Loading…
Analysis of DNA damage recovery processes in the adaptive response to ionizing radiation in human lymphocytes
It has been frequently suggested that the adaptive response to ionizing radiation involves the induction of a chromosomal repair mechanism. Although several lines of evidence favour this assumption, direct proof is lacking. We have chosen to study this question with the help of the comet assay. Lymp...
Saved in:
Published in: | Mutagenesis 1996-05, Vol.11 (3), p.291-297 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 297 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 291 |
container_title | Mutagenesis |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | WOJCIK, A SAUER, K ZÖLZER, F BAUCH, T MÜLLER, W.-U |
description | It has been frequently suggested that the adaptive response to ionizing radiation involves the induction of a chromosomal repair mechanism. Although several lines of evidence favour this assumption, direct proof is lacking. We have chosen to study this question with the help of the comet assay. Lymphocytes from three human donors were given an adapting dose of 0.05 Gy 16 h after mitogenic stimulation and a challenging dose of 2 Gy 5 h thereafter. While a portion of the cells was removed from the cultures for the comet assay, remaining cells were harvested at 52 h culture time and screened for chromosomal aberrations. In some experiments an analysis of cell proliferation was additionally carried out by flow cytometry. In the comet assay a reduced level of initial damage and an increased repair capacity was observed in the adapted + challenged cells; however, this did not result in a reduction of the aberration frequencies. No effect of the adapting dose on cell proliferation was detectable. The analysis of comet distributions revealed that the observed enhanced repair capacity was due to the presence of a subpopulation of slowly repairing cells in the challenged lymphocytes and the lack of such a subpopulation in the adapted + challenged cells. We assume that the slowly repairing cells were quiescent G0 lymphocytes which were removed from the adapted + challenged cell population, probably by apoptotic-like processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/mutage/11.3.291 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15619560</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15619560</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p266t-4a2debe07c4382cea15811d2c0818a9a2e305a9c3cc9ac99ad92de7eaa26f5df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLw0AUhQdRaq2uXQmzEHdp55HMZJalPqHoRtfhdnLTjuRlZlKIv96IwdXlcL5zuBxCrjlbcmbkquoD7HHF-VIuheEnZM5jFUcyZfEpmTOhdJTKRJ-TC-8_GeNaKDYjs1RprhM-J9W6hnLwztOmoPeva5pDNRbSDm1zxG6gbddY9B49dTUNB6SQQxvc8RfxbVN7pKGhrqndt6v3tIPcQRjlL37oK6hpOVTtobFDQH9JzgooPV5Nd0E-Hh_eN8_R9u3pZbPeRq1QKkQxiBx3yLSNZSosAk9SznNhWcpTMCBQsgSMldYasMZAbsaARgChiiQv5ILc_fWO33_16ENWOW-xLKHGpvcZTxQ3iWIjeDOB_a7CPGs7V0E3ZNM-o387-eAtlEUHtXX-H5NMa8GE_AG24neO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15619560</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of DNA damage recovery processes in the adaptive response to ionizing radiation in human lymphocytes</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>WOJCIK, A ; SAUER, K ; ZÖLZER, F ; BAUCH, T ; MÜLLER, W.-U</creator><creatorcontrib>WOJCIK, A ; SAUER, K ; ZÖLZER, F ; BAUCH, T ; MÜLLER, W.-U</creatorcontrib><description>It has been frequently suggested that the adaptive response to ionizing radiation involves the induction of a chromosomal repair mechanism. Although several lines of evidence favour this assumption, direct proof is lacking. We have chosen to study this question with the help of the comet assay. Lymphocytes from three human donors were given an adapting dose of 0.05 Gy 16 h after mitogenic stimulation and a challenging dose of 2 Gy 5 h thereafter. While a portion of the cells was removed from the cultures for the comet assay, remaining cells were harvested at 52 h culture time and screened for chromosomal aberrations. In some experiments an analysis of cell proliferation was additionally carried out by flow cytometry. In the comet assay a reduced level of initial damage and an increased repair capacity was observed in the adapted + challenged cells; however, this did not result in a reduction of the aberration frequencies. No effect of the adapting dose on cell proliferation was detectable. The analysis of comet distributions revealed that the observed enhanced repair capacity was due to the presence of a subpopulation of slowly repairing cells in the challenged lymphocytes and the lack of such a subpopulation in the adapted + challenged cells. We assume that the slowly repairing cells were quiescent G0 lymphocytes which were removed from the adapted + challenged cell population, probably by apoptotic-like processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0267-8357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3804</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/mutage/11.3.291</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8671751</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MUTAEX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Physiological ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological effects of radiation ; Cell Division - radiation effects ; Cells, Cultured - radiation effects ; Chromosome Aberrations ; DNA Damage ; DNA Repair ; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation ; Electrophoresis, Agar Gel ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetic Techniques ; Humans ; Ionizing radiations ; Lymphocytes - cytology ; Lymphocytes - radiation effects ; Male ; Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><ispartof>Mutagenesis, 1996-05, Vol.11 (3), p.291-297</ispartof><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3077202$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8671751$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WOJCIK, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAUER, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZÖLZER, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAUCH, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MÜLLER, W.-U</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of DNA damage recovery processes in the adaptive response to ionizing radiation in human lymphocytes</title><title>Mutagenesis</title><addtitle>Mutagenesis</addtitle><description>It has been frequently suggested that the adaptive response to ionizing radiation involves the induction of a chromosomal repair mechanism. Although several lines of evidence favour this assumption, direct proof is lacking. We have chosen to study this question with the help of the comet assay. Lymphocytes from three human donors were given an adapting dose of 0.05 Gy 16 h after mitogenic stimulation and a challenging dose of 2 Gy 5 h thereafter. While a portion of the cells was removed from the cultures for the comet assay, remaining cells were harvested at 52 h culture time and screened for chromosomal aberrations. In some experiments an analysis of cell proliferation was additionally carried out by flow cytometry. In the comet assay a reduced level of initial damage and an increased repair capacity was observed in the adapted + challenged cells; however, this did not result in a reduction of the aberration frequencies. No effect of the adapting dose on cell proliferation was detectable. The analysis of comet distributions revealed that the observed enhanced repair capacity was due to the presence of a subpopulation of slowly repairing cells in the challenged lymphocytes and the lack of such a subpopulation in the adapted + challenged cells. We assume that the slowly repairing cells were quiescent G0 lymphocytes which were removed from the adapted + challenged cell population, probably by apoptotic-like processes.</description><subject>Adaptation, Physiological</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological effects of radiation</subject><subject>Cell Division - radiation effects</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured - radiation effects</subject><subject>Chromosome Aberrations</subject><subject>DNA Damage</subject><subject>DNA Repair</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</subject><subject>Electrophoresis, Agar Gel</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetic Techniques</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ionizing radiations</subject><subject>Lymphocytes - cytology</subject><subject>Lymphocytes - radiation effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><issn>0267-8357</issn><issn>1464-3804</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtLw0AUhQdRaq2uXQmzEHdp55HMZJalPqHoRtfhdnLTjuRlZlKIv96IwdXlcL5zuBxCrjlbcmbkquoD7HHF-VIuheEnZM5jFUcyZfEpmTOhdJTKRJ-TC-8_GeNaKDYjs1RprhM-J9W6hnLwztOmoPeva5pDNRbSDm1zxG6gbddY9B49dTUNB6SQQxvc8RfxbVN7pKGhrqndt6v3tIPcQRjlL37oK6hpOVTtobFDQH9JzgooPV5Nd0E-Hh_eN8_R9u3pZbPeRq1QKkQxiBx3yLSNZSosAk9SznNhWcpTMCBQsgSMldYasMZAbsaARgChiiQv5ILc_fWO33_16ENWOW-xLKHGpvcZTxQ3iWIjeDOB_a7CPGs7V0E3ZNM-o387-eAtlEUHtXX-H5NMa8GE_AG24neO</recordid><startdate>19960501</startdate><enddate>19960501</enddate><creator>WOJCIK, A</creator><creator>SAUER, K</creator><creator>ZÖLZER, F</creator><creator>BAUCH, T</creator><creator>MÜLLER, W.-U</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960501</creationdate><title>Analysis of DNA damage recovery processes in the adaptive response to ionizing radiation in human lymphocytes</title><author>WOJCIK, A ; SAUER, K ; ZÖLZER, F ; BAUCH, T ; MÜLLER, W.-U</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p266t-4a2debe07c4382cea15811d2c0818a9a2e305a9c3cc9ac99ad92de7eaa26f5df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Physiological</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological effects of radiation</topic><topic>Cell Division - radiation effects</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured - radiation effects</topic><topic>Chromosome Aberrations</topic><topic>DNA Damage</topic><topic>DNA Repair</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</topic><topic>Electrophoresis, Agar Gel</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetic Techniques</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ionizing radiations</topic><topic>Lymphocytes - cytology</topic><topic>Lymphocytes - radiation effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WOJCIK, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAUER, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZÖLZER, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAUCH, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MÜLLER, W.-U</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Mutagenesis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WOJCIK, A</au><au>SAUER, K</au><au>ZÖLZER, F</au><au>BAUCH, T</au><au>MÜLLER, W.-U</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of DNA damage recovery processes in the adaptive response to ionizing radiation in human lymphocytes</atitle><jtitle>Mutagenesis</jtitle><addtitle>Mutagenesis</addtitle><date>1996-05-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>297</epage><pages>291-297</pages><issn>0267-8357</issn><eissn>1464-3804</eissn><coden>MUTAEX</coden><abstract>It has been frequently suggested that the adaptive response to ionizing radiation involves the induction of a chromosomal repair mechanism. Although several lines of evidence favour this assumption, direct proof is lacking. We have chosen to study this question with the help of the comet assay. Lymphocytes from three human donors were given an adapting dose of 0.05 Gy 16 h after mitogenic stimulation and a challenging dose of 2 Gy 5 h thereafter. While a portion of the cells was removed from the cultures for the comet assay, remaining cells were harvested at 52 h culture time and screened for chromosomal aberrations. In some experiments an analysis of cell proliferation was additionally carried out by flow cytometry. In the comet assay a reduced level of initial damage and an increased repair capacity was observed in the adapted + challenged cells; however, this did not result in a reduction of the aberration frequencies. No effect of the adapting dose on cell proliferation was detectable. The analysis of comet distributions revealed that the observed enhanced repair capacity was due to the presence of a subpopulation of slowly repairing cells in the challenged lymphocytes and the lack of such a subpopulation in the adapted + challenged cells. We assume that the slowly repairing cells were quiescent G0 lymphocytes which were removed from the adapted + challenged cell population, probably by apoptotic-like processes.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>8671751</pmid><doi>10.1093/mutage/11.3.291</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0267-8357 |
ispartof | Mutagenesis, 1996-05, Vol.11 (3), p.291-297 |
issn | 0267-8357 1464-3804 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15619560 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Adaptation, Physiological Adult Biological and medical sciences Biological effects of radiation Cell Division - radiation effects Cells, Cultured - radiation effects Chromosome Aberrations DNA Damage DNA Repair Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation Electrophoresis, Agar Gel Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genetic Techniques Humans Ionizing radiations Lymphocytes - cytology Lymphocytes - radiation effects Male Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics |
title | Analysis of DNA damage recovery processes in the adaptive response to ionizing radiation in human lymphocytes |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A31%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20DNA%20damage%20recovery%20processes%20in%20the%20adaptive%20response%20to%20ionizing%20radiation%20in%20human%20lymphocytes&rft.jtitle=Mutagenesis&rft.au=WOJCIK,%20A&rft.date=1996-05-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=297&rft.pages=291-297&rft.issn=0267-8357&rft.eissn=1464-3804&rft.coden=MUTAEX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/mutage/11.3.291&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E15619560%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p266t-4a2debe07c4382cea15811d2c0818a9a2e305a9c3cc9ac99ad92de7eaa26f5df3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15619560&rft_id=info:pmid/8671751&rfr_iscdi=true |