Cognitive reappraisal of facial expressions: Electrophysiological evidence of social anxiety

•ERPs differentiate the face processing of the high- and low-socially anxious groups.•Reappraisal cues enlarge SPN amplitude only for low-socially anxious individuals.•The reduced P2-N2 for low-social anxiety implies the attention deployed to reappraisal.•The early emotional processing of faces is n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neuroscience letters 2014-08, Vol.577, p.45-50
Main Authors: Yuan, Lin, Zhou, Renlai, Hu, Senqi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Anxiety - physiopathology
Brain - physiopathology
Cognition - physiology
Cognitive reappraisal
Electrophysiology
Emotions - physiology
Evoked Potentials
Face processing
Facial Expression
Female
Humans
Judgment - physiology
Social anxiety
Social Perception
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•ERPs differentiate the face processing of the high- and low-socially anxious groups.•Reappraisal cues enlarge SPN amplitude only for low-socially anxious individuals.•The reduced P2-N2 for low-social anxiety implies the attention deployed to reappraisal.•The early emotional processing of faces is not influenced by anxiety and reappraisal. The present study investigates the effect of cognitive reappraisal on emotion regulation in socially anxious individuals. Twenty-eight female subjects were divided into high-socially anxious (HSA) and low-socially anxious (LSA) groups. All subjects viewed threatening faces under cognitive reappraisal and passive viewing conditions, with subjective emotion ratings and event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded. Although the HSA and LSA groups reported similar amounts of reduction in emotion ratings while reappraising threatening faces, ERP data showed the LSA group generated a significantly larger stimuli-preceding negativity (SPN) than the HSA group when viewing the reappraisal cue word. Additionally, the LSA group, but not the HSA group, exhibited reduced P2-N2 peak-to-peak values for the reappraisal condition relative to the passive viewing condition. These results suggest that the LSA subjects paid more attention to and prepared better for the upcoming emotion-regulating task than the HSA subjects. Unlike subjects in the HSA group, subjects in the LSA group could modulate face processing by reappraisal. In conclusion, cognitive reappraisal can be an effective emotion regulation strategy for socially anxious people, and a different neural mechanism may be involved for people who are not socially anxious.
ISSN:0304-3940
1872-7972
DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2014.06.006