Loading…
Slavery in Europe: Part 2, Testing a Predictive Model
Since the passage of the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act and the United Nations Palermo Protocols of 2000, there has been an increased focus on the magnitude and complexity of modern day slavery. Yet, surprisingly, little empirical work exists. A comprehensive review of the litera...
Saved in:
Published in: | Human rights quarterly 2014-05, Vol.36 (2), p.277-295 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-18a146f8eaecaa3b3968ed9a5218d44a943452a27ef9e75b46c67f32298cd9083 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 295 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 277 |
container_title | Human rights quarterly |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Datta, Monti Narayan Bales, Kevin |
description | Since the passage of the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act and the United Nations Palermo Protocols of 2000, there has been an increased focus on the magnitude and complexity of modern day slavery. Yet, surprisingly, little empirical work exists. A comprehensive review of the literature by Elżbieta Goździak and Micah Bump in 2008 found that quantitative methodologies were noticeably scarce and that the dominant anti-trafficking discourse was not evidence based. One reason for this scarcity has been the difficulty in obtaining reliable representative data. In this paper, we utilize a novel measure of contemporary slavery in Europe that illustrates one way to fill this gap. Using this measure as a dependent variable, we test one of the first predictive models of slavery. Employing multivariate regression analysis, we find that several predictors—state stability risk, freedom of speech, access to financial services, geography, and age—are significantly predictive of cross-national variation in slavery across Europe. We conclude by outlining a research agenda to develop a better empirical understanding of modern day slavery. This is essential for the development of more effective government policies and responses, with an eye toward the eventual significant reduction or eradication of slavery. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1353/hrq.2014.0025 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1559006106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20220522067416</informt_id><jstor_id>24518055</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24518055</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-18a146f8eaecaa3b3968ed9a5218d44a943452a27ef9e75b46c67f32298cd9083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks9rFDEYhoMouFaPHoUBLx6c9cvvxJuUagsVC63gLaSZb7ZZZifbZKbQ_96Mqy140UMIhCcv78fzEfKawppyyT_c5Ns1AyrWAEw-ISsKRrbaih9PyQqYli1wy56TF6VsAUBrplZEXg7-DvN9E8fmZM5pjx-bC5-nhr1vrrBMcdw0vrnI2MUwxTtsvqYOh5fkWe-Hgq9-30fk--eTq-PT9vzbl7PjT-dtEFZNLTWeCtUb9Bi859fcKoOd9ZJR0wnhreBCMs809ha1vBYqKN1zxqwJnQXDj8i7Q-4-p9u51nG7WAIOgx8xzcVRzaWSgqr_QJXiFqg19t-olBZAUVAVffsXuk1zHuvMleIAxjBDK9UeqJBTKRl7t89x5_O9o-AWNa6qcYsat6ip_OmBz7s4Ob-JZT-5gj6HGxfHPv16TnnjuhSXCM6p-oMxYAxkPUrXuWuUeCi4xTDt5oKPHaWQlDN3uWzCsghUsGpeLI3fHL5ty5TyQ11WeQNS8p-EKK-8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1530088281</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Slavery in Europe: Part 2, Testing a Predictive Model</title><source>Criminology Collection</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><creator>Datta, Monti Narayan ; Bales, Kevin</creator><creatorcontrib>Datta, Monti Narayan ; Bales, Kevin</creatorcontrib><description>Since the passage of the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act and the United Nations Palermo Protocols of 2000, there has been an increased focus on the magnitude and complexity of modern day slavery. Yet, surprisingly, little empirical work exists. A comprehensive review of the literature by Elżbieta Goździak and Micah Bump in 2008 found that quantitative methodologies were noticeably scarce and that the dominant anti-trafficking discourse was not evidence based. One reason for this scarcity has been the difficulty in obtaining reliable representative data. In this paper, we utilize a novel measure of contemporary slavery in Europe that illustrates one way to fill this gap. Using this measure as a dependent variable, we test one of the first predictive models of slavery. Employing multivariate regression analysis, we find that several predictors—state stability risk, freedom of speech, access to financial services, geography, and age—are significantly predictive of cross-national variation in slavery across Europe. We conclude by outlining a research agenda to develop a better empirical understanding of modern day slavery. This is essential for the development of more effective government policies and responses, with an eye toward the eventual significant reduction or eradication of slavery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-0392</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1085-794X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1085-794X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2014.0025</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HRQUDZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press</publisher><subject>Committees ; Criminal statistics ; Europe ; Financial services ; Forced labor ; Freedom of speech ; Human trafficking ; International agreements ; International cooperation ; International law ; Literature reviews ; Methodology ; Modern slavery ; NGOs ; Non-governmental organizations ; Nongovernmental organizations ; Novels ; Organ trafficking ; Protocol ; Quantitative Methods ; Regression Analysis ; Scarcity ; Slavery ; Slaves ; Testing ; United Nations ; Variables ; Victims ; Violence ; Violent crimes ; Womens rights</subject><ispartof>Human rights quarterly, 2014-05, Vol.36 (2), p.277-295</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Johns Hopkins University Press 2014</rights><rights>Copyright © The Johns Hopkins University Press.</rights><rights>Copyright Johns Hopkins University Press May 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-18a146f8eaecaa3b3968ed9a5218d44a943452a27ef9e75b46c67f32298cd9083</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1530088281/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1530088281?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12823,12825,21354,21365,21372,27841,27842,27900,27901,33199,33200,33587,33588,33745,33746,33961,33962,43708,43789,43923,58212,58445,62633,62634,62636,62649,74166,74191,74280,74437</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Datta, Monti Narayan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bales, Kevin</creatorcontrib><title>Slavery in Europe: Part 2, Testing a Predictive Model</title><title>Human rights quarterly</title><description>Since the passage of the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act and the United Nations Palermo Protocols of 2000, there has been an increased focus on the magnitude and complexity of modern day slavery. Yet, surprisingly, little empirical work exists. A comprehensive review of the literature by Elżbieta Goździak and Micah Bump in 2008 found that quantitative methodologies were noticeably scarce and that the dominant anti-trafficking discourse was not evidence based. One reason for this scarcity has been the difficulty in obtaining reliable representative data. In this paper, we utilize a novel measure of contemporary slavery in Europe that illustrates one way to fill this gap. Using this measure as a dependent variable, we test one of the first predictive models of slavery. Employing multivariate regression analysis, we find that several predictors—state stability risk, freedom of speech, access to financial services, geography, and age—are significantly predictive of cross-national variation in slavery across Europe. We conclude by outlining a research agenda to develop a better empirical understanding of modern day slavery. This is essential for the development of more effective government policies and responses, with an eye toward the eventual significant reduction or eradication of slavery.</description><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Criminal statistics</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Financial services</subject><subject>Forced labor</subject><subject>Freedom of speech</subject><subject>Human trafficking</subject><subject>International agreements</subject><subject>International cooperation</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Modern slavery</subject><subject>NGOs</subject><subject>Non-governmental organizations</subject><subject>Nongovernmental organizations</subject><subject>Novels</subject><subject>Organ trafficking</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Quantitative Methods</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Scarcity</subject><subject>Slavery</subject><subject>Slaves</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>United Nations</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Victims</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Violent crimes</subject><subject>Womens rights</subject><issn>0275-0392</issn><issn>1085-794X</issn><issn>1085-794X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BGRYB</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M0O</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks9rFDEYhoMouFaPHoUBLx6c9cvvxJuUagsVC63gLaSZb7ZZZifbZKbQ_96Mqy140UMIhCcv78fzEfKawppyyT_c5Ns1AyrWAEw-ISsKRrbaih9PyQqYli1wy56TF6VsAUBrplZEXg7-DvN9E8fmZM5pjx-bC5-nhr1vrrBMcdw0vrnI2MUwxTtsvqYOh5fkWe-Hgq9-30fk--eTq-PT9vzbl7PjT-dtEFZNLTWeCtUb9Bi859fcKoOd9ZJR0wnhreBCMs809ha1vBYqKN1zxqwJnQXDj8i7Q-4-p9u51nG7WAIOgx8xzcVRzaWSgqr_QJXiFqg19t-olBZAUVAVffsXuk1zHuvMleIAxjBDK9UeqJBTKRl7t89x5_O9o-AWNa6qcYsat6ip_OmBz7s4Ob-JZT-5gj6HGxfHPv16TnnjuhSXCM6p-oMxYAxkPUrXuWuUeCi4xTDt5oKPHaWQlDN3uWzCsghUsGpeLI3fHL5ty5TyQ11WeQNS8p-EKK-8</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Datta, Monti Narayan</creator><creator>Bales, Kevin</creator><general>Johns Hopkins University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PMKZF</scope><scope>POGQB</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Slavery in Europe: Part 2, Testing a Predictive Model</title><author>Datta, Monti Narayan ; Bales, Kevin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-18a146f8eaecaa3b3968ed9a5218d44a943452a27ef9e75b46c67f32298cd9083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Criminal statistics</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Financial services</topic><topic>Forced labor</topic><topic>Freedom of speech</topic><topic>Human trafficking</topic><topic>International agreements</topic><topic>International cooperation</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Modern slavery</topic><topic>NGOs</topic><topic>Non-governmental organizations</topic><topic>Nongovernmental organizations</topic><topic>Novels</topic><topic>Organ trafficking</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Quantitative Methods</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Scarcity</topic><topic>Slavery</topic><topic>Slaves</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>United Nations</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Victims</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Violent crimes</topic><topic>Womens rights</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Datta, Monti Narayan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bales, Kevin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Digital Collections</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Human rights quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Datta, Monti Narayan</au><au>Bales, Kevin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Slavery in Europe: Part 2, Testing a Predictive Model</atitle><jtitle>Human rights quarterly</jtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>277</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>277-295</pages><issn>0275-0392</issn><issn>1085-794X</issn><eissn>1085-794X</eissn><coden>HRQUDZ</coden><abstract>Since the passage of the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act and the United Nations Palermo Protocols of 2000, there has been an increased focus on the magnitude and complexity of modern day slavery. Yet, surprisingly, little empirical work exists. A comprehensive review of the literature by Elżbieta Goździak and Micah Bump in 2008 found that quantitative methodologies were noticeably scarce and that the dominant anti-trafficking discourse was not evidence based. One reason for this scarcity has been the difficulty in obtaining reliable representative data. In this paper, we utilize a novel measure of contemporary slavery in Europe that illustrates one way to fill this gap. Using this measure as a dependent variable, we test one of the first predictive models of slavery. Employing multivariate regression analysis, we find that several predictors—state stability risk, freedom of speech, access to financial services, geography, and age—are significantly predictive of cross-national variation in slavery across Europe. We conclude by outlining a research agenda to develop a better empirical understanding of modern day slavery. This is essential for the development of more effective government policies and responses, with an eye toward the eventual significant reduction or eradication of slavery.</abstract><cop>Baltimore</cop><pub>Johns Hopkins University Press</pub><doi>10.1353/hrq.2014.0025</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0275-0392 |
ispartof | Human rights quarterly, 2014-05, Vol.36 (2), p.277-295 |
issn | 0275-0392 1085-794X 1085-794X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1559006106 |
source | Criminology Collection; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; ProQuest One Literature |
subjects | Committees Criminal statistics Europe Financial services Forced labor Freedom of speech Human trafficking International agreements International cooperation International law Literature reviews Methodology Modern slavery NGOs Non-governmental organizations Nongovernmental organizations Novels Organ trafficking Protocol Quantitative Methods Regression Analysis Scarcity Slavery Slaves Testing United Nations Variables Victims Violence Violent crimes Womens rights |
title | Slavery in Europe: Part 2, Testing a Predictive Model |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-25T11%3A59%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Slavery%20in%20Europe:%20Part%202,%20Testing%20a%20Predictive%20Model&rft.jtitle=Human%20rights%20quarterly&rft.au=Datta,%20Monti%20Narayan&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=277&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=277-295&rft.issn=0275-0392&rft.eissn=1085-794X&rft.coden=HRQUDZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/hrq.2014.0025&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24518055%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-18a146f8eaecaa3b3968ed9a5218d44a943452a27ef9e75b46c67f32298cd9083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1530088281&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20220522067416&rft_jstor_id=24518055&rfr_iscdi=true |