Loading…
Primary care approaches to musculoskeletal multiple-site joint pain pharmacological therapy: a survey of general practitioners
Chronic multiple-site joint pain (MSJP) due to osteoarthritis and soft tissue disorders is common in people over 50 years old and associated with poor outcomes. This study examined current pharmacological approaches to MSJP management in primary care. One hundred and fifty general practitioners (GPs...
Saved in:
Published in: | Primary health care research & development 2014-10, Vol.15 (4), p.476-481 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f54bc8553feeaf15613ea3e1931f38b81b81a97317c49a516ec572552f4ad5233 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f54bc8553feeaf15613ea3e1931f38b81b81a97317c49a516ec572552f4ad5233 |
container_end_page | 481 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 476 |
container_title | Primary health care research & development |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Raja, Rafi Kingsbury, Sarah R. Wise, Elspeth Conaghan, Philip G. |
description | Chronic multiple-site joint pain (MSJP) due to osteoarthritis and soft tissue disorders is common in people over 50 years old and associated with poor outcomes. This study examined current pharmacological approaches to MSJP management in primary care. One hundred and fifty general practitioners (GPs) attending an educational seminar participated in an electronic survey (mean response rate 96%). Most GPs reported treating multiple painful joints concurrently (78%) compared with focusing on a single joint (21%). The majority believed there was no difference in analgesia for different disorders when selecting paracetamol (84%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)/COX-2 inhibitors (57%) or opioids (70%). When optimising therapy, intra-class optimisation (increase NSAID dose 41%, change to another NSAID/COX-2 inhibitor 30%) was preferred to inter-class step up therapy (add opioid 23%, change to opioid 6%). For NSAID gastrointestinal intolerance, the preference was to add a gastro-protective agent (74%). There is a need to better characterise MSJP and examine optimal pharmacotherapy regimens. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1463423613000546 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1555620157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1463423613000546</cupid><sourcerecordid>3409914741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f54bc8553feeaf15613ea3e1931f38b81b81a97317c49a516ec572552f4ad5233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9rFDEQx0OxtLX6B_giAV98Wc3kx-6eb1LqDyhY0D4vc7nZu5zZzZpkhXvxbzfXO6VYhEAymc98k5kvYy9AvAEBzduvoGulpapBCSGMrk_YBeimqQBk-2R_rlW1z5-zpylthYBW1M0ZO5daGwAQF-zXbXQDxh23GInjNMWAdkOJ58CHOdnZh_SdPGX0JfbZTZ6q5DLxbXBj5hO6kU8bjAPa4MPa2QLmDUWcdu848jTHn7TjoedrGsut51NEm112oYTpGTvt0Sd6ftwv2d2H629Xn6qbLx8_X72_qayGOle90UvbGqN6IuzBlIYJFcFCQa_aZQtl4aJR0Fi9QAM1WdNIY2SvcWWkUpfs9UG39PdjppS7wSVL3uNIYU4dGGNqKcA0BX31D7oNcxzL7-4pqUwr9xQcKBtDSpH6bjoMsgPR7c3pHplTal4eleflQKu_FX_cKIA6iuKwjG61pgdv_1f2N5pKmnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1555235827</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Primary care approaches to musculoskeletal multiple-site joint pain pharmacological therapy: a survey of general practitioners</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Raja, Rafi ; Kingsbury, Sarah R. ; Wise, Elspeth ; Conaghan, Philip G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Raja, Rafi ; Kingsbury, Sarah R. ; Wise, Elspeth ; Conaghan, Philip G.</creatorcontrib><description>Chronic multiple-site joint pain (MSJP) due to osteoarthritis and soft tissue disorders is common in people over 50 years old and associated with poor outcomes. This study examined current pharmacological approaches to MSJP management in primary care. One hundred and fifty general practitioners (GPs) attending an educational seminar participated in an electronic survey (mean response rate 96%). Most GPs reported treating multiple painful joints concurrently (78%) compared with focusing on a single joint (21%). The majority believed there was no difference in analgesia for different disorders when selecting paracetamol (84%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)/COX-2 inhibitors (57%) or opioids (70%). When optimising therapy, intra-class optimisation (increase NSAID dose 41%, change to another NSAID/COX-2 inhibitor 30%) was preferred to inter-class step up therapy (add opioid 23%, change to opioid 6%). For NSAID gastrointestinal intolerance, the preference was to add a gastro-protective agent (74%). There is a need to better characterise MSJP and examine optimal pharmacotherapy regimens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1463-4236</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-1128</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1463423613000546</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24451110</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use ; Arthralgia - drug therapy ; Arthritis ; Bias ; Biomedical research ; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain ; Pain Management - methods ; Pain Measurement ; Polls & surveys ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data ; Primary Health Care ; Questionnaires ; Response rates ; Seminars ; Short Report ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Primary health care research & development, 2014-10, Vol.15 (4), p.476-481</ispartof><rights>Cambridge University Press 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f54bc8553feeaf15613ea3e1931f38b81b81a97317c49a516ec572552f4ad5233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f54bc8553feeaf15613ea3e1931f38b81b81a97317c49a516ec572552f4ad5233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1463423613000546/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,72960</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24451110$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raja, Rafi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingsbury, Sarah R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, Elspeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conaghan, Philip G.