Loading…
Safe and successful bone marrow biopsy: An anatomical and CT‐based cadaver study
Bone marrow biopsy is generally a safe procedure. However, infrequently the procedure is associated with serious injuries that are attributed to inadvertent needle penetration of the iliac bone's inner cortex. An evidence‐based approach to needle orientation during iliac crest biopsy does not e...
Saved in:
Published in: | American journal of hematology 2014-10, Vol.89 (10), p.943-946 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4580-d61b8f909ee0f300fa0316ef9341511518ca8acccbea6488062cc55cdf6ffdae3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4580-d61b8f909ee0f300fa0316ef9341511518ca8acccbea6488062cc55cdf6ffdae3 |
container_end_page | 946 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 943 |
container_title | American journal of hematology |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | Konda, Bhavana Pathak, Swati Edwin, Inga Mishall, Priti Downie, Sherry A. Olson, Todd R. Reed, Louis J. Friedman, Ellen W. |
description | Bone marrow biopsy is generally a safe procedure. However, infrequently the procedure is associated with serious injuries that are attributed to inadvertent needle penetration of the iliac bone's inner cortex. An evidence‐based approach to needle orientation during iliac crest biopsy does not exist. In our study, the posterior to anterior path of the bone marrow needle from the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) was studied in human cadavers in two orientations: (1) perpendicularly to the coronal plane (the perpendicular approach) and (2) laterally toward the ipsilateral anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) (the lateral approach). The biopsy needle was deliberately advanced through the inner ilial cortex in both approaches. Dissections and imaging studies were done to identify the relationship of the penetrating needle to internal structures. Both approaches begin with a perpendicular puncture of the outer cortex at the PSIS. The perpendicular approach proceeds anteriorly whereas in the lateral approach the needle is reoriented toward the ipsilateral ASIS before advancing. The lateral approach caused less damage to neurovascular structures and avoided the sacroiliac joint compared to the perpendicular approach. This procedure is best done in the lateral decubitus position. Proper use of the lateral approach should obviate many of the complications reported in the literature. Am. J. Hematol. 89:943–946, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ajh.23790 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1562660395</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1562660395</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4580-d61b8f909ee0f300fa0316ef9341511518ca8acccbea6488062cc55cdf6ffdae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M9Kw0AQBvBFFFurB19AAl70kHY22Wx3vZWiVikIWs9hs5nFlPyp2caSm4_gM_okrk31IAgLs4fffAwfIacUhhQgGKnlyzAIxxL2SJ-C5L7gUbBP-hBy6v4ge-TI2iUApUzAIekFTLKAAuuTxydl0FNl6tlGa7TWNLmXVCV6harrauMlWbWy7ZU3KZ1S66rItMq3C9PF5_tHoiymnlapesPas-smbY_JgVG5xZPdHJDnm-vFdObPH27vppO5r1kkwE85TYSRIBHBhABGQUg5GhkyGlH3hFZCaa0TVJwJATzQOop0argxqcJwQC663FVdvTZo13GRWY15rkqsGhvTiAecQygjR8__0GXV1KW7bqtAMjYWTl12SteVtTWaeFVnroY2phB_Fx27ouNt0c6e7RKbpMD0V_4068CoA5ssx_b_pHhyP-sivwCWCoc6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1562094478</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safe and successful bone marrow biopsy: An anatomical and CT‐based cadaver study</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Konda, Bhavana ; Pathak, Swati ; Edwin, Inga ; Mishall, Priti ; Downie, Sherry A. ; Olson, Todd R. ; Reed, Louis J. ; Friedman, Ellen W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Konda, Bhavana ; Pathak, Swati ; Edwin, Inga ; Mishall, Priti ; Downie, Sherry A. ; Olson, Todd R. ; Reed, Louis J. ; Friedman, Ellen W.</creatorcontrib><description>Bone marrow biopsy is generally a safe procedure. However, infrequently the procedure is associated with serious injuries that are attributed to inadvertent needle penetration of the iliac bone's inner cortex. An evidence‐based approach to needle orientation during iliac crest biopsy does not exist. In our study, the posterior to anterior path of the bone marrow needle from the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) was studied in human cadavers in two orientations: (1) perpendicularly to the coronal plane (the perpendicular approach) and (2) laterally toward the ipsilateral anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) (the lateral approach). The biopsy needle was deliberately advanced through the inner ilial cortex in both approaches. Dissections and imaging studies were done to identify the relationship of the penetrating needle to internal structures. Both approaches begin with a perpendicular puncture of the outer cortex at the PSIS. The perpendicular approach proceeds anteriorly whereas in the lateral approach the needle is reoriented toward the ipsilateral ASIS before advancing. The lateral approach caused less damage to neurovascular structures and avoided the sacroiliac joint compared to the perpendicular approach. This procedure is best done in the lateral decubitus position. Proper use of the lateral approach should obviate many of the complications reported in the literature. Am. J. Hematol. 