Loading…

The correlation between the vestibulo-ocular reflex and multi-focal ocular correction: implications for vestibular compensation

Abstract Purpose An accurate vestibulo-ocular reflex is important for gaze stability, and is adaptable through modification, based on stable and repeated vestibular and visual feedback. The optical power of eye glasses changes the ocular rotation needed to view an object due to the prismatic effect....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of otolaryngology 2014-09, Vol.35 (5), p.572-576
Main Authors: Michaelides, Elias, MD, Schutt, Christopher A., MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-536adbae1d240d441d18384324a0f3ef6ca08a97006569de6960abcb935c9b153
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-536adbae1d240d441d18384324a0f3ef6ca08a97006569de6960abcb935c9b153
container_end_page 576
container_issue 5
container_start_page 572
container_title American journal of otolaryngology
container_volume 35
creator Michaelides, Elias, MD
Schutt, Christopher A., MD
description Abstract Purpose An accurate vestibulo-ocular reflex is important for gaze stability, and is adaptable through modification, based on stable and repeated vestibular and visual feedback. The optical power of eye glasses changes the ocular rotation needed to view an object due to the prismatic effect. Depending on the diopter of a lens, eyes have to rotate through fewer or more degrees to correct for refractive change. We aim to determine how multifocal lenses, such as progressives, affect needed ocular rotation and ocular gain based on location of the lens in which an object is viewed. Differing ocular gains within the same field of vision will create non-stable visual feedback possibly delaying vestibular recovery. Methods and materials Needed ocular rotation, and ocular gain to view an object 30° lateral to midline were calculated across different points in the vertical axis of a representative progressive lens. Results In a progressive lens with superior correction of + 1 D and inferior correction of + 5.5 D, needed ocular rotation to view an object 30° lateral to midline would differ by 4.015°, with difference in ocular gain of 0.1336, indicating a 13.027% change in ocular gain, based on superior verse inferior viewing. Conclusions Progressive lenses have variable areas of VOR gain. This lack of consistent vestibulo-visual feedback may lead to prolonged compensation time in patients with vestibular injury.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjoto.2014.06.003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1562426865</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196070914001355</els_id><sourcerecordid>3465690291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-536adbae1d240d441d18384324a0f3ef6ca08a97006569de6960abcb935c9b153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk2L1TAUhoMoznX0H4gU3LhpPWk-butCkMEvGHDhCO5Cmpxiatpck3Z0Vv51097rCLNxFUie8-ac9z2EPKVQUaDy5VDpcQhzqGqgvAJZAbB7ZEcFq8uGNl_vkx3QVpawh_aMPEppgExwJh6Ss1oApy2jO_L76hsWJsSIXs8uTEWH80_EqZjz_TWm2XWLD2Uwi9exiNh7_FXoyRbj4mdX9sFoX5xeNxmzqrwq3HjwzmySqehDvNXauPGAU9oeH5MHvfYJn5zOc_Ll3duriw_l5af3Hy_eXJaGczGXgkltO43U1hws59TShjWc1VxDz7CXRkOj2z2AFLK1KFsJujNdy4Rpu-zJOXlx1D3E8GPJvajRJYPe6wnDkhQVsua1bOSKPr-DDmGJU-5OUUk57Bu5UfxImRhSysaoQ3SjjjeKgloDUoM6BqTWgBRIle3PZc9O4ks3or0t-ptIBl4fAcxuXDuMKhmHk0HrVnOVDe5_P9wVMN5NOQv_HW8w_ZtFpVqB-rwuybojeTKgTAj2B2Pwuns</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1614078665</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The correlation between the vestibulo-ocular reflex and multi-focal ocular correction: implications for vestibular compensation</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Michaelides, Elias, MD ; Schutt, Christopher A., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Michaelides, Elias, MD ; Schutt, Christopher A., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose An accurate vestibulo-ocular reflex is important for gaze stability, and is adaptable through modification, based on stable and repeated vestibular and visual feedback. The optical power of eye glasses changes the ocular rotation needed to view an object due to the prismatic effect. Depending on the diopter of a lens, eyes have to rotate through fewer or more degrees to correct for refractive change. We aim to determine how multifocal lenses, such as progressives, affect needed ocular rotation and ocular gain based on location of the lens in which an object is viewed. Differing ocular gains within the same field of vision will create non-stable visual feedback