Loading…

Muscle thickness measurements to estimate gluteus medius and minimus activity levels

Abstract The clinical assessment of gluteus medius and minimus force sharing requires non-invasive measurements of individual activity levels. Do ultrasound measurements of change of muscle thickness substitute invasive electromyography (EMG)? Isometric hip abduction in 20–80% maximal voluntary isom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Manual therapy 2014-10, Vol.19 (5), p.453-460
Main Authors: Dieterich, Angela V, Pickard, Christine M, Strauss, Geoffrey R, Deshon, Louise E, Gibson, William, McKay, Janice
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-778226e0dda5128ecc34946c90813c4781ec2e07917ca0a0ee06c49ba93c929c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-778226e0dda5128ecc34946c90813c4781ec2e07917ca0a0ee06c49ba93c929c3
container_end_page 460
container_issue 5
container_start_page 453
container_title Manual therapy
container_volume 19
creator Dieterich, Angela V
Pickard, Christine M
Strauss, Geoffrey R
Deshon, Louise E
Gibson, William
McKay, Janice
description Abstract The clinical assessment of gluteus medius and minimus force sharing requires non-invasive measurements of individual activity levels. Do ultrasound measurements of change of muscle thickness substitute invasive electromyography (EMG)? Isometric hip abduction in 20–80% maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) was measured using dynamometry, M-mode ultrasound for gluteus medius and minimus thickness and EMG using (1) surface electrodes on gluteus medius, n  = 15, (2) fine-wire electrodes in deep gluteus medius and minimus, n  = 6. Gluteus medius thickened by 5.0 (SD 2.5) mm at 80% MVIC while gluteus minimus thickness was constant in the surface EMG study and decreased by 1.6 (SD 1.6) mm at the more ventral location in the fine-wire EMG study. Thickness change of gluteus medius enabled prediction of torque ( r2 0.66) and of surface EMG amplitude ( r2 0.57). Surface EMG enabled higher torque prediction ( r2 0.84) than thickness change. Thickness change of gluteus minimus did not enable a practically relevant estimation of torque production. Ultrasound examination revealed a differential thickening behaviour of gluteus medius and minimus which enabled estimation of isometric torque production only for gluteus medius but with lower precision than surface EMG.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.math.2014.04.014
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1558527533</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1356689X14000794</els_id><sourcerecordid>1558527533</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-778226e0dda5128ecc34946c90813c4781ec2e07917ca0a0ee06c49ba93c929c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2KFTEQhYMozo--gAvppZu-Vv46HRBBhnEURlzogLuQqa5xcifdPSbpC_dtfBafzDR3dOFCKKgEzjlJfcXYCw4bDrx7vd2MvtxuBHC1gVpcPWLHXEvRCtPZx_Usddd2vf12xE5y3gKAVaCfsiOh-h4EmGN29WnJGKkptwHvJsq5GcnnJdFIU8lNmRvKJdR3qPkel0LLKhhCbX4afv0cwxTG9YIl7ELZN5F2FPMz9uTGx0zPH_opu3p__vXsQ3v5-eLj2bvLFpXWpTWmF6IjGAavuegJUSqrOrTQc4nK9JxQEBjLDXrwQAQdKnvtrUQrLMpT9uqQe5_mH0v9qRtDRorRTzQv2XGtey2MlrJKxUGKac450Y27T3WutHcc3IrTbd2K0604HdTiqppePuQv13Xsv5Y__KrgzUFQh6ZdoOQyBpqwIkqExQ1z-H_-23_sGCtR9PGO9pS385Kmys9xl4UD92Vd6LpPruoujVXyN3z9nSY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1558527533</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Muscle thickness measurements to estimate gluteus medius and minimus activity levels</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Dieterich, Angela V ; Pickard, Christine M ; Strauss, Geoffrey R ; Deshon, Louise E ; Gibson, William ; McKay, Janice</creator><creatorcontrib>Dieterich, Angela V ; Pickard, Christine M ; Strauss, Geoffrey R ; Deshon, Louise E ; Gibson, William ; McKay, Janice</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The clinical assessment of gluteus medius and minimus force sharing requires non-invasive measurements of individual activity levels. Do ultrasound measurements of change of muscle thickness substitute invasive electromyography (EMG)? Isometric hip abduction in 20–80% maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) was measured using dynamometry, M-mode ultrasound for gluteus medius and minimus thickness and EMG using (1) surface electrodes on gluteus medius, n  = 15, (2) fine-wire electrodes in deep gluteus medius and minimus, n  = 6. Gluteus medius thickened