Loading…
Explaining the unexplainable - the impact of physicians' attitude towards litigation on their incident disclosure behaviour
Rationale, aims and objectives This study aims to provide in‐depth insight into the emotions and thoughts of physicians towards malpractice litigation, and how these relate to their incident disclosure behaviour. Methods Thirty‐one Dutch physicians were interviewed and completed short questionnaires...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 2014-10, Vol.20 (5), p.649-656 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-47efba02e5182cd2616e5472ce359e3e8b52765acfa87cc31b271f6a71cda8163 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-47efba02e5182cd2616e5472ce359e3e8b52765acfa87cc31b271f6a71cda8163 |
container_end_page | 656 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 649 |
container_title | Journal of evaluation in clinical practice |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Renkema, Erik Broekhuis, Manda H. Ahaus, Kees |
description | Rationale, aims and objectives
This study aims to provide in‐depth insight into the emotions and thoughts of physicians towards malpractice litigation, and how these relate to their incident disclosure behaviour.
Methods
Thirty‐one Dutch physicians were interviewed and completed short questionnaires regarding malpractice litigation. We used hierarchical cluster analysis to identify physician clusters. Additional qualitative data were analysed.
Results
Physicians vary largely in their attitude towards malpractice litigation, and their attitude is not straightforward related to their disclosure behaviour. Based on their responses physicians could be divided into two clusters: one with a positive and one with a negative attitude. Physicians with a negative attitude showed often, but also 6 out of 15 not, a reluctance to disclose, whereas the majority in the positive attitude cluster (12 out of 16) showed no reluctance. If, what and how physicians disclose incidents depends on a complex interplay of their emotions and thoughts regarding litigation, and not only on their fear of litigation as many studies assume.
Conclusions
Due to the variation among physicians in their litigation attitude and behaviour in terms of incident disclosure the oft‐heard call for ‘openness’ about medical incidents will not be easy to achieve. A coaching system in which physicians can share and discuss their differing attitudes and disclosure principles, teaching medical students and junior physicians about disclosure, and explaining how to organize emotional and legal support for oneself in case of litigation could decrease stress feelings and support open disclosure behaviour. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jep.12194 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1561979036</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1561979036</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-47efba02e5182cd2616e5472ce359e3e8b52765acfa87cc31b271f6a71cda8163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFO3DAURa2qVYEpi_5A5V3LIhDbsZ0sKzQdYBBFKhVL68V5YUwzSbAdYMTPkyHArpYlW0_nXj0dQr6y9JCN5-gW-0PGWZF9ILtMKJlwLcXH7V-qhPEi2yF7IdymKROp1J_JDs-KVKS53iVP88e-Ade69obGFdKhxWkAZYM0eZm5dQ820q6m_WoTnHXQhu8UYnRxqJDG7gF8FWjjoruB6LqWjncMOk9da12FbaSVC7bpwuCRlriCe9cN_gv5VEMTcP_1nZG_v-ZXxyfJ-e_F6fHP88SKQmVJprEuIeUoWc5txRVTKDPNLQpZoMC8lFwrCbaGXFsrWMk1qxVoZivImRIz8mPq7X13N2CIZj1ug00DLXZDMEwqVujRyBY9mFDruxA81qb3bg1-Y1hqtq7N6Nq8uB7Zb6-1Q7nG6p18kzsCRxPw4Brc_L_JnM0v3yqTKeFCxMf3BPh_Rmmhpbm-WJg_8nK5vFpocyGeAZacmgs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1561979036</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Explaining the unexplainable - the impact of physicians' attitude towards litigation on their incident disclosure behaviour</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Renkema, Erik ; Broekhuis, Manda H. ; Ahaus, Kees</creator><creatorcontrib>Renkema, Erik ; Broekhuis, Manda H. ; Ahaus, Kees</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale, aims and objectives
This study aims to provide in‐depth insight into the emotions and thoughts of physicians towards malpractice litigation, and how these relate to their incident disclosure behaviour.
Methods
Thirty‐one Dutch physicians were interviewed and completed short questionnaires regarding malpractice litigation. We used hierarchical cluster analysis to identify physician clusters. Additional qualitative data were analysed.
