Loading…

Characteristics of biochars from crop residues: Potential for carbon sequestration and soil amendment

Biochar has potential to sequester carbon in soils and simultaneously improve soil quality and plant growth. More understanding of biochar variation is needed to optimise these potential benefits. Slow pyrolysis at 600 °C was undertaken to determine how yields and characteristics of biochars differ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental management 2014-12, Vol.146, p.189-197
Main Authors: Windeatt, Jayne H., Ross, Andrew B., Williams, Paul T., Forster, Piers M., Nahil, Mohamad A., Singh, Surjit
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-3ce697b4618e0a0a8b9824c3c3a6b9273808bb456b17faedbcad50c7dc73431e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-3ce697b4618e0a0a8b9824c3c3a6b9273808bb456b17faedbcad50c7dc73431e3
container_end_page 197
container_issue
container_start_page 189
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 146
creator Windeatt, Jayne H.
Ross, Andrew B.
Williams, Paul T.
Forster, Piers M.
Nahil, Mohamad A.
Singh, Surjit
description Biochar has potential to sequester carbon in soils and simultaneously improve soil quality and plant growth. More understanding of biochar variation is needed to optimise these potential benefits. Slow pyrolysis at 600 °C was undertaken to determine how yields and characteristics of biochars differ when produced from eight different agricultural residues. Biochar properties such as carbon content, surface area, pH, ultimate and proximate analysis, nutrient and metal content and the R50 recalcitrance index were determined. Significant variations seen in biochar characteristics were attributed to feedstock variation since pyrolysis conditions were constant. Biochar yields varied from 28% to 39%. Average carbon content was 51%. Ash content of both feedstocks and biochars were correlated with biochar carbon content. Macronutrients were concentrated during pyrolysis, but biochar macronutrient content was low in comparison to biochars produced from more nutrient rich feedstocks. Most biochars were slightly alkaline, ranging from pH 6.1 to pH 11.6. pH was correlated with biochar K content. Aromaticity was increased with pyrolysis, shown by a reduction in biochar H/C and O/C ratios relative to feedstock values. The R50 recalcitrance index showed biochars to be either class 2 or class 3. Biochar carbon sequestration potential was 21.3%–32.5%. The R50 recalcitrance index is influenced by the presence of alkali metals in the biochar which may lead to an under-estimation of biochar stability. The residues assessed here, at current global availability, could produce 373 Mt of biochar. This quantity of biochar has the potential to sequester 0.55 Pg CO2 yr−1 in soils over long time periods. •Biochars from eight crop residue feedstocks have been characterised in detail.•Variation in biochar recalcitrance and carbon sequestration potential is noted.•High alkali content catalysed the degradation of biochars.•21.3%–32.5% of the feedstock carbon would be stored long-term.•150 Mt C yr−1 (0.55 Pg CO2 eq yr−1) could be sequestered using these crop residues.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.08.003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1564353625</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479714003983</els_id><sourcerecordid>1564353625</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-3ce697b4618e0a0a8b9824c3c3a6b9273808bb456b17faedbcad50c7dc73431e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU-LFDEQxYMo7rj6EZSACF66TTrdSdrLIoP_YEEPeg6VdDWm6U7GJLPgtzfjjApePIQiVb8qHu8R8pSzljMuXy3tguFug9B2jPct0y1j4h7ZcTYOjZaC3Sc7JhhvejWqK_Io54VVouPqIbnqBq6E6tSO4P4bJHAFk8_Fu0zjTK2PrnYznVPcqEvxQBNmPx0xv6afY8FQPKx0jok6SDYGmvF7HZYExdcfhInm6FcKG4apvvKYPJhhzfjkUq_J13dvv-w_NLef3n_cv7ltXK_H0giHclS2l1wjAwbajrrrnXACpB07JTTT1vaDtFzNgJN1MA3Mqckp0QuO4pq8PN89pPhLkdl8driuEDAes-GD7MUgZDdU9Pk_6BKPKVR1J0rKbuRCV2o4U9WFnBPO5pD8BumH4cyccjCLueRgTjkYpk11ue49u1w_2g2nP1u_ja_AiwsA2cE6JwjO57-c1h2vOit3c-aw2nbnMZnsPAaHk0_oipmi_4-Un2YDqcg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1566629138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characteristics of biochars from crop residues: Potential for carbon sequestration and soil amendment</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Windeatt, Jayne H. ; Ross, Andrew B. ; Williams, Paul T. ; Forster, Piers M. ; Nahil, Mohamad A. ; Singh, Surjit</creator><creatorcontrib>Windeatt, Jayne H. ; Ross, Andrew B. ; Williams, Paul T. ; Forster, Piers M. ; Nahil, Mohamad A. ; Singh, Surjit</creatorcontrib><description>Biochar has potential to sequester carbon in soils and simultaneously improve soil quality and plant growth. More understanding of biochar variation is needed to optimise these potential benefits. Slow pyrolysis at 600 °C was undertaken to determine how yields and characteristics of biochars differ when produced from eight different agricultural residues. Biochar properties such as carbon content, surface area, pH, ultimate and proximate analysis, nutrient and metal content and the R50 recalcitrance index were determined. Significant variations seen in biochar characteristics were attributed to feedstock variation since pyrolysis conditions were constant. Biochar yields varied from 28% to 39%. Average carbon content was 51%. Ash content of both feedstocks and biochars were correlated with biochar carbon content. Macronutrients were concentrated during pyrolysis, but biochar macronutrient content was low in comparison to biochars produced from more nutrient rich feedstocks. Most biochars were slightly alkaline, ranging from pH 6.1 to pH 11.6. pH was correlated with biochar K content. Aromaticity was increased with pyrolysis, shown by a reduction in biochar H/C and O/C ratios relative to feedstock values. The R50 recalcitrance index showed biochars to be either class 2 or class 3. Biochar carbon sequestration potential was 21.3%–32.5%. The R50 recalcitrance index is influenced by the presence of alkali metals in the biochar which may lead to an under-estimation of biochar stability. The residues assessed here, at current global availability, could produce 373 Mt of biochar. This quantity of biochar has the potential to sequester 0.55 Pg CO2 yr−1 in soils over long time periods. •Biochars from eight crop residue feedstocks have been characterised in detail.