possibly delaying vestibular recovery. Methods and materials Needed ocular rotation, and ocular gain to view an object 30° lateral to midline were calculated across different points in the vertical axis of a representative progressive lens. Results In a progressive lens with superior correction of + 1 D and inferior correction of + 5.5 D, needed ocular rotation to view an object 30° lateral to midline would differ by 4.015°, with difference in ocular gain of 0.1336, indicating a 13.027% change in ocular gain, based on superior verse inferior viewing. Conclusions Progressive lenses have variable areas of VOR gain. This lack of consistent vestibulo-visual feedback may lead to prolonged compensation time in patients with vestibular injury.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0709</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-818X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2014.06.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25041931</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOTDP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Compensation ; Contact lenses ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Eyeglasses ; Humans ; Mathematical models ; Otolaryngology ; Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular - physiology ; Rotation ; Surgery ; Vestibule, Labyrinth - physiology</subject><ispartof>American journal of otolaryngology, 2014-09, Vol.35 (5), p.572-576</ispartof><rights>2014</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-536adbae1d240d441d18384324a0f3ef6ca08a97006569de6960abcb935c9b153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-536adbae1d240d441d18384324a0f3ef6ca08a97006569de6960abcb935c9b153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25041931$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Michaelides, Elias, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schutt, Christopher A., MD</creatorcontrib><title>The correlation between the vestibulo-ocular reflex and multi-focal ocular correction: implications for vestibular compensation</title><title>American journal of otolaryngology</title><addtitle>Am J Otolaryngol</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose An accurate vestibulo-ocular reflex is important for gaze stability, and is adaptable through modification, based on stable and repeated vestibular and visual feedback. The optical power of eye glasses changes the ocular rotation needed to view an object due to the prismatic effect. Depending on the diopter of a lens, eyes have to rotate through fewer or more degrees to correct for refractive change. We aim to determine how multifocal lenses, such as progressives, affect needed ocular rotation and ocular gain based on location of the lens in which an object is viewed. Differing ocular gains within the same field of vision will create non-stable visual feedback possibly delaying vestibular recovery. Methods and materials Needed ocular rotation, and ocular gain to view an object 30° lateral to midline were calculated across different points in the vertical axis of a representative progressive lens. Results In a progressive lens with superior correction of + 1 D and inferior correction of + 5.5 D, needed ocular rotation to view an object 30° lateral to midline would differ by 4.015°, with difference in ocular gain of 0.1336, indicating a 13.027% change in ocular gain, based on superior verse inferior viewing. Conclusions Progressive lenses have variable areas of VOR gain. This lack of consistent vestibulo-visual feedback may lead to prolonged compensation time in patients with vestibular injury.</description><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Contact lenses</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Eyeglasses</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular - physiology</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Vestibule, Labyrinth - physiology</subject><issn>0196-0709</issn><issn>1532-818X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkk2L1TAUhoMoznX0H4gU3LhpPWk-butCkMEvGHDhCO5Cmpxiatpck3Z0Vv51097rCLNxFUie8-ac9z2EPKVQUaDy5VDpcQhzqGqgvAJZAbB7ZEcFq8uGNl_vkx3QVpawh_aMPEppgExwJh6Ss1oApy2jO_L76hsWJsSIXs8uTEWH80_EqZjz_TWm2XWLD2Uwi9exiNh7_FXoyRbj4mdX9sFoX5xeNxmzqrwq3HjwzmySqehDvNXauPGAU9oeH5MHvfYJn5zOc_Ll3duriw_l5af3Hy_eXJaGczGXgkltO43U1hws59TShjWc1VxDz7CXRkOj2z2AFLK1KFsJujNdy4Rpu-zJOXlx1D3E8GPJvajRJYPe6wnDkhQVsua1bOSKPr-DDmGJU-5OUUk57Bu5UfxImRhSysaoQ3SjjjeKgloDUoM6BqTWgBRIle3PZc9O4ks3or0t-ptIBl4fAcxuXDuMKhmHk0HrVnOVDe5_P9wVMN5NOQv_HW8w_ZtFpVqB-rwuybojeTKgTAj2B2Pwuns</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Michaelides, Elias, MD</creator><creator>Schutt, Christopher A., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>The correlation between the vestibulo-ocular reflex and multi-focal ocular correction: implications for vestibular compensation</title><author>Michaelides, Elias, MD ; Schutt, Christopher A., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-536adbae1d240d441d18384324a0f3ef6ca08a97006569de6960abcb935c9b153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Contact lenses</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Eyeglasses</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular - physiology</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Vestibule, Labyrinth - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Michaelides, Elias, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schutt, Christopher A., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of otolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Michaelides, Elias, MD</au><au>Schutt, Christopher A., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The correlation between the vestibulo-ocular reflex and multi-focal ocular correction: implications for vestibular compensation</atitle><jtitle>American journal of otolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Otolaryngol</addtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>572</spage><epage>576</epage><pages>572-576</pages><issn>0196-0709</issn><eissn>1532-818X</eissn><coden>AJOTDP</coden><abstract>Abstract Purpose An accurate vestibulo-ocular reflex is important for gaze stability, and is adaptable through modification, based on stable and repeated vestibular and visual feedback. The optical power of eye glasses changes the ocular rotation needed to view an object due to the prismatic effect. Depending on the diopter of a lens, eyes have to rotate through fewer or more degrees to correct for refractive change. We aim to determine how multifocal lenses, such as progressives, affect needed ocular rotation and ocular gain based on location of the lens in which an object is viewed. Differing ocular gains within the same field of vision will create non-stable visual feedback possibly delaying vestibular recovery. Methods and materials Needed ocular rotation, and ocular gain to view an object 30° lateral to midline were calculated across different points in the vertical axis of a representative progressive lens. Results In a progressive lens with superior correction of + 1 D and inferior correction of + 5.5 D, needed ocular rotation to view an object 30° lateral to midline would differ by 4.015°, with difference in ocular gain of 0.1336, indicating a 13.027% change in ocular gain, based on superior verse inferior viewing. Conclusions Progressive lenses have variable areas of VOR gain. This lack of consistent vestibulo-visual feedback may lead to prolonged compensation time in patients with vestibular injury.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25041931</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjoto.2014.06.003</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-0709
ispartof American journal of otolaryngology, 2014-09, Vol.35 (5), p.572-576
issn 0196-0709
1532-818X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1562426865
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Compensation
Contact lenses
Eye Movements - physiology
Eyeglasses
Humans
Mathematical models
Otolaryngology
Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular - physiology
Rotation
Surgery
Vestibule, Labyrinth - physiology
title The correlation between the vestibulo-ocular reflex and multi-focal ocular correction: implications for vestibular compensation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T22%3A29%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20correlation%20between%20the%20vestibulo-ocular%20reflex%20and%20multi-focal%20ocular%20correction:%20implications%20for%20vestibular%20compensation&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20otolaryngology&rft.au=Michaelides,%20Elias,%20MD&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=572&rft.epage=576&rft.pages=572-576&rft.issn=0196-0709&rft.eissn=1532-818X&rft.coden=AJOTDP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjoto.2014.06.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3465690291%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-536adbae1d240d441d18384324a0f3ef6ca08a97006569de6960abcb935c9b153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1614078665&rft_id=info:pmid/25041931&rfr_iscdi=true