Loading…

Explaining the unexplainable - the impact of physicians' attitude towards litigation on their incident disclosure behaviour

Rationale, aims and objectives This study aims to provide in‐depth insight into the emotions and thoughts of physicians towards malpractice litigation, and how these relate to their incident disclosure behaviour. Methods Thirty‐one Dutch physicians were interviewed and completed short questionnaires...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 2014-10, Vol.20 (5), p.649-656
Main Authors: Renkema, Erik, Broekhuis, Manda H., Ahaus, Kees
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-47efba02e5182cd2616e5472ce359e3e8b52765acfa87cc31b271f6a71cda8163
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-47efba02e5182cd2616e5472ce359e3e8b52765acfa87cc31b271f6a71cda8163
container_end_page 656
container_issue 5
container_start_page 649
container_title Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
container_volume 20
creator Renkema, Erik
Broekhuis, Manda H.
Ahaus, Kees
description Rationale, aims and objectives This study aims to provide in‐depth insight into the emotions and thoughts of physicians towards malpractice litigation, and how these relate to their incident disclosure behaviour. Methods Thirty‐one Dutch physicians were interviewed and completed short questionnaires regarding malpractice litigation. We used hierarchical cluster analysis to identify physician clusters. Additional qualitative data were analysed. Results Physicians vary largely in their attitude towards malpractice litigation, and their attitude is not straightforward related to their disclosure behaviour. Based on their responses physicians could be divided into two clusters: one with a positive and one with a negative attitude. Physicians with a negative attitude showed often, but also 6 out of 15 not, a reluctance to disclose, whereas the majority in the positive attitude cluster (12 out of 16) showed no reluctance. If, what and how physicians disclose incidents depends on a complex interplay of their emotions and thoughts regarding litigation, and not only on their fear of litigation as many studies assume. Conclusions Due to the variation among physicians in their litigation attitude and behaviour in terms of incident disclosure the oft‐heard call for ‘openness’ about medical incidents will not be easy to achieve. A coaching system in which physicians can share and discuss their differing attitudes and disclosure principles, teaching medical students and junior physicians about disclosure, and explaining how to organize emotional and legal support for oneself in case of litigation could decrease stress feelings and support open disclosure behaviour.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jep.12194
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1561979036</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1561979036</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-47efba02e5182cd2616e5472ce359e3e8b52765acfa87cc31b271f6a71cda8163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFO3DAURa2qVYEpi_5A5V3LIhDbsZ0sKzQdYBBFKhVL68V5YUwzSbAdYMTPkyHArpYlW0_nXj0dQr6y9JCN5-gW-0PGWZF9ILtMKJlwLcXH7V-qhPEi2yF7IdymKROp1J_JDs-KVKS53iVP88e-Ade69obGFdKhxWkAZYM0eZm5dQ820q6m_WoTnHXQhu8UYnRxqJDG7gF8FWjjoruB6LqWjncMOk9da12FbaSVC7bpwuCRlriCe9cN_gv5VEMTcP_1nZG_v-ZXxyfJ-e_F6fHP88SKQmVJprEuIeUoWc5txRVTKDPNLQpZoMC8lFwrCbaGXFsrWMk1qxVoZivImRIz8mPq7X13N2CIZj1ug00DLXZDMEwqVujRyBY9mFDruxA81qb3bg1-Y1hqtq7N6Nq8uB7Zb6-1Q7nG6p18kzsCRxPw4Brc_L_JnM0v3yqTKeFCxMf3BPh_Rmmhpbm-WJg_8nK5vFpocyGeAZacmgs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1561979036</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Explaining the unexplainable - the impact of physicians' attitude towards litigation on their incident disclosure behaviour</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Renkema, Erik ; Broekhuis, Manda H. ; Ahaus, Kees</creator><creatorcontrib>Renkema, Erik ; Broekhuis, Manda H. ; Ahaus, Kees</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale, aims and objectives This study aims to provide in‐depth insight into the emotions and thoughts of physicians towards malpractice litigation, and how these relate to their incident disclosure behaviour. Methods Thirty‐one Dutch physicians were interviewed and completed short questionnaires regarding malpractice litigation. We used hierarchical cluster analysis to identify physician clusters. Additional qualitative data were analysed. Results Physicians vary largely in their attitude towards malpractice litigation, and their attitude is not straightforward related to their disclosure behaviour. Based on their responses physicians could be divided into two clusters: one with a positive and one with a negative attitude. Physicians with a negative attitude showed often, but also 6 out of 15 not, a reluctance to disclose, whereas the majority in the positive attitude cluster (12 out of 16) showed no reluctance. If, what and how physicians disclose incidents depends on a complex interplay of their emotions and thoughts regarding litigation, and not only on their fear of litigation as many studies assume. Conclusions Due to the variation among physicians in their litigation attitude and behaviour in terms of incident disclosure the oft‐heard call for ‘openness’ about medical incidents will not be easy to achieve. A coaching system in which physicians can share and discuss their differing attitudes and disclosure principles, teaching medical students and junior physicians about disclosure, and explaining how to organize emotional and legal support for oneself in case of litigation could decrease stress feelings and support open disclosure behaviour.