89:943–946, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-8609</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-8652</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ajh.23790</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24942104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Biopsy, Needle - methods ; Bone Marrow - diagnostic imaging ; Cadaver ; Female ; Hematology ; Humans ; Male ; Spine - diagnostic imaging ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>American journal of hematology, 2014-10, Vol.89 (10), p.943-946</ispartof><rights>2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4580-d61b8f909ee0f300fa0316ef9341511518ca8acccbea6488062cc55cdf6ffdae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4580-d61b8f909ee0f300fa0316ef9341511518ca8acccbea6488062cc55cdf6ffdae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24942104$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Konda, Bhavana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pathak, Swati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwin, Inga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mishall, Priti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downie, Sherry A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Todd R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Louis J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedman, Ellen W.</creatorcontrib><title>Safe and successful bone marrow biopsy: An anatomical and CT‐based cadaver study</title><title>American journal of hematology</title><addtitle>Am J Hematol</addtitle><description>Bone marrow biopsy is generally a safe procedure. However, infrequently the procedure is associated with serious injuries that are attributed to inadvertent needle penetration of the iliac bone's inner cortex. An evidence‐based approach to needle orientation during iliac crest biopsy does not exist. In our study, the posterior to anterior path of the bone marrow needle from the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) was studied in human cadavers in two orientations: (1) perpendicularly to the coronal plane (the perpendicular approach) and (2) laterally toward the ipsilateral anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) (the lateral approach). The biopsy needle was deliberately advanced through the inner ilial cortex in both approaches. Dissections and imaging studies were done to identify the relationship of the penetrating needle to internal structures. Both approaches begin with a perpendicular puncture of the outer cortex at the PSIS. The perpendicular approach proceeds anteriorly whereas in the lateral approach the needle is reoriented toward the ipsilateral ASIS before advancing. The lateral approach caused less damage to neurovascular structures and avoided the sacroiliac joint compared to the perpendicular approach. This procedure is best done in the lateral decubitus position. Proper use of the lateral approach should obviate many of the complications reported in the literature. Am. J. Hematol. 89:943–946, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Biopsy, Needle - methods</subject><subject>Bone Marrow - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Spine - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0361-8609</issn><issn>1096-8652</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10M9Kw0AQBvBFFFurB19AAl70kHY22Wx3vZWiVikIWs9hs5nFlPyp2caSm4_gM_okrk31IAgLs4fffAwfIacUhhQgGKnlyzAIxxL2SJ-C5L7gUbBP-hBy6v4ge-TI2iUApUzAIekFTLKAAuuTxydl0FNl6tlGa7TWNLmXVCV6harrauMlWbWy7ZU3KZ1S66rItMq3C9PF5_tHoiymnlapesPas-smbY_JgVG5xZPdHJDnm-vFdObPH27vppO5r1kkwE85TYSRIBHBhABGQUg5GhkyGlH3hFZCaa0TVJwJATzQOop0argxqcJwQC663FVdvTZo13GRWY15rkqsGhvTiAecQygjR8__0GXV1KW7bqtAMjYWTl12SteVtTWaeFVnroY2phB_Fx27ouNt0c6e7RKbpMD0V_4068CoA5ssx_b_pHhyP-sivwCWCoc6</recordid><startdate>201410</startdate><enddate>201410</enddate><creator>Konda, Bhavana</creator><creator>Pathak, Swati</creator><creator>Edwin, Inga</creator><creator>Mishall, Priti</creator><creator>Downie, Sherry A.</creator><creator>Olson, Todd R.</creator><creator>Reed, Louis J.</creator><creator>Friedman, Ellen W.