYfwFvAi5fV_ZPd7JykSG2FiiAK3pZtMpGUNIm7Kdibr-Hr-SRuiYgInmYYvt-P4SPklLMLzlh2GbjgJqOMSwocUqr3yCgeUmrAmP2fPXs-JEchrBjTnAkxIld3uG79lk7fOvQVNjkmM9clVZNMna-3yaRoaww5Nn34fP9I5q7rqgZDSB6wa30fjslB6eqAJ99zTJ5upo_Xc7q4n91eTxY0lyB6WirJjQKRogOpETK-ZDJHcJDDkpXOKJkh0yCEA10sXckUK8EUKsXCcAFyTM6H3s63rxsMvV1X8a26dg22m2C5UgyMUspE9OwPumo3vonfWQ4StFBpuqP4QOW-DcFjaTtfrZ3fWs7sTqkdlNqo1O6UWh0zYsiEyDYv6H81_xv6ArQjeJA</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Tadić, Maja</creator><creator>Braam, Huub</creator><creator>Van Vliet, Katja</creator><creator>Veenhoven, Ruut</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Memory-Experience Gap in Early Adolescents’ Happiness Reports</title><author>Tadić, Maja ; Braam, Huub ; Van Vliet, Katja ; Veenhoven, Ruut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f53185924ea936e971b03ce9a9c9b0fa8537e06922a96dbaf050f98d54ed81293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Averages</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive bias</topic><topic>Early Adolescents</topic><topic>Early Childhood Education</topic><topic>Happiness</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Multilevel analysis</topic><topic>Pupils</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Secondary Schools</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social Work</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Unpleasant</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tadić, Maja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braam, Huub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Vliet, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veenhoven, Ruut</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Child indicators research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tadić, Maja</au><au>Braam, Huub</au><au>Van Vliet, Katja</au><au>Veenhoven, Ruut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Memory-Experience Gap in Early Adolescents’ Happiness Reports</atitle><jtitle>Child indicators research</jtitle><stitle>Child Ind Res</stitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>21-40</pages><issn>1874-897X</issn><eissn>1874-8988</eissn><abstract>Studies among adult populations show that estimates of how happy one has felt in the past tend to be more positive than average happiness as assessed using time sampling techniques. This ‘memory-experience gap’ is attributed to cognitive biases, among which fading affect bias. In this paper we report a study among 352 pupils of a secondary school in the Netherlands. These youngsters reported subsequently: 1) how happy they had felt yesterday, 2) how happy they had felt during the last month, 3) what they had done the previous day and 4) how they had felt during each of these activities. Unlike earlier studies, the average rating of happiness in the last month appeared to be lower than average happiness of the previous day. In accordance with earlier research, the global rating of happiness during the previous day was higher than the average of reported affect during separate activities during that day. A further multilevel analysis suggest that in estimating how they have felt on the whole yesterday, youngsters overestimated short pleasant episodes and underestimated unpleasant episodes, especially when such episodes lasted long.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s12187-013-9194-6</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1874-897X |
ispartof | Child indicators research, 2014-03, Vol.7 (1), p.21-40 |
issn | 1874-897X 1874-8988 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1550985558 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Social Science Premium Collection; Springer Nature; Education Collection |
subjects | Adolescents Averages Child and School Psychology Cognitive bias Early Adolescents Early Childhood Education Happiness Memory Multilevel analysis Pupils Quality of Life Research Sampling Secondary Schools Social Sciences Social Work Students Unpleasant |
title | Memory-Experience Gap in Early Adolescents’ Happiness Reports |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T09%3A47%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Memory-Experience%20Gap%20in%20Early%20Adolescents%E2%80%99%20Happiness%20Reports&rft.jtitle=Child%20indicators%20research&rft.au=Tadi%C4%87,%20Maja&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=21-40&rft.issn=1874-897X&rft.eissn=1874-8988&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12187-013-9194-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1939625448%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f53185924ea936e971b03ce9a9c9b0fa8537e06922a96dbaf050f98d54ed81293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1939625448&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |