Subclassification of left ventricular hypertrophy based on dilation stratifies coronary artery disease patients with distinct risk

• Published in: European journal of clinical investigation 2014-10, Vol.44 (10), p.893-901
• Main Authors: Huang, Bao-Tao, Peng, Yong, Liu, Wei, Zhang, Chen, Huang, Fang-Yang, Wang, Peng-Ju, Zuo, Zhi-Liang, Liao, Yan-Biao, Chai, Hua, Li, Qiao, Zhao, Zhen-Gang, Luo, Xiao-Lin, Ren, Xin, Huang, Kai-Sen, Meng, Qing-Tao, Chen, Chi, Huang, De-Jia, Chen, Mao
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Age Distribution; Coronary artery disease; Coronary Artery Disease - pathology; Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology; Echocardiography; Epidemiologic Methods; Female; Humans; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular - classification; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular - pathology; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular - physiopathology; left ventricular geometry; left ventricular remoulding; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Ventricular Remodeling - physiology
• ISSN: 0014-2972; 1365-2362
• DOI: 10.1111/eci.12320

Background A new 4‐tired classification of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) based on LV concentricity and dilation has been proposed; however, the association between the new categorization of LV geometry and outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is still unknown. Methods All the 2297 patients with CAD included underwent echocardiographic examination prior to discharge. Left ventricular mass (LVM) was calculated, and left ventricular end‐diastolic volume (EDV) was indexed by body surface area (BSA). Study cohort was divided into five groups according to LV geometry: (i) eccentric nondilated LVH (normal LVM/EDV(2/3) and EDV/BSA) (n = 129); (ii) eccentric dilated LVH (normal LVM/EDV(2/3) with increased EDV/BSA) (n = 222); (iii) concentric nondilated LVH (increased LVM/EDV(2/3) with normal EDV/BSA) (n = 441); (iv) concentric dilated LVH (increased LVM/EDV(2/3) and EDV/BSA) (n = 118); and (v) normal LV mass (n = 1387). Results Dilated LVH was associated with a higher event rates of all‐cause death (eccentric 13·1% vs. 3·1%; concentric 13·6% vs. 8·4%) and composite events (eccentric: 17·6% vs. 5·4%; concentric: 18·6% vs. 12·7%) compared with nondilated LVH. While eccentric nondilated LVH had comparable risk for adverse outcomes compared with normal LV mass (all‐cause death: relative risk (RR) 0·68, 95% confidential interval (CI) 0·25–1·85; composite events: RR 0·75, 95% CI 0·36–1·58). Cox regression analyses showed that eccentric dilated LVH had the highest propensity to all‐cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2·752 [95% CI 1·749–4·328], P