Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: sensitivity to calibration data

The identification of hydrologic models requires that appropriate data be selected for model calibration. In the research presented here, the shuffled complex evolution (SCE-UA) global optimization method was used to calibrate the NWSRFS-SMA conceptual rainfall-runoff flood forecasting model of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 1996, Vol.181 (1), p.23-48
Main Authors: Yapo, Patrice O., Gupta, Hoshin Vijai, Sorooshian, Soroosh
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
calibration
daily root mean square
flooding
hydrologic data
hydrology
maximum likelihood
meteorological data
optimization
prediction
rain
rivers
runoff
simulation models
soil moisture accounting model
statistical analysis
stream flow
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The identification of hydrologic models requires that appropriate data be selected for model calibration. In the research presented here, the shuffled complex evolution (SCE-UA) global optimization method was used to calibrate the NWSRFS-SMA conceptual rainfall-runoff flood forecasting model of the US National Weather Service, using a 40-year record of historical data. Based on 344 calibration runs using different lengths of data from different sections of the historical record, we conclude that approximately 8 years of data are required to obtain calibrations that are relatively insensitive to the period selected. Further, the reduction in parameter uncertainty is maximal when the wettest data periods on record are used. A residual analysis is used to compare the performance of the daily root mean square (DRMS) and heteroscedastic maximum likelihood error (HMLE) objective functions. The results suggest that the factor currently limiting model performance is the unavailability of strategies that explicitly account for model error during calibration.
ISSN:0022-1694
1879-2707
DOI:10.1016/0022-1694(95)02918-4