Loading…

Fuzzy option prioritization for the graph model for conflict resolution

A fuzzy option prioritization technique is developed to efficiently model uncertain preferences of DMs in strategic conflicts as fuzzy preferences by using the decision makers' (DMs') fuzzy truth values of preference statements at feasible states within the framework of the Graph Model for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fuzzy sets and systems 2014-07, Vol.246, p.34-48
Main Authors: Bashar, M. Abul, Kilgour, D. Marc, Hipel, Keith W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9bf6ef3e85210f626baae8b8d5d2482bb2bbb3f64ac69bda399f8a1bd4a2a9bc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9bf6ef3e85210f626baae8b8d5d2482bb2bbb3f64ac69bda399f8a1bd4a2a9bc3
container_end_page 48
container_issue
container_start_page 34
container_title Fuzzy sets and systems
container_volume 246
creator Bashar, M. Abul
Kilgour, D. Marc
Hipel, Keith W.
description A fuzzy option prioritization technique is developed to efficiently model uncertain preferences of DMs in strategic conflicts as fuzzy preferences by using the decision makers' (DMs') fuzzy truth values of preference statements at feasible states within the framework of the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. The preference statements of a DM express desirable combinations of options or courses of action, and are listed in order of importance. A fuzzy truth value is a truth degree, expressed as a number between 0 and 1, capturing uncertainty in the truth of a preference statement at a feasible state. A fuzzy preference formula is introduced based on the fuzzy truth values of preference statements, and it is established that the output of this formula is a fuzzy preference relation. It is shown that fuzzy option prioritization can also be used when the truth values of preference statements at feasible states are completely based on Boolean logic, thereby generating a crisp preference over feasible states that is the same as would be found by employing the existing crisp option prioritization, making the crisp option prioritization technique a special case of the fuzzy option prioritization methodology. To demonstrate how this methodology can be employed to represent fuzzy preferences in real-world decision problems, fuzzy option prioritization is applied to an actual dispute over groundwater contamination that took place in Elmira, Ontario, Canada.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fss.2014.02.011
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1551073485</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165011414000633</els_id><sourcerecordid>1551073485</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9bf6ef3e85210f626baae8b8d5d2482bb2bbb3f64ac69bda399f8a1bd4a2a9bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_wLteetOapG2W4pUMN4WBN3od8nHiMrqmJq2w_nqzzWvhwPngfQ-8D0L3BBcEE_a4K2yMBcWkKjAtMCEXaEb4guaMY3KJZklT5-lcXaObGHcYp5nhGVqvxmk6ZL4fnO-yPjgf3OAmeVqtD9mwhewryH6b7b2B9nTTvrOt00MWIPp2PGpv0ZWVbYS7vz5Hn6uXj-Vrvnlfvy2fN7kuGzbkjbIMbAm8pgRbRpmSErjipja04lSpVKq0rJKaNcrIsmksl0SZSlLZKF3O0cP5bx_89whxEHsXNbSt7MCPUZC6JnhRVrxOUnKW6uBjDGBFireX4SAIFkdoYicSNHGEJjAViUjyPJ09kDL8OAgiagedBuMC6EEY7_5x_wLan3bW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1551073485</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fuzzy option prioritization for the graph model for conflict resolution</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2023</source><creator>Bashar, M. Abul ; Kilgour, D. Marc ; Hipel, Keith W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bashar, M. Abul ; Kilgour, D. Marc ; Hipel, Keith W.</creatorcontrib><description>A fuzzy option prioritization technique is developed to efficiently model uncertain preferences of DMs in strategic conflicts as fuzzy preferences by using the decision makers' (DMs') fuzzy truth values of preference statements at feasible states within the framework of the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. The preference statements of a DM express desirable combinations of options or courses of action, and are listed in order of importance. A fuzzy truth value is a truth degree, expressed as a number between 0 and 1, capturing uncertainty in the truth of a preference statement at a feasible state. A fuzzy preference formula is introduced based on the fuzzy truth values of preference statements, and it is established that the output of this formula is a fuzzy preference relation. It is shown that fuzzy option prioritization can also be used when the truth values of preference statements at feasible states are completely based on Boolean logic, thereby generating a crisp preference over feasible states that is the same as would be found by employing the existing crisp option prioritization, making the crisp option prioritization technique a special case of the fuzzy option prioritization methodology. To demonstrate how this methodology can be employed to represent fuzzy preferences in real-world decision problems, fuzzy option prioritization is applied to an actual dispute over groundwater contamination that took place in Elmira, Ontario, Canada.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0114</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6801</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2014.02.011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Crisps ; Fuzzy ; Fuzzy logic ; Fuzzy option prioritization ; Fuzzy preference ; Fuzzy score interval ; Fuzzy set theory ; Fuzzy truth value ; Graph model ; Graphs ; Groundwater ; Mathematical models ; Methodology ; Preference statement</subject><ispartof>Fuzzy sets and systems, 2014-07, Vol.246, p.34-48</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9bf6ef3e85210f626baae8b8d5d2482bb2bbb3f64ac69bda399f8a1bd4a2a9bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9bf6ef3e85210f626baae8b8d5d2482bb2bbb3f64ac69bda399f8a1bd4a2a9bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bashar, M. Abul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilgour, D. Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hipel, Keith W.