Loading…

Paleolithic Cultures in China: Uniqueness and Divergence

This paper presents an overview of the Chinese Paleolithic industries between 300 ka and 40 ka, a time span now termed the “later Early Paleolithic” (LEP) in the Chinese chronological scheme. It describes the unique features of LEP remains in China compared with contemporaneous materials in Africa a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Current anthropology 2013-12, Vol.54 (S8), p.S358-S370
Main Author: Gao, Xing
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f51e9d74e70f34fa2938986a952f268ea95e821c30b4564ea4e28ae93118ee9d3
container_end_page S370
container_issue S8
container_start_page S358
container_title Current anthropology
container_volume 54
creator Gao, Xing
description This paper presents an overview of the Chinese Paleolithic industries between 300 ka and 40 ka, a time span now termed the “later Early Paleolithic” (LEP) in the Chinese chronological scheme. It describes the unique features of LEP remains in China compared with contemporaneous materials in Africa and western Eurasia as well as the internal diversity and complexity of these Chinese Paleolithic assemblages. Basic features of LEP remains in China include the persistent and conservative pebble-tool and simple flake-tool traditions, the use of poor-quality local raw materials, tool fabrication on pebbles and direct use of unretouched flakes, opportunistic flaking, simple and casual modification, and the lack of obvious temporal trends. The diversity and complexity of Chinese Paleolithic cultures as they are expressed in terms of the major difference between southern China’s pebble-tool tradition and northern China’s simple flake-tool tradition are also assessed. Based on such generalizations and analyses, a comprehensive behavioral model is proposed to explain the unique features of LEP cultures in China and the alternative pathway of human evolution and adaptation in China during that period of time.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/673502
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1556286964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/673502</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/673502</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f51e9d74e70f34fa2938986a952f268ea95e821c30b4564ea4e28ae93118ee9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWKv-A6EgipfVTL5zlMUvKOhBz0uME5qS7tZk9-C_d0tFRBA8zRye9xnmJeQY6CVQo66U5pKyHTIByXUluWG7ZEIpQMUZFfvkoJQlpdRK0BNy8uQSdin2i-hn9ZD6IWOZxXZWL2LrDslecKng0deckpfbm-f6vpo_3j3U1_PKc276KkhA-6YFahq4CI5ZbqxRzkoWmDI4LmgYeE5fhVQCnUBmHFoOYHBM8im52HrXuXsfsPTNKhaPKbkWu6E0IKViRlkl_oFyGMUGzIie_kKX3ZDb8ZEGhNWUW2Y3wvMt5XNXSsbQrHNcufzRAG02hTbbQkfw7EvnincpZNf6WL5pZkAb4D_OLkvf5b9snzrYewE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1497039294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Paleolithic Cultures in China: Uniqueness and Divergence</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>University of Chicago Press Journals (Full run)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Gao, Xing</creator><creatorcontrib>Gao, Xing</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents an overview of the Chinese Paleolithic industries between 300 ka and 40 ka, a time span now termed the “later Early Paleolithic” (LEP) in the Chinese chronological scheme. It describes the unique features of LEP remains in China compared with contemporaneous materials in Africa and western Eurasia as well as the internal diversity and complexity of these Chinese Paleolithic assemblages. Basic features of LEP remains in China include the persistent and conservative pebble-tool and simple flake-tool traditions, the use of poor-quality local raw materials, tool fabrication on pebbles and direct use of unretouched flakes, opportunistic flaking, simple and casual modification, and the lack of obvious temporal trends. The diversity and complexity of Chinese Paleolithic cultures as they are expressed in terms of the major difference between southern China’s pebble-tool tradition and northern China’s simple flake-tool tradition are also assessed. Based on such generalizations and analyses, a comprehensive behavioral model is proposed to explain the unique features of LEP cultures in China and the alternative pathway of human evolution and adaptation in China during that period of time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-3204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5382</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/673502</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CUANAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; African