Marriage or Carriage? Trends in Union Context and Birth Type by Education

• Published in: Journal of marriage and family 2014-06, Vol.76 (3), p.506-519
• Main Authors: Gibson-Davis, Christina, Rackin, Heather
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Birth; Births; Childbirth; Children; Class; Classification; Cohabitation; cohabiting couples with children; Conception; Demography; Economic inequality; Education; Educational Attainment; Family (Sociological Unit); Females; Inequality; Interpersonal Relationship; Level of education; Marriage; Marriage and Family Education; Married status; Mothers; National Surveys; Parents; Pregnancy; Relationship Context of Fertility; Social Class; Social classes; Social Inequality; Social Influences; socioeconomic status; State Surveys; Trends; union formation; Unions; Women
• ISSN: 0022-2445; 1741-3737
• DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12109

Using data from 8,951 first-time mothers in the National Survey of Family Growth, the authors analyzed trends in union contexts during the transition to motherhood by social class (proxied by maternal education). Conventional classifications of union contexts as married or cohabiting were extended by classifying births relative to union status at conception. The most conventional married birth type, in which the mother was married at conception and at birth, declined sharply, but only among low- and moderately educated women. Women with lower levels of education were instead more likely to have a birth in the context of a cohabiting union formed prior to conception. In 2005–2010, the adjusted probability of a low-educated mother having a conventional married birth was 11.5%, versus 78.4% for highly educated mothers. The growing disparity in union type at first birth by social class may have implications for social and economic inequality.