Loading…
Tax effects in a two-region model of monopolistic competition
I examine how unit tax and ad valorem tax affect firm location in a monopolistic‐competition model with asymmetrically sized regions and a quasi‐linear preference. Tax revenue is evenly distributed to all workers or evenly distributed to the workers residing in the region generating the tax revenue....
Saved in:
Published in: | Papers in regional science 2014-08, Vol.93 (3), p.595-617 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5650-324213aa632228976616583e71b711657cd6428f56f6961392429a67986c8be83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5650-324213aa632228976616583e71b711657cd6428f56f6961392429a67986c8be83 |
container_end_page | 617 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 595 |
container_title | Papers in regional science |
container_volume | 93 |
creator | Takatsuka, Hajime |
description | I examine how unit tax and ad valorem tax affect firm location in a monopolistic‐competition model with asymmetrically sized regions and a quasi‐linear preference. Tax revenue is evenly distributed to all workers or evenly distributed to the workers residing in the region generating the tax revenue. When a homogeneous good is traded, despite reimbursement systems, the ad valorem tax retains the firm share, while the unit tax accelerates firm agglomeration in the larger region. When the homogeneous good is nontradable, despite taxation schemes, the intraregional distribution retains the firm share, while the interregional one accelerates agglomeration in the larger region.
Resumen
Se examina cómo el impuesto específico y el impuesto ad valorem afectan a la localización de empresas en un modelo de competencia‐monopolio con regiones de tamaño asimétrico y una preferencia cuasi‐lineal. Los ingresos tributarios se distribuyen de manera uniforme para todos los trabajadores o se distribuyen uniformemente a los trabajadores que residen en la región que genera la recaudación tributaria. En las transacciones de un bien homogéneo, a pesar de los sistemas de reembolso, el impuesto ad valorem conserva la proporción de la empresa, mientras que el impuesto específico acelera la aglomeración de empresas en la región más grande. Cuando el bien homogéneo no es objeto de transacciones, a pesar de los regímenes fiscales, la distribución intrarregional conserva la proporción de la empresa, mientras que la interregional acelera la aglomeración en la región más grande. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/pirs.12010 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560813190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3845014171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5650-324213aa632228976616583e71b711657cd6428f56f6961392429a67986c8be83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYso-Nz4CwoiiFDNTZrXwoUMOg74GHygu5DJpBLtNDXpoPPvzVh14cK7yVl859ybk2W7gI4gzXHrQjwCjACtZBtQElpQSflq0oiyQoBE69lmjC8IIVbKciM7udcfua0qa7qYuybXeffui2CfnW_ymZ_aOvdVEo1vfe1i50xu_Ky1nesSsZ2tVbqOduf73coezs_uBxfF5c1wNDi9LAxlFBUElxiI1oxgjIXkjAGjglgOEw5JcjNlJRYVZRWTDIhMvNSMS8GMmFhBtrKDPrcN_m1uY6dmLhpb17qxfh4VUIYEkPS9hO79QV_8PDTpOgUcU44Jo5Cow54ywccYbKXa4GY6LBQgtWxSLZtUX00meP87Ukej6yroxrj468CCp71YJg567t3VdvFPohqPbu9-sovek7q1H78eHV4V44RT9Xg9VE9yjPDV04UakE8ptY5Z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1725723651</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tax effects in a two-region model of monopolistic competition</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Takatsuka, Hajime</creator><creatorcontrib>Takatsuka, Hajime</creatorcontrib><description>I examine how unit tax and ad valorem tax affect firm location in a monopolistic‐competition model with asymmetrically sized regions and a quasi‐linear preference. Tax revenue is evenly distributed to all workers or evenly distributed to the workers residing in the region generating the tax revenue. When a homogeneous good is traded, despite reimbursement systems, the ad valorem tax retains the firm share, while the unit tax accelerates firm agglomeration in the larger region. When the homogeneous good is nontradable, despite taxation schemes, the intraregional distribution retains the firm share, while the interregional one accelerates agglomeration in the larger region.