•Variation in biochar recalcitrance and carbon sequestration potential is noted.•High alkali content catalysed the degradation of biochars.•21.3%–32.5% of the feedstock carbon would be stored long-term.•150 Mt C yr−1 (0.55 Pg CO2 eq yr−1) could be sequestered using these crop residues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.08.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25173727</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVMAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biochar ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carbon ; Carbon Sequestration ; Charcoal ; Charcoal - chemistry ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Crop residue ; Crop residues ; Crops, Agricultural ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Humans ; Plant growth ; Pyrolysis ; Recalcitrance ; Sequestration ; Soil - chemistry ; Soils ; Temperature</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2014-12, Vol.146, p.189-197</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Ltd. Dec 15, 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-3ce697b4618e0a0a8b9824c3c3a6b9273808bb456b17faedbcad50c7dc73431e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-3ce697b4618e0a0a8b9824c3c3a6b9273808bb456b17faedbcad50c7dc73431e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28821362$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25173727$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Windeatt, Jayne H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Andrew B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Paul T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forster, Piers M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nahil, Mohamad A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Surjit</creatorcontrib><title>Characteristics of biochars from crop residues: Potential for carbon sequestration and soil amendment</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>Biochar has potential to sequester carbon in soils and simultaneously improve soil quality and plant growth. More understanding of biochar variation is needed to optimise these potential benefits. Slow pyrolysis at 600 °C was undertaken to determine how yields and characteristics of biochars differ when produced from eight different agricultural residues. Biochar properties such as carbon content, surface area, pH, ultimate and proximate analysis, nutrient and metal content and the R50 recalcitrance index were determined. Significant variations seen in biochar characteristics were attributed to feedstock variation since pyrolysis conditions were constant. Biochar yields varied from 28% to 39%. Average carbon content was 51%. Ash content of both feedstocks and biochars were correlated with biochar carbon content. Macronutrients were concentrated during pyrolysis, but biochar macronutrient content was low in comparison to biochars produced from more nutrient rich feedstocks. Most biochars were slightly alkaline, ranging from pH 6.1 to pH 11.6. pH was correlated with biochar K content. Aromaticity was increased with pyrolysis, shown by a reduction in biochar H/C and O/C ratios relative to feedstock values. The R50 recalcitrance index showed biochars to be either class 2 or class 3. Biochar carbon sequestration potential was 21.3%–32.5%. The R50 recalcitrance index is influenced by the presence of alkali metals in the biochar which may lead to an under-estimation of biochar stability. The residues assessed here, at current global availability, could produce 373 Mt of biochar. This quantity of biochar has the potential to sequester 0.55 Pg CO2 yr−1 in soils over long time periods. •Biochars from eight crop residue feedstocks have been characterised in detail.•Variation in biochar recalcitrance and carbon sequestration potential is noted.•High alkali content catalysed the degradation of biochars.•21.3%–32.5% of the feedstock carbon would be stored long-term.•150 Mt C yr−1 (0.55 Pg CO2 eq yr−1) could be sequestered using these crop residues.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biochar</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon Sequestration</subject><subject>Charcoal</subject><subject>Charcoal - chemistry</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Crop residue</subject><subject>Crop residues</subject><subject>Crops, Agricultural</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Pyrolysis</subject><subject>Recalcitrance</subject><subject>Sequestration</subject><subject>Soil - chemistry</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU-LFDEQxYMo7rj6EZSACF66TTrdSdrLIoP_YEEPeg6VdDWm6U7GJLPgtzfjjApePIQiVb8qHu8R8pSzljMuXy3tguFug9B2jPct0y1j4h7ZcTYOjZaC3Sc7JhhvejWqK_Io54VVouPqIbnqBq6E6tSO4P4bJHAFk8_Fu0zjTK2PrnYznVPcqEvxQBNmPx0xv6afY8FQPKx0jok6SDYGmvF7HZYExdcfhInm6FcKG4apvvKYPJhhzfjkUq_J13dvv-w_NLef3n_cv7ltXK_H0giHclS2l1wjAwbajrrrnXACpB07JTTT1vaDtFzNgJN1MA3Mqckp0QuO4pq8PN89pPhLkdl8driuEDAes-GD7MUgZDdU9Pk_6BKPKVR1J0rKbuRCV2o4U9WFnBPO5pD8BumH4cyccjCLueRgTjkYpk11ue49u1w_2g2nP1u_ja_AiwsA2cE6JwjO57-c1h2vOit3c-aw2nbnMZnsPAaHk0_oipmi_4-Un2YDqcg</recordid><startdate>20141215</startdate><enddate>20141215</enddate><creator>Windeatt, Jayne H.</creator><creator>Ross, Andrew B.</creator><creator>Williams, Paul T.</creator><creator>Forster, Piers M.</creator><creator>Nahil, Mohamad A.</creator><creator>Singh, Surjit</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141215</creationdate><title>Characteristics of biochars from crop residues: Potential for carbon sequestration and soil amendment</title><author>Windeatt, Jayne H. ; Ross, Andrew B. ; Williams, Paul T. ; Forster, Piers M. ; Nahil, Mohamad A. ; Singh, Surjit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-3ce697b4618e0a0a8b9824c3c3a6b9273808bb456b17faedbcad50c7dc73431e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biochar</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon Sequestration</topic><topic>Charcoal</topic><topic>Charcoal - chemistry</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Crop residue</topic><topic>Crop residues</topic><topic>Crops, Agricultural</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Pyrolysis</topic><topic>Recalcitrance</topic><topic>Sequestration</topic><topic>Soil - chemistry</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Windeatt, Jayne H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Andrew B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Paul T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forster, Piers M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nahil, Mohamad A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Surjit</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Windeatt, Jayne H.</au><au>Ross, Andrew B.</au><au>Williams, Paul T.</au><au>Forster, Piers M.</au><au>Nahil, Mohamad A.</au><au>Singh, Surjit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characteristics of biochars from crop residues: Potential for carbon sequestration and soil amendment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2014-12-15</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>146</volume><spage>189</spage><epage>197</epage><pages>189-197</pages><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><coden>JEVMAW</coden><abstract>Biochar has potential to sequester carbon in soils and simultaneously improve soil quality and plant growth. More understanding of biochar variation is needed to optimise these potential benefits. Slow pyrolysis at 600 °C was undertaken to determine how yields and characteristics of biochars differ when produced from eight different agricultural residues. Biochar properties such as carbon content, surface area, pH, ultimate and proximate analysis, nutrient and metal content and the R50 recalcitrance index were determined. Significant variations seen in biochar characteristics were attributed to feedstock variation since pyrolysis conditions were constant. Biochar yields varied from 28% to 39%. Average carbon content was 51%. Ash content of both feedstocks and biochars were correlated with biochar carbon content. Macronutrients were concentrated during pyrolysis, but biochar macronutrient content was low in comparison to biochars produced from more nutrient rich feedstocks. Most biochars were slightly alkaline, ranging from pH 6.1 to pH 11.6. pH was correlated with biochar K content. Aromaticity was increased with pyrolysis, shown by a reduction in biochar H/C and O/C ratios relative to feedstock values. The R50 recalcitrance index showed biochars to be either class 2 or class 3. Biochar carbon sequestration potential was 21.3%–32.5%. The R50 recalcitrance index is influenced by the presence of alkali metals in the biochar which may lead to an under-estimation of biochar stability. The residues assessed here, at current global availability, could produce 373 Mt of biochar. This quantity of biochar has the potential to sequester 0.55 Pg CO2 yr−1 in soils over long time periods. •Biochars from eight crop residue feedstocks have been characterised in detail.•Variation in biochar recalcitrance and carbon sequestration potential is noted.•High alkali content catalysed the degradation of biochars.•21.3%–32.5% of the feedstock carbon would be stored long-term.•150 Mt C yr−1 (0.55 Pg CO2 eq yr−1) could be sequestered using these crop residues.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25173727</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.08.003</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2014-12, Vol.146, p.189-197
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1564353625
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biochar
Biological and medical sciences
Carbon
Carbon Sequestration
Charcoal
Charcoal - chemistry
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Crop residue
Crop residues
Crops, Agricultural
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Humans
Plant growth
Pyrolysis
Recalcitrance
Sequestration
Soil - chemistry
Soils
Temperature
title Characteristics of biochars from crop residues: Potential for carbon sequestration and soil amendment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T15%3A21%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characteristics%20of%20biochars%20from%20crop%20residues:%20Potential%20for%20carbon%20sequestration%20and%20soil%20amendment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Windeatt,%20Jayne%20H.&rft.date=2014-12-15&rft.volume=146&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=197&rft.pages=189-197&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft.coden=JEVMAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.08.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1564353625%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-3ce697b4618e0a0a8b9824c3c3a6b9273808bb456b17faedbcad50c7dc73431e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1566629138&rft_id=info:pmid/25173727&rfr_iscdi=true