</creatorcontrib><title>Primary care approaches to musculoskeletal multiple-site joint pain pharmacological therapy: a survey of general practitioners</title><title>Primary health care research & development</title><addtitle>Prim Health Care Res Dev</addtitle><description>Chronic multiple-site joint pain (MSJP) due to osteoarthritis and soft tissue disorders is common in people over 50 years old and associated with poor outcomes. This study examined current pharmacological approaches to MSJP management in primary care. One hundred and fifty general practitioners (GPs) attending an educational seminar participated in an electronic survey (mean response rate 96%). Most GPs reported treating multiple painful joints concurrently (78%) compared with focusing on a single joint (21%). The majority believed there was no difference in analgesia for different disorders when selecting paracetamol (84%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)/COX-2 inhibitors (57%) or opioids (70%). When optimising therapy, intra-class optimisation (increase NSAID dose 41%, change to another NSAID/COX-2 inhibitor 30%) was preferred to inter-class step up therapy (add opioid 23%, change to opioid 6%). For NSAID gastrointestinal intolerance, the preference was to add a gastro-protective agent (74%). There is a need to better characterise MSJP and examine optimal pharmacotherapy regimens.</description><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Arthralgia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biomedical research</subject><subject>Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain Management - methods</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Seminars</subject><subject>Short Report</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1463-4236</issn><issn>1477-1128</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kd9rFDEQx0OxtLX6B_giAV98Wc3kx-6eb1LqDyhY0D4vc7nZu5zZzZpkhXvxbzfXO6VYhEAymc98k5kvYy9AvAEBzduvoGulpapBCSGMrk_YBeimqQBk-2R_rlW1z5-zpylthYBW1M0ZO5daGwAQF-zXbXQDxh23GInjNMWAdkOJ58CHOdnZh_SdPGX0JfbZTZ6q5DLxbXBj5hO6kU8bjAPa4MPa2QLmDUWcdu848jTHn7TjoedrGsut51NEm112oYTpGTvt0Sd6ftwv2d2H629Xn6qbLx8_X72_qayGOle90UvbGqN6IuzBlIYJFcFCQa_aZQtl4aJR0Fi9QAM1WdNIY2SvcWWkUpfs9UG39PdjppS7wSVL3uNIYU4dGGNqKcA0BX31D7oNcxzL7-4pqUwr9xQcKBtDSpH6bjoMsgPR7c3pHplTal4eleflQKu_FX_cKIA6iuKwjG61pgdv_1f2N5pKmnw</recordid><startdate>201410</startdate><enddate>201410</enddate><creator>Raja, Rafi</creator><creator>Kingsbury, Sarah R.</creator><creator>Wise, Elspeth</creator><creator>Conaghan, Philip G.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201410</creationdate><title>Primary care approaches to musculoskeletal multiple-site joint pain pharmacological therapy: a survey of general practitioners</title><author>Raja, Rafi ; Kingsbury, Sarah R. ; Wise, Elspeth ; Conaghan, Philip G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f54bc8553feeaf15613ea3e1931f38b81b81a97317c49a516ec572552f4ad5233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Arthralgia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biomedical research</topic><topic>Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain Management - methods</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Seminars</topic><topic>Short Report</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raja, Rafi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingsbury, Sarah R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, Elspeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conaghan, Philip G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Primary health care research & development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raja, Rafi</au><au>Kingsbury, Sarah R.</au><au>Wise, Elspeth</au><au>Conaghan, Philip G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Primary care approaches to musculoskeletal multiple-site joint pain pharmacological therapy: a survey of general practitioners</atitle><jtitle>Primary health care research & development</jtitle><addtitle>Prim Health Care Res Dev</addtitle><date>2014-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>476</spage><epage>481</epage><pages>476-481</pages><issn>1463-4236</issn><eissn>1477-1128</eissn><abstract>Chronic multiple-site joint pain (MSJP) due to osteoarthritis and soft tissue disorders is common in people over 50 years old and associated with poor outcomes. This study examined current pharmacological approaches to MSJP management in primary care. One hundred and fifty general practitioners (GPs) attending an educational seminar participated in an electronic survey (mean response rate 96%). Most GPs reported treating multiple painful joints concurrently (78%) compared with focusing on a single joint (21%). The majority believed there was no difference in analgesia for different disorders when selecting paracetamol (84%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)/COX-2 inhibitors (57%) or opioids (70%). When optimising therapy, intra-class optimisation (increase NSAID dose 41%, change to another NSAID/COX-2 inhibitor 30%) was preferred to inter-class step up therapy (add opioid 23%, change to opioid 6%). For NSAID gastrointestinal intolerance, the preference was to add a gastro-protective agent (74%). There is a need to better characterise MSJP and examine optimal pharmacotherapy regimens.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>24451110</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1463423613000546</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1463-4236 |
ispartof | Primary health care research & development, 2014-10, Vol.15 (4), p.476-481 |
issn | 1463-4236 1477-1128 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1555620157 |
source | Cambridge University Press |
subjects | Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use Arthralgia - drug therapy Arthritis Bias Biomedical research Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - therapeutic use Female Humans Male Middle Aged Pain Pain Management - methods Pain Measurement Polls & surveys Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data Primary Health Care Questionnaires Response rates Seminars Short Report Studies Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Primary care approaches to musculoskeletal multiple-site joint pain pharmacological therapy: a survey of general practitioners |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A43%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Primary%20care%20approaches%20to%20musculoskeletal%20multiple-site%20joint%20pain%20pharmacological%20therapy:%20a%20survey%20of%20general%20practitioners&rft.jtitle=Primary%20health%20care%20research%20&%20development&rft.au=Raja,%20Rafi&rft.date=2014-10&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=476&rft.epage=481&rft.pages=476-481&rft.issn=1463-4236&rft.eissn=1477-1128&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1463423613000546&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3409914741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f54bc8553feeaf15613ea3e1931f38b81b81a97317c49a516ec572552f4ad5233%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1555235827&rft_id=info:pmid/24451110&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1463423613000546&rfr_iscdi=true |