Resumen
Se examina cómo el impuesto específico y el impuesto ad valorem afectan a la localización de empresas en un modelo de competencia‐monopolio con regiones de tamaño asimétrico y una preferencia cuasi‐lineal. Los ingresos tributarios se distribuyen de manera uniforme para todos los trabajadores o se distribuyen uniformemente a los trabajadores que residen en la región que genera la recaudación tributaria. En las transacciones de un bien homogéneo, a pesar de los sistemas de reembolso, el impuesto ad valorem conserva la proporción de la empresa, mientras que el impuesto específico acelera la aglomeración de empresas en la región más grande. Cuando el bien homogéneo no es objeto de transacciones, a pesar de los regímenes fiscales, la distribución intrarregional conserva la proporción de la empresa, mientras que la interregional acelera la aglomeración en la región más grande.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1056-8190</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-5957</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/pirs.12010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>ad valorem tax ; Ad valorem taxes ; Agglomeration ; Asia ; Bgi / Prodig ; Distribution ; firm location ; Human geography ; Industrial concentration ; Japan ; Location of industry ; Monopolistic competition ; Studies ; Tax revenue ; Tax revenues ; Taxation ; Taxation economics ; Unit tax</subject><ispartof>Papers in regional science, 2014-08, Vol.93 (3), p.595-617</ispartof><rights>2013 The Author(s). Papers in Regional Science © 2013 RSAI</rights><rights>Tous droits réservés © Prodig - Bibliographie Géographique Internationale (BGI), 2014</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Aug 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5650-324213aa632228976616583e71b711657cd6428f56f6961392429a67986c8be83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5650-324213aa632228976616583e71b711657cd6428f56f6961392429a67986c8be83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33222,33223</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28790329$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Takatsuka, Hajime</creatorcontrib><title>Tax effects in a two-region model of monopolistic competition</title><title>Papers in regional science</title><addtitle>Pap Reg Sci</addtitle><description>I examine how unit tax and ad valorem tax affect firm location in a monopolistic‐competition model with asymmetrically sized regions and a quasi‐linear preference. Tax revenue is evenly distributed to all workers or evenly distributed to the workers residing in the region generating the tax revenue. When a homogeneous good is traded, despite reimbursement systems, the ad valorem tax retains the firm share, while the unit tax accelerates firm agglomeration in the larger region. When the homogeneous good is nontradable, despite taxation schemes, the intraregional distribution retains the firm share, while the interregional one accelerates agglomeration in the larger region.
Resumen
Se examina cómo el impuesto específico y el impuesto ad valorem afectan a la localización de empresas en un modelo de competencia‐monopolio con regiones de tamaño asimétrico y una preferencia cuasi‐lineal. Los ingresos tributarios se distribuyen de manera uniforme para todos los trabajadores o se distribuyen uniformemente a los trabajadores que residen en la región que genera la recaudación tributaria. En las transacciones de un bien homogéneo, a pesar de los sistemas de reembolso, el impuesto ad valorem conserva la proporción de la empresa, mientras que el impuesto específico acelera la aglomeración de empresas en la región más grande. Cuando el bien homogéneo no es objeto de transacciones, a pesar de los regímenes fiscales, la distribución intrarregional conserva la proporción de la empresa, mientras que la interregional acelera la aglomeración en la región más grande.</description><subject>ad valorem tax</subject><subject>Ad valorem taxes</subject><subject>Agglomeration</subject><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Bgi / Prodig</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>firm location</subject><subject>Human geography</subject><subject>Industrial concentration</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Location of industry</subject><subject>Monopolistic competition</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tax revenue</subject><subject>Tax revenues</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Taxation economics</subject><subject>Unit