Loading…

The minimal clinically important difference determined using item response theory models: an attempt to solve the issue of the association with baseline score

Abstract Objectives Determining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of questionnaires on an interval scale, the trait level (TL) scale, using item response theory (IRT) models could overcome its association with baseline severity. The aim of this study was to compare the sensitivity (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical epidemiology 2014-04, Vol.67 (4), p.433-440
Main Authors: Rouquette, Alexandra, Blanchin, Myriam, Sébille, Véronique, Guillemin, Francis, Côté, Sylvana M, Falissard, Bruno, Hardouin, Jean-Benoit
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objectives Determining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of questionnaires on an interval scale, the trait level (TL) scale, using item response theory (IRT) models could overcome its association with baseline severity. The aim of this study was to compare the sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and predictive values (PVs) of the MCID determined on the score scale (MCID-Sc) or the TL scale (MCID-TL). Study Design and Setting The MCID-Sc and MCID-TL of the MOS-SF36 general health subscale were determined for deterioration and improvement on a cohort of 1,170 patients using an anchor-based method and a partial credit model. The Se, Sp, and PV were calculated using the global rating of change (the anchor) as the gold standard test. Results The MCID-Sc magnitude was smaller for improvement (1.58 points) than for deterioration (−7.91 points). The Se, Sp, and PV were similar for MCID-Sc and MCID-TL in both cases. However, if the MCID was defined on the score scale as a function of a range of baseline scores, its Se, Sp, and PV were consistently higher. Conclusion This study reinforces the recommendations concerning the use of an MCID-Sc defined as a function of a range of baseline scores.
ISSN:0895-4356
1878-5921
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.009