Caveat Emptor Under Prudentialism: The Case of the Canadian Home Inspection Industry

Residential home (that is, housing) inspection has been a growth industry in Canada and the United States since its emergence in the 1970s. Within a legal context where the purchase of used housing is governed by the doctrine of caveat emptor, and a political and economic context characterized by pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social & legal studies 2014-06, Vol.23 (2), p.195-213
Main Author: Frauley, Jon
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Canada
Citizenship
Consumer protection
Consumerism
Consumers
Consumption
Governance
Housing
Inspection
Inspections
Law
Legal System
Markets
Moral hazard
Protection
Public good
Public Services
Real estate
Residential buildings
Risk
Risk assessment
Social services
U.S.A
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-70b250903400d4ac4eae4187716d2078358a807cf7cfe37d13513253a1bcd7913
container_end_page 213
container_issue 2
container_start_page 195
container_title Social & legal studies
container_volume 23
creator Frauley, Jon
description Residential home (that is, housing) inspection has been a growth industry in Canada and the United States since its emergence in the 1970s. Within a legal context where the purchase of used housing is governed by the doctrine of caveat emptor, and a political and economic context characterized by prudentialism, home inspection appears to offer a means by which consumers can discharge their legal and political duty to be prudent. However, in Canada, because home inspection is largely unregulated and market driven, consumers of pre-owned housing are placed at a structural disadvantage relative to home inspectors. This article argues that we should be cautious of embracing private residential home inspection as an adequate consumer protection mechanism or form of risk consulting because there are fundamental and irreconcilable differences between a public service that strives to meet the objective of the public good and home inspection as a private service offered for public consumption that strives to meet the objectives of private interests.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0964663913513218
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1551002937</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0964663913513218</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1550999668</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-70b250903400d4ac4eae4187716d2078358a807cf7cfe37d13513253a1bcd7913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1Lw0AQxRdRsMTePVa8eInO7OznUUr9gIIe7Dlsk61E8lF3E8H_3pR4kIIQGHiH-b3hMY-xS4RbRK3vwCqhFFkkicTRnLAZCoWpJgunbHZYp4f9OZvHWG6BUEnQJGbsaum-vOsWq3rftWGxaQofFq-hL3zTla4qY33Bznauin7-qwnbPKzelk_p-uXxeXm_TnMheZdq2HIJFkgAFMLlwjsv0GiNquCgDUnjDOh8N4wnXYxRJTnc5oUekifsZry7D-1n72OX1WXMfVW5xrd9zFBKBOCW9BQUrLVKmQkoCUNKyCkBCAUhDJqw6yP0o-1DM7xnoLjgkqvh3QmDkcpDG2Pwu2wfytqF7wwhO_SWHfc2WNLREt27_3P0P_4H5UaRiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1524252666</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Caveat Emptor Under Prudentialism: The Case of the Canadian Home Inspection Industry</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Frauley, Jon</creator><creatorcontrib>Frauley, Jon</creatorcontrib><description>Residential home (that is, housing) inspection has been a growth industry in Canada and the United States since its emergence in the 1970s. Within a legal context where the purchase of used housing is governed by the doctrine of caveat emptor, and a political and economic context characterized by prudentialism, home inspection appears to offer a means by which consumers can discharge their legal and political duty to be prudent. However, in Canada, because home inspection is largely unregulated and market driven, consumers of pre-owned housing are placed at a structural disadvantage relative to home inspectors. This article argues that we should be cautious of embracing private residential home inspection as an adequate consumer protection mechanism or form of risk consulting because there are fundamental and irreconcilable differences between a public service that strives to meet the objective of the public good and home inspection as a private service offered for public consumption that strives to meet the objectives of private interests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-6639</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7390</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0964663913513218</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SLSTEK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Canada ; Citizenship ; Consumer protection ; Consumerism ; Consumers ; Consumption ; Governance ; Housing ; Inspection ; Inspections ; Law ; Legal System ; Markets ; Moral hazard ; Protection ; Public good ; Public Services ; Real estate ; Residential buildings ; Risk ; Risk assessment ; Social services ; U.S.A</subject><ispartof>Social &amp; legal studies, 2014-06, Vol.23 (2), p.195-213</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2013</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Jun 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-70b250903400d4ac4eae4187716d2078358a807cf7cfe37d13513253a1bcd7913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908,33206,33207,33757,33758,79115</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frauley, Jon</creatorcontrib><title>Caveat Emptor Under Prudentialism: The Case of the Canadian Home Inspection Industry</title><title>Social &amp; legal studies</title><description>Residential home (that is, housing) inspection has been a growth industry in Canada and the United States since its emergence in the 1970s. Within a legal context where the purchase of used housing is governed by the doctrine of caveat emptor, and a political and economic context characterized by prudentialism, home inspection appears to offer a means by which consumers can discharge their legal and political duty to be prudent. However, in Canada, because home inspection is largely unregulated and market driven, consumers of pre-owned housing are placed at a structural disadvantage relative to home inspectors. This article argues that we should be cautious of embracing private residential home inspection as an adequate consumer protection mechanism or form of risk consulting because there are fundamental and irreconcilable differences between a public service that strives to meet the objective of the public good and home inspection as a private service offered for public consumption that strives to meet the objectives of private interests.