tax</subject><issn>1056-8190</issn><issn>1435-5957</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYso-Nz4CwoiiFDNTZrXwoUMOg74GHygu5DJpBLtNDXpoPPvzVh14cK7yVl859ybk2W7gI4gzXHrQjwCjACtZBtQElpQSflq0oiyQoBE69lmjC8IIVbKciM7udcfua0qa7qYuybXeffui2CfnW_ymZ_aOvdVEo1vfe1i50xu_Ky1nesSsZ2tVbqOduf73coezs_uBxfF5c1wNDi9LAxlFBUElxiI1oxgjIXkjAGjglgOEw5JcjNlJRYVZRWTDIhMvNSMS8GMmFhBtrKDPrcN_m1uY6dmLhpb17qxfh4VUIYEkPS9hO79QV_8PDTpOgUcU44Jo5Cow54ywccYbKXa4GY6LBQgtWxSLZtUX00meP87Ukej6yroxrj468CCp71YJg567t3VdvFPohqPbu9-sovek7q1H78eHV4V44RT9Xg9VE9yjPDV04UakE8ptY5Z</recordid><startdate>201408</startdate><enddate>201408</enddate><creator>Takatsuka, Hajime</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Springer</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201408</creationdate><title>Tax effects in a two-region model of monopolistic competition</title><author>Takatsuka, Hajime</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5650-324213aa632228976616583e71b711657cd6428f56f6961392429a67986c8be83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>ad valorem tax</topic><topic>Ad valorem taxes</topic><topic>Agglomeration</topic><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Bgi / Prodig</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>firm location</topic><topic>Human geography</topic><topic>Industrial concentration</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Location of industry</topic><topic>Monopolistic competition</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tax revenue</topic><topic>Tax revenues</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Taxation economics</topic><topic>Unit tax</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takatsuka, Hajime</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Papers in regional science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takatsuka, Hajime</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tax effects in a two-region model of monopolistic competition</atitle><jtitle>Papers in regional science</jtitle><addtitle>Pap Reg Sci</addtitle><date>2014-08</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>595</spage><epage>617</epage><pages>595-617</pages><issn>1056-8190</issn><eissn>1435-5957</eissn><abstract>I examine how unit tax and ad valorem tax affect firm location in a monopolistic‐competition model with asymmetrically sized regions and a quasi‐linear preference. Tax revenue is evenly distributed to all workers or evenly distributed to the workers residing in the region generating the tax revenue. When a homogeneous good is traded, despite reimbursement systems, the ad valorem tax retains the firm share, while the unit tax accelerates firm agglomeration in the larger region. When the homogeneous good is nontradable, despite taxation schemes, the intraregional distribution retains the firm share, while the interregional one accelerates agglomeration in the larger region.
Resumen
Se examina cómo el impuesto específico y el impuesto ad valorem afectan a la localización de empresas en un modelo de competencia‐monopolio con regiones de tamaño asimétrico y una preferencia cuasi‐lineal. Los ingresos tributarios se distribuyen de manera uniforme para todos los trabajadores o se distribuyen uniformemente a los trabajadores que residen en la región que genera la recaudación tributaria. En las transacciones de un bien homogéneo, a pesar de los sistemas de reembolso, el impuesto ad valorem conserva la proporción de la empresa, mientras que el impuesto específico acelera la aglomeración de empresas en la región más grande. Cuando el bien homogéneo no es objeto de transacciones, a pesar de los regímenes fiscales, la distribución intrarregional conserva la proporción de la empresa, mientras que la interregional acelera la aglomeración en la región más grande.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/pirs.12010</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1056-8190 |
ispartof | Papers in regional science, 2014-08, Vol.93 (3), p.595-617 |
issn | 1056-8190 1435-5957 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560813190 |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | ad valorem tax Ad valorem taxes Agglomeration Asia Bgi / Prodig Distribution firm location Human geography Industrial concentration Japan Location of industry Monopolistic competition Studies Tax revenue Tax revenues Taxation Taxation economics Unit tax |
title | Tax effects in a two-region model of monopolistic competition |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T16%3A06%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tax%20effects%20in%20a%20two-region%20model%20of%20monopolistic%20competition&rft.jtitle=Papers%20in%20regional%20science&rft.au=Takatsuka,%20Hajime&rft.date=2014-08&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=595&rft.epage=617&rft.pages=595-617&rft.issn=1056-8190&rft.eissn=1435-5957&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/pirs.12010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3845014171%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5650-324213aa632228976616583e71b711657cd6428f56f6961392429a67986c8be83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1725723651&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |