Loading…
Paleolithic Cultures in China: Uniqueness and Divergence
This paper presents an overview of the Chinese Paleolithic industries between 300 ka and 40 ka, a time span now termed the “later Early Paleolithic” (LEP) in the Chinese chronological scheme. It describes the unique features of LEP remains in China compared with contemporaneous materials in Africa a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Current anthropology 2013-12, Vol.54 (S8), p.S358-S370 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f51e9d74e70f34fa2938986a952f268ea95e821c30b4564ea4e28ae93118ee9d3 |
container_end_page | S370 |
container_issue | S8 |
container_start_page | S358 |
container_title | Current anthropology |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Gao, Xing |
description | This paper presents an overview of the Chinese Paleolithic industries between 300 ka and 40 ka, a time span now termed the “later Early Paleolithic” (LEP) in the Chinese chronological scheme. It describes the unique features of LEP remains in China compared with contemporaneous materials in Africa and western Eurasia as well as the internal diversity and complexity of these Chinese Paleolithic assemblages. Basic features of LEP remains in China include the persistent and conservative pebble-tool and simple flake-tool traditions, the use of poor-quality local raw materials, tool fabrication on pebbles and direct use of unretouched flakes, opportunistic flaking, simple and casual modification, and the lack of obvious temporal trends. The diversity and complexity of Chinese Paleolithic cultures as they are expressed in terms of the major difference between southern China’s pebble-tool tradition and northern China’s simple flake-tool tradition are also assessed. Based on such generalizations and analyses, a comprehensive behavioral model is proposed to explain the unique features of LEP cultures in China and the alternative pathway of human evolution and adaptation in China during that period of time. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/673502 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1556286964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/673502</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/673502</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f51e9d74e70f34fa2938986a952f268ea95e821c30b4564ea4e28ae93118ee9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWKv-A6EgipfVTL5zlMUvKOhBz0uME5qS7tZk9-C_d0tFRBA8zRye9xnmJeQY6CVQo66U5pKyHTIByXUluWG7ZEIpQMUZFfvkoJQlpdRK0BNy8uQSdin2i-hn9ZD6IWOZxXZWL2LrDslecKng0deckpfbm-f6vpo_3j3U1_PKc276KkhA-6YFahq4CI5ZbqxRzkoWmDI4LmgYeE5fhVQCnUBmHFoOYHBM8im52HrXuXsfsPTNKhaPKbkWu6E0IKViRlkl_oFyGMUGzIie_kKX3ZDb8ZEGhNWUW2Y3wvMt5XNXSsbQrHNcufzRAG02hTbbQkfw7EvnincpZNf6WL5pZkAb4D_OLkvf5b9snzrYewE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1497039294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Paleolithic Cultures in China: Uniqueness and Divergence</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>University of Chicago Press Journals (Full run)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Gao, Xing</creator><creatorcontrib>Gao, Xing</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents an overview of the Chinese Paleolithic industries between 300 ka and 40 ka, a time span now termed the “later Early Paleolithic” (LEP) in the Chinese chronological scheme. It describes the unique features of LEP remains in China compared with contemporaneous materials in Africa and western Eurasia as well as the internal diversity and complexity of these Chinese Paleolithic assemblages. Basic features of LEP remains in China include the persistent and conservative pebble-tool and simple flake-tool traditions, the use of poor-quality local raw materials, tool fabrication on pebbles and direct use of unretouched flakes, opportunistic flaking, simple and casual modification, and the lack of obvious temporal trends. The diversity and complexity of Chinese Paleolithic cultures as they are expressed in terms of the major difference between southern China’s pebble-tool tradition and northern China’s simple flake-tool tradition are also assessed. Based on such generalizations and analyses, a comprehensive behavioral model is proposed to explain the unique features of LEP cultures in China and the alternative pathway of human evolution and adaptation in China during that period of time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-3204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5382</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/673502</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CUANAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; African culture ; Alternative Approaches ; Archaeological dating ; Archaeological research ; Asia ; China ; Chinese culture ; Conferences ; Cross-national analysis ; Cultural anthropology ; Cultural Pluralism ; Eurasia ; Far East ; Fossils ; Generalities ; Hand axes ; History of technology ; Human evolution ; Humans ; Lithic industry ; Material culture ; Methodology and general studies ; Multiculturalism ; Palaeolithic and mesolithic ; Paleolithic Age ; Pebbles ; Peoples Republic of China ; Prehistoric technology ; Prehistoric tools ; Prehistory and protohistory ; Raw Materials ; Scrapers ; Stone Age ; Stone tools ; Typology, technology and attribute analysis</subject><ispartof>Current anthropology, 2013-12, Vol.54 (S8), p.S358-S370</ispartof><rights>2013 by The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Dec 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f51e9d74e70f34fa2938986a952f268ea95e821c30b4564ea4e28ae93118ee9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,33223,33224,33774,33775</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28178138$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gao, Xing</creatorcontrib><title>Paleolithic Cultures in China: Uniqueness and Divergence</title><title>Current anthropology</title><description>This paper presents an overview of the Chinese Paleolithic industries between 300 ka and 40 ka, a time span now termed the “later Early Paleolithic” (LEP) in the Chinese chronological scheme. It describes the unique features of LEP remains in China compared with contemporaneous materials in Africa and western Eurasia as well as the internal diversity and complexity of these Chinese Paleolithic assemblages. Basic features of LEP remains in China include the persistent and conservative pebble-tool and simple flake-tool traditions, the use of poor-quality local raw materials, tool fabrication on pebbles and direct use of unretouched flakes, opportunistic flaking, simple and casual modification, and the lack of obvious temporal trends. The diversity and complexity of Chinese Paleolithic cultures as they are expressed in terms of the major difference between southern China’s pebble-tool tradition and northern China’s simple flake-tool tradition are also assessed. Based on such generalizations and analyses, a comprehensive behavioral model is proposed to explain the unique features of LEP cultures in China and the alternative pathway of human evolution and adaptation in China during that period of time.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>African culture</subject><subject>Alternative Approaches</subject><subject>Archaeological dating</subject><subject>Archaeological research</subject><subject>Asia</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Chinese culture</subject><subject>Conferences</subject><subject>Cross-national analysis</subject><subject>Cultural anthropology</subject><subject>Cultural Pluralism</subject><subject>Eurasia</subject><subject>Far East</subject><subject>Fossils</subject><subject>Generalities</subject><subject>Hand axes</subject><subject>History of technology</subject><subject>Human evolution</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lithic industry</subject><subject>Material culture</subject><subject>Methodology and general studies</subject><subject>Multiculturalism</subject><subject>Palaeolithic and mesolithic</subject><subject>Paleolithic Age</subject><subject>Pebbles</subject><subject>Peoples Republic of China</subject><subject>Prehistoric technology</subject><subject>Prehistoric tools</subject><subject>Prehistory and protohistory</subject><subject>Raw Materials</subject><subject>Scrapers</subject><subject>Stone Age</subject><subject>Stone tools</subject><subject>Typology, technology and attribute analysis</subject><issn>0011-3204</issn><issn>1537-5382</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWKv-A6EgipfVTL5zlMUvKOhBz0uME5qS7tZk9-C_d0tFRBA8zRye9xnmJeQY6CVQo66U5pKyHTIByXUluWG7ZEIpQMUZFfvkoJQlpdRK0BNy8uQSdin2i-hn9ZD6IWOZxXZWL2LrDslecKng0deckpfbm-f6vpo_3j3U1_PKc276KkhA-6YFahq4CI5ZbqxRzkoWmDI4LmgYeE5fhVQCnUBmHFoOYHBM8im52HrXuXsfsPTNKhaPKbkWu6E0IKViRlkl_oFyGMUGzIie_kKX3ZDb8ZEGhNWUW2Y3wvMt5XNXSsbQrHNcufzRAG02hTbbQkfw7EvnincpZNf6WL5pZkAb4D_OLkvf5b9snzrYewE</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Gao, Xing</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Paleolithic Cultures in China</title><author>Gao, Xing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f51e9d74e70f34fa2938986a952f268ea95e821c30b4564ea4e28ae93118ee9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>African culture</topic><topic>Alternative Approaches</topic><topic>Archaeological