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-1294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jep.12194</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24903087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>attitude ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; CPM theory ; Disclosure ; Emotions ; Female ; Humans ; incident disclosure ; litigation risk ; Male ; Malpractice - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Medical Errors - psychology ; Netherlands ; physicians ; Physicians - psychology ; the Netherlands</subject><ispartof>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2014-10, Vol.20 (5), p.649-656</ispartof><rights>2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-47efba02e5182cd2616e5472ce359e3e8b52765acfa87cc31b271f6a71cda8163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-47efba02e5182cd2616e5472ce359e3e8b52765acfa87cc31b271f6a71cda8163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24903087$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Renkema, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broekhuis, Manda H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahaus, Kees</creatorcontrib><title>Explaining the unexplainable - the impact of physicians' attitude towards litigation on their incident disclosure behaviour</title><title>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</title><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><description>Rationale, aims and objectives This study aims to provide in‐depth insight into the emotions and thoughts of physicians towards malpractice litigation, and how these relate to their incident disclosure behaviour. Methods Thirty‐one Dutch physicians were interviewed and completed short questionnaires regarding malpractice litigation. We used hierarchical cluster analysis to identify physician clusters. Additional qualitative data were analysed. Results Physicians vary largely in their attitude towards malpractice litigation, and their attitude is not straightforward related to their disclosure behaviour. Based on their responses physicians could be divided into two clusters: one with a positive and one with a negative attitude. Physicians with a negative attitude showed often, but also 6 out of 15 not, a reluctance to disclose, whereas the majority in the positive attitude cluster (12 out of 16) showed no reluctance. If, what and how physicians disclose incidents depends on a complex interplay of their emotions and thoughts regarding litigation, and not only on their fear of litigation as many studies assume. Conclusions Due to the variation among physicians in their litigation attitude and behaviour in terms of incident disclosure the oft‐heard call for ‘openness’ about medical incidents will not be easy to achieve. A coaching system in which physicians can share and discuss their differing attitudes and disclosure principles, teaching medical students and junior physicians about disclosure, and explaining how to organize emotional and legal support for oneself in case of litigation could decrease stress feelings and support open disclosure behaviour.</description><subject>attitude</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>CPM theory</subject><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>incident disclosure</subject><subject>litigation risk</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malpractice - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Medical Errors - psychology</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>physicians</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>the Netherlands</subject><issn>1356-1294</issn><issn>1365-2753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFO3DAURa2qVYEpi_5A5V3LIhDbsZ0sKzQdYBBFKhVL68V5YUwzSbAdYMTPkyHArpYlW0_nXj0dQr6y9JCN5-gW-0PGWZF9ILtMKJlwLcXH7V-qhPEi2yF7IdymKROp1J_JDs-KVKS53iVP88e-Ade69obGFdKhxWkAZYM0eZm5dQ820q6m_WoTnHXQhu8UYnRxqJDG7gF8FWjjoruB6LqWjncMOk9da12FbaSVC7bpwuCRlriCe9cN_gv5VEMTcP_1nZG_v-ZXxyfJ-e_F6fHP88SKQmVJprEuIeUoWc5txRVTKDPNLQpZoMC8lFwrCbaGXFsrWMk1qxVoZivImRIz8mPq7X13N2CIZj1ug00DLXZDMEwqVujRyBY9mFDruxA81qb3bg1-Y1hqtq7N6Nq8uB7Zb6-1Q7nG6p18kzsCRxPw4Brc_L_JnM0v3yqTKeFCxMf3BPh_Rmmhpbm-WJg_8nK5vFpocyGeAZacmgs</recordid><startdate>201410</startdate><enddate>201410</enddate><creator>Renkema, Erik</creator><creator>Broekhuis, Manda H.