Loading…

Analysis of DNA damage recovery processes in the adaptive response to ionizing radiation in human lymphocytes

It has been frequently suggested that the adaptive response to ionizing radiation involves the induction of a chromosomal repair mechanism. Although several lines of evidence favour this assumption, direct proof is lacking. We have chosen to study this question with the help of the comet assay. Lymp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Mutagenesis 1996-05, Vol.11 (3), p.291-297
Main Authors: WOJCIK, A, SAUER, K, ZÖLZER, F, BAUCH, T, MÜLLER, W.-U
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 297
container_issue 3
container_start_page 291
container_title Mutagenesis
container_volume 11
creator WOJCIK, A
SAUER, K
ZÖLZER, F
BAUCH, T
MÜLLER, W.-U
description It has been frequently suggested that the adaptive response to ionizing radiation involves the induction of a chromosomal repair mechanism. Although several lines of evidence favour this assumption, direct proof is lacking. We have chosen to study this question with the help of the comet assay. Lymphocytes from three human donors were given an adapting dose of 0.05 Gy 16 h after mitogenic stimulation and a challenging dose of 2 Gy 5 h thereafter. While a portion of the cells was removed from the cultures for the comet assay, remaining cells were harvested at 52 h culture time and screened for chromosomal aberrations. In some experiments an analysis of cell proliferation was additionally carried out by flow cytometry. In the comet assay a reduced level of initial damage and an increased repair capacity was observed in the adapted + challenged cells; however, this did not result in a reduction of the aberration frequencies. No effect of the adapting dose on cell proliferation was detectable. The analysis of comet distributions revealed that the observed enhanced repair capacity was due to the presence of a subpopulation of slowly repairing cells in the challenged lymphocytes and the lack of such a subpopulation in the adapted + challenged cells. We assume that the slowly repairing cells were quiescent G0 lymphocytes which were removed from the adapted + challenged cell population, probably by apoptotic-like processes.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/mutage/11.3.291
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15619560</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15619560</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p266t-4a2debe07c4382cea15811d2c0818a9a2e305a9c3cc9ac99ad92de7eaa26f5df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLw0AUhQdRaq2uXQmzEHdp55HMZJalPqHoRtfhdnLTjuRlZlKIv96IwdXlcL5zuBxCrjlbcmbkquoD7HHF-VIuheEnZM5jFUcyZfEpmTOhdJTKRJ-TC-8_GeNaKDYjs1RprhM-J9W6hnLwztOmoPeva5pDNRbSDm1zxG6gbddY9B49dTUNB6SQQxvc8RfxbVN7pKGhrqndt6v3tIPcQRjlL37oK6hpOVTtobFDQH9JzgooPV5Nd0E-Hh_eN8_R9u3pZbPeRq1QKkQxiBx3yLSNZSosAk9SznNhWcpTMCBQsgSMldYasMZAbsaARgChiiQv5ILc_fWO33_16ENWOW-xLKHGpvcZTxQ3iWIjeDOB_a7CPGs7V0E3ZNM-o387-eAtlEUHtXX-H5NMa8GE_AG24neO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15619560</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of DNA damage recovery processes in the adaptive response to ionizing radiation in human lymphocytes</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>WOJCIK, A ; SAUER, K ; ZÖLZER, F ; BAUCH, T ; MÜLLER, W.-U</creator><creatorcontrib>WOJCIK, A ; SAUER, K ; ZÖLZER, F ; BAUCH, T ; MÜLLER, W.-U</creatorcontrib><description>It has been frequently suggested that the adaptive response to ionizing radiation involves the induction of a chromosomal repair mechanism. Although several lines of evidence favour this assumption, direct proof is lacking. We have chosen to study this question with the help of the comet assay. Lymphocytes from three human donors were given an adapting dose of 0.05 Gy 16 h after mitogenic stimulation and a challenging dose of 2 Gy 5 h thereafter. While a portion of the cells was removed from the cultures for the comet assay, remaining cells were harvested at 52 h culture time and screened for chromosomal aberrations. In some experiments an analysis of cell proliferation was additionally carried out by flow cytometry. In the comet assay a reduced level of initial damage and an increased repair capacity was observed in the adapted + challenged cells; however, this did not result in a reduction of the aberration frequencies. No effect of the adapting dose on cell proliferation was detectable. The analysis of comet distributions revealed that the observed enhanced repair capacity was due to the presence of a subpopulation of slowly repairing cells in the challenged lymphocytes and the lack of such a subpopulation in the adapted + challenged cells. We assume that the slowly repairing cells were quiescent G0 lymphocytes which were removed from the adapted + challenged cell population, probably by apoptotic-like processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0267-8357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3804</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/mutage/11.3.291</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8671751</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MUTAEX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Physiological ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological effects of radiation ; Cell Division - radiation effects ; Cells, Cultured - radiation effects ; Chromosome Aberrations ; DNA Damage ; DNA Repair ; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation ; Electrophoresis, Agar Gel ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetic Techniques ; Humans ; Ionizing radiations ; Lymphocytes - cytology ; Lymphocytes - radiation effects ; Male ; Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><ispartof>Mutagenesis, 1996-05, Vol.11 (3), p.291-297</ispartof><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3077202$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8671751$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WOJCIK, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAUER, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZÖLZER, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAUCH, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MÜLLER, W.-U</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of DNA damage recovery processes in the adaptive response to ionizing radiation in human lymphocytes</title><title>Mutagenesis</title><addtitle>Mutagenesis</addtitle><description>It has been frequently suggested that the adaptive response to ionizing radiation involves the induction of a chromosomal repair mechanism. Although several lines of evidence favour this assumption, direct proof is lacking. We have chosen to study this question with the help of the comet assay. Lymphocytes from three human donors were given an adapting dose of 0.05 Gy 16 h after mitogenic stimulation and a challenging dose of 2 Gy 5 h thereafter. While a portion of the cells was removed from the cultures for the comet assay, remaining cells were harvested at 52 h culture time and screened for chromosomal aberrations. In some experiments an analysis of cell proliferation was additionally carried out by flow cytometry. In the comet assay a reduced level of initial damage and an increased repair capacity was observed in the adapted + challenged cells; however, this did not result in a reduction of the aberration frequencies. No effect of the adapting dose on cell proliferation was detectable. The analysis of comet distributions revealed that the observed enhanced repair capacity was due to the presence of a subpopulation of slowly repairing cells in the challenged lymphocytes and the lack of such a subpopulation in the adapted + challenged cells. We assume that the slowly repairing cells were quiescent G0 lymphocytes which were removed from the adapted + challenged cell population, probably by apoptotic-like processes.</description><subject>Adaptation, Physiological</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological effects of radiation</subject><subject>Cell Division - radiation effects</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured - radiation effects</subject><subject>Chromosome Aberrations</subject><subject>DNA Damage</subject><subject>DNA Repair</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</subject><subject>Electrophoresis, Agar Gel</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetic Techniques</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ionizing radiations</subject><subject>Lymphocytes - cytology</subject><subject>Lymphocytes - radiation effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><issn>0267-8357</issn><issn>1464-3804</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtLw0AUhQdRaq2uXQmzEHdp55HMZJalPqHoRtfhdnLTjuRlZlKIv96IwdXlcL5zuBxCrjlbcmbkquoD7HHF-VIuheEnZM5jFUcyZfEpmTOhdJTKRJ-TC-8_GeNaKDYjs1RprhM-J9W6hnLwztOmoPeva5pDNRbSDm1zxG6gbddY9B49dTUNB6SQQxvc8RfxbVN7pKGhrqndt6v3tIPcQRjlL37oK6hpOVTtobFDQH9JzgooPV5Nd0E-Hh_eN8_R9u3pZbPeRq1QKkQxiBx3yLSNZSosAk9SznNhWcpTMCBQsgSMldYasMZAbsaARgChiiQv5ILc_fWO33_16ENWOW-xLKHGpvcZTxQ3iWIjeDOB_a7CPGs7V0E3ZNM-o387-eAtlEUHtXX-H5NMa8GE_AG24neO</recordid><startdate>19960501</startdate><enddate>19960501</enddate><creator>WOJCIK, A</creator><creator>SAUER, K</creator><creator>ZÖLZER, F</creator><creator>BAUCH, T</creator><creator>MÜLLER, W.-U</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960501</creationdate><title>Analysis of DNA damage recovery processes in the adaptive response to ionizing radiation in human lymphocytes</title><author>WOJCIK, A ; SAUER, K ; ZÖLZER, F ; BAUCH, T ; MÜLLER, W.