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201410</creationdate><title>Safe and successful bone marrow biopsy: An anatomical and CT‐based cadaver study</title><author>Konda, Bhavana ; Pathak, Swati ; Edwin, Inga ; Mishall, Priti ; Downie, Sherry A. ; Olson, Todd R. ; Reed, Louis J. ; Friedman, Ellen W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4580-d61b8f909ee0f300fa0316ef9341511518ca8acccbea6488062cc55cdf6ffdae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Biopsy, Needle - methods</topic><topic>Bone Marrow - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Spine - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Konda, Bhavana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pathak, Swati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwin, Inga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mishall, Priti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downie, Sherry A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Todd R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Louis J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedman, Ellen W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of hematology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Konda, Bhavana</au><au>Pathak, Swati</au><au>Edwin, Inga</au><au>Mishall, Priti</au><au>Downie, Sherry A.</au><au>Olson, Todd R.</au><au>Reed, Louis J.</au><au>Friedman, Ellen W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safe and successful bone marrow biopsy: An anatomical and CT‐based cadaver study</atitle><jtitle>American journal of hematology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Hematol</addtitle><date>2014-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>943</spage><epage>946</epage><pages>943-946</pages><issn>0361-8609</issn><eissn>1096-8652</eissn><abstract>Bone marrow biopsy is generally a safe procedure. However, infrequently the procedure is associated with serious injuries that are attributed to inadvertent needle penetration of the iliac bone's inner cortex. An evidence‐based approach to needle orientation during iliac crest biopsy does not exist. In our study, the posterior to anterior path of the bone marrow needle from the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) was studied in human cadavers in two orientations: (1) perpendicularly to the coronal plane (the perpendicular approach) and (2) laterally toward the ipsilateral anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) (the lateral approach). The biopsy needle was deliberately advanced through the inner ilial cortex in both approaches. Dissections and imaging studies were done to identify the relationship of the penetrating needle to internal structures. Both approaches begin with a perpendicular puncture of the outer cortex at the PSIS. The perpendicular approach proceeds anteriorly whereas in the lateral approach the needle is reoriented toward the ipsilateral ASIS before advancing. The lateral approach caused less damage to neurovascular structures and avoided the sacroiliac joint compared to the perpendicular approach. This procedure is best done in the lateral decubitus position. Proper use of the lateral approach should obviate many of the complications reported in the literature. Am. J. Hematol. 89:943–946, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>24942104</pmid><doi>10.1002/ajh.23790</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0361-8609 |
ispartof | American journal of hematology, 2014-10, Vol.89 (10), p.943-946 |
issn | 0361-8609 1096-8652 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1562660395 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Biopsy, Needle - methods Bone Marrow - diagnostic imaging Cadaver Female Hematology Humans Male Spine - diagnostic imaging Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
title | Safe and successful bone marrow biopsy: An anatomical and CT‐based cadaver study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T04%3A44%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safe%20and%20successful%20bone%20marrow%20biopsy:%20An%20anatomical%20and%20CT%E2%80%90based%20cadaver%20study&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20hematology&rft.au=Konda,%20Bhavana&rft.date=2014-10&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=943&rft.epage=946&rft.pages=943-946&rft.issn=0361-8609&rft.eissn=1096-8652&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ajh.23790&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1562660395%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4580-d61b8f909ee0f300fa0316ef9341511518ca8acccbea6488062cc55cdf6ffdae3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1562094478&rft_id=info:pmid/24942104&rfr_iscdi=true |