Does repeated human intrusion cause cumulative declines in avian richness and abundance?

• Published in: Ecological applications 1996-05, Vol.6 (2), p.492-505
• Main Authors: Riffell, Samuel K., Gutzwiller, Kevin J., Anderson, Stanley H.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aves; Bird nesting; Bird songs; BIRDS; Censuses; Conservation biology; DIMINUTION DE LA POPULATION; DISMINUCION DE LA POBLACION; FOREST RESOURCES; GENERO HUMANO; GENRE HUMAIN; MANKIND; OISEAU; PAJAROS; POPULATION DECREASE; RECURSOS FORESTALES; RESSOURCE FORESTIERE; T tests; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife habitats; Wildlife management; Woodpeckers
• ISSN: 1051-0761; 1939-5582
• DOI: 10.2307/2269386

Human intrusion, the mere presence of people in the environment, has become a dominant form of disturbance in many landscapes. Some forms of intrusion from recreationists and other groups occur repeatedly and can seriously alter avian reproduction, survival, and habitat use. Accordingly, repeated intrusion has the potential to cause impacts that accumulate through time and that are manifested as progressive declines in avian richness and abundance. From 1989 to 1993, we experimentally assessed whether or not temporally cumulative impacts occurred in Wyoming bird communities as a result of repeated intrusion by solitary hikers; the intrusions lasted 1-2 h each week during 10 consecutive weeks of each year's breeding season. We tested a priori hypotheses about declines in overall richness and abundance, relative richness and abundance for sets of common and uncommon species, richness and abundance for six guilds, and separate abundances of four common species. Relative richness and abundance for the set of common species were the only metrices to exhibit significant declines between years during the 5-yr period. The declines in these variables, however, were not cumulative. At a statistical power level of 0,85, minimum detectable differences for many variables were small enough to have allowed easy detection of substantive declines, had any occurred. The yearly effects we detected for some richness and abundance variables may not have led to cumulative declines because individuals displaced one year may have been replaced in subsequent years, and some individuals each year may have habituated to or learned to tolerate the intrusions. For the avian communities and intrusion levels we studied, managers should focus on trying to preclude or ameliorate short-term impacts. Attempts to identify the types and intensities of intrusion that actually cause cumulative declines in richness and abundance should continue. Data about intrusions that do not generate cumulative declines, such as those presented here, are just as important as data about intrusions that do cause cumulative declines; managers need both to define the scope of intrusion disturbances that can lead to cumulative impacts in avian communities. Information about the cumulative effects of intrusion should be used by conservation biologists, wildlife managers, and land-use planners to decide whether or how to control intrusion.