-U</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p266t-4a2debe07c4382cea15811d2c0818a9a2e305a9c3cc9ac99ad92de7eaa26f5df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Physiological</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological effects of radiation</topic><topic>Cell Division - radiation effects</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured - radiation effects</topic><topic>Chromosome Aberrations</topic><topic>DNA Damage</topic><topic>DNA Repair</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</topic><topic>Electrophoresis, Agar Gel</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetic Techniques</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ionizing radiations</topic><topic>Lymphocytes - cytology</topic><topic>Lymphocytes - radiation effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WOJCIK, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAUER, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZÖLZER, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAUCH, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MÜLLER, W.-U</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Mutagenesis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WOJCIK, A</au><au>SAUER, K</au><au>ZÖLZER, F</au><au>BAUCH, T</au><au>MÜLLER, W.-U</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of DNA damage recovery processes in the adaptive response to ionizing radiation in human lymphocytes</atitle><jtitle>Mutagenesis</jtitle><addtitle>Mutagenesis</addtitle><date>1996-05-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>297</epage><pages>291-297</pages><issn>0267-8357</issn><eissn>1464-3804</eissn><coden>MUTAEX</coden><abstract>It has been frequently suggested that the adaptive response to ionizing radiation involves the induction of a chromosomal repair mechanism. Although several lines of evidence favour this assumption, direct proof is lacking. We have chosen to study this question with the help of the comet assay. Lymphocytes from three human donors were given an adapting dose of 0.05 Gy 16 h after mitogenic stimulation and a challenging dose of 2 Gy 5 h thereafter. While a portion of the cells was removed from the cultures for the comet assay, remaining cells were harvested at 52 h culture time and screened for chromosomal aberrations. In some experiments an analysis of cell proliferation was additionally carried out by flow cytometry. In the comet assay a reduced level of initial damage and an increased repair capacity was observed in the adapted + challenged cells; however, this did not result in a reduction of the aberration frequencies. No effect of the adapting dose on cell proliferation was detectable. The analysis of comet distributions revealed that the observed enhanced repair capacity was due to the presence of a subpopulation of slowly repairing cells in the challenged lymphocytes and the lack of such a subpopulation in the adapted + challenged cells. We assume that the slowly repairing cells were quiescent G0 lymphocytes which were removed from the adapted + challenged cell population, probably by apoptotic-like processes.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>8671751</pmid><doi>10.1093/mutage/11.3.291</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0267-8357
ispartof Mutagenesis, 1996-05, Vol.11 (3), p.291-297
issn 0267-8357
1464-3804
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15619560
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Adaptation, Physiological
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Biological effects of radiation
Cell Division - radiation effects
Cells, Cultured - radiation effects
Chromosome Aberrations
DNA Damage
DNA Repair
Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
Electrophoresis, Agar Gel
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Genetic Techniques
Humans
Ionizing radiations
Lymphocytes - cytology
Lymphocytes - radiation effects
Male
Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics
title Analysis of DNA damage recovery processes in the adaptive response to ionizing radiation in human lymphocytes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A31%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20DNA%20damage%20recovery%20processes%20in%20the%20adaptive%20response%20to%20ionizing%20radiation%20in%20human%20lymphocytes&rft.jtitle=Mutagenesis&rft.au=WOJCIK,%20A&rft.date=1996-05-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=297&rft.pages=291-297&rft.issn=0267-8357&rft.eissn=1464-3804&rft.coden=MUTAEX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/mutage/11.3.291&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E15619560%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p266t-4a2debe07c4382cea15811d2c0818a9a2e305a9c3cc9ac99ad92de7eaa26f5df3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15619560&rft_id=info:pmid/8671751&rfr_iscdi=true