dating</topic><topic>Archaeological research</topic><topic>Asia</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Chinese culture</topic><topic>Conferences</topic><topic>Cross-national analysis</topic><topic>Cultural anthropology</topic><topic>Cultural Pluralism</topic><topic>Eurasia</topic><topic>Far East</topic><topic>Fossils</topic><topic>Generalities</topic><topic>Hand axes</topic><topic>History of technology</topic><topic>Human evolution</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lithic industry</topic><topic>Material culture</topic><topic>Methodology and general studies</topic><topic>Multiculturalism</topic><topic>Palaeolithic and mesolithic</topic><topic>Paleolithic Age</topic><topic>Pebbles</topic><topic>Peoples Republic of China</topic><topic>Prehistoric technology</topic><topic>Prehistoric tools</topic><topic>Prehistory and protohistory</topic><topic>Raw Materials</topic><topic>Scrapers</topic><topic>Stone Age</topic><topic>Stone tools</topic><topic>Typology, technology and attribute analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Xing</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Current anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Xing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Paleolithic Cultures in China: Uniqueness and Divergence</atitle><jtitle>Current anthropology</jtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>S8</issue><spage>S358</spage><epage>S370</epage><pages>S358-S370</pages><issn>0011-3204</issn><eissn>1537-5382</eissn><coden>CUANAX</coden><abstract>This paper presents an overview of the Chinese Paleolithic industries between 300 ka and 40 ka, a time span now termed the “later Early Paleolithic” (LEP) in the Chinese chronological scheme. It describes the unique features of LEP remains in China compared with contemporaneous materials in Africa and western Eurasia as well as the internal diversity and complexity of these Chinese Paleolithic assemblages. Basic features of LEP remains in China include the persistent and conservative pebble-tool and simple flake-tool traditions, the use of poor-quality local raw materials, tool fabrication on pebbles and direct use of unretouched flakes, opportunistic flaking, simple and casual modification, and the lack of obvious temporal trends. The diversity and complexity of Chinese Paleolithic cultures as they are expressed in terms of the major difference between southern China’s pebble-tool tradition and northern China’s simple flake-tool tradition are also assessed. Based on such generalizations and analyses, a comprehensive behavioral model is proposed to explain the unique features of LEP cultures in China and the alternative pathway of human evolution and adaptation in China during that period of time.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/673502</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0011-3204 |
ispartof | Current anthropology, 2013-12, Vol.54 (S8), p.S358-S370 |
issn | 0011-3204 1537-5382 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1556286964 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); University of Chicago Press Journals (Full run); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Adaptation African culture Alternative Approaches Archaeological dating Archaeological research Asia China Chinese culture Conferences Cross-national analysis Cultural anthropology Cultural Pluralism Eurasia Far East Fossils Generalities Hand axes History of technology Human evolution Humans Lithic industry Material culture Methodology and general studies Multiculturalism Palaeolithic and mesolithic Paleolithic Age Pebbles Peoples Republic of China Prehistoric technology Prehistoric tools Prehistory and protohistory Raw Materials Scrapers Stone Age Stone tools Typology, technology and attribute analysis |
title | Paleolithic Cultures in China: Uniqueness and Divergence |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T19%3A41%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Paleolithic%20Cultures%20in%20China:%20Uniqueness%20and%20Divergence&rft.jtitle=Current%20anthropology&rft.au=Gao,%20Xing&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=S8&rft.spage=S358&rft.epage=S370&rft.pages=S358-S370&rft.issn=0011-3204&rft.eissn=1537-5382&rft.coden=CUANAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/673502&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/673502%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f51e9d74e70f34fa2938986a952f268ea95e821c30b4564ea4e28ae93118ee9d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1497039294&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/673502&rfr_iscdi=true |