Results
Physicians vary largely in their attitude towards malpractice litigation, and their attitude is not straightforward related to their disclosure behaviour. Based on their responses physicians could be divided into two clusters: one with a positive and one with a negative attitude. Physicians with a negative attitude showed often, but also 6 out of 15 not, a reluctance to disclose, whereas the majority in the positive attitude cluster (12 out of 16) showed no reluctance. If, what and how physicians disclose incidents depends on a complex interplay of their emotions and thoughts regarding litigation, and not only on their fear of litigation as many studies assume.
Conclusions
Due to the variation among physicians in their litigation attitude and behaviour in terms of incident disclosure the oft‐heard call for ‘openness’ about medical incidents will not be easy to achieve. A coaching system in which physicians can share and discuss their differing attitudes and disclosure principles, teaching medical students and junior physicians about disclosure, and explaining how to organize emotional and legal support for oneself in case of litigation could decrease stress feelings and support open disclosure behaviour.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-1294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jep.12194</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24903087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>attitude ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; CPM theory ; Disclosure ; Emotions ; Female ; Humans ; incident disclosure ; litigation risk ; Male ; Malpractice - legislation & jurisprudence ; Medical Errors - psychology ; Netherlands ; physicians ; Physicians - psychology ; the Netherlands</subject><ispartof>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2014-10, Vol.20 (5), p.649-656</ispartof><rights>2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-47efba02e5182cd2616e5472ce359e3e8b52765acfa87cc31b271f6a71cda8163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-47efba02e5182cd2616e5472ce359e3e8b52765acfa87cc31b271f6a71cda8163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24903087$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Renkema, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broekhuis, Manda H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahaus, Kees</creatorcontrib><title>Explaining the unexplainable - the impact of physicians' attitude towards litigation on their incident disclosure behaviour</title><title>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</title><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><description>Rationale, aims and objectives
This study aims to provide in‐depth insight into the emotions and thoughts of physicians towards malpractice litigation, and how these relate to their incident disclosure behaviour.
Methods
Thirty‐one Dutch physicians were interviewed and completed short questionnaires regarding malpractice litigation. We used hierarchical cluster analysis to identify physician clusters. Additional qualitative data were analysed.
Results
Physicians vary largely in their attitude towards malpractice litigation, and their attitude is not straightforward related to their disclosure behaviour. Based on their responses physicians could be divided into two clusters: one with a positive and one with a negative attitude. Physicians with a negative attitude showed often, but also 6 out of 15 not, a reluctance to disclose, whereas the majority in the positive attitude cluster (12 out of 16) showed no reluctance. If, what and how physicians disclose incidents depends on a complex interplay of their emotions and thoughts regarding litigation, and not only on their fear of litigation as many studies assume.
Conclusions
Due to the variation among physicians in their litigation attitude and behaviour in terms of incident disclosure the oft‐heard call for ‘openness’ about medical incidents will not be easy to achieve. A coaching system in which physicians can share and discuss their differing attitudes and disclosure principles, teaching medical students and junior physicians about disclosure, and explaining how to organize emotional and legal support for oneself in case of litigation could decrease stress feelings and support open disclosure behaviour.</description><subject>attitude</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>CPM theory</subject><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>incident disclosure</subject><subject>litigation risk</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malpractice - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Medical Errors - psychology</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>physicians</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>the Netherlands</subject><issn>1356-1294</issn><issn>1365-2753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFO3DAURa2qVYEpi_5A5V3LIhDbsZ0sKzQdYBBFKhVL68V5YUwzSbAdYMTPkyHArpYlW0_nXj0dQr6y9JCN5-gW-0PGWZF9ILtMKJlwLcXH7V-qhPEi2yF7IdymKROp1J_JDs-KVKS53iVP88e-Ade69obGFdKhxWkAZYM0eZm5dQ820q6m_WoTnHXQhu8UYnRxqJDG7gF8FWjjoruB6LqWjncMOk9da12FbaSVC7bpwuCRlriCe9cN_gv5VEMTcP_1nZG_v-ZXxyfJ-e_F6fHP88SKQmVJprEuIeUoWc5txRVTKDPNLQpZoMC8lFwrCbaGXFsrWMk1qxVoZivImRIz8mPq7X13N2CIZj1ug00DLXZDMEwqVujRyBY9mFDruxA81qb3bg1-Y1hqtq7N6Nq8uB7Zb6-1Q7nG6p18kzsCRxPw4Brc_L_JnM0v3yqTKeFCxMf3BPh_Rmmhpbm-WJg_8nK5vFpocyGeAZacmgs</recordid><startdate>201410</startdate><enddate>201410</enddate><creator>Renkema, Erik</creator><creator>Broekhuis, Manda H.