Loading…

Primary care approaches to musculoskeletal multiple-site joint pain pharmacological therapy: a survey of general practitioners

Chronic multiple-site joint pain (MSJP) due to osteoarthritis and soft tissue disorders is common in people over 50 years old and associated with poor outcomes. This study examined current pharmacological approaches to MSJP management in primary care. One hundred and fifty general practitioners (GPs...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Primary health care research & development 2014-10, Vol.15 (4), p.476-481
Main Authors: Raja, Rafi, Kingsbury, Sarah R., Wise, Elspeth, Conaghan, Philip G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f54bc8553feeaf15613ea3e1931f38b81b81a97317c49a516ec572552f4ad5233
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f54bc8553feeaf15613ea3e1931f38b81b81a97317c49a516ec572552f4ad5233
container_end_page 481
container_issue 4
container_start_page 476
container_title Primary health care research & development
container_volume 15
creator Raja, Rafi
Kingsbury, Sarah R.
Wise, Elspeth
Conaghan, Philip G.
description Chronic multiple-site joint pain (MSJP) due to osteoarthritis and soft tissue disorders is common in people over 50 years old and associated with poor outcomes. This study examined current pharmacological approaches to MSJP management in primary care. One hundred and fifty general practitioners (GPs) attending an educational seminar participated in an electronic survey (mean response rate 96%). Most GPs reported treating multiple painful joints concurrently (78%) compared with focusing on a single joint (21%). The majority believed there was no difference in analgesia for different disorders when selecting paracetamol (84%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)/COX-2 inhibitors (57%) or opioids (70%). When optimising therapy, intra-class optimisation (increase NSAID dose 41%, change to another NSAID/COX-2 inhibitor 30%) was preferred to inter-class step up therapy (add opioid 23%, change to opioid 6%). For NSAID gastrointestinal intolerance, the preference was to add a gastro-protective agent (74%). There is a need to better characterise MSJP and examine optimal pharmacotherapy regimens.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1463423613000546
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1555620157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1463423613000546</cupid><sourcerecordid>3409914741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f54bc8553feeaf15613ea3e1931f38b81b81a97317c49a516ec572552f4ad5233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9rFDEQx0OxtLX6B_giAV98Wc3kx-6eb1LqDyhY0D4vc7nZu5zZzZpkhXvxbzfXO6VYhEAymc98k5kvYy9AvAEBzduvoGulpapBCSGMrk_YBeimqQBk-2R_rlW1z5-zpylthYBW1M0ZO5daGwAQF-zXbXQDxh23GInjNMWAdkOJ58CHOdnZh_SdPGX0JfbZTZ6q5DLxbXBj5hO6kU8bjAPa4MPa2QLmDUWcdu848jTHn7TjoedrGsut51NEm112oYTpGTvt0Sd6ftwv2d2H629Xn6qbLx8_X72_qayGOle90UvbGqN6IuzBlIYJFcFCQa_aZQtl4aJR0Fi9QAM1WdNIY2SvcWWkUpfs9UG39PdjppS7wSVL3uNIYU4dGGNqKcA0BX31D7oNcxzL7-4pqUwr9xQcKBtDSpH6bjoMsgPR7c3pHplTal4eleflQKu_FX_cKIA6iuKwjG61pgdv_1f2N5pKmnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1555235827</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Primary care approaches to musculoskeletal multiple-site joint pain pharmacological therapy: a survey of general practitioners</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Raja, Rafi ; Kingsbury, Sarah R. ; Wise, Elspeth ; Conaghan, Philip G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Raja, Rafi ; Kingsbury, Sarah R. ; Wise, Elspeth ; Conaghan, Philip G.</creatorcontrib><description>Chronic multiple-site joint pain (MSJP) due to osteoarthritis and soft tissue disorders is common in people over 50 years old and associated with poor outcomes. This study examined current pharmacological approaches to MSJP management in primary care. One hundred and fifty general practitioners (GPs) attending an educational seminar participated in an electronic survey (mean response rate 96%). Most GPs reported treating multiple painful joints concurrently (78%) compared with focusing on a single joint (21%). The majority believed there was no difference in analgesia for different disorders when selecting paracetamol (84%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)/COX-2 inhibitors (57%) or opioids (70%). When optimising therapy, intra-class optimisation (increase NSAID dose 41%, change to another NSAID/COX-2 inhibitor 30%) was preferred to inter-class step up therapy (add opioid 23%, change to opioid 6%). For NSAID gastrointestinal intolerance, the preference was to add a gastro-protective agent (74%). There is a need to better characterise MSJP and examine optimal pharmacotherapy regimens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1463-4236</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-1128</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1463423613000546</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24451110</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use ; Arthralgia - drug therapy ; Arthritis ; Bias ; Biomedical research ; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain ; Pain Management - methods ; Pain Measurement ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Primary Health Care ; Questionnaires ; Response rates ; Seminars ; Short Report ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Primary health care research &amp; development, 2014-10, Vol.15 (4), p.476-481</ispartof><rights>Cambridge University Press 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f54bc8553feeaf15613ea3e1931f38b81b81a97317c49a516ec572552f4ad5233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f54bc8553feeaf15613ea3e1931f38b81b81a97317c49a516ec572552f4ad5233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1463423613000546/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,72960</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24451110$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raja, Rafi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingsbury, Sarah R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, Elspeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conaghan, Philip G.