culture ; Alternative Approaches ; Archaeological dating ; Archaeological research ; Asia ; China ; Chinese culture ; Conferences ; Cross-national analysis ; Cultural anthropology ; Cultural Pluralism ; Eurasia ; Far East ; Fossils ; Generalities ; Hand axes ; History of technology ; Human evolution ; Humans ; Lithic industry ; Material culture ; Methodology and general studies ; Multiculturalism ; Palaeolithic and mesolithic ; Paleolithic Age ; Pebbles ; Peoples Republic of China ; Prehistoric technology ; Prehistoric tools ; Prehistory and protohistory ; Raw Materials ; Scrapers ; Stone Age ; Stone tools ; Typology, technology and attribute analysis</subject><ispartof>Current anthropology, 2013-12, Vol.54 (S8), p.S358-S370</ispartof><rights>2013 by The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Dec 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f51e9d74e70f34fa2938986a952f268ea95e821c30b4564ea4e28ae93118ee9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,33223,33224,33774,33775</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28178138$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gao, Xing</creatorcontrib><title>Paleolithic Cultures in China: Uniqueness and Divergence</title><title>Current anthropology</title><description>This paper presents an overview of the Chinese Paleolithic industries between 300 ka and 40 ka, a time span now termed the “later Early Paleolithic” (LEP) in the Chinese chronological scheme. It describes the unique features of LEP remains in China compared with contemporaneous materials in Africa and western Eurasia as well as the internal diversity and complexity of these Chinese Paleolithic assemblages. Basic features of LEP remains in China include the persistent and conservative pebble-tool and simple flake-tool traditions, the use of poor-quality local raw materials, tool fabrication on pebbles and direct use of unretouched flakes, opportunistic flaking, simple and casual modification, and the lack of obvious temporal trends. The diversity and complexity of Chinese Paleolithic cultures as they are expressed in terms of the major difference between southern China’s pebble-tool tradition and northern China’s simple flake-tool tradition are also assessed. Based on such generalizations and analyses, a comprehensive behavioral model is proposed to explain the unique features of LEP cultures in China and the alternative pathway of human evolution and adaptation in China during that period of time.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>African culture</subject><subject>Alternative Approaches</subject><subject>Archaeological dating</subject><subject>Archaeological research</subject><subject>Asia</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Chinese culture</subject><subject>Conferences</subject><subject>Cross-national analysis</subject><subject>Cultural anthropology</subject><subject>Cultural Pluralism</subject><subject>Eurasia</subject><subject>Far East</subject><subject>Fossils</subject><subject>Generalities</subject><subject>Hand axes</subject><subject>History of technology</subject><subject>Human evolution</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lithic industry</subject><subject>Material culture</subject><subject>Methodology and general studies</subject><subject>Multiculturalism</subject><subject>Palaeolithic and mesolithic</subject><subject>Paleolithic Age</subject><subject>Pebbles</subject><subject>Peoples Republic of China</subject><subject>Prehistoric technology</subject><subject>Prehistoric tools</subject><subject>Prehistory and protohistory</subject><subject>Raw Materials</subject><subject>Scrapers</subject><subject>Stone Age</subject><subject>Stone tools</subject><subject>Typology, technology and attribute analysis</subject><issn>0011-3204</issn><issn>1537-5382</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWKv-A6EgipfVTL5zlMUvKOhBz0uME5qS7tZk9-C_d0tFRBA8zRye9xnmJeQY6CVQo66U5pKyHTIByXUluWG7ZEIpQMUZFfvkoJQlpdRK0BNy8uQSdin2i-hn9ZD6IWOZxXZWL2LrDslecKng0deckpfbm-f6vpo_3j3U1_PKc276KkhA-6YFahq4CI5ZbqxRzkoWmDI4LmgYeE5fhVQCnUBmHFoOYHBM8im52HrXuXsfsPTNKhaPKbkWu6E0IKViRlkl_oFyGMUGzIie_kKX3ZDb8ZEGhNWUW2Y3wvMt5XNXSsbQrHNcufzRAG02hTbbQkfw7EvnincpZNf6WL5pZkAb4D_OLkvf5b9snzrYewE</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Gao, Xing</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Paleolithic Cultures in China</title><author>Gao, Xing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f51e9d74e70f34fa2938986a952f268ea95e821c30b4564ea4e28ae93118ee9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>African culture</topic><topic>Alternative Approaches</topic><topic>Archaeological