by 5.0 (SD 2.5) mm at 80% MVIC while gluteus minimus thickness was constant in the surface EMG study and decreased by 1.6 (SD 1.6) mm at the more ventral location in the fine-wire EMG study. Thickness change of gluteus medius enabled prediction of torque ( r2 0.66) and of surface EMG amplitude ( r2 0.57). Surface EMG enabled higher torque prediction ( r2 0.84) than thickness change. Thickness change of gluteus minimus did not enable a practically relevant estimation of torque production. Ultrasound examination revealed a differential thickening behaviour of gluteus medius and minimus which enabled estimation of isometric torque production only for gluteus medius but with lower precision than surface EMG.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-689X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2014.04.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24880207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Buttocks ; Electromyography ; Female ; Hip ; Humans ; Male ; Muscle ; Muscle Contraction - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Torque ; Ultrasonography ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Manual therapy, 2014-10, Vol.19 (5), p.453-460</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-778226e0dda5128ecc34946c90813c4781ec2e07917ca0a0ee06c49ba93c929c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-778226e0dda5128ecc34946c90813c4781ec2e07917ca0a0ee06c49ba93c929c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9594-3962</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24880207$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dieterich, Angela V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickard, Christine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strauss, Geoffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deshon, Louise E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKay, Janice</creatorcontrib><title>Muscle thickness measurements to estimate gluteus medius and minimus activity levels</title><title>Manual therapy</title><addtitle>Man Ther</addtitle><description>Abstract The clinical assessment of gluteus medius and minimus force sharing requires non-invasive measurements of individual activity levels. Do ultrasound measurements of change of muscle thickness substitute invasive electromyography (EMG)? Isometric hip abduction in 20–80% maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) was measured using dynamometry, M-mode ultrasound for gluteus medius and minimus thickness and EMG using (1) surface electrodes on gluteus medius, n  = 15, (2) fine-wire electrodes in deep gluteus medius and minimus, n  = 6. Gluteus medius thickened by 5.0 (SD 2.5) mm at 80% MVIC while gluteus minimus thickness was constant in the surface EMG study and decreased by 1.6 (SD 1.6) mm at the more ventral location in the fine-wire EMG study. Thickness change of gluteus medius enabled prediction of torque ( r2 0.66) and of surface EMG amplitude ( r2 0.57). Surface EMG enabled higher torque prediction ( r2 0.84) than thickness change. Thickness change of gluteus minimus did not enable a practically relevant estimation of torque production. Ultrasound examination revealed a differential thickening behaviour of gluteus medius and minimus which enabled estimation of isometric torque production only for gluteus medius but with lower precision than surface EMG.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Buttocks</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hip</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Torque</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>1356-689X</issn><issn>1532-2769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc2KFTEQhYMozo--gAvppZu-Vv46HRBBhnEURlzogLuQqa5xcifdPSbpC_dtfBafzDR3dOFCKKgEzjlJfcXYCw4bDrx7vd2MvtxuBHC1gVpcPWLHXEvRCtPZx_Usddd2vf12xE5y3gKAVaCfsiOh-h4EmGN29WnJGKkptwHvJsq5GcnnJdFIU8lNmRvKJdR3qPkel0LLKhhCbX4afv0cwxTG9YIl7ELZN5F2FPMz9uTGx0zPH_opu3p__vXsQ3v5-eLj2bvLFpXWpTWmF6IjGAavuegJUSqrOrTQc4nK9JxQEBjLDXrwQAQdKnvtrUQrLMpT9uqQe5_mH0v9qRtDRorRTzQv2XGtey2MlrJKxUGKac450Y27T3WutHcc3IrTbd2K0604HdTiqppePuQv13Xsv5Y__KrgzUFQh6ZdoOQyBpqwIkqExQ1z-H_-23_sGCtR9PGO9pS385Kmys9xl4UD92Vd6LpPruoujVXyN3z9nSY</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Dieterich, Angela V</creator><creator>Pickard, Christine M</creator><creator>Strauss, Geoffrey R</creator><creator>Deshon, Louise