</creatorcontrib><title>Primary care approaches to musculoskeletal multiple-site joint pain pharmacological therapy: a survey of general practitioners</title><title>Primary health care research &amp; development</title><addtitle>Prim Health Care Res Dev</addtitle><description>Chronic multiple-site joint pain (MSJP) due to osteoarthritis and soft tissue disorders is common in people over 50 years old and associated with poor outcomes. This study examined current pharmacological approaches to MSJP management in primary care. One hundred and fifty general practitioners (GPs) attending an educational seminar participated in an electronic survey (mean response rate 96%). Most GPs reported treating multiple painful joints concurrently (78%) compared with focusing on a single joint (21%). The majority believed there was no difference in analgesia for different disorders when selecting paracetamol (84%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)/COX-2 inhibitors (57%) or opioids (70%). When optimising therapy, intra-class optimisation (increase NSAID dose 41%, change to another NSAID/COX-2 inhibitor 30%) was preferred to inter-class step up therapy (add opioid 23%, change to opioid 6%). For NSAID gastrointestinal intolerance, the preference was to add a gastro-protective agent (74%). There is a need to better characterise MSJP and examine optimal pharmacotherapy regimens.</description><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Arthralgia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biomedical research</subject><subject>Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain Management - methods</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Seminars</subject><subject>Short Report</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1463-4236</issn><issn>1477-1128</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kd9rFDEQx0OxtLX6B_giAV98Wc3kx-6eb1LqDyhY0D4vc7nZu5zZzZpkhXvxbzfXO6VYhEAymc98k5kvYy9AvAEBzduvoGulpapBCSGMrk_YBeimqQBk-2R_rlW1z5-zpylthYBW1M0ZO5daGwAQF-zXbXQDxh23GInjNMWAdkOJ58CHOdnZh_SdPGX0JfbZTZ6q5DLxbXBj5hO6kU8bjAPa4MPa2QLmDUWcdu848jTHn7TjoedrGsut51NEm112oYTpGTvt0Sd6ftwv2d2H629Xn6qbLx8_X72_qayGOle90UvbGqN6IuzBlIYJFcFCQa_aZQtl4aJR0Fi9QAM1WdNIY2SvcWWkUpfs9UG39PdjppS7wSVL3uNIYU4dGGNqKcA0BX31D7oNcxzL7-4pqUwr9xQcKBtDSpH6bjoMsgPR7c3pHplTal4eleflQKu_FX_cKIA6iuKwjG61pgdv_1f2N5pKmnw</recordid><startdate>201410</startdate><enddate>201410</enddate><creator>Raja, Rafi</creator><creator>Kingsbury, Sarah R.</creator><creator>Wise, Elspeth</creator><creator>Conaghan, Philip G.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201410</creationdate><title>Primary care approaches to musculoskeletal multiple-site joint pain pharmacological therapy: a survey of general practitioners</title><author>Raja, Rafi ; Kingsbury, Sarah R. ; Wise, Elspeth ; Conaghan, Philip G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f54bc8553feeaf15613ea3e1931f38b81b81a97317c49a516ec572552f4ad5233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Arthralgia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biomedical research</topic><topic>Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain Management - methods</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Seminars</topic><topic>Short Report</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raja, Rafi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingsbury, Sarah R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, Elspeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conaghan, Philip G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Primary health care research &amp; development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raja, Rafi</au><au>Kingsbury, Sarah R.</au><au>Wise, Elspeth</au><au>Conaghan, Philip G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Primary care approaches to musculoskeletal multiple-site joint pain pharmacological therapy: a survey of general practitioners</atitle><jtitle>Primary health care research &amp; development</jtitle><addtitle>Prim Health Care Res Dev</addtitle><date>2014-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>476</spage><epage>481</epage><pages>476-481</pages><issn>1463-4236</issn><eissn>1477-1128</eissn><abstract>Chronic multiple-site joint pain (MSJP) due to osteoarthritis and soft tissue disorders is common in people over 50 years old and associated with poor outcomes. This study examined current pharmacological approaches to MSJP management in primary care. One hundred and fifty general practitioners (GPs) attending an educational seminar participated in an electronic survey (mean response rate 96%). Most GPs reported treating multiple painful joints concurrently (78%) compared with focusing on a single joint (21%). The majority believed there was no difference in analgesia for different disorders when selecting paracetamol (84%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)/COX-2 inhibitors (57%) or opioids (70%). When optimising therapy, intra-class optimisation (increase NSAID dose 41%, change to another NSAID/COX-2 inhibitor 30%) was preferred to inter-class step up therapy (add opioid 23%, change to opioid 6%). For NSAID gastrointestinal intolerance, the preference was to add a gastro-protective agent (74%). There is a need to better characterise MSJP and examine optimal pharmacotherapy regimens.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>24451110</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1463423613000546</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1463-4236
ispartof Primary health care research & development, 2014-10, Vol.15 (4), p.476-481
issn 1463-4236
1477-1128
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1555620157
source Cambridge University Press
subjects Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use
Arthralgia - drug therapy
Arthritis
Bias
Biomedical research
Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pain
Pain Management - methods
Pain Measurement
Polls & surveys
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data
Primary Health Care
Questionnaires
Response rates
Seminars
Short Report
Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Primary care approaches to musculoskeletal multiple-site joint pain pharmacological therapy: a survey of general practitioners
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A43%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Primary%20care%20approaches%20to%20musculoskeletal%20multiple-site%20joint%20pain%20pharmacological%20therapy:%20a%20survey%20of%20general%20practitioners&rft.jtitle=Primary%20health%20care%20research%20&%20development&rft.au=Raja,%20Rafi&rft.date=2014-10&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=476&rft.epage=481&rft.pages=476-481&rft.issn=1463-4236&rft.eissn=1477-1128&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1463423613000546&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3409914741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f54bc8553feeaf15613ea3e1931f38b81b81a97317c49a516ec572552f4ad5233%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1555235827&rft_id=info:pmid/24451110&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1463423613000546&rfr_iscdi=true