dating</topic><topic>Archaeological research</topic><topic>Asia</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Chinese culture</topic><topic>Conferences</topic><topic>Cross-national analysis</topic><topic>Cultural anthropology</topic><topic>Cultural Pluralism</topic><topic>Eurasia</topic><topic>Far East</topic><topic>Fossils</topic><topic>Generalities</topic><topic>Hand axes</topic><topic>History of technology</topic><topic>Human evolution</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lithic industry</topic><topic>Material culture</topic><topic>Methodology and general studies</topic><topic>Multiculturalism</topic><topic>Palaeolithic and mesolithic</topic><topic>Paleolithic Age</topic><topic>Pebbles</topic><topic>Peoples Republic of China</topic><topic>Prehistoric technology</topic><topic>Prehistoric tools</topic><topic>Prehistory and protohistory</topic><topic>Raw Materials</topic><topic>Scrapers</topic><topic>Stone Age</topic><topic>Stone tools</topic><topic>Typology, technology and attribute analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Xing</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Current anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Xing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Paleolithic Cultures in China: Uniqueness and Divergence</atitle><jtitle>Current anthropology</jtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>S8</issue><spage>S358</spage><epage>S370</epage><pages>S358-S370</pages><issn>0011-3204</issn><eissn>1537-5382</eissn><coden>CUANAX</coden><abstract>This paper presents an overview of the Chinese Paleolithic industries between 300 ka and 40 ka, a time span now termed the “later Early Paleolithic” (LEP) in the Chinese chronological scheme. It describes the unique features of LEP remains in China compared with contemporaneous materials in Africa and western Eurasia as well as the internal diversity and complexity of these Chinese Paleolithic assemblages. Basic features of LEP remains in China include the persistent and conservative pebble-tool and simple flake-tool traditions, the use of poor-quality local raw materials, tool fabrication on pebbles and direct use of unretouched flakes, opportunistic flaking, simple and casual modification, and the lack of obvious temporal trends. The diversity and complexity of Chinese Paleolithic cultures as they are expressed in terms of the major difference between southern China’s pebble-tool tradition and northern China’s simple flake-tool tradition are also assessed. Based on such generalizations and analyses, a comprehensive behavioral model is proposed to explain the unique features of LEP cultures in China and the alternative pathway of human evolution and adaptation in China during that period of time.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/673502</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-3204
ispartof Current anthropology, 2013-12, Vol.54 (S8), p.S358-S370
issn 0011-3204
1537-5382
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1556286964
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); University of Chicago Press Journals (Full run); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Adaptation
African culture
Alternative Approaches
Archaeological dating
Archaeological research
Asia
China
Chinese culture
Conferences
Cross-national analysis
Cultural anthropology
Cultural Pluralism
Eurasia
Far East
Fossils
Generalities
Hand axes
History of technology
Human evolution
Humans
Lithic industry
Material culture
Methodology and general studies
Multiculturalism
Palaeolithic and mesolithic
Paleolithic Age
Pebbles
Peoples Republic of China
Prehistoric technology
Prehistoric tools
Prehistory and protohistory
Raw Materials
Scrapers
Stone Age
Stone tools
Typology, technology and attribute analysis
title Paleolithic Cultures in China: Uniqueness and Divergence
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T19%3A41%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Paleolithic%20Cultures%20in%20China:%20Uniqueness%20and%20Divergence&rft.jtitle=Current%20anthropology&rft.au=Gao,%20Xing&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=S8&rft.spage=S358&rft.epage=S370&rft.pages=S358-S370&rft.issn=0011-3204&rft.eissn=1537-5382&rft.coden=CUANAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/673502&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/673502%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f51e9d74e70f34fa2938986a952f268ea95e821c30b4564ea4e28ae93118ee9d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1497039294&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/673502&rfr_iscdi=true