E</creator><creator>Gibson, William</creator><creator>McKay, Janice</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9594-3962</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Muscle thickness measurements to estimate gluteus medius and minimus activity levels</title><author>Dieterich, Angela V ; Pickard, Christine M ; Strauss, Geoffrey R ; Deshon, Louise E ; Gibson, William ; McKay, Janice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-778226e0dda5128ecc34946c90813c4781ec2e07917ca0a0ee06c49ba93c929c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Buttocks</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hip</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Torque</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dieterich, Angela V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickard, Christine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strauss, Geoffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deshon, Louise E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKay, Janice</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Manual therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dieterich, Angela V</au><au>Pickard, Christine M</au><au>Strauss, Geoffrey R</au><au>Deshon, Louise E</au><au>Gibson, William</au><au>McKay, Janice</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Muscle thickness measurements to estimate gluteus medius and minimus activity levels</atitle><jtitle>Manual therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Man Ther</addtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>453</spage><epage>460</epage><pages>453-460</pages><issn>1356-689X</issn><eissn>1532-2769</eissn><abstract>Abstract The clinical assessment of gluteus medius and minimus force sharing requires non-invasive measurements of individual activity levels. Do ultrasound measurements of change of muscle thickness substitute invasive electromyography (EMG)? Isometric hip abduction in 20–80% maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) was measured using dynamometry, M-mode ultrasound for gluteus medius and minimus thickness and EMG using (1) surface electrodes on gluteus medius, n  = 15, (2) fine-wire electrodes in deep gluteus medius and minimus, n  = 6. Gluteus medius thickened by 5.0 (SD 2.5) mm at 80% MVIC while gluteus minimus thickness was constant in the surface EMG study and decreased by 1.6 (SD 1.6) mm at the more ventral location in the fine-wire EMG study. Thickness change of gluteus medius enabled prediction of torque ( r2 0.66) and of surface EMG amplitude ( r2 0.57). Surface EMG enabled higher torque prediction ( r2 0.84) than thickness change. Thickness change of gluteus minimus did not enable a practically relevant estimation of torque production. Ultrasound examination revealed a differential thickening behaviour of gluteus medius and minimus which enabled estimation of isometric torque production only for gluteus medius but with lower precision than surface EMG.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24880207</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.math.2014.04.014</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9594-3962</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1356-689X
ispartof Manual therapy, 2014-10, Vol.19 (5), p.453-460
issn 1356-689X
1532-2769
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1558527533
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Adult
Buttocks
Electromyography
Female
Hip
Humans
Male
Muscle
Muscle Contraction - physiology
Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Torque
Ultrasonography
Ultrasound
title Muscle thickness measurements to estimate gluteus medius and minimus activity levels
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T17%3A46%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Muscle%20thickness%20measurements%20to%20estimate%20gluteus%20medius%20and%C2%A0minimus%20activity%20levels&rft.jtitle=Manual%20therapy&rft.au=Dieterich,%20Angela%20V&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=453&rft.epage=460&rft.pages=453-460&rft.issn=1356-689X&rft.eissn=1532-2769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.math.2014.04.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1558527533%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-778226e0dda5128ecc34946c90813c4781ec2e07917ca0a0ee06c49ba93c929c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1558527533&rft_id=info:pmid/24880207&rfr_iscdi=true