</creatorcontrib><title>Fuzzy option prioritization for the graph model for conflict resolution</title><title>Fuzzy sets and systems</title><description>A fuzzy option prioritization technique is developed to efficiently model uncertain preferences of DMs in strategic conflicts as fuzzy preferences by using the decision makers' (DMs') fuzzy truth values of preference statements at feasible states within the framework of the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. The preference statements of a DM express desirable combinations of options or courses of action, and are listed in order of importance. A fuzzy truth value is a truth degree, expressed as a number between 0 and 1, capturing uncertainty in the truth of a preference statement at a feasible state. A fuzzy preference formula is introduced based on the fuzzy truth values of preference statements, and it is established that the output of this formula is a fuzzy preference relation. It is shown that fuzzy option prioritization can also be used when the truth values of preference statements at feasible states are completely based on Boolean logic, thereby generating a crisp preference over feasible states that is the same as would be found by employing the existing crisp option prioritization, making the crisp option prioritization technique a special case of the fuzzy option prioritization methodology. To demonstrate how this methodology can be employed to represent fuzzy preferences in real-world decision problems, fuzzy option prioritization is applied to an actual dispute over groundwater contamination that took place in Elmira, Ontario, Canada.</description><subject>Crisps</subject><subject>Fuzzy</subject><subject>Fuzzy logic</subject><subject>Fuzzy option prioritization</subject><subject>Fuzzy preference</subject><subject>Fuzzy score interval</subject><subject>Fuzzy set theory</subject><subject>Fuzzy truth value</subject><subject>Graph model</subject><subject>Graphs</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Preference statement</subject><issn>0165-0114</issn><issn>1872-6801</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_wLteetOapG2W4pUMN4WBN3od8nHiMrqmJq2w_nqzzWvhwPngfQ-8D0L3BBcEE_a4K2yMBcWkKjAtMCEXaEb4guaMY3KJZklT5-lcXaObGHcYp5nhGVqvxmk6ZL4fnO-yPjgf3OAmeVqtD9mwhewryH6b7b2B9nTTvrOt00MWIPp2PGpv0ZWVbYS7vz5Hn6uXj-Vrvnlfvy2fN7kuGzbkjbIMbAm8pgRbRpmSErjipja04lSpVKq0rJKaNcrIsmksl0SZSlLZKF3O0cP5bx_89whxEHsXNbSt7MCPUZC6JnhRVrxOUnKW6uBjDGBFireX4SAIFkdoYicSNHGEJjAViUjyPJ09kDL8OAgiagedBuMC6EEY7_5x_wLan3bW</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Bashar, M. Abul</creator><creator>Kilgour, D. Marc</creator><creator>Hipel, Keith W.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Fuzzy option prioritization for the graph model for conflict resolution</title><author>Bashar, M. Abul ; Kilgour, D. Marc ; Hipel, Keith W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9bf6ef3e85210f626baae8b8d5d2482bb2bbb3f64ac69bda399f8a1bd4a2a9bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Crisps</topic><topic>Fuzzy</topic><topic>Fuzzy logic</topic><topic>Fuzzy option prioritization</topic><topic>Fuzzy preference</topic><topic>Fuzzy score interval</topic><topic>Fuzzy set theory</topic><topic>Fuzzy truth value</topic><topic>Graph model</topic><topic>Graphs</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Preference statement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bashar, M. Abul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilgour, D. Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hipel, Keith W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Fuzzy sets and systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bashar, M. Abul</au><au>Kilgour, D. Marc</au><au>Hipel, Keith W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fuzzy option prioritization for the graph model for conflict resolution</atitle><jtitle>Fuzzy sets and systems</jtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>246</volume><spage>34</spage><epage>48</epage><pages>34-48</pages><issn>0165-0114</issn><eissn>1872-6801</eissn><abstract>A fuzzy option prioritization technique is developed to efficiently model uncertain preferences of DMs in strategic conflicts as fuzzy preferences by using the decision makers' (DMs') fuzzy truth values of preference statements at feasible states within the framework of the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. The preference statements of a DM express desirable combinations of options or courses of action, and are listed in order of importance. A fuzzy truth value is a truth degree, expressed as a number between 0 and 1, capturing uncertainty in the truth of a preference statement at a feasible state. A fuzzy preference formula is introduced based on the fuzzy truth values of preference statements, and it is established that the output of this formula is a fuzzy preference relation. It is shown that fuzzy option prioritization can also be used when the truth values of preference statements at feasible states are completely based on Boolean logic, thereby generating a crisp preference over feasible states that is the same as would be found by employing the existing crisp option prioritization, making the crisp option prioritization technique a special case of the fuzzy option prioritization methodology. To demonstrate how this methodology can be employed to represent fuzzy preferences in real-world decision problems, fuzzy option prioritization is applied to an actual dispute over groundwater contamination that took place in Elmira, Ontario, Canada.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fss.2014.02.011</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-0114
ispartof Fuzzy sets and systems, 2014-07, Vol.246, p.34-48
issn 0165-0114
1872-6801
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1551073485
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2023
subjects Crisps
Fuzzy
Fuzzy logic
Fuzzy option prioritization
Fuzzy preference
Fuzzy score interval
Fuzzy set theory
Fuzzy truth value
Graph model
Graphs
Groundwater
Mathematical models
Methodology
Preference statement
title Fuzzy option prioritization for the graph model for conflict resolution
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-10T05%3A43%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fuzzy%20option%20prioritization%20for%20the%20graph%20model%20for%20conflict%20resolution&rft.jtitle=Fuzzy%20sets%20and%20systems&rft.au=Bashar,%20M.%20Abul&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=246&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=48&rft.pages=34-48&rft.issn=0165-0114&rft.eissn=1872-6801&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fss.2014.02.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1551073485%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9bf6ef3e85210f626baae8b8d5d2482bb2bbb3f64ac69bda399f8a1bd4a2a9bc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1551073485&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true