</creator><creator>Ahaus, Kees</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201410</creationdate><title>Explaining the unexplainable - the impact of physicians' attitude towards litigation on their incident disclosure behaviour</title><author>Renkema, Erik ; Broekhuis, Manda H. ; Ahaus, Kees</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-47efba02e5182cd2616e5472ce359e3e8b52765acfa87cc31b271f6a71cda8163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>attitude</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>CPM theory</topic><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>incident disclosure</topic><topic>litigation risk</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malpractice - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Medical Errors - psychology</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>physicians</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>the Netherlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Renkema, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broekhuis, Manda H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahaus, Kees</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Renkema, Erik</au><au>Broekhuis, Manda H.</au><au>Ahaus, Kees</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Explaining the unexplainable - the impact of physicians' attitude towards litigation on their incident disclosure behaviour</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2014-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>649</spage><epage>656</epage><pages>649-656</pages><issn>1356-1294</issn><eissn>1365-2753</eissn><abstract>Rationale, aims and objectives This study aims to provide in‐depth insight into the emotions and thoughts of physicians towards malpractice litigation, and how these relate to their incident disclosure behaviour. Methods Thirty‐one Dutch physicians were interviewed and completed short questionnaires regarding malpractice litigation. We used hierarchical cluster analysis to identify physician clusters. Additional qualitative data were analysed. Results Physicians vary largely in their attitude towards malpractice litigation, and their attitude is not straightforward related to their disclosure behaviour. Based on their responses physicians could be divided into two clusters: one with a positive and one with a negative attitude. Physicians with a negative attitude showed often, but also 6 out of 15 not, a reluctance to disclose, whereas the majority in the positive attitude cluster (12 out of 16) showed no reluctance. If, what and how physicians disclose incidents depends on a complex interplay of their emotions and thoughts regarding litigation, and not only on their fear of litigation as many studies assume. Conclusions Due to the variation among physicians in their litigation attitude and behaviour in terms of incident disclosure the oft‐heard call for ‘openness’ about medical incidents will not be easy to achieve. A coaching system in which physicians can share and discuss their differing attitudes and disclosure principles, teaching medical students and junior physicians about disclosure, and explaining how to organize emotional and legal support for oneself in case of litigation could decrease stress feelings and support open disclosure behaviour.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24903087</pmid><doi>10.1111/jep.12194</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1356-1294
ispartof Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2014-10, Vol.20 (5), p.649-656
issn 1356-1294
1365-2753
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1561979036
source Wiley
subjects attitude
Attitude of Health Personnel
CPM theory
Disclosure
Emotions
Female
Humans
incident disclosure
litigation risk
Male
Malpractice - legislation & jurisprudence
Medical Errors - psychology
Netherlands
physicians
Physicians - psychology
the Netherlands
title Explaining the unexplainable - the impact of physicians' attitude towards litigation on their incident disclosure behaviour
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A41%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Explaining%20the%20unexplainable%20-%20the%20impact%20of%20physicians'%20attitude%20towards%20litigation%20on%20their%20incident%20disclosure%20behaviour&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evaluation%20in%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Renkema,%20Erik&rft.date=2014-10&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=649&rft.epage=656&rft.pages=649-656&rft.issn=1356-1294&rft.eissn=1365-2753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jep.12194&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1561979036%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-47efba02e5182cd2616e5472ce359e3e8b52765acfa87cc31b271f6a71cda8163%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1561979036&rft_id=info:pmid/24903087&rfr_iscdi=true