</description><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>Consumer protection</subject><subject>Consumerism</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Inspections</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Legal System</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Moral hazard</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>Public good</subject><subject>Public Services</subject><subject>Real estate</subject><subject>Residential buildings</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Social services</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><issn>0964-6639</issn><issn>1461-7390</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1Lw0AQxRdRsMTePVa8eInO7OznUUr9gIIe7Dlsk61E8lF3E8H_3pR4kIIQGHiH-b3hMY-xS4RbRK3vwCqhFFkkicTRnLAZCoWpJgunbHZYp4f9OZvHWG6BUEnQJGbsaum-vOsWq3rftWGxaQofFq-hL3zTla4qY33Bznauin7-qwnbPKzelk_p-uXxeXm_TnMheZdq2HIJFkgAFMLlwjsv0GiNquCgDUnjDOh8N4wnXYxRJTnc5oUekifsZry7D-1n72OX1WXMfVW5xrd9zFBKBOCW9BQUrLVKmQkoCUNKyCkBCAUhDJqw6yP0o-1DM7xnoLjgkqvh3QmDkcpDG2Pwu2wfytqF7wwhO_SWHfc2WNLREt27_3P0P_4H5UaRiQ</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Frauley, Jon</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Caveat Emptor Under Prudentialism</title><author>Frauley, Jon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-70b250903400d4ac4eae4187716d2078358a807cf7cfe37d13513253a1bcd7913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>Consumer protection</topic><topic>Consumerism</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Inspections</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Legal System</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Moral hazard</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>Public good</topic><topic>Public Services</topic><topic>Real estate</topic><topic>Residential buildings</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Social services</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frauley, Jon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Social &amp; legal studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frauley, Jon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Caveat Emptor Under Prudentialism: The Case of the Canadian Home Inspection Industry</atitle><jtitle>Social &amp; legal studies</jtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>195</spage><epage>213</epage><pages>195-213</pages><issn>0964-6639</issn><eissn>1461-7390</eissn><coden>SLSTEK</coden><abstract>Residential home (that is, housing) inspection has been a growth industry in Canada and the United States since its emergence in the 1970s. Within a legal context where the purchase of used housing is governed by the doctrine of caveat emptor, and a political and economic context characterized by prudentialism, home inspection appears to offer a means by which consumers can discharge their legal and political duty to be prudent. However, in Canada, because home inspection is largely unregulated and market driven, consumers of pre-owned housing are placed at a structural disadvantage relative to home inspectors. This article argues that we should be cautious of embracing private residential home inspection as an adequate consumer protection mechanism or form of risk consulting because there are fundamental and irreconcilable differences between a public service that strives to meet the objective of the public good and home inspection as a private service offered for public consumption that strives to meet the objectives of private interests.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0964663913513218</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-6639
ispartof Social & legal studies, 2014-06, Vol.23 (2), p.195-213
issn 0964-6639
1461-7390
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1551002937
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE
subjects Canada
Citizenship
Consumer protection
Consumerism
Consumers
Consumption
Governance
Housing
Inspection
Inspections
Law
Legal System
Markets
Moral hazard
Protection
Public good
Public Services
Real estate
Residential buildings
Risk
Risk assessment
Social services
U.S.A
title Caveat Emptor Under Prudentialism: The Case of the Canadian Home Inspection Industry
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T16%3A43%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Caveat%20Emptor%20Under%20Prudentialism:%20The%20Case%20of%20the%20Canadian%20Home%20Inspection%20Industry&rft.jtitle=Social%20&%20legal%20studies&rft.au=Frauley,%20Jon&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=195&rft.epage=213&rft.pages=195-213&rft.issn=0964-6639&rft.eissn=1461-7390&rft.coden=SLSTEK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0964663913513218&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1550999668%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-70b250903400d4ac4eae4187716d2078358a807cf7cfe37d13513253a1bcd7913%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1524252666&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0964663913513218&rfr_iscdi=true