</creator><creator>Ahaus, Kees</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201410</creationdate><title>Explaining the unexplainable - the impact of physicians' attitude towards litigation on their incident disclosure behaviour</title><author>Renkema, Erik ; Broekhuis, Manda H. ; Ahaus, Kees</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-47efba02e5182cd2616e5472ce359e3e8b52765acfa87cc31b271f6a71cda8163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>attitude</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>CPM theory</topic><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>incident disclosure</topic><topic>litigation risk</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malpractice - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Medical Errors - psychology</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>physicians</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>the Netherlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Renkema, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broekhuis, Manda H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahaus, Kees</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Renkema, Erik</au><au>Broekhuis, Manda H.</au><au>Ahaus, Kees</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Explaining the unexplainable - the impact of physicians' attitude towards litigation on their incident disclosure behaviour</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2014-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>649</spage><epage>656</epage><pages>649-656</pages><issn>1356-1294</issn><eissn>1365-2753</eissn><abstract>Rationale, aims and objectives
This study aims to provide in‐depth insight into the emotions and thoughts of physicians towards malpractice litigation, and how these relate to their incident disclosure behaviour.
Methods
Thirty‐one Dutch physicians were interviewed and completed short questionnaires regarding malpractice litigation. We used hierarchical cluster analysis to identify physician clusters. Additional qualitative data were analysed.
Results
Physicians vary largely in their attitude towards malpractice litigation, and their attitude is not straightforward related to their disclosure behaviour. Based on their responses physicians could be divided into two clusters: one with a positive and one with a negative attitude. Physicians with a negative attitude showed often, but also 6 out of 15 not, a reluctance to disclose, whereas the majority in the positive attitude cluster (12 out of 16) showed no reluctance. If, what and how physicians disclose incidents depends on a complex interplay of their emotions and thoughts regarding litigation, and not only on their fear of litigation as many studies assume.
Conclusions
Due to the variation among physicians in their litigation attitude and behaviour in terms of incident disclosure the oft‐heard call for ‘openness’ about medical incidents will not be easy to achieve. A coaching system in which physicians can share and discuss their differing attitudes and disclosure principles, teaching medical students and junior physicians about disclosure, and explaining how to organize emotional and legal support for oneself in case of litigation could decrease stress feelings and support open disclosure behaviour.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24903087</pmid><doi>10.1111/jep.12194</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1356-1294 |
ispartof | Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2014-10, Vol.20 (5), p.649-656 |
issn | 1356-1294 1365-2753 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1561979036 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | attitude Attitude of Health Personnel CPM theory Disclosure Emotions Female Humans incident disclosure litigation risk Male Malpractice - legislation & jurisprudence Medical Errors - psychology Netherlands physicians Physicians - psychology the Netherlands |
title | Explaining the unexplainable - the impact of physicians' attitude towards litigation on their incident disclosure behaviour |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A41%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Explaining%20the%20unexplainable%20-%20the%20impact%20of%20physicians'%20attitude%20towards%20litigation%20on%20their%20incident%20disclosure%20behaviour&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evaluation%20in%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Renkema,%20Erik&rft.date=2014-10&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=649&rft.epage=656&rft.pages=649-656&rft.issn=1356-1294&rft.eissn=1365-2753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jep.12194&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1561979036%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-47efba02e5182cd2616e5472ce359e3e8b52765acfa87cc31b271f6a71cda8163%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1561979036&rft_id=info:pmid/24903087&rfr_iscdi=true |